Skip to content
8 Resolutions & reports ·decision 8 of 13 on Wednesday, 11 March 2026

European Semester for economic policy coordination: employment and social priorities for 2026

Committee report by Nela Riehl · voted 13:02–13:06

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 404 for · 208 against · 20 abstained (64 % in favour) Economy & single marketJobs, social affairs & equalitySocial protection & povertyEmployment & workers’ rights

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 404 Against 208 Abstained 20

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:06 · 64% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its resolution on employment and social priorities for the 2026 European Semester, setting out its position on coordinating economic, employment and social policies across the EU. The text calls for stronger integration of social objectives into EU economic governance, with the European Pillar of Social Rights at its core, and for measurable social targets to guide country-specific recommendations. It also urges an ambitious EU anti-poverty strategy, action on child poverty, and investment in people, including education, training and affordable housing, to address labour shortages and support sustainable growth.

How the vote unfolded · 32 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 9 amendments (2 adopted, 7 rejected) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (6 adopted, 16 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, S&D, PfE · split votes by PPE (2) · separate votes by PPE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 32 ballots in voting order
1. Vote on text inserted before paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 3 13:02 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 3 – Am 8 requested by S&D
Adopted
5. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Amendment 20 to paragraph 5 13:02 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 5 – Am 20 requested by PfE
Rejected
7. Separate vote on paragraph 5
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Separate vote on paragraph 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 6 13:03 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 6 – Am 11 requested by The Left
Adopted
10. Separate vote on paragraph 7
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
11. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 7
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 8 13:04 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 8 – Am 15 requested by The Left
Rejected
14. Amendment 21 to paragraph 9 13:04 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 9 – Am 21 requested by PfE
Rejected
15. Separate vote on paragraph 9 requested by PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
16. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 15
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
17. Paragraph 17 — part 1 13:04 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits’ and ‘and stresses the importance of monitoring its use during this cycle of the European Semester; calls for measures to combat speculation and regulate short-term rentals in areas under housing stress;’” requested by PPE requested by S&D
Adopted
18. Paragraph 17 — part 2 13:04 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/2 Part 2: ‘the prevention and reduction of homelessness and building retrofits’ requested by PPE requested by S&D
Adopted
19. Paragraph 17 — part 3 13:05 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 17/3 Part 3: ‘and stresses the importance of monitoring its use during this cycle of the European Semester; calls for measures to combat speculation and regulate short-term rentals in areas under housing stress;’ requested by PPE requested by S&D
Rejected
20. Amendment 22 to paragraph 19 13:05 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 19 – Am 22 requested by PfE
Rejected
21. Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 19 13:05 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – After § 19 – Am 23 requested by PfE
Rejected
22. Separate vote on paragraph 20 requested by PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
23. Separate vote on paragraph 20 requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Amendment 24 to paragraph 22 13:05 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – § 22 – Am 24 requested by PfE
Rejected
25. Paragraph 23 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Underlines that the European Semester recommendations in 2026 will be crucial in shaping the next multiannual financial framework; believes that reforms and investments should be selected for their efficiency and effectiveness in addressing the relevant country-specific recommendations; warns that if EU funding is to be tied to Semester guidance, that guidance must be socially balanced in full alignment with the EPSR, and regional and local actors must play an important role in the disbursement of funds; notes with concern, in this regard, the Commission’s proposal for social spending, which risks diluting focus on employment and social objectives’ requested by PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
26. Paragraph 23 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘and calls for a stand-alone and reinforced ESF+ with thematic concentrations;’ requested by PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
27. Amendment 19 to recital B 13:06 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – Recital B – Am 19 requested by PfE
Rejected
28. Separate vote on recital C
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
29. Separate vote on recital C
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Vote on text inserted after recital G
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
31. Separate vote on recital H
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
32. Final vote — text as a whole 13:06 A10-0033/2026 – Nela Riehl – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 11 March 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2026-0033 in procedure 2025/2183.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site