Skip to content
2 Objections to Commission measures ·decision 2 of 11 on Thursday, 8 October 2026

Objection under Rule 115(2), (3) and (4)(c) · implementing measure

Certain botanical species containing hydroxyanthracene derivatives

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:04

Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding.

Rejected for lack of an absolute majority (361 votes needed) 282 for · 259 against · 23 abstained (50 % in favour) Agriculture, food & fisheries

What Parliament decided

Rejected Objection failed for lack of an absolute majority (361 votes needed)

The objection failed — the Commission measure goes ahead.

For 282 Against 259 Abstained 23

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 13:04 · 50% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✗
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The draft Commission regulation would prohibit foods containing preparations from certain Rheum, Cassia senna and Rhamnus species where those preparations contain hydroxyanthracene derivatives, moving them from Part C to Part A of Annex III to Regulation (EC) No 1925/2006. Parliament rejected the text, so it did not oppose adoption of the draft regulation. Parliament considers the draft regulation exceeds the Commission's implementing powers and calls on the Commission to withdraw it or defer adoption until the Court of Justice rules on the pending appeals. It also calls on the Commission to obtain a complete and up-to-date scientific assessment and to explain whether Article 30 of Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 applies.

Roll call requested by Verts/ALE.

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 8 October 2026. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2026-0465.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site