Sittings · Document

Draft report (COM(2025)0180 – C100072/2025 – 2025/0097(COD)) 2026-01-28

Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Directive 2014/45/EU on periodic roadworthiness tests for motor vehicles and their trailers and Directive 2014/47/EU on the technical roadside inspection of the roadworthiness of commercial vehicles circulating in the Union

Committee on Transport and Tourism

Official HTML ↗ PDF DOCX

Amendment 440

Julien Leonardelli, Philippe Olivier

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point vii

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – item 1.2.2

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
1.2.2. Efficiency	Test with a brake tester or, if one cannot be used for technical reasons, by a road test using a deceleration recording instrument to establish the braking ratio which relates (a) to the maximum authorised mass or, (b) in the case of semi-trailers, to the sum of the authorised axle loads, or (c) to reference values. Vehicles or a trailer with a maximum permissible mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes must be inspected following the standards given by ISO 21069 or equivalent methods. For vehicles not inspected following the standards given by ISO 21069 or equivalent methods, if the minimum figure of braking ratio is not achieved, at least meaningful brake testing must be performed. Meaningful brake testing is performed if brake efficiency is below the service, secondary or parking values prescribed in 1.2.2 or 1.3.2 or 1.4.2 but all the following conditions are met: — the braking system is in good condition with no obvious defects, — wheels of all axles lock because adhesion between the tyre and brake tester surface was exhausted during the brake test; if wheels on some axles do not lock, it must be safely concluded that the braking efficiency values prescribed in 1.2.2 or 1.3.2 or 1.4.2 would be achieved when the vehicle is loaded, — brake actuation level by the inspector must always be proportional to the current load of the axle. Information on system values may be retrieved using electronic vehicle interface. Road tests should be carried out under dry conditions on a flat, straight road. In cases where vehicles of R or T category are tested on the road, meaningful brake testing is performed if all the above conditions are met. In case of doubt, the braking efficiency shall be demonstrated in loaded or partially loaded condition.	Does not give at least the minimum figure as follows (1): 1. Vehicles registered for the first time after 1/1/2012: — Category M1: 58 % — Categories M2 and M3: 50 % — Category N1 50 % — Categories N2 and N3: 50 % — Categories O2, O3 and O4: — for semi-trailers: 45 % (2) — for draw-bar trailers: 50 %		X
		2. Vehicles registered for the first time before 1/1/2012: — Categories M1, M2 and M3: 50 % (3) — Category N1: 45 % — Categories N2 and N3: 43 % (4) — Categories O2, O3 and O4: 40 % (5)		X
		3. Other categories Categories L (both brakes together): — Category L1e: 42 % — Categories L2e, L6e: 40 % — Category L3e: 50 % — Category L4e: 46 % — Categories L5e, L7e: 44 % Category L (rear wheel brake): all categories: 25 % of the total vehicle mass Category T: 40 % Less than 50 % of the above values reached.		X
Amendment
(vii) the following entry in item 1.2.2. is deleted:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
1.2.2. Efficiency	Test with a brake tester or, if one cannot be used for technical reasons, by a road test using a deceleration recording instrument to establish the braking ratio which relates (a) to the maximum authorised mass or, (b) in the case of semi-trailers, to the sum of the authorised axle loads, or (c) to reference values. Vehicles or a trailer with a maximum permissible mass exceeding 3,5 tonnes must be inspected following the standards given by ISO 21069 or equivalent methods. For vehicles not inspected following the standards given by ISO 21069 or equivalent methods, if the minimum figure of braking ratio is not achieved, at least meaningful brake testing must be performed. Information on system values may be retrieved using electronic vehicle interface. Road tests should be carried out under dry conditions on a flat, straight road. In cases where vehicles of R or T category are tested on the road, meaningful brake testing is performed if all the above conditions are met. In case of doubt, the braking efficiency shall be demonstrated in loaded or partially loaded condition.	Does not give at least the minimum figure as follows (1): 1. Vehicles registered for the first time after 1/1/2012: — Category M1: 58 % — Categories M2 and M3: 50 % — Category N1 50 % — Categories N2 and N3: 50 % — Categories O2, O3 and O4: — for semi-trailers: 45 % (2) — for draw-bar trailers: 50 %		X
		2. Vehicles registered for the first time before 1/1/2012: — Categories M1, M2 and M3: 50 % (3) — Category N1 45 % — Categories N2 and N3: 43 % (4) — Categories O2, O3 and O4: 40 % (5)		X
		3. Other categories Categories L (both brakes together): — Category L1e: 42 % — Categories L2e, L6e: 40 % — Category L3e: 50 % — Category L4e: 46 % — Categories L5e, L7e: 44 % Category L (rear wheel brake): all categories: 25 % of the total vehicle mass Category T: 40 % Less than 50 % of the above values reached.		X

Or. fr

Justification

In practice, if this wording is maintained, there is a risk that vehicles with defective or unsatisfactory brakes will be type-approved. In view of the risk involved, we propose deleting this one entry from the table.

Amendment 441

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 4.14.3

	Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure		Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.3 Traction battery	Visual inspection, complemented by using the vehicle interface (where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle, and where the necessary data is available).	(a) Marks of leakage Leaking (presence of droplets)		X
		(b) Incorrect software or hardware, or readiness-code not active			X
Amendment
(xxiv) in the table, item 4.14.3 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure		Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.3 Traction battery	Visual inspection, complemented by using the vehicle interface (where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle, and where the necessary data is available). Determination of the State of Health, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle (to be specified in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in Article 17).	(b) Marks of leakage Leaking (presence of droplets)		X
		(b) Incorrect software or hardware, or readiness-code not active			X
		(c) Minimum thresholds not reached [to be specified in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in Article 17]		X

Or. en

Justification

The state of health of batteries was not included in the COM proposal - by including this, owners and buyers can have better information about the functioning of the batteries in vehicles that use such technology for propulsion and for safety purposes.

