Skip to content

← Decision 8

9 Resolutions & reports ·decision 9 of 9 on Tuesday, 17 June 2025

Financing for development – ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville

Committee report by Charles Goerens · voted 13:51–13:56

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Rejected by a small majority 282 for · 340 against · 26 abstained (44 % in favour) Foreign affairsDevelopment & humanitarian aid
The vote✦ In shortFull textProcedure

What Parliament decided

Rejected Rejected by a small majority

Parliament rejected the text.

For 282 Against 340 Abstained 26

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:56 · 44% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✗
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew; opposed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The resolution addresses financing for development ahead of the Fourth International Conference on Financing for Development in Seville. Parliament rejected the text, meaning it will not adopt the proposed position.

How the vote unfolded · 19 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 rejected) and 16 parts of the text voted on separately (7 adopted, 9 rejected).

Roll calls requested by S&D, Renew, ESN · split votes by Members (2) · separate votes by Members.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 19 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1 13:51 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – Alternative motion for a resolution – Am 1 requested by ESN
Rejected
2. Separate vote on paragraph 1 13:52 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 1 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Rejected
3. Separate vote on paragraph 20 13:52 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 20 requested by Members requested by S&D
Rejected
4. Separate vote on paragraph 24 13:52 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 24 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Rejected
5. Separate vote on paragraph 33 13:52 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 33 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Rejected
6. Separate vote on paragraph 39 13:53 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 39 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Adopted
7. Amendment 2 to paragraph 40 13:53 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 40 – Am 2 requested by S&D
Rejected
8. Separate vote on paragraph 42 13:53 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 42 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Rejected
9. Separate vote on paragraph 43 13:53 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 43 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Adopted
10. Separate vote on paragraph 44 13:54 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 44 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Rejected
11. Separate vote on paragraph 53 13:54 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 53 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Adopted
12. Separate vote on paragraph 55 13:54 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 55 requested by Members requested by S&D
Rejected
13. Separate vote on paragraph 64 13:54 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 64 requested by Members requested by S&D, Renew
Rejected
14. Paragraph 66 — part 1 13:54 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 66/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘long-term, sustainable funding for United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East (UNRWA), guaranteeing’” requested by Members requested by S&D
Adopted
15. Paragraph 66 — part 2 13:55 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 66/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by Members requested by S&D
Adopted
16. Paragraph 67 — part 1 13:55 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 67/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the word: ‘UNWRA’” requested by Members requested by S&D
Adopted
17. Paragraph 67 — part 2 13:55 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 67/2 Part 2: “that word” requested by Members requested by S&D
Adopted
18. Separate vote on paragraph 69 13:55 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – § 69 requested by Members requested by S&D
Rejected
19. Final vote — text as a whole 13:56 A10-0101/2025 – Charles Goerens – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)
Rejected

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 17 June 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0101 in procedure 2025/2004.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site