Skip to content
2 New EU laws ·decision 2 of 18 on Wednesday, 17 June 2026

Common system for the return of third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union (Return Regulation)

Committee report by Malik Azmani · · voted 13:50–13:51

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 418 for · 218 against · 30 abstained (63 % in favour) Migration & asylumReturns

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 418 Against 218 Abstained 30

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 13:51 · 63% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE and S&D.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed EU law setting up a common system for returning third-country nationals staying illegally in the Union. The law replaces existing directives and aims to make return procedures simpler, faster, and more effective across member states. Parliament asks the Commission to refer the matter back if it substantially amends its proposal, and forwards its position to the Council and national parliaments.

How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots

A proposal to reject the whole text was defeated first. Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 parts of the text voted on separately (2 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, Renew · split votes by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 6 ballots in voting order
1. Proposal to reject the text 13:50 A10-0048/2026 – Malik Azmani – Proposal for rejection – Am 2 = 3 =
Rejected
2. Proposal to vote on amendments 13:50 A10-0048/2026 – Malik Azmani – Proposal to vote on amendments
Rejected
3. Final vote on the provisional agreement 13:51 A10-0048/2026 – Malik Azmani – Provisional agreement – Am 4
Adopted
4. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 17 June 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0048 in procedure 2025/0059.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site