Amendment 442

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 4.14.4.3

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.4.3 Ground continuity (X)2	Measurement using an ohmmeter	Test not feasible	X
		Too high resistance (over 100 Ohms)		X
Amendment
In the table, item 4.14.4.3 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.4.3 Ground continuity	Measurement using an ohmmeter	Test not feasible	X
		Too high resistance (over 100 m)		X

Or. en

Justification

The test with 100 Ohms is senseless. In ECE R100 100milliOhms is defined and this is the correct value measuring ground continuity or earth conductor. 100 Ohms is not a valid reference value. Inspection of this point should be mandatory, given that it is part of the R100 regulation.

Amendment 443

Rachel Blom

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 4.14.4.6

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.4.6 Charging cable	Visual inspection and by operation.	(a) Deteriorated (b) Charging cable not provided	X X
Amendment
xxiv in the table, item 4.14.4.6 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

This is not a safety-relevant item; it creates unnecessary failures and administrative burden (and is also impractical, as not every charging context requires a cable to be carried in the vehicle).

Amendment 444

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 4.14.5

Text proposed by the Commission
4.14.5. High voltage electrical and electronical equipment (X)2
Amendment
in the table, item 4.14.5 is replaced by the following:
4.14.5. High voltage electrical and electronical equipment

Or. en

Justification

Under point 4.14.5. High voltage electrical and electronical equipment (X)2 should be tested as follows:

 4.14.5.1. High voltage electrical and electronic equipment

 4.14.5.2. Traction motor

 4.14.5.3. Electronic converters, motor, and inverter

Electric vehicles are becoming increasingly popular. Proper functioning of these components is crucial for safety reasons. Verification of them should be mandatory during the PTI.

Amendment 445

Rachel Blom

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 4.14.5.2

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.5.2. Traction motor	Visual inspection Check of operational readiness of the systems by an applicable interface (OBD or OBM) Measurement of equipotential bonding, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle		X X
Amendment
(4.14.5.2) sub 3 is deleted
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.5.2. Traction motor	Visual inspection Check of operational readiness of the systems by an applicable interface (OBD or OBM)		X X

Or. en

Justification

Cannot be checked without dismantling; disproportionate cost, time and risk of damage.

Amendment 446

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 4.14.6

Text proposed by the Commission
4.14.6. Insulation resistance (X)2
Amendment
in the table, item 4.14.6 is replaced by the following:
4.14.6. Insulation resistance

Or. en

Justification

Electric vehicles are becoming increasingly popular. Verification of insulation resistance should be mandatory for safety reasons during the PTI. This key point is part of the ECE R100 regulation.

Amendment 447

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxviii

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 5.3.2.1.1

Text proposed by the Commission
5.3.2.1. efficiency testing of damping (X)2	Using special equipment and compare left/right differences	a) Significant difference between left and right. b) Given minimum values not reached.
2 (X) identifies items which relate to the condition of the vehicle and its suitability for use on the road but which are not considered essential in a roadworthiness test.
Amendment
in the table, item 5.3.2.1 is replaced by the following:
5.3.2.1. efficiency testing of damping	Using special equipment and comparing left/ right differences, or based on the measurement of oscillation behaviour or damping of the vehicle	a) Significant difference between left and right. b) Given minimum values not reached.
deleted

Or. en

Justification

The need for an effective and reliable suspension test is nowadays even more evident with electronic-assisted braking systems and ADAS (Advanced driver-assistance systems) equipped vehicles already on the road, self-driving vehicles soon to come, and heavier EVs.

The suspension system is a vital element for the vehicle's braking ability and direction control. Nowadays, there are suspension testers on the market suitable for testing the suspension systems of vehicles in categories M1 and N1 during statutory periodical technical inspections, whose goal is to ensure road safety. Suspension tests for M1 and N1 category vehicles should be part of the roadworthiness test, as initially proposed by the European Commission.

Amendment 448

Rachel Blom

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxiii

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 8.2.2.3

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
8.2.2.3 Nox-measurement	Vehicle preparation: [to be specified in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in Article 17]; - […] Measuring instrument preparation: — [to be specified in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in Article 17 or combined with PN testing above]; — Self-checks of the instrument [to be specified in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in Article 17]; Before each test, the good condition of the sampling system shall be verified, including checking the sampling hose and probe for damage. Test procedure: — [to be specified in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in Article 17 or combined with PN testing above].	(Measurement result exceeds [NOX limit to be specified in accordance with the delegated acts referred to in Article 17].	X X
Amendment
(8.2.2.3) in the table, item 8.2.2.3 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Due to their limited reliability and high dependency on test conditions, NOx measurements are not suitable as a stand-alone criterion for failure in periodic roadworthiness testing.

Amendment 449

Cynthia Ní Mhurchú

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 8.4.1a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 8.4.1a (new) should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
	Verification that the fuel contained in the tank or fuel-delivery system complies with the applicable fuel-quality standards for the relevant fuel type (including petrol, diesel, biodiesel blends, e-fuel blends, synthetic fuels or other liquid fuels). A fuel sample shall be taken from the tank or fuel line using a standardised sampling procedure. The sample shall be analysed either: (a) by an approved in-situ rapid-analysis device capable of detecting incorrect fuel type, excessive water content, contamination, excessive sulphur levels, excessive fatty-acid methyl ester content, inadequate lubricity or adulteration; or (b) by submission of the sample to an accredited laboratory in accordance with recognised CEN or ISO standards. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the analytical parameters to be verified, the minimum detectable thresholds, the recognition criteria for rapid-test devices and the requirements for accreditation of laboratories.	Fuel sample does not comply with the applicable Union or national fuel-quality standard, including cases of incorrect fuel type, adulteration, contamination, excessive sulphur, fatty-acid methyl ester or water content, insufficient lubricity, presence of foreign matter, or any other prohibited characteristic.		X

Or. en

Amendment 450

Nina Carberry

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxiv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 8.4.1a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 8.4.1a (new) should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
8.4.1a. Fuel Quality	Verification that the fuel contained in the tank or fuel-delivery system complies with the applicable fuel-quality standards for the relevant fuel type (including petrol, diesel, biodiesel blends, e-fuel blends, synthetic fuels or other liquid fuels). A fuel sample shall be taken from the tank or fuel line using a standardised sampling procedure. The sample shall be analysed either: (a) by an approved in-situ rapid-analysis device capable of detecting incorrect fuel type, excessive water content, contamination, excessive sulphur levels, excessive fatty-acid methyl ester content, inadequate lubricity or adulteration; or (b) by submission of the sample to an accredited laboratory in accordance with recognised CEN or ISO standards. The Commission shall adopt implementing acts specifying the analytical parameters to be verified, the minimum detectable thresholds, the recognition criteria for rapid-test devices and the requirements for accreditation of laboratories.

