8 Resolutions & reports ·decision 8 of 13 on Thursday, 29 February 2024

EU/Chile Advanced Framework Agreement (resolution)

Committee report by María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela · voted 12:06–12:08

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a clear majority 319 for · 113 against · 121 abstained (58 % in favour)

The vote ✦ In short Full text Procedure

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a clear majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 319 Against 113 Abstained 121

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:08 · 58% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it

The Left ✗
Verts/ALE –
S&D ✓
Renew ✓
PPE ✓
ECR –
PfE ✗
ESN ✗
NI ✗

Backed by S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by The Left, PfE and ESN; Verts/ALE and ECR mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 19 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 4 amendments (4 rejected) and 14 parts of the text voted on separately (6 adopted, 8 rejected).

Roll calls requested by Renew, ID · split votes by S&D, PPE (3).

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 19 ballots in voting order

1. Separate vote on paragraph 2

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

2. Separate vote on paragraph 7

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

3. Paragraph 11 — part 1 12:06 Accord-cadre avancé UE/Chili (résolution) - EU/Chile Advanced Framework Agreement (Resolution) - Fortgeschrittenes Rahmenabkommen EU/Chile (Entschließung) - A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - § 11/1 Part 1: ‘Reiterates the importance of the protection of the rights of indigenous peoples in line with the international agreements such as UNDRIP’ requested by PPE requested by Renew

Adopted

4. Paragraph 11 — part 2 12:06 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - § 11/2 Part 2: ‘and ILO Convention 169, including the respect of the free, prior and informed consent (FPIC) of local communities and indigenous peoples; requested by PPE requested by Renew

Adopted

5. Paragraph 31 — part 1 12:06 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - § 31/1 Part 1: ‘Welcomes the recognition of indigenous peoples’ knowledge and practices under the TSD chapter;’ requested by PPE requested by Renew

Adopted

6. Paragraph 31 — part 2 12:06 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - § 31/2 Part 2: ‘regrets, however, that ILO Convention 169 and the UN principle of free prior and informed consent enshrined in UNDRIP, which uphold the rights of indigenous peoples in trade relations, are not explicitly mentioned;’ requested by PPE requested by Renew

Adopted

7. Amendment 5 to paragraph 34 12:07 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - § 34 - Am 5 requested by ID

Rejected

8. Amendment 6, adding text after paragraph 34 12:07 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - Après le § 34 - Am 6 requested by ID

Rejected

9. Separate vote on paragraph 35

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

10. Amendment 8, adding text after paragraph 36 12:07 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - Après le § 36 - Am 8 requested by ID

Rejected

11. Separate vote on paragraph 43

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

12. Separate vote on paragraph 43

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

13. Paragraph 49 — part 1 12:07 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - § 49/1 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘including the right to free, prior and informed consent’” requested by PPE requested by Renew

Adopted

14. Paragraph 49 — part 2 12:08 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - § 49/2 Part 2: “those words” requested by PPE requested by Renew

Adopted

15. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 49

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

16. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 49

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

17. Separate vote on paragraph 54

— no individual positions recorded

Rejected

18. Amendment 4, adding text after recital G 12:08 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - Après le considérant G - Am 4 requested by ID

Rejected

19. Final vote — text as a whole 12:08 A9-0017/2024 - María Soraya Rodríguez Ramos, Samira Rafaela - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)

Adopted

Part of the sitting of Thursday, 29 February 2024. The vote was taken on Report A-9-2024-0017 in procedure 2023/0260R.

New here? How plenary voting works

A sitting: One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots: Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how: Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure: Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges: How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — ; *** — ; * —
Lapsed —
A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site