Skip to content

← Decision 3 Decision 5 →

4 Budget & emergency funds ·decision 4 of 5 on Wednesday, 23 October 2024

General budget of the European Union for the financial year 2025 – all sections

Committee report · voted 13:20–13:45

Budget decisions: the annual budget, amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds, and discharge (approving how a budget was spent).

Rejected by a clear majority 233 for · 360 against · 59 abstained (36 % in favour) EU budget & fundsAnnual budget
The vote✦ In shortFull textProcedure

What Parliament decided

Rejected Resolution rejected by a clear majority

Parliament rejected the resolution that accompanies its budget position; its amendments to the draft budget were voted on separately.

For 233 Against 360 Abstained 59

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:45 · 36% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✗
  • Verts/ALE ✗
  • S&D ✗
  • Renew ✗
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✓
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ✗

Backed by PPE and ECR; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PfE and ESN.

✦ What this vote decides · AI summary, based on the text voted on

The European Parliament rejected the Council's position on the draft general budget of the European Union for 2025, refusing the proposed spending. This means the budget as proposed by the Council was not approved, and the spending plans were turned down. The Parliament's resolution had called for a people-centred budget with investments in areas like public health, housing, and the environment, and for support to Ukraine and agriculture.

How the vote unfolded · 152 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 75 amendments (14 adopted, 61 rejected) and 76 parts of the text voted on separately (62 adopted, 10 rejected, 4 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, PPE, ECR, PfE, ESN, Members · split votes by The Left (3), Verts/ALE (2), S&D (4), PPE (6), ECR (5), PfE (15), Members · separate votes by PfE, ESN.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 152 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3, adding text before paragraph 1 13:20 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 3 requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Amendment 4, adding text before paragraph 1 13:20 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 4 requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Amendment 5, adding text before paragraph 1 13:21 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 5 requested by The Left
Rejected
4. Amendment 6, adding text before paragraph 1 13:21 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 6 requested by The Left
Rejected
5. Amendment 7, adding text before paragraph 1 13:21 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Before § 1 – Am 7 requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Separate vote on paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Amendment 53, adding text after paragraph 4 13:21 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 4 – Am 53 requested by The Left
Rejected
10. Separate vote on paragraph 5 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Paragraph 5 — part 2 13:22 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 5/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
12. Amendment 54, adding text after paragraph 5 13:22 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 5 – Am 54 requested by The Left
Rejected
13. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 6
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Separate vote on paragraph 11 requested by ESN
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Separate vote on paragraph 12 13:22 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 12 requested by PfE
Adopted
16. Amendment 18, adding text after paragraph 13 13:22 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 13 – Am 18 requested by Members
Adopted
17. Separate vote on paragraph 14 requested by ESN
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Separate vote on paragraph 15 13:23 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 15 requested by PfE
Adopted
19. Amendment 42, adding text after paragraph 15 13:23 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 42 requested by ESN
Rejected
20. Amendment 55, adding text after paragraph 15 13:23 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 55 requested by The Left
Rejected
21. Amendment 56, adding text after paragraph 15 13:23 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 56 requested by The Left
Rejected
22. Amendment 57, adding text after paragraph 15 13:23 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 57 requested by The Left
Rejected
23. Amendment 58, adding text after paragraph 15 13:24 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 58 requested by The Left
Rejected
24. Amendment 59, adding text after paragraph 15 13:24 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 59 requested by The Left
Rejected
25. Amendment 60, adding text after paragraph 15 13:24 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 60 requested by The Left
Rejected
26. Amendment 61, adding text after paragraph 15 13:24 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 15 – Am 61 requested by The Left
Rejected
27. Separate vote on paragraph 21 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
28. Amendment 21, adding text after paragraph 27 — part 1 13:24 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 27 – Am 21/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Condemns’, ‘which’, ‘inexplicable and devastating’, ‘highlights in that regard, that the use and accountability of Union funds has been transparent for decades at Hungarian universities;’ and ‘calls on the Commission to immediately withdraw its discriminative decision;’” requested by PPE requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
29. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 27
30. Separate vote on paragraph 31 13:25 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 31 requested by PfE
Adopted
31. Separate vote on paragraph 33 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 34 13:25 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 8 requested by The Left
Rejected
33. Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 34 13:25 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 9 requested by The Left
Rejected
34. Amendment 10, adding text after paragraph 34 13:25 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 10 requested by The Left