Or. en

Amendment 451

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.1

Text proposed by the Commission
10.1. Cornering light Description: during cornering, an extra headlamp is activated. Operates up to 40 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 48 or UNECE-R 119.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.1) in the table the item 10.1 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with cornering lights, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning cornering light cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 452

Julien Leonardelli, Philippe Olivier

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – item 10.1

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.1. Cornering light Description: during cornering, an extra headlamp is activated. Operates up to 40 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 48 or UNECE-R 119.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing (b) System or components damaged (c) Software version or -integrity incorrect (d) Wiring damaged (e) Warning device shows system malfunction. (f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users (g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X X	X X X X X X X X	X X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.1. is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.1. Cornering light Description: during cornering, an extra headlamp is activated. Operates up to 40 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 48 or UNECE-R 119.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing (b) System or components damaged (c) Software version or - integrity incorrect (d) Wiring damaged (e) Warning device shows system malfunction. (f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Affecting safe operation of the vehicle (g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (h) Other failure Affecting safe operation of the vehicle		X X X X X X X X

Or. fr

Justification

With regard to points (f) and (h), the minor defects should be deleted as there is no point in including them: if a defect does not affect the safety of the vehicle, it should not be checked during a roadworthiness test. Another point is that it should be difficult for the inspector to differentiate between major and dangerous defects. Therefore, only major defects should be retained.

Amendment 453

Julien Leonardelli, Philippe Olivier

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – item 10.1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.1a (new) should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.1a. ADAS (advanced driver-assistance systems)	Visual inspection: This point shall be used when detailed inspection of ADAS and other safety-related systems is not possible because the necessary data is unavailable and it is not possible to use an electronic interface. This point is not to be used where data is available and the use of an electronic interface is possible. In that case, the following ones are to be used instead.	(a) System or component missing (b) System or components damaged (c) Wiring damaged (d) Warning device shows system malfunction. (e) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface. Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users

Or. fr

Justification

Création d'un nouveau point provisoire pour le contrôle visuel de la fonction ADAS : actuellement, les défauts liés à l'aide à la conduite qui peuvent être détectés par inspection visuelle ne peuvent pas être attribués à un ADAS spécifique en raison de limitations techniques. Nous proposons donc de modifier l'annexe 1 - pendant un nombre d'années limité et jusqu'à ce que l'inspection électronique soit mise en place et fonctionnelle - et de créer un nouveau point 10.1a. Ce nouveau point permettrait de regrouper les défauts liés à l'ADAS pouvant être détectés par inspection visuelle, plutôt que de les répertorier systématiquement dans chaque fonction. Ce point permettrait de faciliter le contrôle et l'inspection des véhicules.

Amendment 454

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.2

Text proposed by the Commission
10.2 Adaptive cruise control Description: The system maintains the vehicle's speed, depending on the preferred speed and distance to the vehicle in front	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.2) in the table the item 10.2 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with an adaptive cruise control system, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning adaptive cruise control system cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 455

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.7

Text proposed by the Commission
10.7 Automatic hold function Description: the system independently holds the vehicle after stopping using the service brake and/or parking brake and automatically releases them when starting.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.7) in the table the item 10.7 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with automatic light, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning automatic light cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 456

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.9

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.9 Automatic emergency braking system Description: the system independently starts braking in order to avoid a collision with an obstacle or another road user, or to reduce the consequences of an inevitable impact.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operative (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.9 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.9 Automatic emergency braking system Description: the system independently starts braking in order to avoid a collision with an obstacle or another road user, or to reduce the consequences of an inevitable impact, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 131 or UNECE-R 152.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operative (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendment replicates the approach of COM for other technologies by referring to applicable UNECE regulations.

Amendment 457

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.9

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.9 Automatic emergency braking system Description: the system independently starts braking in order to avoid a collision with an obstacle or another road user, or to reduce the consequences of an inevitable impact.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operative (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.9 Automatic emergency braking system Description: the system independently starts braking in order to avoid a collision with an obstacle or another road user, or to reduce the consequences of an inevitable impact.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operative (for example audio components)		X
	Visual inspection and performance verification, complemented by the use of electronic interface.	(h) Performance failures Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The proper performance verification (system check, component plausibility and functional test) is critical for those safety systems that have been inserted as mandatory under (GSR 2019 2144 and implementing acts), play an active role in road safety (e.g. Automatic emergency braking system, Lane keep assist), and in which a reduction in performance or a calibration loss could create road dangers because of drivers over-reliance on them.

At this moment, it is crucial that the ADAS systems most critical to safety - specifically the Automatic Emergency Braking system (AEB, point 10.09 in the Commission’s proposal) and the Lane Keep Assist (LKA, point 10.47 in the Commission’s proposal) - must undergo not only visual inspections but also functional tests. These should be able to detect potential faults before they lead to accidents.

It is a priority to verify the operation of these two driver assistance systems, as they are the ones that most affect driving behaviour. Should they fail or not function properly, they would pose a greater risk to the safety of the vehicle, its passengers, and other road users.

