Sittings · Document

Draft report (2024/2056(INI)) 2024-10-10

Activities of the European Ombudsman – annual report 2023

Committee on Petitions

Amendment 1

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Recital E a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	E a. whereas Article 298(1) TFEU states that ‘in carrying out their missions, the institutions, bodies, offices and agencies of the Union shall have the support of an open, efficient and independent European administration’;

Or. en

Amendment 2

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Recital F

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
F. whereas in 2023, the Ombudsman opened 398 inquiries, of which 393 were complaint-based and 5 own-initiative, while closing 372 inquiries (369 complaint-based and 3 own-initiative);	F. whereas in 2023, the Ombudsman opened 398 inquiries, of which 393 were complaint-based and 5 own-initiative, while closing 372 inquiries (369 complaint-based and 3 own-initiative); thus continuing its intense and efficient activity, enabled by the new Regulation 2021/1163 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT of 24 June 2021 laying down the regulations and general conditions governing the performance of the Ombudsman’s duties (Statute of the European Ombudsman) and repealing Decision 94/262/ECSC, EC, Euratom

Or. en

Amendment 3

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Recital I

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
I. whereas in the inquiries closed by the Ombudsman in 2023, no maladministration was found in 26.6 % of cases, a solution was settled by the institution in 55.4 % of cases, no further inquiries were justified in 12.4 % of cases and maladministration was found in 7.3 % of cases;	I. whereas in the inquiries closed by the Ombudsman in 2023, no maladministration was found in 99 (26.6 %) cases, a solution was achieved, partly achieved or settled by the institution in 206 (55.4 %) cases, no further inquiries were justified in 46 (12.4 %) cases and maladministration was found in 27 (7.3 %) cases;

Or. en

Amendment 4

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Recital K a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	K a. whereas the Ombudsman's experience with handling complaints about access to documents is that long delays frequently occurred in cases that were of significant public interest, whose effects were to render the information obtained no longer useful for the requesters and to prevent citizens from having their say at relevant times in decision-making;

Or. en

Amendment 5

Jana Toom, Michał Kobosko

Motion for a resolution

Recital L

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
L. whereas EU citizens have broad rights to access documents held by the EU administration; whereas the Ombudsman opened an own-initiative inquiry asking the Commission to urgently deal with systematic delays in its handling of access to documents requests in order to ensure it adheres to the deadlines set out in the EU public access law (Regulation (EC) No 1049/20012 ); whereas this inquiry revealed that when the Commission is asked to review a decision on access to documents, it misses the deadlines set out in the law in 85 % of cases;	L. whereas EU citizens have broad rights to access documents held by the EU administration; whereas the Ombudsman opened an own-initiative inquiry asking the Commission to urgently deal with systematic delays in its handling of access to documents requests in order to ensure it adheres to the deadlines set out in the EU public access law (Regulation (EC) No 1049/20012 ); whereas this inquiry revealed that when the Commission is asked to review a decision on access to documents, it misses the deadlines set out in the law in 85 % of cases with the majority of replies arriving after 60 days;
_________________	_________________
2 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.	2 Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents, OJ L 145, 31.5.2001, p. 43.

Or. en

Amendment 6

Cristian Terheş

Motion for a resolution

Recital M

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
M. whereas in 2023, the Ombudsman published a special report following her strategic inquiry into the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents; whereas the Ombudsman submitted this report to the European Parliament with a view to seeking its help in prevailing upon the Commission to act on her recommendations, being of the opinion that citizens are entitled to expect better practices from an open, modern and service-minded EU administration;	M. whereas in 2023, the Ombudsman published a special report following her strategic inquiry into the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents; whereas the Ombudsman’s inquiry revealed that when individuals seek a review of an access decision, known as a confirmatory request, the Commission misses the deadlines set out in the law in 85% of cases; whereas the Ombudsman submitted this report to the European Parliament with a view to seeking its help in prevailing upon the Commission to act on her recommendations, being of the opinion that citizens are entitled to expect better practices from an open, modern and service-minded EU administration;