Rejected
35. Amendment 11, adding text after paragraph 34 13:25 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 11 requested by The Left
Rejected
36. Amendment 12, adding text after paragraph 34 13:26 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 34 – Am 12 requested by The Left
Rejected
37. Paragraph 35 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and all Member States’ and ‘in parallel to the implementation of the Recovery and Resilience Facility;’” requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
38. Paragraph 35 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
39. Paragraph 36 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and calls on Member States to prevent delays caused by a lack of administrative capacity at all levels of governance;’” requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
40. Paragraph 36 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
41. Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 35 — part 1 13:26 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 35 – Am 22/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Highlights that the Hungarian government conducted a series of negotiations with the Commission in order for Hungary to be able to access the cohesion funds it is rightfully entitled to; notes that, as a result of that dialogue, Hungary undertook to fulfil a package of measures; condemns the fact that the Commission is imposing more and more conditions to transfer development funds to Hungary;’, ‘and that the Commission disburse the financial resources immediately’ and ‘and to stop the politically selected ideological blackmailing of Member States.’” requested by PPE requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
42. Amendment 22, adding text after paragraph 35 — part 2 13:26 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 35 – Am 22/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PPE requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
43. Amendment 62, adding text after paragraph 40 13:27 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 40 – Am 62 requested by The Left
Rejected
44. Separate vote on paragraph 41 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
45. Paragraph 41 — part 2 13:27 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 41/2 Part 2: ‘stresses that the Union should find the resources to express solidarity by supporting the areas, citizens and companies affected by the recent devastating floods in Central and Eastern Europe in September 2024;’ requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
46. Separate vote on paragraph 42 requested by ECR, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
47. Separate vote on paragraph 42 requested by ECR, PfE
48. Separate vote on paragraph 42 requested by ECR, PfE
49. Separate vote on paragraph 42 requested by ECR, PfE
50. Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 43 — part 1 13:27 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 43 – Am 23/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘Condemns the fact that in December 2022 the Commission decided to exclude Hungarian universities, students, teachers and researchers from mobility programmes;’ and ‘regrets that the realisation of that goal is obviously opposed by Union decisions that exclude the vast majority of students from a Member State from mobility; calls on the Commission to immediately withdraw its discriminative decision;’” requested by PPE requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
51. Amendment 23, adding text after paragraph 43 — part 2 13:28 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 43 – Am 23/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PPE requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
52. Separate vote on paragraph 44 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
53. Paragraph 44 — part 2 13:28 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 44/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
54. Amendment 24, adding text after paragraph 44 13:28 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 44 – Am 24 requested by PfE
Rejected
55. Paragraph 45 — part 1 13:28 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 45/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the LGBTQI+ community,’” requested by ECR requested by PfE
Adopted
56. Paragraph 45 — part 2 13:28 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 45/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by ECR requested by PfE, ECR
Adopted
57. Amendment 25, adding text after paragraph 45 13:29 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 45 – Am 25 requested by PfE
Rejected
58. Paragraph 46 — part 1 13:29 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 46/1 Part 1: ‘Demands an increase of the support to the Turkish-Cypriot line by EUR 1 million above DB’ requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
59. Separate vote on paragraph 46 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
60. Paragraph 49 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and the European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation’” requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
61. Paragraph 49 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
62. Amendment 13, adding text after paragraph 50 13:29 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 50 – Am 13 requested by The Left
Rejected
63. Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 50 13:29 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 50 – Am 14 requested by The Left
Rejected
64. Separate vote on paragraph 51 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
65. Paragraph 51 — part 2 13:30 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 51/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
66. Amendment 43, adding text after paragraph 51 13:30 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 51 – Am 43 requested by ESN
Rejected
67. Separate vote on paragraph 52 13:30 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 52 requested by PfE
Adopted
68. Separate vote on paragraph 53 13:30 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 53 requested by PfE
Adopted
69. Separate vote on paragraph 54 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
70. Paragraph 54 — part 2 13:30 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 54/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