Amendment 458

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.11

Text proposed by the Commission
10.11 Automatic light Description: depending on the ambient brightness, the system automatically switches on and off the driving light.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.11) in the table the item 10.11 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 459

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.14

Text proposed by the Commission
10.14 Electronic damping Description: depending on the driving situation, the rebound and compression stage of the shock absorbers is adjusted by the system.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.14) in the table the item 10.14 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with electronic damping, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning electronic damping cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 460

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.17

Text proposed by the Commission
10.17 High beam assist Description: the system automatically activates and deactivates the high beam according to the driving situation and lighting conditions.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.17) in the table the item 10.17 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Since the vehicle approval regulations (e.g., GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, or Type Approval Regulation (EU) 2018/858) do not stipulate that vehicles must be equipped with a high beam assist system, this function cannot be required during periodic technical inspections of motor vehicles. If the system malfunctions, this cannot be considered a defect. Inspection resources should be used efficiently by focusing on mandatory safety-related aspects.

Amendment 461

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.19a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.19a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.19a. Belt reminder Description: System that warns the driver in the event a person seated in the front row does not wear their seat belt and/or a person seated in the rear row(s) unbuckles their belt while the vehicle is in motion, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 16.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

This system was not included and is an important technology under the General Safety Regulation for motor vehicles to remind drivers and passengers to wear their seat belts.

Amendment 462

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.19a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.19a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.19a Belt reminder Description: System that warns the driver in the event a person seated in the front row does not wear their seat belt and/or a person seated in the rear row(s) unbuckles their belt while the vehicle is in motion, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 16.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 463

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.19a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.19a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
10.19a Belt reminder Description: System that warns the driver in the event a person seated in the front row does not wear their seat belt and/or a person seated in the rear row(s) unbuckles their belt while the vehicle is in motion, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 16.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 464

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.21

Text proposed by the Commission
10.21 Bending light Description: during cornering and depending on the steering angle and speed, the light beam is swivelled and/or an additional headlight is activated, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 48; UNECE-R 98; UNECE-R 112; or UNECE-R 123.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.21) in the table the item 10.21 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with bending light, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning bending light cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 465

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.22

Text proposed by the Commission
10.22 Steering assist Description: depending on the driving situation, the steering angle is automatically changed, without intervention by the driver. Relevant if the steering intervention occurs at a speed of more than 15 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 79.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.22) in the table the item 10.22 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with a steering assist system, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning system cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 466

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.22

Text proposed by the Commission
10.22 Steering assist Description: depending on the driving situation, the steering angle is automatically changed, without intervention by the driver. Relevant if the steering intervention occurs at a speed of more than 15 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 79.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
Replace item 10.22 by the following:
10.22 Steering assist Description: depending on the driving situation, the steering angle is automatically changed, without intervention by the driver. Relevant if the steering intervention occurs at a speed of more than 15 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 79.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 467

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.28

Text proposed by the Commission
10.28 Superimposed steering Description: depending on the driving situation, the system varies the transmission ratio of the steering.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.28) in the table the item 10.28 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with a superimposed steering system, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning system cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 468

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.38

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.38 Kneeling Description: the system allows a road vehicle to be lowered to make it easier for passengers to board and disembark.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.38 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.38 Kneeling Description: the system allows a road vehicle to be lowered to make it easier for passengers to board and disembark, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 107.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendment replicates the approach of COM for other technologies by referring to applicable UNECE regulations.

Amendment 469

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.44

Text proposed by the Commission
10.44 Adaptive headlights Description: the illumination of the surrounding road area and/or the direct illumination of road users in the danger area in front of the vehicle is optimised by dynamic adaption of the light beams.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv. 10.44) in the table the item 10.44 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with adaptive headlights, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, malfunctioning adaptive headlights cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 470

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.46

Text proposed by the Commission
10.46 Lane change assistance Description: at a lane change, the system warns the driver about vehicles in the next lane and steers the vehicle back.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.46 is replaced by the following:
10.46 Lane change assistance Description: at a lane change, the system warns the driver about vehicles in the next lane and steers the vehicle back.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 471

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.47

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.47 Lane keeping assistance Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane and steers the vehicle back, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/646	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operative (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment: adding a mandatory performance verification to this crucial safety function
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.47 Lane keeping assistance Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane and steers the vehicle back, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/646	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
	Visual inspection and performance verification, complemented by the use of electronic interface.	(h) Performance failures Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

At this moment, it is crucial that the ADAS systems most critical to safety - specifically the Automatic Emergency Braking system (AEB, point 10.09 in the Commission’s proposal) and the Lane Keep Assist (LKA, point 10.47 in the Commission’s proposal) - must undergo not only visual inspections but also functional tests. These should be capable of detecting any potential faults before they lead to accidents.

Amendment 472

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.47

Text proposed by the Commission
10.47 Lane keeping assistance Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane and steers the vehicle back, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/646*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.47 is replaced by the following:
10.47 Lane keeping assistance Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane and steers the vehicle back, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/646*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 473

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.47a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.47a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.47a Lane departure warning Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, UNECE-R130.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

This system was not included and is an important technology under the General Safety Regulation for motor vehicles with respect to trucks and buses - which is not accounted for under lane keep assistance.

Amendment 474

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.47a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.47a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.47a Lane departure warning Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, UNECE-R130.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 475

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.47a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.47a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
10.47a Lane departure warning Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, UNECE-R130.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 476

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.48

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48. Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.48 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48. Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example not connected or failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect - power source not connected or insufficient charge		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendment ensures that checks on the power source to e-call systems are covered.

