6 Resolutions & reports ·decision 6 of 10 on Thursday, 11 September 2025

Implementation and streamlining of EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market

Committee report by Anna-Maja Henriksson · voted 13:20–13:21

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 459 for · 65 against · 90 abstained (75 % in favour) Economy & single market Simplification & red tape Single market rules

The vote ✦ In short Full text Procedure

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 459 Against 65 Abstained 90

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:21 · 75% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it

The Left ✗
Verts/ALE ✓
S&D ✓
Renew ✓
PPE ✓
ECR ✓
PfE –
ESN ✗
NI –

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left and ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament adopted a resolution on implementing and streamlining EU internal market rules to strengthen the single market. The text calls for cutting red tape, especially for small and medium-sized enterprises, and for better implementation of existing rules. It asks the Commission to set timetables and roadmaps for reducing administrative burdens.

How the vote unfolded · 8 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 3 parts of the text voted on separately (3 rejected).

Roll call requested by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 8 ballots in voting order

1. Separate vote on paragraph 2

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

2. Separate vote on paragraph 4

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

3. Amendment 4 to paragraph 5 13:20 A10-0151/2025 - Anna-Maja Henriksson - § 5 - Am 4 requested by PfE

Rejected

4. Amendment 5, adding text after paragraph 13 13:20 A10-0151/2025 - Anna-Maja Henriksson - Après le § 13 - Am 5 requested by PfE

Rejected

5. Amendment 6 to paragraph 27 13:20 A10-0151/2025 - Anna-Maja Henriksson - § 27 - Am 6 requested by PfE

Rejected

6. Amendment 7 to paragraph 36 13:21 A10-0151/2025 - Anna-Maja Henriksson - § 36 - Am 7 requested by PfE

Rejected

7. Separate vote on recital G

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

8. Final vote — text as a whole 13:21 A10-0151/2025 - Anna-Maja Henriksson - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)

Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 11 September 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0151 in procedure 2025/2009.

New here? How plenary voting works

A sitting: One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots: Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how: Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure: Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges: How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — ; *** — ; * —
Lapsed —
A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site