Or. en

Amendment 7

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Recital M

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
M. whereas in 2023, the Ombudsman published a special report following her strategic inquiry into the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents; whereas the Ombudsman submitted this report to the European Parliament with a view to seeking its help in prevailing upon the Commission to act on her recommendations, being of the opinion that citizens are entitled to expect better practices from an open, modern and service-minded EU administration;	M. whereas in 2023, the Ombudsman published a special report following her strategic inquiry into the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents; whereas the Ombudsman submitted this report to the European Parliament with a view to seeking its support in getting the Commission to act on its recommendations , being of the opinion that citizens are entitled to expect better practices from an open, modern and service-minded EU administration;

Or. en

Amendment 8

Cristian Terheş

Motion for a resolution

Recital M a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	M a. whereas in 2023 the Ombudsman criticised the Commission’s initial failure to include specific emails in the scope of an access request concerning exchanges on draft EU soil, forest, and climate adaptation strategies; whereas during the Ombudsman’s inquiry, the Commission agreed to register the emails in question and examine whether they could be released; whereas this practice should not be applied arbitrarily and the Commission should consistently apply this approach to all cases, including in the negotiations related to the purchase of COVID-19 vaccines;

Or. en

Amendment 9

Kosma Złotowski, Ivaylo Valchev, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Recital M a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	M a. whereas the Ombudsman acknowledged significant progress in strengthening the ethics rules in the European Parliament following Qatargate but expressed concerns about their implementation and enforcement; whereas the Ombudsman opened a separate inquiry concerning travel costs paid for the Commission by third parties since 2021;

Or. en

Amendment 10

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Recital N

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
N. whereas the special report was discussed in the Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and led to a European Parliament resolution entitled ‘The time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents’3 , in which Parliament expressed great concern about the extreme delays in the Commission’s process of granting public access to requested documents and asked the Commission to correct these systematic and significant delays;	N. whereas the special report was discussed in the Parliament’s Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs and led to a European Parliament resolution entitled ‘The time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents’3 , in which Parliament expressed great concern about the extreme delays in the Commission’s process of granting public access to requested documents and asked the Commission to correct these systematic and significant delays and called on the Commission to finally and immediately publish the text messages that the President of the Commission and the CEO of the pharmaceutical company Pfizer exchanged during the negotiations on the procurement of 1.8 billion doses of COVID- 19 vaccines and requested the immediate and full publication of all contracts for the purchase of COVID- 19 vaccines financed wholly or partially with public funds;
_________________	_________________
3 Texts Adopted, P9_TA(2024)0172.	3 Texts Adopted, P9_TA(2024)0172.

Or. en

Amendment 11

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Recital N a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	N a. whereas on 14 March 2024 Parliament adopted the resolution entitled ‘The time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents` in which stresses that, if the Commission does not address the systematic and significant delays in its processing of requests for public access to documents by the time the new College of Commissioners is established, Parliament will consider using all available parliamentary instruments to address the matter;

Or. en

Amendment 12

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Recital P

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
P. whereas transparency is a vital part of a democratic society and an important tool in the fight against corruption; whereas EU citizens have the right to the highest level of transparency and whereas the very highest level of accessibility to public documents is essential to ensure accountability;	P. whereas transparency is a vital part of a democratic society and an important tool in the fight against corruption; whereas EU citizens have the right to transparency and whereas accessibility to public documents is essential to ensure accountability;

Or. en

Amendment 13

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Recital P a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	P a. whereas the Ombudsman's inquiry in case OI/3/2023/MHZ concerning Frontex's role in search and rescue operations has shown the existence of severe shortcomings, including the failure to ensure that Frontex's fundamental rights monitors are sufficiently involved in decision-making on maritime emergencies as well as the absence of Frontex's internal guidelines on issuing emergency signals; whereas this inquiry was launched by the Ombudsman following the Adriana tragedy in June 2023, which resulted in over 600 people drowning off the coast of Greece;

Or. en

Amendment 14

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Recital Q a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	Q a. whereas the European Ombudsman may propose recommendations, suggest remedies and improvement recommendations aimed at resolving various aspects of maladministration;

Or. en

Amendment 15

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 2 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	2 a. Congratulates Emily O’Reilly on her determination to open wider strategic inquiries and initiatives revealing thus systemic malfunctions within EU institutions regarding access to documents, protection of fundamental rights, ethical issues, accountability in decision making and personnel issues;