Amendment 477

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.48

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.48 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48. Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example not connected or failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect - power source not connected or insufficient charge		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 478

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.48

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.48 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example not connected or failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect - power source not connected or insufficient charge		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 479

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.53

Text proposed by the Commission
10.53 Automated lane keeping system (ALKS) Description: a system which is activated by the driver, and which keeps the vehicle within its lane by controlling the lateral and longitudinal movements of the vehicle for extended periods without the need for further driver input (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 157).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.53 is replaced by the following:
10.53. Automated lane keeping system (ALKS) Description: a system which is activated by the driver, and which keeps the vehicle within its lane by controlling the lateral and longitudinal movements of the vehicle for extended periods without the need for further driver input (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 157).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 480

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.54

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54. Turning assistant Description: a system to inform the driver of a possible collision with a traffic participant (for example bicycle) near side (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.54 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54. Close proximity Description: system to detect a traffic participant (for example pedestrian or bicycle) in close proximity to the front or nearside of the vehicle, and that provides a warning and/or avoids a possible collision with the traffic participant (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151, UNECE-R 159).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

This system was not included and is an important technology under the General Safety Regulation for motor vehicles to allow trucks and buses to detect pedestrians and cyclists.

Amendment 481

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.54

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54 Turning assistant Description: a system to inform the driver of a possible collision with a traffic participant (for example bicycle) near side (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.54 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54 Close proximity Description: system to detect a traffic participant (for example pedestrian or bicycle) in close proximity to the front or nearside of the vehicle, and that provides a warning and/or avoids a possible collision with the traffic participant (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151, UNECE-R 159).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 482

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.54

Text proposed by the Commission
10.54 Turning assistant Description: a system to inform the driver of a possible collision with a traffic participant (for example bicycle) near side (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
in the table, item 10.54 is replaced by the following:
10.54 Close Proximity Description: system to detect a traffic participant (for example pedestrian or bicycle) in close proximity to the front or nearside of the vehicle, and that provides a warning and/or avoids a possible collision with the traffic participant (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151, UNECE-R 159).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 483

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.56

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.56 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(ca) Map data version outdated or incorrect, where applicable		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendments better align with the detailed requirements as set out by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958 on intelligent speed assistance (ISA) systems.

Amendment 484

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.56

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.56 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(ca) Map data version outdated or incorrect, where applicable		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 485

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.56

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.56 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(ca) Map data version outdated or incorrect, where applicable		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 486

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.57

Text proposed by the Commission
10.57 Reversing detection Description: system to make the driver aware of people and objects at the rear of the vehicle with the primary aim of avoiding collisions when reversing, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 158.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
in the table, item 10.57 is replaced by the following:
10.57 Reversing detection Description: system to make the driver aware of people and objects at the rear of the vehicle with the primary aim of avoiding collisions when reversing, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 158.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 487

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.59

Text proposed by the Commission
10.59 Advanced driver distraction warning Description: system that helps the driver to continue to pay attention to the traffic situation and that warns the driver when he or she is distracted, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2590*******.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
in the table, item 10.59 is replaced by the following:
10.59. Advanced driver distraction warning Description: system that helps the driver to continue to pay attention to the traffic situation and that warns the driver when he or she is distracted, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2590*******.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 488

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.61

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426*********.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.61 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the automated vehicle or fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426********* and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

A ‘fully automated vehicle’ is one that can move without a driver whilst an ‘automated vehicle’ still requires a driver, at least in part, and hence the amendment makes the description more flexible to account for both elements.

Amendment 489

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.61

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426*********.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxv) in the table, item 10.61 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the automated vehicle or fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426********* and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 490

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.61

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426*********.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.61 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426********* and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 491

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.62

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62 Driver availability monitoring systems (automated driving) Description: System that assesses whether the driver is capable of taking over the driving function of a self-driving vehicle, if necessary, in certain situations, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.61 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62 Driver availability monitoring systems (automated driving) Description: System that assesses whether the driver is capable of taking over the driving function of a self-driving vehicle, if necessary, in certain situations, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 492

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.62a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62a Assisted Driving Systems Description: systems that assist the driver in performing vehicle dynamic control (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 171).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

This system was not included and is an important technology under the (updated) General Safety Regulation for motor vehicles. Although point 10.22 covers steering assist systems, DCAS-compliant systems go beyond merely steering assist.

Amendment 493

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.62a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62 a (new) should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62a Assisted Driving Systems Description: systems that assist the driver in performing vehicle dynamic control (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 171).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 494

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.62a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62a should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
10.62a Assisted Driving Systems Description: systems that assist the driver in performing vehicle dynamic control (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 171, UNECE-R 79).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 495

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.62b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62b should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62b Data storage system for automated driving Description: system enabling the determination of interactions between the automated driving system (for example the ALKS) and the human driver, for example in accordance with Paragraph 8 of UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation	X

Or. en

Justification

Data storage system for automated driving (DSSAD) are extremely important for crash investigations and thus should be checked in addition to other new technologies.

Amendment 496

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.62b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62 b (new) should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62b Data storage system for automated driving Description: system enabling the determination of interactions between the automated driving system (for example the ALKS) and the human driver, for example in accordance with Paragraph 8 of UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation	X

Or. en

Amendment 497

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point c – point xxxv

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex I – point 10.62b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62b should be inserted in Annex I of Directive 2014/45/EU:
10.62b Data storage system for automated driving Description: system enabling the determination of interactions between the automated driving system (for example the ALKS) and the human driver, for example in accordance with Paragraph 8 of UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example data not accessible)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation	X

Or. en

Amendment 498

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – point i a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
	(i a) A device to connect to the electronic vehicle interface, such as an EOBD/OBM scan tool

Or. en

Justification

To ensure proper testing of modern cars during PTI, the OBD protocol should be updated to the latest version, such as EOBD/OBM. Modern vehicles rely heavily on electronic control systems for safety and emissions performance. Using EOBD/OBM in PTI aligns the inspection method with the technological reality of current vehicle design. EOBD and OBM provide direct diagnostic information on the status and performance of emission-relevant components and systems.EOBD and OBM are justified for use during PTI because they provide standardised, cost-effective, and objective access to in-use diagnostic and operational data that are essential for verifying the functionality of safety- and emission-relevant systems over the vehicle lifetime.

