Skip to content
Own-initiative report First reading

Protection of the European Union’s financial interests – combating fraud – annual report 2023

Parliament sets out its own position on a topic. The resolution is not binding but signals what Parliament wants.

Where it stands: Parliament adopted the text on 6 May 2025. This is its final position on the matter.

  1. ✓ Referred to committee 28 November 2024
  2. ✓ Committee work Report adopted 18 March 2025
  3. ✓ Tabled for plenary 1 April 2025
  4. ✓ Plenary vote Adopted 6 May 2025
  5. ✓ Parliament’s position Final
How a file moves through Parliament

A file is referred to one lead committee (others may give an opinion). Its rapporteur writes a draft report, committee members table amendments, and the committee votes to adopt the report. The report is then tabled for all MEPs; political groups can table further amendments, which are voted on before the final vote in plenary. The adopted resolution is Parliament’s final position; it is not itself law.

Who is working on it

Lead committee
CONT — Budgetary Control
Rapporteur
Gilles BOYER Renew
Shadow rapporteurs
Caterina CHINNICI PPEEero HEINÄLUOMA S&DVirginie JORON PfEDaniel FREUND Verts/ALERudi KENNES The LeftAlexander JUNGBLUTH ESN

The rapporteur drafts and negotiates the text for the lead committee; each other political group names a shadow rapporteur to follow the file.

The text, version by version

Latest Tabled for plenary → Adopted by Parliament: Adds new paragraphs on VAT gap data and IT fragmentation, and rewrites a paragraph on NGO funding transparency. The other changes are formal: decimal separators updated, paragraph numbering adjusted, and references corrected. see the changes →

Committee draft → Tabled for plenary: Adds calls for stronger cooperation, holistic approaches, and proactive measures across anti-fraud actors, including on information exchange and synergies between authorities. Updates fraud statistics, noting a significant increase in cases and financial impact, and adds calls for improved recovery rates and transparency on recoveries. Adds extensive new paragraphs on AI-related fraud risks, digitalisation, and data sharing, proposing new mechanisms and task forces. Expands sections on rule of law, corruption, organised crime, and external action, including new paragraphs on Hungary, Ukraine, and sanctions. The other changes are formal or wording: renumbering, minor rephrasing, and spelling corrections. see the changes →

Newest version first. Open a version to read it in full. “What changed” shows the differences paragraph by paragraph; ✦ lines are AI-written from the texts themselves.

Timeline

  1. Plenary stage
  2. Adopted Adopted by a large majority
    For 473 Against 59 Abstained 114

    Final vote — text as a whole at 13:22 · 73% of votes cast in favour · every MEP’s position →

    How the vote unfolded · 33 ballots

    adopted rejected lapsed square = amendment circle = part of the text decisive vote Solid = roll call (click for every MEP’s vote); faded = no individual positions

    Show all 33 ballots in voting order
    1. Amendment 9, adding text after paragraph 1 13:16 A10–0049/2025 – Gilles Boyer – After § 1 – Am 9
    Rejected
    2. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 2
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    3. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 5
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    4. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 14
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    5. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 14
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    6. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 24
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    7. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 26
    electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    8. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 27
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    9. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    10. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    electronic vote (totals only) — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    11. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    — no individual positions recorded
    12. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    — no individual positions recorded
    13. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    — no individual positions recorded
    14. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    — no individual positions recorded
    15. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    — no individual positions recorded
    16. Separate vote on paragraph 36
    — no individual positions recorded
    17. Amendment 14, adding text after paragraph 36 13:19 A10–0049/2025 – Gilles Boyer – After § 36 – Am 14
    Rejected
    18. Amendment 15, adding text after paragraph 68 13:19 A10–0049/2025 – Gilles Boyer – After § 68 – Am 15
    Rejected
    19. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 68
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    20. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 70
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    21. Separate vote on paragraph 71
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    22. Separate vote on paragraph 72
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    23. Separate vote on paragraph 73
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    24. Vote on text inserted after paragraph 73
    — no individual positions recorded
    Rejected
    25. Separate vote on paragraph 75
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    26. Separate vote on paragraph 90
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    27. Separate vote on paragraph 90
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    28. Separate vote on paragraph 117
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    29. Vote on text inserted after recital F
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    30. Amendment 7, adding text after recital F 13:21 A10–0049/2025 – Gilles Boyer – After recital F – Am 7
    Rejected
    31. Amendment 8, adding text after recital L 13:21 A10–0049/2025 – Gilles Boyer – After recital L – Am 8
    Rejected
    32. Separate vote on recital M
    — no individual positions recorded
    Adopted
    33. Final vote — text as a whole 13:22 A10–0049/2025 – Gilles Boyer – Motion for a resolution (as a whole)
    Adopted
  3. 5 May 2025 Debated in plenary

    MEPs debated the text in the chamber ahead of the vote.

  4. 29 April – 30 April 2025 19 amendments tabled for the plenary vote

    Groups propose changes to the tabled text; each is voted on before the final vote.

  5. 1 April 2025 Report tabled for plenary

    This is the text all MEPs vote on. Political groups can still table amendments to it.

  6. Committee stage
  7. 18 March 2025 Committee vote: report adopted

    CONT (Budgetary Control) voted on the amendments and adopted the report that goes to plenary.

  8. 5 February 2025 Amendments tabled in committee

    Members of CONT (Budgetary Control) proposed changes to the draft.

  9. 18 December 2024 Draft report published

    The rapporteur’s first text in CONT (Budgetary Control). Members can table amendments before the committee votes.

  10. 28 November 2024 Referred to the CONT (Budgetary Control) committee

    The lead committee prepares Parliament’s report.