Or. en

Amendment 16

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 4

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
4. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s publication of a guide to accessing EU documents, which aims to raise citizens’ awareness of their right of access to documents and enable them to scrutinise EU decision-making;	4. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s publication of a guide to accessing EU documents, which aims to raise citizens’ awareness of their right of access to documents and enable them to scrutinise EU decision-making; Believes that it is essential to continue providing citizens with suitable information on the role and scope of the Ombudsman's activities and its influence on the development of EU institutions;

Or. en

Amendment 17

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	4 a. Encourages all other EU institutions to promote the Ombudsman’s guide to accessing EU documents in a joint effort to raise citizens’ awareness of their right of access to documents and increase the participation of citizens in the EU’s decision-making processes;

Or. en

Amendment 18

Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 4 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	4a. Regrets the complete absence of initiatives to support Cypriot citizens such as Titina Loizidou who have been expelled from the occupied territory of the Republic of Cyprus by the Turkish occupation army and whose claims have been repeatedly vindicated in court;

Or. el

Amendment 19

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
5. Welcomes the recommendations following the Ombudsman’s own-initiative inquiry into the time the Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents, which call on the Commission to deal with its systemic delays as a matter of urgency and to respect the deadlines set out in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; is worried by the inquiry’s finding that the Commission’s systemic and significant delays in dealing with document access requests amount to maladministration;	5. Welcomes the recommendations following the Ombudsman’s own-initiative inquiry into the time the Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents, which call on the Commission to deal with its systemic delays as a matter of urgency and to respect the deadlines set out in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; is worried by the inquiry’s finding that the Commission’s systemic and significant delays in dealing with document access requests amount to maladministration; deplores the fact that the most important contracts with the pharmaceutical industries concluded by the President of the Commission without any transparency and in violation of all European public procurement rules have still not been made public;

Or. fr

Amendment 20

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
5. Welcomes the recommendations following the Ombudsman’s own-initiative inquiry into the time the Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents, which call on the Commission to deal with its systemic delays as a matter of urgency and to respect the deadlines set out in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; is worried by the inquiry’s finding that the Commission’s systemic and significant delays in dealing with document access requests amount to maladministration;	5. Welcomes the recommendations following the Ombudsman’s own-initiative inquiry into the time the Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents, which call on the Commission to fundamentally rethink its way of handling such requests, deal with its systemic delays as a matter of urgency and respect the deadlines set out in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 on public access to European Parliament, Council and Commission documents; is deeply worried by the inquiry’s finding that the Commission’s systemic and significant delays in dealing with document access requests amount to maladministration;

Or. en

Amendment 21

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	5 a. Supports the Ombudsman's view that 'access delayed is access denied', as documents and information sought are often time sensitive and can lose relevance to the requesters if delays occur; believes that the Commission must proactively publish documents and statistics on how it handles requests on access to documents, including clear data on compliance with the deadlines set by EU law, as such information is key to improve transparency on this matter and strengthen the Commission's accountability towards citizens;

Or. en

Amendment 22

Kosma Złotowski, Ivaylo Valchev, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	5 a. Underlines that the transparency of decision making, in particular in terms of lobbying, in the area of environment protection and climate change has been the focus of many Ombudsman inquiries;

Or. en

Amendment 23

Fidias Panayiotou, Maria Zacharia, Ana Miranda Paz

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
6. Urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU;	6. Urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to update the definition of an EU document taking into account evolving means of communication, such as text and instant messages and to align this regulation to the new digital context and to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU; invites the Ombudsman, in this context and based on it`s proven expertise to advise and propose good practice guidelines preserving thus citizens` access to public documents in an rapidly evolving digital society;

Or. en

Amendment 24

Nadine Morano

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
6. Urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU;	6. Calls on the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU; stresses that while it is essential for the institutions to be transparent in their relations with citizens, that transparency must not undermine their political negotiations, which could be hampered by a demand for excessive transparency, leading to a substantial increase in informal meetings and thereby producing an effect opposite to that sought;

