Skip to content
3 New EU laws ·decision 3 of 19 on Tuesday, 15 September 2026

Market stability reserve for the EU Emissions Trading System (EU ETS): ceasing the invalidation of allowances

Committee report by Pierfrancesco Maran · · voted 13:23–13:24

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a clear majority 367 for · 240 against · 59 abstained (55 % in favour) Climate & environmentEmissions & carbon pricing

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a clear majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 367 Against 240 Abstained 59

Final vote at 13:24 · 55% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left –
  • Verts/ALE –
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN; The Left and Verts/ALE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal concerns a decision amending Decision (EU) 2015/1814 so that allowances in the Market Stability Reserve (MSR) of the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) would no longer be invalidated. Parliament adopted its position at first reading on this law, which means MEPs have set out where they stand and will need to agree with the Council before the law is final. The committee report leaves the Commission's proposal unchanged, but its explanatory statement says this is not a substantive position and that a definitive view would be premature before the wider ETS review expected in mid-July 2026. Parliament calls on the Commission to refer the matter to it again if the proposal is replaced or substantially amended, and instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 11 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (2 adopted, 1 rejected) and 2 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 1 lapsed). Procedural motion adopted: Referral back to committee.

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, PfE · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 11 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text Proposal for rejection
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate votes Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Amendment 4 13:23 A10-0230/2026 – Pierfrancesco Maran – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 4 requested by PfE
Adopted
6. Amendment 5 13:23 A10-0230/2026 – Pierfrancesco Maran – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate votes – Am 5 requested by PfE
Adopted
7. Amendment 6, adding text after Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015/1814 13:23 A10-0230/2026 – Pierfrancesco Maran – after Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015/1814 – Article 1 – § 5 a – Am 6 requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Rejected
8. After Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015 — part 1814 After Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015/1814 – Article 1 – § 5 a
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. After Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015 — part 1814 After Article 1; Decision (EU) 2015/1814 – Article 1 – § 5 a
10. Final vote 13:24 A10-0230/2026 – Pierfrancesco Maran – Commission proposal
Adopted
11. Referral back to committee Request for referral back to committee
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 15 September 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0230 in procedure 2026/0085.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site