Skip to content
6 Objections to Commission measures ·decision 6 of 15 on Wednesday, 8 July 2026

Objection under Rule 114(3) · delegated act

Trajectory to decrease the contribution of high indirect land-use change-risk biofuels, bioliquids and biomass fuels to renewable energy targets

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:09–13:12

Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding.

Adopted by a clear majority 388 for · 248 against · 24 abstained (59 % in favour) EnergyClimate & environmentRenewables

What Parliament decided

Adopted Objection passed by a clear majority

The objection passed, so the Commission measure cannot enter into force.

For 388 Against 248 Abstained 24

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:12 · 59% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✗
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The European Parliament voted to block a Commission delegated regulation that would have added soybean to the list of high indirect land-use change-risk feedstocks, phasing out soy-based biodiesel from EU renewable energy targets by 2030. The objection passed, meaning the Commission measure is blocked and cannot enter into force. Parliament does not object to the palm oil phase-down or to fixing the certification procedure, and asks the Commission to revise the act accordingly.

How the vote unfolded · 14 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 7 amendments (7 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 5 rejected).

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, ECR, PfE · split votes by PfE · separate votes by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 14 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 4, adding text after paragraph 1 13:09 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 4 requested by PfE
Rejected
2. Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 1 13:09 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 5 requested by PfE
Rejected
3. Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 1 13:09 B10-0337/2026 – After § 1 – Am 6 requested by PfE
Rejected
4. Amendment 7 to paragraph 3, introductory part 13:10 B10-0337/2026 – § 3, introductory part – Am 7 requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Separate vote on paragraph 3, point c requested by PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Recital A — part 1 of 4 Part 1: ‘whereas Directive (EU) 2018/2001 establishes a binding Union-wide renewable energy target and, in order to ensure that biofuels counting towards that target deliver genuine climate benefits, introduces a framework to address the risk of indirect land-use change (ILUC), under which feedstocks may be classified as high ILUC-risk’ except ‘establishes a binding Union-wide renewable energy target and’ and ‘climate’ requested by PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Recital A — part 2 of 4 Part 2: ‘establishes a binding Union-wide renewable energy target and’ requested by PfE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Recital A — part 3 of 4 Part 3: ‘climate’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Recital A — part 4 of 4 Part 4: ‘and subject to a cap on their contribution to renewable energy targets’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
10. Amendment 1 to recital B 13:11 B10-0337/2026 – Recital B – Am 1 requested by PfE
Rejected
11. Amendment 2, adding text after recital G 13:11 B10-0337/2026 – After recital G – Am 2 requested by PfE
Rejected
12. Separate vote on recital H requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Amendment 3, adding text after recital M 13:12 B10-0337/2026 – After recital M – Am 3 requested by PfE
Rejected
14. Final vote — text as a whole 13:12 B10-0337/2026 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) requested by Verts/ALE, ECR
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 8 July 2026. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2026-0337 in procedure 2026/2680.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site