Skip to content
5 Resolutions & reports ·decision 5 of 10 on Thursday, 22 January 2026

Case of Joseph Figueira Martin in the Central African Republic

Motion for a resolution · voted at 12:05

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 582 for · 0 against · 35 abstained (94 % in favour) Foreign affairsAfricaHuman rights abroad

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 582 Against 0 Abstained 35

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 12:05 · 94% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution on the case of Joseph Figueira Martin, a Belgian-Portuguese citizen detained in the Central African Republic. It condemns his forced labour sentence and calls on the Central African authorities to annul or revise it, guarantee legal remedies, and ensure fair trial rights and medical care. Parliament also demands an independent investigation into allegations of torture and urges accountability for the Wagner Group's abuses. The resolution will be forwarded to EU institutions, member states, and Central African authorities.

How the vote unfolded · 7 ballots

6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll call requested by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 7 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote on the motion for a resolution 12:05 RC-B10-0066/2026 – Motion for a resolution requested by Renew
Adopted
2. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0066/2026
— no individual positions recorded
3. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0088/2026
— no individual positions recorded
4. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0091/2026
— no individual positions recorded
5. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0093/2026
— no individual positions recorded
6. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0094/2026
— no individual positions recorded
7. Alternative motion for a resolution B10-0096/2026
— no individual positions recorded

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 22 January 2026. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2026-0066 in procedure 2026/2572.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site