Amendment 499

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a – point ii

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex III – section 1 – para 1– point 16

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
(16) device to measure particle number emissions with sufficient accuracy;	(16) device to measure particle number emissions with sufficient accuracy, in accordance with Commission Recommendation (EU) 2023/688, as adopted on 20 March 2023.

Or. en

Justification

The original wording “sufficient accuracy” is not clear enough, for there is no detail on how something can be defined as “sufficient”. As the Commission has already produced a recommendation on the topic, which includes details on minimum accuracy requirements deemed reasonable by the industry, including such a reference would improve the final text and avoid uneven application across the EU.

Amendment 500

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 – point a a (new)

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex III – section I – para 1– point a

Text proposed by the Commission	Amendment
	(a a) For testing vehicles with a maximum mass not exceeding 3.5 tonnes, a suspension tester that complies with the minimum phase shift standard.

Or. en

Justification

To align Annex III with the amendments made to Annex I.

Amendment 501

Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – paragraph 1 – point 2 a (new)

Directive 2014/45/EU

Annex III – section II – point iii

Present text	Amendment
II. Calibration of equipment used for measurements Unless specified otherwise by the relevant Union legislation, the interval between two successive calibrations may not exceed: (i) 24 months for the measurement of weight, pressure and sound level, (ii) 24 months for the measurement of forces, (iii) 12 months for the measurement of gaseous emissions.	(2 a) "II. Calibration of equipment used for measurements Unless specified otherwise by the relevant Union legislation, the interval between two successive calibrations may not exceed: (i) 24 months for the measurement of weight, pressure and sound level, (ii) 24 months for the measurement of forces, (iii) 12 months for the measurement of gaseous emissions, opacity, particulate number and noise.
	"

Or. en

(32014L0045)

Justification

To ensure correct and repeatable measurement quality, not only devices measuring gaseous emissions, but also devices measuring opacity, Particulate number, and noise should be calibrated at intervals of no more than 12 months between successive calibrations.

Amendment 502

Rachel Blom

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxiii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 4.14.4.6

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
4.14.4.6 Charging cable	Visual inspection and by operation.	(a) Deteriorated (b) Charging cable not provided	X X
Amendment
xxiv in the table, item 4.14.4.6 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

This is not a safety-relevant item; it creates unnecessary failures and administrative burden (and is also impractical, as not every charging context requires a cable to be carried in the vehicle)

Amendment 503

Rachel Blom

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxx

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 8.1.1

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
8.1.1. Noise suppression system	For L-category vehicles powered by internal combustion engines, visual inspection and measurement of noise emitted by stationary vehicle using a sound level meter. For other vehicles, subjective evaluation (unless the inspector considers that the noise level may be borderline, in which case a measurement of noise emitted by stationary vehicle using a sound level meter may be conducted)	(a) Noise levels in excess of those permitted in the requirements1.		X
		(b) Any part of the noise suppression system loose, damaged, incorrectly fitted, missing or obviously modified in a way that would adversely affect the noise levels. Very serious risk of falling off.	X	X
		Remote sensing measurement showing significant non-compliance.		X
Amendment
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
8.1.1. Noise suppression system	For L-category vehicles powered by internal combustion engines, visual inspection and measurement of noise emitted by stationary vehicle using a sound level meter. For other vehicles, Subjective evaluation (unless the inspector considers that the noise level may be borderline, in which case a measurement of noise emitted by stationary vehicle using a sound level meter may be conducted)	(a) Noise levels in excess of those permitted in the requirements1.	X
		(b) Any part of the noise suppression system loose, damaged, incorrectly fitted, missing or obviously modified in a way that would adversely affect the noise levels. Very serious risk of falling off.	X
		Remote sensing measurement showing significant non-compliance.	X

Or. en

Justification

Remote sensing results are inherently indicative and highly dependent on external conditions, and therefore may only justify a minor deficiency triggering further verification rather than enforcement or sanctions.

Amendment 504

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.1

Text proposed by the Commission
10.1. Cornering light Description: during cornering, an extra headlamp is activated. Operates up to 40 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 48 or UNECE-R 119.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.1) in the table the item 10.1 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 505

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.2

Text proposed by the Commission
10.2 Adaptive cruise control Description: The system maintains the vehicle's speed, depending on the preferred speed and distance to the vehicle in front.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.2) in the table the item 10.2 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 506

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.7

Text proposed by the Commission
10.7 Automatic hold function Description: the system independently holds the vehicle after stopping using the service brake and/or parking brake and automatically releases them when starting.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.7) in the table the item 10.7 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with an automatic hold function, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, a malfunctioning automatic hold function cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 507

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.9

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.9 Automatic emergency braking system Description: the system independently starts braking in order to avoid a collision with an obstacle or another road user, or to reduce the consequences of an inevitable impact.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operative (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.9 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.9 Automatic emergency braking system Description: the system independently starts braking in order to avoid a collision with an obstacle or another road user, or to reduce the consequences of an inevitable impact, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 131 or UNECE-R 152.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operative (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendment replicates the approach of COM for other technologies by referring to applicable UNECE regulations.

Amendment 508

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.11

Text proposed by the Commission
10.11 Automatic light Description: depending on the ambient brightness, the system automatically switches on and off the driving light.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.11) in the table the item 10.11 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with automatic light, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, malfunctioning automatic lights cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 509

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.14

Text proposed by the Commission
10.14 Electronic damping Description: depending on the driving situation, the rebound and compression stage of the shock absorbers is adjusted by the system.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.14) in the table the item 10.14 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

As vehicle approval legislation—such as the GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, and Regulation (EU) 2018/858—does not require vehicles to be equipped with electronic damping, this feature cannot be mandated in periodic technical inspections. Accordingly, malfunctioning electronic damping cannot be deemed a defect. Inspection capacity should be directed toward legally required, safety-relevant systems.