Or. fr

Amendment 25

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
6. Urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU;	6. Underlines that public access to documents is a fundamental right of EU citizens and a cornerstone of European democracy. Technological and societal developments since the adoption of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 call for the consideration of a consolidation of citizen’s rights to access to documents; calls on the Commission to consider a proposal for revision and urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 to improve transparency and public accountability in the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 26

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
6. Urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU;	6. Urges the Council to recognise the need for the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and to engage, without further delay, in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on this revision, in order to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 27

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
6. Urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to turn these three key EU institutions into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU;	6. Urges the Council to engage in constructive negotiations with Parliament and the Commission on the revision of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, in order to turn these three key EU institutions, including their presidency, into role models of transparency and public accountability for the whole of the EU;

Or. fr

Amendment 28

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	6 a. Strongly believes that any revision of Regulation (EC) 1049/2001 must result in enhancing public access for EU citizens and residents to documents of the Union institutions, bodies, offices and agencies; is firmly convinced that the starting point for any future negotiation must be based on the position already adopted by the Parliament, insisting that an amended text, as an absolute minimum, must: extend the Regulation’s scope to all EU institutions, offices, bodies and agencies; enhance legislative transparency, including access to legislative legal opinions, whereby any use of exceptions should constitute an exemption from the general rule of transparency; include the Aarhus Convention; ensure transparency and appropriate access to documents in relation to international negotiations and agreements; consider that the definition of ‘document’ also explicitly refers to text, instant messages as well as e-mails, pertaining to professional activities;

Or. en

Amendment 29

Jana Toom, Michał Kobosko

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;	7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and the need for more proactive transparency and a more constructive approach towards requesters; calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority by reforming its management of public access to documents; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;
_________________	_________________
4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).	4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).

Or. en

Amendment 30

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;	7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is concerned about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;
_________________	_________________
4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).	4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).

Or. en

Amendment 31

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;	7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; notes that where a complaint does not fall within the Ombudsman's remit, the Ombudsman may advise the complainant to refer the matter to another authority or to the Petitions Committee; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;
_________________	_________________
4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).	4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).

Or. en

Amendment 32

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;	7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report[1] to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, reminds the Commission that 1 year has already passed since the Ombudsman’s special report recommended that the Commission correct that situation as a matter of priority and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to urgently improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation; [1] Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).
_________________
4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).

Or. en

Amendment 33

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners to remedy this situation;	7. Endorses the conclusions of the Ombudsman’s special report4 to the European Parliament concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents and is worried about the Ombudsman’s assessment that these systemic and significant delays in the Commission’s processing of requests for public access to documents amount to maladministration; underlines how important it is that the Commission dedicate more resources to dealing with confirmatory requests under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 and calls on the Commission to correct this situation as a matter of priority and to improve its practice of handling confirmatory requests; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions; reminds the Commission of Parliament’s right to bring action against it before the Court of Justice of the European Union on the grounds of infringement of the Treaties and expects a clear and unequivocal commitment by the new College of Commissioners and the Commission President to remedy this situation;
_________________	_________________
4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).	4 Special Report of the European Ombudsman in her strategic inquiry concerning the time the European Commission takes to deal with requests for public access to documents (OI/2/2022/OAM).

Or. fr

Amendment 34

Maria Zacharia, Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	7a. Recalls the Commission’s refusal in 2002 and the Ombudsman’s complaint of maladministration in respect of its refusal to grant full access to text messages between Ursula von der Leyen, President of the Commission, and Albert Bourla, CEO of the pharmaceutical giant Pfizer, regarding contracts for the COVID-19 vaccine;

Or. el

Amendment 35

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	7 a. Endorses the assessment of Ombudsman’s special report which underlines that unless and until the Commission, at the highest levels, demonstrates in practice that transparency is the rule and a priority for the institution, its handling of requests will continue to be delayed.