71. Paragraph 55 — part 1 13:30 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 55/1 Part 1: ‘Recalls the economic, social and environmental relevance of fisheries, aquaculture and maritime affairs and the specific economic challenges faced by the small-scale, artisanal and coastal fishing sector; stresses the strategic role of fisheries and the related sectors in this regard’ requested by The Left, PfE requested by PfE
Adopted
72. Paragraph 55 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Recalls the economic, social and environmental relevance of fisheries, aquaculture and maritime affairs and the specific economic challenges faced by the small-scale, artisanal and coastal fishing sector; stresses the strategic role of fisheries and the related sectors in this regard’ requested by The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
73. Paragraph 55 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘and expresses concern over the lack of clarity over the consequences of the Commission proposal to cut the budget of the EMFAF; insists that special attention must be devoted to the fishing fleets in order to improve safety, working conditions, energy efficiency and environmental sustainability,’ requested by The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
74. Amendment 26, adding text after paragraph 56 13:31 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 56 – Am 26 requested by PfE
Adopted
75. Amendment 27, adding text after paragraph 57 13:31 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 57 – Am 27 requested by PfE
Adopted
76. Paragraph 61 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: ‘Stresses that the smooth and efficient implementation of the Union’s migration and asylum policy by Member States is key to ensuring the security of the Union and preserving the free movement of people within the Union;’ requested by The Left requested by ESN, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
77. Paragraph 61 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘insists that the Union’s migration and asylum policy should be governed by the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility, including its financial implications, between the Member States as enshrined in Article 80 of the TEU, and in respect for fundamental rights, in line with Union values and international commitments;’ requested by The Left requested by ESN, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
78. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 61 13:31 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 61 – Am 2 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
79. Separate vote on paragraph 62 requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
80. Separate vote on paragraph 62 13:32 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 62 requested by PfE
Adopted
81. Amendment 29, adding text after paragraph 62 13:32 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 62 – Am 29 requested by PfE
Rejected
82. Amendment 44, adding text after paragraph 62 13:32 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 62 – Am 44 requested by ESN
Rejected
83. Paragraph 63 — part 1 of 9 Part 1: ‘Underlines the importance for Member States to comply with their commitments, including upholding the right to asylum, and ensuring effective, humane and fair management and protection of the EU’s external borders, as well as effective, safe and dignified reception, integration and return and readmission procedures;’ without the words ‘including upholding the right to asylum,’ ‘and protection of the EU’s external borders’ and ‘and return and readmission procedures’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
84. Paragraph 63 — part 2 of 9 Part 2: ‘including upholding the right to asylum,’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
85. Paragraph 63 — part 3 of 9 Part 3: ‘and protection of the EU’s external borders’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
86. Paragraph 63 — part 4 of 9 Part 4: ‘and return and readmission procedures’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
87. Paragraph 63 — part 5 of 9 Part 5: ‘underlines the need to better protect vulnerable people from smuggling and trafficking networks and address the negative effects of the instrumentalisation of migrants as part of hybrid attacks, notably by pro-Russian forces; recalls the crucial role the Asylum, Migration and Integration Fund (AMIF) and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI) play in this regard’ excluding the words ‘and address the negative effects of the instrumentalisation of migrants as part of hybrid attacks, notably by pro-Russian forces;’ and ‘and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI)’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
88. Paragraph 63 — part 6 of 9 Part 6: ‘and address the negative effects of the instrumentalisation of migrants as part of hybrid attacks, notably by pro-Russian forces;’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
89. Paragraph 63 — part 7 of 9 Part 7: ‘and the Border Management and Visa Instrument (BMVI)’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
90. Paragraph 63 — part 8 13:33 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 63/8 Part 8: ‘in particular supporting Member States with’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
Adopted
91. Paragraph 63 — part 9 13:33 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 63/9 Part 9: ‘reinforced border protection capabilities including physical infrastructure, buildings, equipment, systems and services required at border crossing points,’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
Adopted
92. Paragraph 63 — part 8 of 9 Part 8: ‘in particular supporting Member States with’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
93. Paragraph 63 — part 11 13:33 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 63/11 Part 11: ‘as well as meeting the requirements of reception conditions for asylum seekers and migrants;’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
Adopted
94. Paragraph 63 — part 9 of 9 Part 9: ‘reinforced border protection capabilities including physical infrastructure, buildings, equipment, systems and services required at border crossing points,’ requested by ECR, The Left, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
95. Amendment 30, adding text after paragraph 63 13:33 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 30 requested by PfE
Rejected
96. Amendment 45, adding text after paragraph 63 13:33 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 45 requested by ESN
Adopted
97. Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 63 — part 1 13:34 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 31/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘regrets that’ and ‘the European Court of Justice imposed a fine on it for not letting migrants enter Hungary before a final decision is made on their application; requests that the Commission use part of the EUR 2 billion due for border protection for Hungary to finance the fine imposed on Hungary by the European Court of Justice.’” requested by PPE requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
98. Amendment 31, adding text after paragraph 63 — part 2 13:34 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 31/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PPE requested by PfE, PPE
Rejected
99. Amendment 64, adding text after paragraph 63 13:34 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 63 – Am 64 requested by The Left
Rejected
100. Amendment 32, adding text after paragraph 64 13:34 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 32 requested by PfE
Adopted
101. Amendment 33, adding text after paragraph 64 13:35 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 33 requested by PfE
Rejected
102. Amendment 34, adding text after paragraph 64 13:35 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 34 requested by PfE
Rejected
103. Amendment 46, adding text after paragraph 64 13:35 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 64 – Am 46 requested by ESN
Adopted
104. Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 66 13:35 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 66 – Am 15 requested by The Left
Rejected
105. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 67
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
106. Amendment 65, adding text after paragraph 68 13:35 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 68 – Am 65 requested by The Left
Rejected
107. Paragraph 75 — part 1 of 3 Part 1: ‘Stresses the importance of the Southern Neighbourhood line in supporting political, economic and social reforms in the region taking into consideration the increasing humanitarian needs in the region as well as other purposes of regional cooperation in providing assistance to refugees, in particular Syrian and Palestinian refugees, and in enabling support along the southern migration routes;’ requested by ECR, PfE, Members
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
108. Paragraph 75 — part 2 of 3 Part 2: ‘proposes to increase appropriations for the line by EUR 60 million above the DB, including to reinforce funding for UNRWA based on EU regulations and values;’ without the words ‘including to reinforce funding for UNRWA’ requested by ECR, PfE, Members requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
109. Paragraph 75 — part 3 of 3 Part 3: ‘including to reinforce funding for UNRWA’ requested by ECR, PfE, Members
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
110. Paragraph 75 — part 3 13:36 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 75/3 Part 3: ‘including to reinforce funding for UNRWA’ requested by ECR, PfE, Members
Adopted
111. Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 75 13:36 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 1 requested by PPE
Rejected
112. Amendment 37, adding text after paragraph 75 13:36 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 37 requested by PfE
Rejected
113. Amendment 69, adding text after paragraph 75 13:36 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 75 – Am 69 requested by Members
Adopted
114. Paragraph 76 — part 1 of 3 Part 1: ‘Underlines that the war continues to have significant effects on countries in the Eastern Neighbourhood, such as the Republic of Moldova, that have provided shelter and assistance to refugees fleeing the war and faced the knock-on effects of sky-high inflation and energy prices; stresses the need for targeted financial and technical assistance to help these countries stabilise their economies and strengthen public infrastructure amidst these pressures;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
115. Paragraph 76 — part 2 of 3 Part 2: ‘underlines the importance of sustained support for candidate countries in implementing the necessary accession-related reforms and in enhancing their resilience and preventing and countering hybrid threats; decides, therefore, to increase appropriations by EUR 50 million above the DB for the Eastern Neighbourhood to address these complex challenges;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
116. Paragraph 76 — part 3 of 3 Part 3: ‘decides, therefore, to increase appropriations by EUR 50 million above the DB for the Eastern Neighbourhood to address these complex challenges; proposes, furthermore, to increase accession-related support under the Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA III) by EUR 3 million in 2025 to accelerate the reform process, enhance resilience, and ensure a smooth transition towards EU standards;’ requested by PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
117. Amendment 47, adding text after paragraph 76 13:37 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 76 – Am 47 requested by ESN
Rejected
118. Paragraph 78 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘sexual and reproductive health’, ‘and LGBTIQ+ rights’ and ‘and to further reinforce the work on these aspects by civil society organisations, human rights defenders and journalists,’” requested by ECR, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
119. Paragraph 78 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: ‘sexual and reproductive health’ requested by ECR, PfE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
120. Paragraph 78 — part 2 13:37 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 78/2 Part 2: ‘sexual and reproductive health’ requested by ECR, PfE
Adopted
121. Paragraph 78 — part 3 13:38 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 78/3 Part 3: ‘and LGBTIQ+ rights’ requested by ECR, PfE
Adopted
122. Paragraph 78 — part 4 13:38 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 78/4 Part 4: ‘and to further reinforce the work on these aspects by civil society organisations, human rights defenders and journalists,’ requested by ECR, PfE
Adopted
123. Amendment 38, adding text after paragraph 79 13:38 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 79 – Am 38 requested by PfE
Rejected
124. Amendment 39, adding text after paragraph 79 13:38 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 79 – Am 39 requested by PfE
Rejected
125. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 82
