Sittings · Document

Joint motion for a resolution 2026-04-28

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment

28.4.2026 B100206/2026 }

B100213/2026 }

B100235/2026 } RC1/Am. 1

Amendment 1

Stefano Cavedagna, Denis Nesci, Piotr Müller, Guillaume Peltier, Sebastian Tynkkynen

on behalf of the ECR Group

Joint motion for a resolution

PPE, S&D, Renew

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment

Joint motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Joint motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Invites the Commission to assess the need for a more harmonised approach at EU level to define cyberbullying; invites the Commission to examine whether cyberbullying, including the non-consensual dissemination of intimate material, should be recognised as a particularly serious crime with a cross-border dimension at EU level; reiterates its support for adding hate crime, which could cover the most severe forms of cyberbullying, to the list of EU crimes under Article 83(1) TFEU;7. Stresses that online forms of harassment, including cyberbullying, constitute a serious and harmful phenomenon requiring effective prevention and response measures; whereas, while such conduct can have significant individual and societal impacts, it does not, in its current manifestations, fulfil the criteria of a particularly serious crime with a clear cross-border dimension within the meaning of Article 83(1) TFEU;

Or. en

28.4.2026 B100206/2026 }

B100213/2026 }

B100235/2026 } RC1/Am. 2

Amendment 2

Assita Kanko, Stefano Cavedagna, Denis Nesci, Piotr Müller, Guillaume Peltier, Sebastian Tynkkynen

on behalf of the ECR Group

Joint motion for a resolution

PPE, S&D, Renew

The need for targeted criminal provisions and platforms’ responsibility to effectively address cyberbullying and online harassment

Joint motion for a resolution

Paragraph 15 a (new)

Joint motion for a resolutionAmendment
15a. Emphasises that any enforcement action taken under the DSA should fully respect fundamental rights, particularly freedom of expression;

Or. en