Or. en

Amendment 36

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
8. Takes note of the Ombudsman’s inquiry into the extent to which the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission apply EU law and the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union when it comes to public access requests for legislative documents, in which the Ombudsman stressed the need to facilitate EU citizens’ participation in the EU law-making process;	8. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s inquiry into the extent to which the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission apply EU law and the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union when it comes to public access requests for legislative documents, in which the Ombudsman stressed the need to ensure timely public access to legislative documents as well as to facilitate EU citizens’ participation in the EU law-making process; underlines that the Ombudsman noted with concern that past inquiries related to insufficient and delayed public access suggested that these institutions were not giving full effect to EU law and related case-law; regrets that the EU institutions in refusing to disclose legislative documents presented in some cases only general arguments or even the same ones which were previously dismissed by the EU Courts; recalls that according to EU case-law, EU institutions can only refuse to disclose legislative documents in exceptional circumstances and their reasoning for doing so must be based on specific and tangible facts;

Or. en

Amendment 37

Jana Toom, Michał Kobosko

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
8. Takes note of the Ombudsman’s inquiry into the extent to which the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission apply EU law and the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union when it comes to public access requests for legislative documents, in which the Ombudsman stressed the need to facilitate EU citizens’ participation in the EU law-making process;	8. Takes note of the Ombudsman’s inquiry into the extent to which the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission apply EU law and the decisions of the Court of Justice of the European Union when it comes to public access requests for legislative documents, in which the Ombudsman stressed the need to facilitate EU citizens’ participation in the EU law-making process; acknowledges the importance of the timely treatment of access to documents requests by all institutions in fostering a sense of trust in European law making;

Or. en

Amendment 38

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	8 a. Recalls that publicity and transparency are the main principles underlying the EU legislative process, as confirmed by the case-law of the Court of Justice, which provided clear legal guidance on the way to ensure their full and consistent respect; reminds that the Court of Justice also stipulated that the lack of transparency and information weakens citizens' trust in the legitimacy of the EU legislative process as a whole;

Or. en

Amendment 39

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
9. Is particularly worried that the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission’s refusal to provide access to documents concerning the greenhouse gas emissions of the ceramics industry reported under the EU Emissions Trading System; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the overriding public interest and to be more mindful of it when assessing the possibility of disclosing documents concerning emissions into the environment;	9. Is particularly worried that the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission’s refusal to provide access to documents concerning the greenhouse gas emissions of the ceramics industry reported under the EU Emissions Trading System; regrets that the Commission rejected the Ombudsman’s solution proposal and maintained the position adopted in its confirmatory decision, thus failing to ensure the required transparency as well as to give full effect to the EU Aarhus Regulation and the Aarhus Convention; calls on the Commission to guarantee full public access to environmental information and public participation in decision-making also relating to environment;

Or. en

Amendment 40

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
9. Is particularly worried that the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission’s refusal to provide access to documents concerning the greenhouse gas emissions of the ceramics industry reported under the EU Emissions Trading System; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the overriding public interest and to be more mindful of it when assessing the possibility of disclosing documents concerning emissions into the environment;	9. Is particularly worried that the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission’s refusal to provide access to documents concerning the greenhouse gas emissions of the ceramics industry reported under the EU Emissions Trading System; calls on the Ombudsman to continue raise awareness on the findings of investigations regarding EU and third countries trade negotiations which may lead to an increase in the transparency of EU trade agreements; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the overriding public interest and to be more mindful of it when assessing the possibility of disclosing documents concerning emissions into the environment;

Or. en

Amendment 41

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
9. Is particularly worried that the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission’s refusal to provide access to documents concerning the greenhouse gas emissions of the ceramics industry reported under the EU Emissions Trading System; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the overriding public interest and to be more mindful of it when assessing the possibility of disclosing documents concerning emissions into the environment;	9. Is particularly worried that the Ombudsman found maladministration in the Commission’s refusal to provide access, as with all the contracts concluded since 2020 with the pharmaceutical industries, to documents concerning the greenhouse gas emissions of the ceramics industry reported under the EU Emissions Trading System; calls on the Commission to pay particular attention to the overriding public interest and to be more mindful of it when assessing the possibility of disclosing documents concerning emissions into the environment;

Or. fr

Amendment 42

Fidias Panayiotou, Maria Zacharia, Ana Miranda Paz

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	9 a. It is highly concerned that the Commission's refusal to provide access to documents concerning the greenhouse gas emissions reported under the EU Emissions Trading System, extends to more industrial facilities, other than the ceramics industry and calls on the Commission to ensure full public access to environmental information";

