Skip to content
9 Resolutions & reports ·decision 9 of 12 on Wednesday, 20 May 2026

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

Committee report by Stéphanie Yon-Courtin · voted 13:24–13:26

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 518 for · 31 against · 102 abstained (80 % in favour) Climate & environmentAgriculture, food & fisheriesFisheriesWater & oceans

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 518 Against 31 Abstained 102

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:26 · 80% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left –
  • Verts/ALE –
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; The Left and Verts/ALE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution on how the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive affects fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins. The text finds uneven implementation, limited benefits for fisheries, and calls for better stakeholder engagement, data, and cross-border cooperation. MEPs ask the Commission to revise the directive through the forthcoming Ocean Act and to set binding targets.

How the vote unfolded · 8 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 7 amendments (7 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, PfE, ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 8 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 4 to paragraph 16 13:24 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 16 – Am 4 requested by ESN
Rejected
2. Amendment 2 to paragraph 31 13:24 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 31 – Am 2 requested by PfE
Rejected
3. Amendment 5 to paragraph 41 13:25 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 41 – Am 5 requested by ESN
Rejected
4. Amendment 7, adding text after paragraph 42 13:25 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – After § 42 – Am 7 requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Amendment 6 to paragraph 69 13:25 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – § 69 – Am 6 requested by ESN
Rejected
6. Amendment 1, adding text after recital C 13:25 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – After recital C – Am 1 requested by PfE
Rejected
7. Amendment 3 to recital F 13:25 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – Recital F – Am 3 requested by ESN
Rejected
8. Final vote — text as a whole 13:26 A10-0120/2026 – Stéphanie Yon-Courtin – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 20 May 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0120 in procedure 2024/2126.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site