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
126. Separate vote on paragraph 84
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
127. Amendment 72, adding text after paragraph 87 13:38 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 87 – Am 72 requested by The Left
Rejected
128. Amendment 73, adding text after paragraph 87 13:39 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 87 – Am 73 requested by The Left
Rejected
129. Separate vote on paragraph 88 13:39 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 88 requested by PPE
Adopted
130. Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 1 13:39 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/1 Part 1: ‘Reiterates Parliament’s priorities for the forthcoming financial year, namely, focusing Parliament’s budget to deliver on its core functions of co-legislator, acting as one arm of the budgetary authority, representing citizens and scrutinising the work of other institutions,’ requested by PPE, S&D, Verts/ALE requested by PPE
Adopted
131. Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 2 13:39 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/2 Part 2: “deletion of the words ‘and the implementation of EU legislation’” requested by PPE, S&D, Verts/ALE requested by PPE
Rejected
132. Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 3 13:40 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/3 Part 3: ‘as well as providing the resources for cyber-security and IT development and priority projects on engaging with citizens, green Parliament promoting the saving of resources and an accessible Parliament, fully respecting gender equality;’ without the word ‘fully’ requested by PPE, S&D, Verts/ALE requested by PPE
Adopted
133. Amendment 50 to paragraph 89 — part 4 13:40 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 89 – Am 50/4 Part 4: ‘fully’ requested by PPE, S&D, Verts/ALE requested by PPE
Adopted
134. Amendment 19 to paragraph 90, After point d 13:40 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 90, After point d – Am 19 requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
135. Amendment 20 to paragraph 90, point e 13:40 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 90, point e – Am 20 requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
136. Paragraph 90, point f — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including outreach in the languages of linguistic minorities and communities, where appropriate;’” requested by PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
137. Paragraph 90, point f — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PPE
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
138. Separate vote on paragraph 90, point g
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
139. Amendment 74, adding text after paragraph 90 13:41 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 90 – Am 74 requested by The Left
Rejected
140. Amendment 75, adding text after paragraph 90 13:41 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 90 – Am 75 requested by The Left
Rejected
141. Amendment 76, adding text after paragraph 90 13:41 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 90 – Am 76 requested by The Left
Rejected
142. Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 1 13:41 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 67/1 Part 1: ‘Highlights that subcontracting cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency services puts people, mainly women, in an extremely vulnerable position;’ requested by S&D requested by The Left
Rejected
143. Amendment 67, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 2 13:42 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 67/2 Part 2: ‘calls for the internalisation of cleaning, catering, crèches and travel agency staff as soon as possible;’ requested by S&D requested by The Left
Rejected
144. Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 1 13:43 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/1 Part 1: ‘Notes with concern the decision of the company managing the Parliament crèche in Brussels to terminate its contract’ requested by S&D, Verts/ALE requested by The Left
Adopted
145. Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 2 13:44 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/2 Part 2: ‘in advance in order to sign a new one for a higher amount; considers that the budget of the European Parliament should not finance the profits of a private company;’ requested by S&D, Verts/ALE requested by The Left
Rejected
146. Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 3 13:44 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/3 Part 3: ‘highlights that the continuous changes of contractors bring uncertainty for the staff, the children and their parents and increase health and safety risks; calls for Parliament to ensure the proper functioning of the crèche protecting the staff, ensuring decent working conditions and fair remuneration, and the quality of the services’ requested by S&D, Verts/ALE requested by The Left
Adopted
147. Amendment 68, adding text after paragraph 91 — part 4 13:44 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 91 – Am 68/4 Part 4: ‘and to take the necessary steps to allow for the crèche staff to be directly employed by Parliament;’ requested by S&D, Verts/ALE requested by The Left
Rejected
148. Amendment 16 to paragraph 92 13:44 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – § 92 – Am 16 requested by The Left
Rejected
149. Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 92 — part 1 13:44 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 92 – Am 17/1 Part 1: ‘Calls for better working conditions and pay for workers in crèches, catering, security, interpretation and translation’ requested by S&D requested by The Left
Adopted
150. Amendment 17, adding text after paragraph 92 — part 2 13:45 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 92 – Am 17/2 Part 2: ‘by bringing them in-house and making them permanent European Parliament staff as soon as possible;’ requested by S&D requested by The Left
Rejected
151. Amendment 77, adding text after paragraph 98 13:45 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – After § 98 – Am 77 requested by The Left
Rejected
152. Final vote — text as a whole 13:45 A10–0008/2024 – Victor Negrescu, Niclas Herbst – Motion for a resolution (text as a whole)
Rejected

Part of the sitting of Wednesday, 23 October 2024. The vote was taken on Report A-10-2024-0008 in procedure 2024/0176.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site