Skip to content
8 Budget & emergency funds ·decision 8 of 13 on Tuesday, 6 May 2025

Mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers: application EGF/2024/003 BE/Van Hool – Belgium

Committee report · voted at 13:15

Budget decisions: the annual budget, amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds, and discharge (approving how a budget was spent).

Adopted by an overwhelming majority 598 for · 48 against · 5 abstained (92 % in favour) Jobs, social affairs & equalityEU budget & fundsEmployment & workers’ rights

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by an overwhelming majority

The budget decision was approved.

For 598 Against 48 Abstained 5

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:15 · 92% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The European Parliament approved the mobilisation of the European Globalisation Adjustment Fund for Displaced Workers to support workers made redundant by the Belgian company Van Hool. The decision releases €7,999,015 to fund personalised services such as job-search support, retraining, and outplacement for 2,397 former Van Hool workers in Belgium. The Parliament agrees with the Commission that Belgium meets the conditions for this aid and instructs its President to sign the decision with the Council.

How the vote unfolded · 5 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 3 rejected).

Roll call requested by PfE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 5 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote on recital E
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote on recital F requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote on recital F 13:15 A10–0080/2025 – Janusz Lewandowski – Recital F requested by PfE
Adopted
4. Separate vote on recital I
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Final vote — text as a whole 13:15 A10–0080/2025 – Janusz Lewandowski – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 6 May 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0080 in procedure 2025/0061.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site