← 24 April 16 July →

Plenary sitting, Thursday, 25 April 2024

MEPs decided on 15 subjects between 13:19 and 13:58 — 15 adopted. That took 258 ballots, 86 of them by roll call with every MEP’s position recorded.

15
subjects decided
15 / 0
adopted / rejected
258
ballots, incl. 53 amendments
86
roll calls (per-MEP record)
Tightest result of the day: Interinstitutional Body for Ethical Standards — Adopted 301–216
New here? How plenary voting works and how to read this page

A sitting is one day of voting in the Parliament’s plenary. Everything voted that day is listed here by subject — a report, resolution, agreement or objection the Parliament is deciding on. Subjects are sorted into sections by what kind of decision they are (new laws, international agreements, non-binding resolutions, …); each section explains what “adopted” means there.

Each subject can involve many ballots. MEPs first vote on amendments (proposed changes) and on parts of the text a group asked to vote on separately, then hold the decisive vote on the whole text — that is the result shown at the top of every subject. The strip of squares and circles under it shows all the ballots in the order they were taken; open the list to see each one.

Only roll-call votes record how each MEP voted — click one to see every individual position and the full breakdown by political group. The row of group badges (✓ mostly for, ✗ mostly against, – mostly abstained, ~ split) shows which groups backed a result. Votes by show of hands record only the outcome.

Every subject is based on a document (a committee report, a motion for a resolution, or a Council/Commission text) and belongs to a procedure — the full legislative file that can span years. The buttons on each subject take you to both.

Glossary: Am 27 = amendment 27 · § 5 = paragraph 5 · part 1/2 = a paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts (a split vote) · separate vote = a paragraph voted on its own, usually so a group can vote against it · = joins identical amendments voted together · 1st reading (***I) = Parliament’s first pass at a proposed law · Lapsed = fell away without a vote because an earlier vote settled the matter.

New EU laws

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

1

Gradual roll-out of Eudamed, information obligation in case of interruption of supply and the transitional provisions for certain in vitro diagnostic medical devices

1st reading · voted at 13:19

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 511 Against 1 Abstained 21

Final vote at 13:19 · 96% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI ~

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

2

Advance passenger information: prevention, detection, investigation and prosecution of terrorist offences and serious crime

Committee report by Assita Kanko · 1st reading · voted at 13:43

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 438 Against 35 Abstained 60

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 13:43 · 82% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left; Verts/ALE mostly abstained.

3

Advance passenger information: enhancing and facilitating external border controls

Committee report by Jan-Christoph Oetjen · 1st reading · voted at 13:43

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 492 Against 33 Abstained 10

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 13:43 · 92% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI ~

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; opposed by The Left.

4

Framework of measures for strengthening Europe’s net-zero technology products manufacturing ecosystem (Net Zero Industry Act)

Committee report by Christian Ehler · 1st reading · voted at 13:44

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 361 Against 121 Abstained 45

Final vote on the provisional agreement at 13:44 · 69% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI ~

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR and PfE; opposed by The Left, Verts/ALE and ESN.

Budget & emergency funds

Spending decisions: amending budgets, solidarity and adjustment funds.

5

Draft Amending Budget 3/2024: Reinforcing the European Public Prosecutor's Office following the accession of Poland and the expected participation of Sweden

Committee report by Siegfried Mureşan · voted at 13:43

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

The spending was approved.

For 434 Against 45 Abstained 55

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 13:43 · 81% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN ~
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE; ECR mostly abstained; ESN split.

6

Draft amending budget No 1/2024: Amendments of the 2024 budget required due to the MFF revision

Committee report by Siegfried Mureşan · voted at 13:43

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

The spending was approved.

