Skip to content
2 New EU laws ·decision 2 of 9 on Thursday, 3 April 2025

Granting equivalence with EU requirements to Moldova and Ukraine as regards field inspections and production of seed

Committee report by Veronika Vrecionová · · voted at 13:10

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 411 for · 191 against · 13 abstained (67 % in favour) Agriculture, food & fisheriesEconomy & single marketForeign affairsSingle market rules

What Parliament decided

Adopted Negotiating mandate approved

Parliament let its committee open negotiations with the Council on the basis of the committee’s report.

For 411 Against 191 Abstained 13

Decision to open negotiations with the Council at 13:10 · 67% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The proposal updates EU rules on recognising field inspections and seed production in Moldova and Ukraine as equivalent to EU standards for certain crops. Parliament adopted its position supporting the proposal, with two technical amendments on inspections to ensure long-term compliance with EU production requirements. The Council and Parliament must now agree before the law is finalised.

Roll call requested by PfE.

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 3 April 2025. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2025-0043 in procedure 2024/0027.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site