Or. en

Amendment 43

Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	9a. Deplores the lack of initiatives in support of citizens who lodge appeals relating to gross abuse of the environment by wind and solar energy companies where there is no significant benefit to local communities;

Or. el

Amendment 44

Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 b (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	9b. Deplores the absence of interventions to support European competition law in the energy, food, transport and telecommunications markets, which are entirely controlled by monopolistic practices;

Or. el

Amendment 45

Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 c (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	9c. Deplores the absence of interventions in support of Greek citizens who have repeatedly been expelled from Istanbul, Imbros and Tenedos, in contravention of the provisions of the Treaty of Lausanne;

Or. el

Amendment 46

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
10. Endorses the intention of the Ombudsman to conduct a broader inquiry into how the scope of environmental information and information related to emissions into the environment is interpreted by the Commission; commends the Ombudsman for emphasising that the EU has an obligation to ensure a high level of public access to environmental information and public participation in decision-making relating to the environment;	10. Commends the Ombudsman for emphasising that the EU has an obligation to ensure a high level of public access to environmental information and public participation in decision-making relating to the environment;

Or. en

Amendment 47

Jana Toom, Michał Kobosko

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
10. Endorses the intention of the Ombudsman to conduct a broader inquiry into how the scope of environmental information and information related to emissions into the environment is interpreted by the Commission; commends the Ombudsman for emphasising that the EU has an obligation to ensure a high level of public access to environmental information and public participation in decision-making relating to the environment;	10. Endorses the intention of the Ombudsman to conduct a broader inquiry into how the scope of environmental information and information related to emissions into the environment is interpreted by the Commission; recalls that a considerable number of petitions to the European Parliament concern the lack of or limited access to environmental information; emphasizes that the EU has an obligation to ensure a high level of public access to environmental information and public participation in decision-making relating to the environment;

Or. en

Amendment 48

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
10. Endorses the intention of the Ombudsman to conduct a broader inquiry into how the scope of environmental information and information related to emissions into the environment is interpreted by the Commission; commends the Ombudsman for emphasising that the EU has an obligation to ensure a high level of public access to environmental information and public participation in decision-making relating to the environment;	10. Endorses the intention of the Ombudsman to conduct a broader inquiry into how the scope of environmental information and information related to emissions into the environment is interpreted by the Commission; commends the Ombudsman for emphasising that the EU and the Commission in particular has an obligation to ensure a high level of public access to environmental information and public participation in decision-making relating to the environment;

Or. en

Amendment 49

Maria Zacharia, Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	10a. Calls on the Council to allow full public access to the legal opinion on the proposed EU directive on adequate minimum wages in the European Union, as recommended by the Ombudsman, who found evidence of maladministration in this matter;

Or. el

Amendment 50

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	10 a. Invites the Ombudsman to conduct a broader inquiry regarding access to documents related to the industrial facilities under the scope of the EU Emissions Trading System and regarding possible distortions of the European carbon market caused by the lack of access to documents.

Or. en

Amendment 51

Kosma Złotowski, Ivaylo Valchev, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that it is essential that the EU institutions follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication;	11. Regrets that the question of what constitutes an EU document continued to be an issue in 2023; welcomes the Ombudsman’s own-initiative inquiry concerning Commission’s failure to release e-mails in the scope of an access request concerning exchanges on draft EU soil, forest and climate adaptation strategies; recalls that work-related text and instant messages are ‘documents’ under Regulation 1049/2001 and stresses that respecting this principle is of particular importance;

Or. en

Amendment 52

Cristian Terheş

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that it is essential that the EU institutions follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication;	11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that it is essential that the EU institutions follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication; Recalls with great concern that, in 2021, following a request for public access to text messages between the Commission’s President and the CEO of a pharmaceutical company regarding the Commission’s purchase of COVID-19 vaccines, the Commission refused to acknowledge that such text messages fall within the definition of a ‘document’ under Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001; notes that, even though the Commission would have to register and search for such text messages, it could still decide not to grant full public access to them if the exceptions listed in Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001, such as commercial interest, applied; recalls that registering a document is a consequence of the existence of a document and not a prerequisite for its existence; takes note of the Ombudsman’s finding of maladministration by the Commission in this case(32); is concerned about the fact that the Commission has failed to follow up on the Ombudsman’s recommendation following her inquiry to conduct another search for relevant text messages; calls on the Commission to conduct a full search without delay; expresses deep concern about the growing distance between citizens and the EU institutions, which this situation has caused;