For 465 Against 53 Abstained 16

Final vote on the motion for a resolution at 13:43 · 87% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by PfE and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

Resolutions & reports

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

7

Azerbaijan, notably the repression of civil society and the cases of Dr Gubad Ibadoghlu and Ilhamiz Guliyev

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:20

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 474 Against 4 Abstained 51

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:20 · 90% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI ~

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 11 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 3 amendments (1 adopted, 2 rejected) and 1 part of the text voted on separately (1 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 11 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 13:20 RC-B9-0227/2024 - § 5 - Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
2. Amendment 4 13:20 RC-B9-0227/2024 - Après le § 5 - Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 6 After § 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Amendment 2 13:20 RC-B9-0227/2024 - Considérant A - Am 2 Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
5. Final vote — text as a whole 13:20 RC-B9-0227/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
6. Alternative motion B9-0227/2024 B9-0227/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B9-0230/2024 B9-0230/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B9-0231/2024 B9-0231/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9. Alternative motion B9-0232/2024 B9-0232/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B9-0236/2024 B9-0236/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Alternative motion B9-0245/2024 B9-0245/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8

The proposed repeal of the law banning female genital mutilation in The Gambia

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:21

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 535 Against 1 Abstained 1

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:21 · 100% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 7 ballots

6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll call requested by Renew.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 7 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote — text as a whole 13:21 RC-B9-0228/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
2. Alternative motion B9-0228/2024 B9-0228/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
3. Alternative motion B9-0229/2024 B9-0229/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4. Alternative motion B9-0233/2024 B9-0233/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Alternative motion B9-0234/2024 B9-0234/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B9-0242/2024 B9-0242/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B9-0243/2024 B9-0243/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9

Interinstitutional Body for Ethical Standards

Committee report by Daniel Freund · voted 13:26–13:40

Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 301 Against 216 Abstained 23

