Skip to content

← Decision 7 Decision 9 →

8 Resolutions & reports ·decision 8 of 16 on Tuesday, 16 January 2024

Implementation of the Erasmus+ programme 2021-2027

Committee report by Milan Zver · voted 12:06–12:07

Non-binding texts in which Parliament states its position on a topic. They carry political weight but do not create law.

Adopted by a large majority 486 for · 62 against · 61 abstained (80 % in favour)
The vote✦ In shortFull textProcedure

What Parliament decided

Adopted Adopted by a large majority

Parliament adopted the text as its official position.

For 486 Against 62 Abstained 61

Final vote — text as a whole at 12:07 · 80% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

Who backed it
  • The Left ✓
  • Verts/ALE ✓
  • S&D ✓
  • Renew ✓
  • PPE ✓
  • ECR ✗
  • PfE –
  • ESN –
  • NI ✓

Backed by The Left, Verts/ALE, S&D, Renew and PPE; opposed by ECR; PfE and ESN mostly abstained.

How the vote unfolded · 9 ballots

Before the final vote, MEPs decided on 2 amendments (1 adopted, 1 rejected) and 6 parts of the text voted on separately (5 adopted, 1 lapsed).

Roll calls requested by Renew, ECR, ID · split votes by ECR · separate votes by ECR.

adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

All 9 ballots in voting order
1. Amendment 1, adding text after paragraph 52 12:06 Exécution du programme Erasmus+ 2021-2027 - Implementation of the Erasmus+ programme 2021-2027 - Durchführung des Programms Erasmus+ 2021-2027 - A9-0413/2023 - Milan Zver - Après le § 52 - Am 1 requested by Renew
Adopted
2. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 52
— no individual positions recorded
3. Separate vote on paragraph 60 requested by ECR
electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
Adopted
4. Paragraph 61 — part 1 of 2 Part 1: “Text as a whole without the words: ‘to strengthen its work with stakeholders on European “inclusion targets” for the programme’” requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
5. Paragraph 61 — part 2 of 2 Part 2: “those words” requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
6. Separate vote on paragraph 117 12:07 A9-0413/2023 - Milan Zver - § 117 requested by ECR
Adopted
7. Amendment 2, adding text after paragraph 117 12:07 A9-0413/2023 - Milan Zver - Après le § 117 - Am 2 requested by ID
Rejected
8. Separate vote on recital G requested by ECR
— no individual positions recorded
Adopted
9. Final vote — text as a whole 12:07 A9-0413/2023 - Milan Zver - Proposition de résolution (ensemble du texte)
Adopted

Part of the sitting of Tuesday, 16 January 2024. The vote was taken on Report A-9-2023-0413 in procedure 2023/2002.

New here? How plenary voting works
A sitting
One day of voting in plenary. Each subject is a report, resolution, agreement or objection; they are grouped by kind of decision, and each group says what “adopted” means there.
The ballots
Members vote on amendments and on parts of the text first, then on the text as a whole. That final, decisive vote is the result shown at the top of each subject.
Who voted how
Only roll-call votes record each Member’s vote — open one for every name and the breakdown by group. A show of hands records the outcome only.
Document & procedure
Each subject rests on a document (a committee report, a motion, a Council or Commission text) and belongs to a procedure, the whole file that can span years.
Group badges
How most of a group voted: ✓ For · ✗ Against · – Abstained · ~ Split (no majority).

Codes in ballot labels

  • Am 27 — amendment 27
  • § 5 — paragraph 5
  • § 5/2, part 2 — a , taken in parts
  • Am 3= 7= — identical amendments voted together
  • ***I — ; *** — ; * —
  • Lapsed —
  • A10-… — committee report; B10-… — motion
  • RC-B10-… — joint motion of several groups

All the terms used on this site