Skip to content
3 New EU laws ·decision 3 of 8 on Thursday, 22 May 2025

Granting equivalence to Moldova and Ukraine for field inspections and seed production

Committee report by Veronika Vrecionová · · voted 12:18–12:19

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 374 for · 176 against · 36 abstained (64 % in favour) Agriculture, food & fisheriesEconomy & single marketSingle market rules

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 374 Against 176 Abstained 36

Final vote at 12:19 · 64% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR –
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal updates EU rules on recognising field inspections and seed production in Moldova and Ukraine as equivalent to EU standards. Parliament adopted its position, supporting the Commission's proposal with two technical amendments on inspections. The amendments aim to ensure products entering the single market fully comply with EU production requirements.

How the vote unfolded · 5 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (3 rejected).

Roll call requested by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 5 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 12:18 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Rejet - Am 3 requested by PfE
Rejected
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendment 4, adding text after recital 11 12:18 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Après le considérant 11 - Am 4 requested by PfE
Rejected
4. Amendment 5, adding text after recital 11 12:19 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Après le considérant 11 - Am 5 requested by PfE
Rejected
5. Final vote 12:19 A10-0043/2025 - Veronika Vrecionová - Proposition de la Commission
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 22 May 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0043 in procedure 2024/0027.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site