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:40 · 56% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D and Renew; opposed by PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 96 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 10 amendments (10 rejected) and 84 parts of the text voted on separately (11 adopted, 73 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, PPE, ID · split votes by PPE, ID · separate votes by PPE, ID.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 96 ballots in voting order
1. Motion for adjournment of the vote (Rule 200(4))
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Separate vote: paragraph 1 § 1
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Separate vote: paragraph 1 § 1
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: paragraph 1 § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Amendment 1 13:26 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - Après le § 1 - Am 1 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
9. Amendment 2 13:27 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - Après le § 2 - Am 2 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
10. Amendment 3 13:27 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - Après le § 2 - Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
11. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
12. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
13. Separate vote: after paragraph 2 After § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Separate vote: paragraph 3 § 3 Split vote requested by PPE · Separate vote requested by ID
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Paragraph 3 — part 2 13:28 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - § 3/2 Part 2: ‘before’ Split vote requested by PPE · Separate vote requested by ID
Adopted
16. Paragraph 3 — part 3 13:28 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - § 3/3 Part 3: ‘and after’ Split vote requested by PPE · Separate vote requested by ID
Adopted
17. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
18. Separate vote: paragraph 4 § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
19. Separate vote: after paragraph 4 After § 4
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
20. Separate vote: paragraph 5 § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
21. Separate vote: paragraph 5 § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
22. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
23. Amendment 4 13:29 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - § 7 - Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
24. Separate vote: paragraph 7 § 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
25. Separate vote: paragraph 7 § 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Separate vote: paragraph 7 § 7
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
27. Separate vote: paragraph 8 § 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
28. Separate vote: paragraph 8 § 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
29. Separate vote: paragraph 9 § 9
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Amendment 6 13:30 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - § 9 - Am 6 Roll call requested by ID
Rejected
31. Amendment 5 13:30 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - Après le § 9 - Am 5 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
32. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
33. Separate vote: paragraph 11 § 11
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
34. Separate vote: paragraph 11 § 11
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
35. Separate vote: paragraph 12 § 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
36. Separate vote: paragraph 13 § 13 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
37. Separate vote: after paragraph 13 After § 13
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
38. Separate vote: after paragraph 13 After § 13
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
39. Separate vote: after paragraph 13 After § 13
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
40. Separate vote: paragraph 14 § 14
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
41. Separate vote: paragraph 14 § 14
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
42. Amendment 7 13:32 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - § 15 - Am 7 Roll call requested by ID
Rejected
43. Separate vote: paragraph 15 § 15 Separate vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
44. Separate vote: paragraph 16 § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
45. Separate vote: paragraph 16 § 16
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
46. Separate vote: paragraph 16 § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
47. Amendment 84 13:33 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - § 16 - Am 84 Roll call requested by ID
Rejected
48. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
49. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
50. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
51. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
52. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
53. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
54. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
55. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
56. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
57. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
58. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
59. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
60. Separate vote: after paragraph 16 After § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
61. Separate vote: paragraph 17 § 17 Separate vote requested by ID
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
62. Separate vote: paragraph 17 § 17 Separate vote requested by ID
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
63. Amendments 86 + 117 (voted as one) 13:35 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - Article 1, § 1 - Am 86= 117= Roll call requested by PPE
Rejected
64. Separate vote: article 1, paragraph 1 Article 1, § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
65. Amendments 81 + 85 + 119 (voted as one) 13:36 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - Article 2, § 1, après le point b - Am 81= 85= 119= Roll call requested by PPE
Rejected
66. Separate vote: article 5, paragraph 5 Article 5, § 5
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
67. Separate vote: article 5, paragraph 5 Article 5, § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
68. Separate vote: article 5, paragraph 5 Article 5, § 5
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
69. Separate vote: article 5, paragraph 6 Article 5, § 6
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
70. Separate vote: article 7, paragraph 1 Article 7, § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
71. Separate vote: article 7, paragraph 1 Article 7, § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
72. Separate vote: article 9, paragraph 1 Article 9, § 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
73. Separate vote: article 10, paragraph 8 Article 10, § 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
74. Separate vote: article 10, paragraph 8 Article 10, § 8
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
75. Separate vote: article 16, paragraph 2 Article 16, § 2
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
76. Separate vote: article 19, paragraph 2 Article 19, § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
77. Separate vote: citation 3 Citation 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
78. Separate vote: before Recital A Before Recital A
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
79. Separate vote: before Recital A Before Recital A
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
80. Separate vote: recital B Recital B
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
81. Separate vote: recital B Recital B
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
82. Separate vote: recital C Recital C
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
83. Separate vote: recital C Recital C
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
84. Separate vote: recital C Recital C
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
85. Separate vote: after Recital C After Recital C
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
86. Separate vote: recital D Recital D Split vote requested by ID
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
87. Separate vote: recital D Recital D Split vote requested by ID
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
88. Separate vote: recital D Recital D Split vote requested by ID
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
89. Separate vote: recital D Recital D Split vote requested by ID
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
90. Separate vote: recital E and after Recital E Recital E and after Recital E
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
91. Separate vote: recital E and after Recital E Recital E and after Recital E
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
92. Separate vote: recital F Recital F
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
93. Separate vote: recital F Recital F
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
94. Separate vote: recital G Recital G
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
95. Separate vote: recital G Recital G
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
96. Final vote — text as a whole 13:40 A9-0181/2024 - Daniel Freund - Proposition de décision (ensemble du texte)
Adopted
10

Estimates of revenue and expenditure for the financial year 2025 – Section I – European Parliament

Committee report by Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou · voted 13:41–13:42

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 338 Against 148 Abstained 46

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:42 · 64% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by Verts/ALE, PfE and ESN; The Left mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 15 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 8 amendments (1 adopted, 7 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (6 rejected).

