Skip to content
3 Objections to Commission measures ·decision 3 of 4 on Wednesday, 12 February 2025

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified maize DP910521

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:08–12:09

Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding.

Adopted by a large majority 477 for · 152 against · 20 abstained (73 % in favour) Agriculture, food & fisheriesHealthFood safety & labelling

What Parliament decided

Adopted Objection passed by a large majority

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

For 477 Against 152 Abstained 20

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:09 · 73% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✗
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by PPE.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The European Parliament objected to the Commission's draft decision authorising the placing on the market of products containing, consisting of or produced from genetically modified maize DP910521. The objection was adopted, meaning the Commission measure is blocked and the maize cannot be authorised for sale in the EU. The resolution cites concerns about the herbicide glufosinate, the Cry1B.34 toxin, and inadequate risk assessment.

How the vote unfolded · 4 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (1 adopted, 1 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 4 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3, adding text after paragraph 4 12:08 B10-0061/2025 – After § 4 – Am 3 requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Vote on text inserted after citation 8
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Amendment 2, adding text after recital V 12:09 B10-0061/2025 – After recital V – Am 2 requested by The Left
Adopted
4. Final vote — text as a whole 12:09 B10-0061/2025 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) requested by Verts/ALE, The Left
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 12 February 2025. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2025-0061 in procedure 2024/3010.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site