Skip to content
Adopted text

Genetically modified maize MON 94804

TA-10-2024-0045 · P10_TA(2024)0045 · PE763.294

Official HTML ↗ PDF DOCX
✦ In shortFull text
✦ In short · AI summary of this text, generated 4 Sept 2026

Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.

Parliament's resolution objects to the Commission's draft decision authorising genetically modified maize MON 94804, considering it exceeds implementing powers and is inconsistent with EU law. It calls on the Commission to withdraw the draft decision and submit a new one, and urges it to consider EU obligations under international agreements.

Key points

  1. The GM maize is engineered to produce an artificial miRNA that suppresses genes in the gibberellic acid pathway, reducing plant height.
  2. Parliament notes outstanding questions on the artificial miRNA's effects, including interactions with other regulatory functions and potential uptake from the gut.
  3. Parliament notes that reduced gibberellins may affect germination, flowering, stress tolerance, and immune response, but the applicant did not explore most impacts.
  4. Member States submitted critical comments on incomplete data and insufficient field trials, and the Commission's decision lacks support from a qualified majority.
  5. Parliament considers the draft decision exceeds implementing powers and is incompatible with Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003's aim of ensuring high protection of health and the environment.
  6. Calls on the Commission to withdraw its draft implementing decision and submit a new draft to the committee.
  7. Expresses disappointment that the Commission continues to authorise GMOs despite Parliament's objections and Member State opposition.
  8. Urges the Commission to take into account EU obligations under international agreements and to include an explanatory memorandum upholding the 'do no harm' principle.

Who is affected

  • The Commission, which is called on to withdraw and resubmit its draft decision.
  • The applicant, Bayer Agriculture BV / Bayer CropScience LP, whose authorisation is objected to.

Legal basis: Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003, in particular Article 7(3) and Article 19(3)