Skip to content
5 Objections to Commission measures ·decision 5 of 9 on Tuesday, 26 November 2024

Objection under Rule 115(2) and (3) · implementing measure

Genetically modified maize DP915635

Motion for a resolution · voted 12:10–12:11

Parliament can object to technical rules the Commission adopts on its own. Against a delegated act an adopted objection is a veto; against most implementing measures (such as GMO authorisations) it is a call on the Commission to withdraw the measure, which is not legally binding.

Adopted by a large majority 478 for · 166 against · 17 abstained (72 % in favour) Agriculture, food & fisheriesHealthFood safety & labelling

What Parliament decided

Adopted Objection passed by a large majority

The objection passed. For an implementing measure it is not legally binding: the Commission is asked to withdraw the measure but can still adopt it.

For 478 Against 166 Abstained 17

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:11 · 72% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ~
  • PPE ✗
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✓
  • ESN ✓
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by PPE; Renew split.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

Parliament objected to a Commission decision authorising the sale of products made from genetically modified maize DP915635. The objection was adopted, so the Commission measure is blocked and the maize cannot be marketed in the EU. Parliament cited concerns about the herbicide glufosinate and the toxin IPD079Ea, and called for more assessment.

How the vote unfolded · 3 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (1 adopted, 1 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 3 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 2 12:10 B10-0149/2024 – After § 2 – Am 2 requested by ECR
Adopted
2. Amendment 1, adding text after recital L 12:11 B10-0149/2024 – After recital L – Am 1 requested by ECR
Rejected
3. Final vote — text as a whole 12:11 B10-0149/2024 – Motion for a resolution (as a whole) requested by The Left, S&D, Verts/ALE
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 26 November 2024. The vote was taken on Motion B-10-2024-0149 in procedure 2024/2839.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site