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, ID · split votes by S&D.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 15 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 3 § 3
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
2. Amendment 8 13:41 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 3 - Am 8 Roll call requested by ID
Rejected
3. Separate vote: after paragraph 4 After § 4
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
4. Separate vote: paragraph 10 § 10
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Separate vote: paragraph 12 § 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote: after paragraph 15 After § 15
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Separate vote: paragraph 16 § 16
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Amendment 1 13:41 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 16 - Am 1 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
9. Amendment 2 13:41 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 16 - Am 2 Roll call requested by Verts/ALE
Rejected
10. Amendment 3 13:42 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 27 - Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
11. Amendment 4 13:42 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 27 - Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
12. Amendment 5 13:42 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 27 - Am 5 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
13. Amendment 6 — part 1 13:42 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 27 - Am 6/1 Part 1: ‘Calls for a genuine commitment to achieving the principle of multilingualism;’ Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by The Left
Adopted
14. Amendment 6 — part 2 13:42 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Après le § 27 - Am 6/2 Part 2: ‘to this end, calls for an increase in funding for the European Parliament’s translation and interpretation services, ensuring that their staff members are recruited to established internal European Parliament posts;’ Split vote requested by S&D · Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
15. Final vote — text as a whole 13:42 A9-0180/2024 - Anna-Michelle Asimakopoulou - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Adopted
11

Russia’s undemocratic presidential elections and their illegitimate extension to the occupied territories

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:44–13:45

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 493 Against 11 Abstained 18

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:45 · 94% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI ~

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN.

How the vote unfolded · 13 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 rejected) and 5 parts of the text voted on separately (1 adopted, 4 rejected). 5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Renew, ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 13 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 11 § 11
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Separate vote: after paragraph 12 After § 12
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Amendment 7 13:44 RC-B9-0253/2024 - Après le § 14 - Am 7 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
4. Amendment 2 13:45 RC-B9-0253/2024 - Après le considérant C - Am 2 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
5. Separate vote: after Recital C After Recital C
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
6. Separate vote: after Recital C After Recital C
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
7. Separate vote: after Recital C After Recital C
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
8. Final vote — text as a whole 13:45 RC-B9-0253/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
9. Alternative motion B9-0253/2024 B9-0253/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B9-0255/2024 B9-0255/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Alternative motion B9-0256/2024 B9-0256/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12. Alternative motion B9-0259/2024 B9-0259/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
13. Alternative motion B9-0260/2024 B9-0260/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
12

New allegations of Russian interference in the European Parliament, in the upcoming EU elections and the impact on the Union

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:45–13:51

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 429 Against 27 Abstained 48

