Skip to content
8 Resolutions & reports ·decision 8 of 9 on Thursday, 23 October 2025

Key objectives for the CITES COP20 meeting in Uzbekistan

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:26–13:28

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote — text as a whole — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted its position on the EU's strategic objectives for the 20th meeting of the Conference of the Parties to CITES, the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species, in Samarkand, Uzbekistan, from 24 November to 5 December 2025. The text calls for stronger protection of species like sharks, elephants, and eels, and for tackling wildlife crime and corruption linked to illegal trade. It also urges the EU to push for stricter trade rules and better enforcement at the meeting.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 1 amendment (1 rejected) and 7 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted).

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, PfE · split votes by ECR (2), PfE · separate votes by ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 9 ballots in voting order
1. Paragraph 54 — part 1 13:26 B10-0450/2025 – § 54/1 Part 1: ‘Emphasises that the absence of a common EU framework for welfare provisions on the breeding, keeping and placing on the market of pet animal species other than dogs and cats, along with divergent national rules, leads to inconsistencies, gaps in enforcement, confusion for consumers and, often, serious animal welfare consequences for species that are unsuitable to be kept as pets, as well as risks to biodiversity, human health and safety, and nature conservation;’ requested by ECR requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
2. Paragraph 54 — part 2 13:27 B10-0450/2025 – § 54/2 Part 2: ‘calls on the Commission to swiftly propose an EU-wide positive list of animals allowed to be kept or traded as pets, based on recommendations from the study on the necessity, added value and feasibility of such a list, while taking into account scientific risk assessments and ecological criteria;’ requested by ECR requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
3. Separate vote on paragraph 55 13:27 B10-0450/2025 – § 55 requested by ECR requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
4. Amendment 1 to paragraph 57 13:27 B10-0450/2025 – § 57 – Am 1 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
5. Paragraph 67 — part 1 13:27 B10-0450/2025 – § 67/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘which in its gravest form should be recognised as ecocide’” requested by PfE requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
6. Paragraph 67 — part 2 13:27 B10-0450/2025 – § 67/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE, Verts/ALE
Adopted
7. Paragraph 71 — part 1 13:28 B10-0450/2025 – § 71/1 Part 1: ‘Calls on the Commission to ensure coordination in the implementation of the Environmental Crime Directive, the Wildlife Trade Regulation and the revised EU action plan against wildlife trafficking and other relevant EU policies such as the Digital Services Act;’ requested by ECR requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
8. Paragraph 71 — part 2 13:28 B10-0450/2025 – § 71/2 Part 2: ‘calls on the Member States to transpose the Environmental Crime Directive and to bring into force the laws, regulations and administrative provisions necessary to comply with the directive by 21 May 2026;’ requested by ECR requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
9. Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 23 October 2025. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2025-0450 in procedure 2025/2618.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site