Skip to content
9 New EU laws ·decision 9 of 17 on Tuesday, 12 March 2024

Substantiation and communication of explicit environmental claims (Green Claims Directive)

Committee report by Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip · · voted 13:37–13:40

Parliament’s position on proposed laws. It usually needs to agree with the Council before a law is final.

Adopted by a large majority 467 for · 65 against · 74 abstained (77 % in favour)

What Parliament decided

Adopted Passed by a large majority

Parliament adopted its position on the law.

For 467 Against 65 Abstained 74

Final vote at 13:40 · 77% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR –
  • PfE ✗
  • ESN ✗
  • NI ~

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by PfE and ESN; ECR mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 30 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (2 adopted) and 22 parts of the text voted on separately (9 adopted, 5 rejected, 8 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by Verts/ALE, ID · split votes by ECR · separate votes by Renew, PPE, ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 30 ballots in voting order
1. Amendments by the committee responsible — put to the vote collectively Amendments by the committee responsible – put to the vote collectively
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
2. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
3. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Amendment 48 13:37 A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 48 requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
6. Amendments by the committee responsible — separate vote Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
7. Amendment 145 13:37 A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Amendments by the committee responsible – separate vote – Am 145 requested by Verts/ALE
Adopted
8. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Separate vote on Article 1, paragraph 2, point k
— no individual positions recorded
10. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
11. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, point h
— no individual positions recorded
12. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
13. Separate vote on Article 3, paragraph 1, after point h
— no individual positions recorded
14. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
15. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
16. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
17. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
18. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
19. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
20. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
21. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
22. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 3
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
23. Separate vote on Article 3, after paragraph 4
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
24. Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
25. Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 1
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
26. Separate vote on Article 17, paragraph 3, subparagraph 2
— no individual positions recorded
Rejected
27. Separate vote on recital 32
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
29. Vote on text inserted after recital 68
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Rejected
30. Final vote 13:40 A9-0056/2024 – Cyrus Engerer, Andrus Ansip – Commission proposal
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 12 March 2024. The vote was taken on Report A-9-2024-0056 in procedure 2023/0085.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site