Skip to content
10 Budget & emergency funds ·decision 10 of 15 on Tuesday, 16 December 2025

Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2025/003 SE/Northvolt – Sweden

Committee report by Aura Salla · voted at 13:12

Budget decisions: the annual budget, amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds, and discharge (approving how a budget was spent).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 578 for · 54 against · 30 abstained (87 % in favour) Jobs, social affairs & equalityEU budget & fundsEmployment & workers’ rights

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

The budget decision was approved.

For 578 Against 54 Abstained 30

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:12 · 87% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament approved the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers to support workers laid off by the Swedish battery maker Northvolt. The decision releases EU money for personalised services such as job-search help, training, business start-up support and allowances for the affected workers. Parliament also calls for faster handling of such applications and for thorough checks on how the funds are used.

How the vote unfolded · 7 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 5 parts of the text voted on separately (5 rejected).

Roll call requested by ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 7 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote on paragraph 5
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote on paragraph 12
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote on recital E
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 11, adding text after recital E 13:12 A10-0239/2025 – Aura Salla – After recital E – Am 11 requested by ESN
Rejected
5. Separate vote on recital F
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote on recital I
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Final vote — text as a whole 13:12 A10-0239/2025 – Aura Salla – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 16 December 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0239 in procedure 2025/0326.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site