Skip to content
Adopted text

Genetically modified maize MON 87427

TA-10-2025-0292 · P10_TA(2025)0292 · PE778.113

✦ In short · AI summary of this text, generated 4 Sept 2026

Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.

Parliament objects to the draft Commission decision renewing authorisation for genetically modified maize MON 87427, saying it exceeds implementing powers and is incompatible with EU law. It calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft decision and not renew authorisation due to glyphosate risks, resistant weeds, biodiversity loss and insufficient long-term evidence. It also asks for a legislative proposal to reform GMO decision-making and urges the Commission to respect international agreements.

Key points

  1. Considers that the draft Commission implementing decision exceeds the implementing powers provided for in Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
  2. Considers the draft decision incompatible with Union law, as it conflicts with the aim of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 to ensure high protection of health and environment, and with the precautionary principle.
  3. Calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision.
  4. Calls on the Commission not to renew authorisation of the GM maize due to risks from glyphosate use, resistant weeds, biodiversity loss and insufficient long-term evidence, in line with the One Health approach.
  5. Calls on the Commission to submit a legislative proposal to reform the GMO decision-making procedure to address Parliament's objections and lack of qualified majority support.
  6. Urges the Commission to take into account EU obligations under international agreements such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the UN Convention on Biological Diversity and the UN Sustainable Development Goals.

Who is affected

  • The Commission, which is asked to withdraw the draft decision and not renew authorisation.
  • Bayer Agriculture B.V. and Bayer CropScience LP, the applicants for renewal, whose authorisation would not be renewed.

Legal basis: Article 191 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union