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:51 · 85% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 54 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 12 amendments (2 adopted, 10 rejected) and 35 parts of the text voted on separately (33 adopted, 2 rejected). 6 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Renew, ECR, ID · split votes by ECR (8), ID · separate votes by ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 54 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 10 13:45 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 2 - Am 10 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
2. Paragraph 2 — part 1 of 2 § 2 Part 1: ‘Expresses its outrage at the participation of MEPs in a pro-Russian media outlet, ‘Voice of Europe’,’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
3. Paragraph 2 — part 1 13:46 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 2/1 Part 1: ‘Expresses its outrage at the participation of MEPs in a pro-Russian media outlet, ‘Voice of Europe’,’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
4. Paragraph 2 — part 2 of 2 § 2 Part 2: ‘while Russia is waging its illegal war of aggression against Ukraine; emphasises that most views propagated by MEPs on ‘Voice of Europe’ do not reflect the stance of the vast majority of MEPs, who overwhelmingly denounce Russia’s unlawful invasion of Ukraine, its employment of hybrid warfare tactics against European democracy, and its other aggressive and anti-democratic policy decisions in recent years;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Separate vote: paragraph 4 13:46 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 4 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
6. Separate vote: paragraph 5 13:46 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 5 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
7. Amendment 11 13:46 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le § 6 - Am 11 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
8. Separate vote: paragraph 8 13:46 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 8 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
9. Separate vote: paragraph 13 13:46 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 13 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
10. Amendment 4 13:47 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le § 13 - Am 4 Roll call requested by ID
Rejected
11. Separate vote: paragraph 14 13:47 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 14 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
12. Separate vote: paragraph 16 § 16 Separate vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Paragraph 18 — part 1 of 2 § 18 Part 1: ‘Believes that the recent allegations might constitute sanctionable behaviour under its Code of Conduct and if confirmed must be met with the firmest response;’ Split vote requested by ID
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
14. Paragraph 18 — part 2 13:47 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 18/2 Part 2: ‘underlines the importance of immediately conducting a thorough internal investigation in order to assess all possible cases of foreign interference from Russia and other countries in the European Parliament;’ Split vote requested by ID · Roll call requested by ID
Adopted
15. Paragraph 18 — part 2 of 2 § 18 Part 2: ‘underlines the importance of immediately conducting a thorough internal investigation in order to assess all possible cases of foreign interference from Russia and other countries in the European Parliament;’ Split vote requested by ID · Roll call requested by ID
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
16. Paragraph 20 — part 1 13:47 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 20/1 Part 1: ‘Calls for Parliament to introduce mandatory, effective and regular training on security, interference, ethical standards, compliance and integrity for all MEPs and their offices and for all Parliament staff,’ Split vote requested by ECR
Adopted
17. Separate vote: paragraph 20 § 20 Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Paragraph 20 — part 3 13:48 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 20/3 Part 3: ‘calls for Parliament’s services to put in place effective monitoring and surveillance systems to detect foreign interference while respecting MEPs’ freedom of mandate;’ Split vote requested by ECR
Adopted
19. Paragraph 21 — part 1 of 2 § 21 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘through a dedicated parliamentary body’” Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Paragraph 21 — part 2 of 2 § 21 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
21. Amendments 12 + 1 (voted as one) 13:48 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 24 - Am 12PC1 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
22. Amendments 12 + 2 (voted as one) 13:48 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 25 - Am 12PC2 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
23. Separate vote: paragraph 25 § 25 Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Paragraph 25 — part 2 13:48 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 25/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
25. Paragraph 27 — part 1 of 4 § 27 Part 1: ‘Insists on the need to do more to protect the European information environment and EU citizens’ right to access reliable information;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
26. Paragraph 27 — part 2 of 4 § 27 Part 2: ‘recalls the need to establish, as stated in Parliament’s previous reports, ‘mirror clauses’ whereby the openness of the European information space to third countries would be proportionate to the access European media outlets have in these countries;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
27. Paragraph 27 — part 3 of 4 § 27 Part 3: ‘underlines that the media outlets working for hostile and authoritarian regimes should not have access to European Parliament premises;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
28. Paragraph 27 — part 4 13:49 RC-B9-0262/2024 - § 27/4 Part 4: ‘insists that labelling on platforms should go beyond identifying deep fakes to also establish positive labelling using tools created by the media sector, such as the Journalism Trust Initiative;’ Split vote requested by ECR · Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
29. Paragraph 27 — part 4 of 4 § 27 Part 4: ‘insists that labelling on platforms should go beyond identifying deep fakes to also establish positive labelling using tools created by the media sector, such as the Journalism Trust Initiative;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
30. Amendment 5 13:49 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant C - Am 5 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
31. Recital C — part 1 of 2 Recital C Part 1: ‘whereas Russia has systematically maintained contacts with far-right and far-left parties, and other personalities and movements to gain support from institutional actors within the Union in order to legitimise its illegal and criminal actions; whereas analysis of voting patterns and speeches in the European Parliament has shown these parties to have been the most sympathetic to Russia, including calls as extreme as those made in public in January 2024 by Member of the European Parliament (MEP) Miroslav Radačovský – who was also paid by Russian sources to observe the parliamentary elections in Russia in 2021 – for the destruction of Europe;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
32. Recital C — part 2 of 2 Recital C Part 2: ‘whereas the Hungarian Fidesz party has been spreading pro-Kremlin messages and propaganda;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
33. Amendment 13 13:49 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant C - Am 13 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
34. Amendment 6 13:50 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant N - Am 6 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
35. Recital N — part 1 of 4 Recital N Part 1: ‘whereas, according to media analyses, since August 2023, 16 far-right MEPs from Germany, France, the Netherlands, Italy, Slovakia, Estonia, Spain, Croatia, Denmark and Belgium participated in debates and interviews organised by ‘Voice of Europe’;’ without the words ‘far-right’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
36. Recital N — part 2 of 4 Recital N Part 2: ‘far-right’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
37. Recital N — part 3 of 4 Recital N Part 3: ‘whereas the vast majority of these politicians tend to normalise manifestations of hatred and intolerance based on race, national origin or sexual orientation and to project a vision of Russia as the authentic keeper of traditional family values;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
38. Recital N — part 4 of 4 Recital N Part 4: ‘whereas the public discourse of those politicians is leading to dangerous divisions in society as a whole, and is a threat to democracy;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
39. Separate vote: recital Q 13:50 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant Q Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
40. Separate vote: recital R 13:50 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant R Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
41. Amendment 3 13:50 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant R - Am 3 Roll call requested by ID
Rejected
42. Recital T — part 1 of 2 Recital T Part 1: ‘whereas there is credible evidence that, in 2020, Peter Pelligrini, then Prime Minister of Slovakia, requested the help of the Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban to obtain support from the Kremlin ahead of Slovakia’s 2020 parliamentary election; whereas this resulted in a visit by Prime Minister Pelligrini to Russia in February 2020, three days before the elections were held;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
43. Recital T — part 2 of 2 Recital T Part 2: ‘whereas the 2023 parliamentary elections were targeted by further Russian interference and disinformation campaigns; whereas Peter Pelligrini is now President-elect of Slovakia and due to take office in June 2024;’ Split vote requested by ECR
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
44. Separate vote: recital W Recital W
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
45. Amendment 7 13:51 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Considérant Z - Am 7 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
46. Amendment 8 13:51 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant Z - Am 8 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
47. Amendment 9 13:51 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Après le considérant Z - Am 9 Roll call requested by ECR
Rejected
48. Final vote — text as a whole 13:51 RC-B9-0262/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
49. Alternative motion B9-0261/2024 B9-0261/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
50. Alternative motion B9-0262/2024 B9-0262/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
51. Alternative motion B9-0263/2024 B9-0263/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
52. Alternative motion B9-0264/2024 B9-0264/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
53. Alternative motion B9-0265/2024 B9-0265/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
54. Alternative motion B9-0266/2024 B9-0266/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
13