Amendment 510

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.17

Text proposed by the Commission
10.17 High beam assist Description: the system automatically activates and deactivates the high beam according to the driving situation and lighting conditions.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.17) in the table the item 10.17 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 511

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.19a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.19a should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.19a Belt reminder Description: System that warns the driver in the event a person seated in the front row does not wear their seat belt and/or a person seated in the rear row(s) unbuckles their belt while the vehicle is in motion, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 16.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

This system was not included and is an important technology under the General Safety Regulation for motor vehicles to remind drivers and passengers to wear their seat belts.

Amendment 512

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.19a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.19a should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.19a Belt reminder Description: System that warns the driver in the event a person seated in the front row does not wear their seat belt and/or a person seated in the rear row(s) unbuckles their belt while the vehicle is in motion, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 16.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 513

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.19a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.19a should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
10.19a Belt reminder Description: System that warns the driver in the event a person seated in the front row does not wear their seat belt and/or a person seated in the rear row(s) unbuckles their belt while the vehicle is in motion, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 16.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 514

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.21

Text proposed by the Commission
10.21 Bending light Description: during cornering and depending on the steering angle and speed, the light beam is swivelled and/or an additional headlight is activated, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 48; UNECE-R 98; UNECE-R 112; or UNECE-R 123.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.21) in the table the item 10.21 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Since the vehicle approval regulations (e.g., GSR, Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, or Type Approval Regulation (EU) 2018/858) do not stipulate that vehicles must be equipped with bending light, this function cannot be required during periodic technical inspections of motor vehicles. If the bending light malfunctions, this cannot be considered a defect. Inspection resources should be used efficiently by focusing on mandatory safety-related aspects.

Amendment 515

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.22

Text proposed by the Commission
10.22 Steering assist Description: depending on the driving situation, the steering angle is automatically changed, without intervention by the driver. Relevant if the steering intervention occurs at a speed of more than 15 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 79.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.22) in the table the item 10.22 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 516

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.22

Text proposed by the Commission
10.22. Steering assist Description: depending on the driving situation, the steering angle is automatically changed, without intervention by the driver. Relevant if the steering intervention occurs at a speed of more than 15 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 79.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.22 is replaced by the following:
10.22. Steering assist Description: depending on the driving situation, the steering angle is automatically changed, without intervention by the driver. Relevant if the steering intervention occurs at a speed of more than 15 km/h, for example in accordance with UNECE-R 79.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example audio components)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 517

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.28

Text proposed by the Commission
10.28 Superimposed steering Description: depending on the driving situation, the system varies the transmission ratio of the steering.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.28) in the table the item 10.28 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 518

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.38

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.38. Kneeling Description: the system allows a road vehicle to be lowered to make it easier for passengers to board and disembark.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.38 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.38. Kneeling Description: the system allows a road vehicle to be lowered to make it easier for passengers to board and disembark, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 107.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendment replicates the approach of COM for other technologies by referring to applicable UNECE regulations.

Amendment 519

Sophia Kircher

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.44

Text proposed by the Commission
10.44 Adaptive headlights Description: the illumination of the surrounding road area and/or the direct illumination of road users in the danger area in front of the vehicle is optimised by dynamic adaption of the light beams.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii. 10.44) in the table the item 10.44 is deleted:
deleted

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 520

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.46

Text proposed by the Commission
10.46 Lane change assistance Description: at a lane change, the system warns the driver about vehicles in the next lane and steers the vehicle back.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.46 is replaced by the following:
10.46 Lane change assistance Description: at a lane change, the system warns the driver about vehicles in the next lane and steers the vehicle back.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 521

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.47

Text proposed by the Commission
10.47 Lane keeping assistance Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane and steers the vehicle back, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/646*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.47 is replaced by the following:
10.47. Lane keeping assistance Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane and steers the vehicle back, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/646*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 522

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.47a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.47a (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.47a Lane departure warning Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, UNECE-R130.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 523

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.47a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.47a(new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.47a. Lane departure warning Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, UNECE-R130.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 524

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.47a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.47a (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
10.47a Lane departure warning Description: the system warns the driver when the vehicle is unintentionally leaving its lane, e.g. in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, UNECE-R130.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 525

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.48

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.48 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example not connected or failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect - power source not connected or insufficient charge		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendment ensures that checks on the power source to e-call systems are covered.

Amendment 526

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.48

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example failing echo-test). - minimum set of data incorrect		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.48 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example not connected or failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect - power source not connected or insufficient charge		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 527

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.48

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.48 Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.48 is replaced by the following:
10.48. Automatic eCall Description: the system is triggered automatically by in-vehicle sensors or manually, it transmits a minimum set of data (EN 15722) via mobile communication network and establishes an audio connection based on the (emergency) number between the vehicle passengers and the public safety answering point, in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2015/758 of the European Parliament and of the Council, and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79*.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface The verification of the minimum set of data (MSD) includes checking whether: - the mandatory fields are filled with plausible information; - the deviation between in-vehicle system (IVS) location and true location is less than 150 meters. The calculation can be done according to point 2.5 of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2017/79; - the deviation between the MSD timestamp and the timestamp of the reading is less than 60s.	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device (eCall MIL) shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation: - audio components (for example not connected or failing echo-test); - minimum set of data incorrect - power source not connected or insufficient charge		X
		(h) Other failure (for example mobile network communication device, electronic control unit, or GPS signal failure) Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 528

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.53

Text proposed by the Commission
10.53 Automated lane keeping system (ALKS) Description: a system which is activated by the driver, and which keeps the vehicle within its lane by controlling the lateral and longitudinal movements of the vehicle for extended periods without the need for further driver input (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 157).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.53 is replaced by the following:
10.53 Automated lane keeping system (ALKS) Description: a system which is activated by the driver, and which keeps the vehicle within its lane by controlling the lateral and longitudinal movements of the vehicle for extended periods without the need for further driver input (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 157).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 529

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.54

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54 Turning assistant Description: a system to inform the driver of a possible collision with a traffic participant (for example bicycle) near side (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.54 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54. Close proximity Description: system to detect a traffic participant (for example pedestrian or bicycle) in close proximity to the front or nearside of the vehicle, and that provides a warning and/or avoids a possible collision with the traffic participant (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151, UNECE-R 159).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

This system was not included and is an important technology under the General Safety Regulation for motor vehicles to allow trucks and buses to detect pedestrians and cyclists.

