Skip to content
3 New EU laws ·decision 3 of 13 on Tuesday, 10 March 2026

Increased efficiency of the External Action Guarantee

Committee report by David McAllister, Charles Goerens · · voted at 13:15

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 441 for · 105 against · 81 abstained (70 % in favour) Foreign affairsEU budget & fundsEuropean Investment BankDevelopment & humanitarian aid

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 441 Against 105 Abstained 81

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 13:15 · 70% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE –
  • ESN ✗
  • NI –

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on a proposed law to make the EU's External Action Guarantee more efficient. The Guarantee backs loans for development and external action; the changes aim to improve how it is used. MEPs also asked the Commission to consult Parliament again if it changes the proposal substantially.

How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 lapsed).

Roll call requested by ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 6 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the provisional agreement 13:15 A10-0221/2025 – David McAllister, Charles Goerens – Provisional agreement – Am 18
Adopted
2. Final vote Text as a whole
— no individual positions recorded
4. Vote on text inserted after recital 2
— no individual positions recorded
5. Separate vote on recital 9
— no individual positions recorded
6. Final vote Commission proposal

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 10 March 2026. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0221 in procedure 2025/0262.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site