Skip to content
5 New EU laws ·decision 5 of 18 on Wednesday, 17 June 2026

European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO) and European Anti-Fraud Office (OLAF): access to VAT information at Union level

Committee report by Michalis Hadjipantela · · voted at 14:03

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 549 for · 33 against · 84 abstained (82 % in favour) Economy & single marketTaxation

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 549 Against 33 Abstained 84

Final vote at 14:03 · 82% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed Council regulation that would give the European Public Prosecutor's Office and the European Anti-Fraud Office access to value added tax information at Union level. The regulation aims to strengthen the fight against cross-border VAT fraud by establishing direct communication channels between Eurofisc and these two bodies. Parliament approved the Commission proposal as amended, adding safeguards on data protection, purpose limitation, and data minimisation. It also calls on the Commission to alter its proposal accordingly and asks the Council to consult Parliament again if it intends to substantially amend the text.

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 17 June 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0159 in procedure 2025/0348.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site