Parliament adopted the text as its official position.
For 305Against 157Abstained 71
Final vote — text as a whole at 12:23 · 57% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →
Who backed it
The Left ✗
Verts/ALE ✓
S&D ✓
Renew ✓
PPE ✓
ECR ✗
PfE ✗
ESN ✗
NI ✗
Backed by Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by The Left, ECR, PfE and ESN.
How the vote unfolded · 18 ballots
Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 17 parts of the text voted on separately (17 adopted).
Roll call requested by PPE · split votes by PPE (8).
adoptedrejectedlapsedsquare = amendmentcircle = part of the textdecisive voteSolid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions
All 18 ballots in voting order
1.Separate vote on paragraph 17A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
2.Paragraph 17 — part 212:20Approfondir l’intégration européenne dans la perspective des futurs élargissements - Deepening EU integration in view of future enlargement - Vertiefung der EU-Integration mit Blick auf eine künftige Erweiterung - A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - § 17/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
3.Separate vote on paragraph 31A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
4.Paragraph 31 — part 212:20A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - § 31/2Part 2: ‘calls on the EU Institutions and Member States to undertake the necessary reforms to ensure that their absence does not delay the accession of new Member States;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
Adopted
5.Paragraph 31 — part 312:20A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - § 31/3Part 3: ‘reiterates, therefore, its calls to grant Parliament a general and direct right of legislative initiative;’A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
Adopted
6.Separate vote on paragraph 32A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
7.Paragraph 32 — part 212:21A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - § 32/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
8.Separate vote on paragraph 33A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
9.Paragraph 33 — part 212:21A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - § 33/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
10.Separate vote on paragraph 35A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
11.Paragraph 35 — part 212:21A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - § 35/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
12.Separate vote on paragraph 40A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
13.Paragraph 40 — part 212:22A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - § 40/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE·A vote in which every MEP’s individual position is recorded and published. requested by PPE
Adopted
14.Recital U — part 1 of 2Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘in the context of a possible revision of the treaties’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
15.Recital U — part 2 of 212:22A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - Considérant U/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
Adopted
16.Recital AA — part 1 of 2Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘and significantly strengthened’”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
A vote by raised hands. Only the outcome is recorded, not who voted how. — no individual
positions recorded
Adopted
17.Recital AA — part 2 of 212:22A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - Considérant AA/2Part 2: “those words”A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another. requested by PPE
Adopted
18.Final vote — text as a whole12:23A9-0015/2024 - Petras Auštrevičius, Pedro Silva Pereira - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).
Codes in ballot labels
Am 27 — amendment 27
§ 5 — paragraph 5
§ 5/2, part 2 — a A paragraph or amendment voted in separate parts, so groups can back one part and oppose another., taken in parts
Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
***I — Parliament’s first vote on a proposed EU law. It sets Parliament’s position for negotiations with the Council.; *** — Parliament can approve or reject the text, for example an international agreement, but cannot amend it.; * — Parliament gives its opinion on a proposal. The Council decides, but must wait for Parliament’s opinion.
Lapsed — Not put to a vote, because an earlier vote already settled the matter.