Attempts to reintroduce a foreign agent law in Georgia and its restrictions on civil society

Motion for a resolution · voted at 13:53

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 425 Against 25 Abstained 30

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:53 · 89% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew, PPE and ECR; opposed by ESN; PfE mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 10 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 adopted). 5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by Renew, ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 10 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 3 13:53 RC-B9-0244/2024 - Après le § 12 - Am 3 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
2. Amendment 1 13:53 RC-B9-0244/2024 - Après le § 14 - Am 1 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
3. Amendment 4 13:53 RC-B9-0244/2024 - Après le § 15 - Am 4 Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
4. Amendments 2 + 5 (voted as one) 13:53 RC-B9-0244/2024 - Après le § 15 - Am 2= 5= Roll call requested by ECR, Renew
Adopted
5. Final vote — text as a whole 13:53 RC-B9-0244/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Adopted
6. Alternative motion B9-0244/2024 B9-0244/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
7. Alternative motion B9-0246/2024 B9-0246/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
8. Alternative motion B9-0247/2024 B9-0247/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
9. Alternative motion B9-0248/2024 B9-0248/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Alternative motion B9-0251/2024 B9-0251/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
14

Iran’s unprecedented attack against Israel, the need for de-escalation and an EU response

Motion for a resolution · voted 13:54–13:58

Adopted Adopted by an overwhelming majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 357 Against 20 Abstained 58

Final vote — text as a whole at 13:58 · 82% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left
  • Verts/ALE ~
  • S&D
  • Renew
  • PPE
  • ECR
  • PfE
  • ESN
  • NI

Backed by S&D, Renew, PPE, ECR, PfE and ESN; The Left mostly abstained; Verts/ALE split.