Amendment 530

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.54

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54. Turning assistant Description: a system to inform the driver of a possible collision with a traffic participant (for example bicycle) near side (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.54 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.54. Close proximity Description: system to detect a traffic participant (for example pedestrian or bicycle) in close proximity to the front or nearside of the vehicle, and that provides a warning and/or avoids a possible collision with the traffic participant (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151, UNECE-R 159).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 531

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.54

Text proposed by the Commission
10.54. Turning assistant Description: a system to inform the driver of a possible collision with a traffic participant (for example bicycle) near side (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.54 is replaced by the following:
10.54. Close Proximity Description: system to detect a traffic participant (for example pedestrian or bicycle) in close proximity to the front or nearside of the vehicle, and that provides a warning and/or avoids a possible collision with the traffic participant (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 151, UNECE-R 159).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 532

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.56

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.56 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.5.6 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(ca) Map data version outdated or incorrect, where applicable		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

The amendments better align with the detailed requirements as set out by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958 on intelligent speed assistance (ISA) systems.

Amendment 533

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.56

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.56 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(ca) Map data version outdated or incorrect, where applicable		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 534

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.56

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.56 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.56 Intelligent speed assistance Description: system to aid the driver in maintaining the appropriate speed for the road environment by providing dedicated and appropriate feedback, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/1958*****.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(ca) Map data version outdated or incorrect, where applicable		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 535

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.57

Text proposed by the Commission
10.57 Reversing detection Description: system to make the driver aware of people and objects at the rear of the vehicle with the primary aim of avoiding collisions when reversing, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 158.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.57 is replaced by the following:
10.57. Reversing detection Description: system to make the driver aware of people and objects at the rear of the vehicle with the primary aim of avoiding collisions when reversing, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 158.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 536

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.59

Text proposed by the Commission
10.59 Advanced driver distraction warning Description: system that helps the driver to continue to pay attention to the traffic situation and that warns the driver when he or she is distracted, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2590*******.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.59 is replaced by the following:
10.59 Advanced driver distraction warning Description: system that helps the driver to continue to pay attention to the traffic situation and that warns the driver when he or she is distracted, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2023/2590*******.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 537

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.61

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426*********.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.61 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the automated vehicle or fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426********* and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 538

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.61

Text proposed by the Commission
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426*********.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
(xxxii) in the table, item 10.61 is replaced by the following:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the automated vehicle or fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426********* and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 539

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.61

Text proposed by the Commission
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the fully automated vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426*********.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.61 is replaced by the following:
10.61 Automated driving system Description: systems that are capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task of the vehicle on a sustained basis, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144, Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/1426********* and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 540

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.62

Text proposed by the Commission
10.62. Driver availability monitoring systems (automated driving) Description: System that assesses whether the driver is capable of taking over the driving function of a self-driving vehicle, if necessary, in certain situations, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
Amendment
In the table, item 10.62 is replaced by the following:
10.62. Driver availability monitoring systems (automated driving) Description: System that assesses whether the driver is capable of taking over the driving function of a self-driving vehicle, if necessary, in certain situations, for example in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2019/2144 and UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged, or sensors obviously misaligned		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example HMI)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 541

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.62 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62 a (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62a. Assisted Driving Systems Description: systems that assist the driver in performing vehicle dynamic control (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 171).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Justification

Amendment 542

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.62a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62 a (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62 a. Assisted Driving Systems Description: systems that assist the driver in performing vehicle dynamic control (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 171).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 543

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.62a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62a (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
10.62a. Assisted Driving Systems Description: systems that assist the driver in performing vehicle dynamic control (for example in accordance with UNECE-R 171, UNECE-R 79).	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation Affecting safe operation of the vehicle Danger to health of persons on board or of other road users	X	X	X

Or. en

Amendment 544

Tilly Metz

on behalf of the Verts/ALE Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.62 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62b (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62b. Data storage system for automated driving Description: system enabling the determination of interactions between the automated driving system (for example the ALKS) and the human driver, for example in accordance with Paragraph 8 of UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation	X

Or. en

Justification

Data storage system for automated driving (DSSAD) are extremely important for crash investigations and thus should be checked in addition to other new technologies.

Amendment 545

Sérgio Gonçalves, Vivien Costanzo, Kathleen Van Brempt, François Kalfon, André Rodrigues

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.62b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62b (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
Item	Method	Reasons for failure	Assessment of deficiencies
			Minor	Major	Dangerous
10.62b. Data storage system for automated driving Description: system enabling the determination of interactions between the automated driving system (for example the ALKS) and the human driver, for example in accordance with Paragraph 8 of UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation	X

Or. en

Amendment 546

Elena Kountoura

on behalf of The Left Group

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – paragraph 1 – point 1 – point b – point xxxii

Directive 2014/47/EU

Annex II – point 10.62b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission
Amendment
The following item 10.62b (new) should be inserted in Annex II of Directive 2014/47/EU:
10.62b. Data storage system for automated driving Description: system enabling the determination of interactions between the automated driving system (for example the ALKS) and the human driver, for example in accordance with Paragraph 8 of UNECE-R 157.	Visual inspection complemented, where made possible by the technical characteristics of the vehicle and where the necessary data is made available, with the use of electronic interface	(a) System or any component missing		X
		(b) System or components damaged		X
		(c) Software version or -integrity incorrect		X
		(d) Wiring damaged		X
		(e) Warning device shows system malfunction.		X
		(f) System indicates failure via the electronic vehicle interface Not affecting the safe operation	X
		(g) System or components not operating, or implausible operation (for example data not accessible)		X
		(h) Other failure Not affecting the safe operation	X

Or. en