How the vote unfolded · 40 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 14 amendments (4 adopted, 10 rejected) and 18 parts of the text voted on separately (9 adopted, 6 rejected, 3 lapsed). 7 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

Roll calls requested by The Left, Verts/ALE, Renew, ECR, ID · split votes by PPE, ID.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 40 ballots in voting order
1. Separate vote: paragraph 1 13:54 RC-B9-0235/2024 - § 1 Roll call requested by ID
Adopted
2. Amendment 1 13:54 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 1 - Am 1 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
3. Amendment 2 13:54 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 1 - Am 2 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
4. Separate vote: paragraph 2 § 2
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
5. Amendment 3 13:54 RC-B9-0235/2024 - § 2 - Am 3 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
6. Amendment 4 13:54 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 2 - Am 4 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
7. Separate vote: paragraph 6 § 6
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
8. Amendment 19 13:55 RC-B9-0235/2024 - § 9 - Am 19 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
9. Separate vote: paragraph 9 § 9
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
10. Separate vote: paragraph 9 § 9
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
11. Separate vote: paragraph 9 § 9
Lapsed
12. Amendment 6 13:55 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 9 - Am 6 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
13. Separate vote: after paragraph 9 After § 9
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
14. Amendment 7 13:55 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 9 - Am 7 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
15. Amendment 8 13:56 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 9 - Am 8 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
16. Amendment 9 13:56 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 9 - Am 9 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
17. Paragraph 11 — part 1 of 2 § 11 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘the E3 (France, Germany, the UK) and its partners to consider imposing a deadline on Iran to comply with its obligations under the JCPOA and, in the event of non-compliance,’” Split vote requested by PPE
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
18. Paragraph 11 — part 2 of 2 § 11 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by PPE
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
19. Amendment 20 13:56 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 11 - Am 20 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
20. Amendment 21 13:57 RC-B9-0235/2024 - § 12 - Am 21 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
21. Separate vote: paragraph 14 § 14
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
22. Separate vote: paragraph 14 § 14
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Amendment 10 13:57 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 18 - Am 10 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
24. Separate vote: paragraph 19 § 19 Split vote requested by ID
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
25. Paragraph 19 — part 2 13:57 RC-B9-0235/2024 - § 19/2 Part 2: “those words” Split vote requested by ID · Roll call requested by ID
Adopted
26. Amendment 11 13:57 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Après le § 19 - Am 11 Roll call requested by The Left
Rejected
27. Separate vote: before Citation 1 Before Citation 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
28. Separate vote: before Citation 1 Before Citation 1
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
29. Separate vote: after Citation 7 After Citation 7
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Separate vote: after Citation 8 After Citation 8
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
31. Separate vote: recital H 13:58 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Considérant H Roll call requested by Renew
Adopted
32. Amendment 18 13:58 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Considérant M - Am 18 Roll call requested by ECR
Adopted
33. Final vote — text as a whole 13:58 RC-B9-0235/2024 - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte) Roll call requested by Verts/ALE, Renew
Adopted
34. Alternative motion B9-0235/2024 B9-0235/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
35. Alternative motion B9-0237/2024 B9-0237/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
36. Alternative motion B9-0239/2024 B9-0239/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
37. Alternative motion B9-0240/2024 B9-0240/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
38. Alternative motion B9-0249/2024 B9-0249/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
39. Alternative motion B9-0250/2024 B9-0250/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
40. Alternative motion B9-0252/2024 B9-0252/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
15

The new security law in Hong Kong and the cases of Andy Li and Joseph John

Motion for a resolution

Adopted Adopted

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

Final vote — text as a whole — decided by show of hands; no counts were recorded.

How the vote unfolded · 6 ballots

5 alternative motions lapsed once the text was adopted.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

Show all 6 ballots in voting order
1. Final vote — text as a whole Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Alternative motion B9-0238/2024 B9-0238/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
3. Alternative motion B9-0241/2024 B9-0241/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
4. Alternative motion B9-0254/2024 B9-0254/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
5. Alternative motion B9-0257/2024 B9-0257/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed
6. Alternative motion B9-0258/2024 B9-0258/2024
show of hands — no individual positions recorded
Lapsed