Or. en

Amendment 53

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that it is essential that the EU institutions follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication;	11. Supports the Ombudsman in her clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that it is essential that the EU institutions follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication, as according to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, citizens and legal persons residing in the EU have a right to access to any document held by almost all EU institutions; underlines that this right is subject only to a very limited number of exceptions and applies to written physical and electronic documents as well as to audio and audio-visual recordings related to policies, activities and decisions of the institutions;

Or. en

Amendment 54

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that it is essential that the EU institutions follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication;	11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and calls on the new Commission to urgently present European Parliament and Council a revised proposal of Regulation 1049/2001) which updates the definition of EU document, taking into account evolving means of communication, such as text and instant messages;

Or. en

Amendment 55

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that it is essential that the EU institutions follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication;	11. Congratulates the Ombudsman for her efforts to further contribute to the clarification of what constitutes an EU document and stresses that the EU institutions should follow the Ombudsman’s recommendations in order to adapt their administrative practices to take into account evolving means of communication;

Or. en

Amendment 56

Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	deleted

Or. el

Amendment 57

Fredis Beleris

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in migration-related actions; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;

Or. en

Amendment 58

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;

Or. en

Amendment 59

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; welcomes the fact that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding (MoU), in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations, highlighting concerns about the absence of a prior human rights impact assessment, notably related to the 'Migration and mobility' pillar of the MoU and the actions foreseen under that pillar;

Or. en

Amendment 60

Nadine Morano

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Notes the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; recalls that Frontex faces major challenges that require a strengthening of its capacities and its budget in order for the agency to perform its work under the best possible conditions; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;

Or. fr

Amendment 61

Kosma Złotowski, Ivaylo Valchev, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations; notes in this respect the legal limitations of Frontex mandate, which does not include the coordination of rescue operations and which is the responsibility of the national rescue coordination centres;

Or. en

Amendment 62

Jana Toom, Michał Kobosko

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations; stresses that all EU institutions, bodies and agencies have an obligation to respect human rights and fundamental freedoms as outlined in the Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights;

Or. en

Amendment 63

Maria Zacharia, Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission after the drowning of more than 500 people off the Greek coast on 14 June 2023; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;

Or. el

Amendment 64

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; notes that the Ombudsman asked for further clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for human rights in the context of the EU-Tunisia Memorandum of Understanding, in an effort to ensure that the EU complies with its human rights obligations;	12. Appreciates the Ombudsman’s commitment to upholding fundamental rights in the EU institutions’ border management activities by launching inquiries into the actions of Frontex and the Commission in this area; calls on the Ombudsman to ask for clarification from the Commission as to how it intends to guarantee respect for the rights of European states to better control their borders in an effort to combat uncontrolled migration flows, the scale of which is undermining the identity, security and prosperity of the EU’s Member States and their citizens;

Or. fr

Amendment 65

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	12 a. Strongly believes that Frontex must fully comply with fundamental rights in all its activities, including in its direct or indirect engagement in search and rescue (SAR) operations; underlines that Frontex must ensure full and consistent application of the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as well as of the International Convention on Maritime Search and Rescue (SAR Convention) and the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea; recalls that in the specific context of its surveillance activities, Frontex’s responsibilities in responding to maritime emergencies are also defined under EU law and that under the overall applicable legal framework, Member States are obliged to render assistance to any vessel or person in distress at sea, ensuring that their authorities comply with that obligation, in accordance with international law and respect for fundamental rights, regardless of the nationality or status of the persons; reminds that this obligation also applies to Frontex where it provides technical and operational assistance in the context of joint operations;

Or. en

Amendment 66

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	12a. In this context, calls on the Ombudsman also to take into account the human rights and interests of local European citizens. Local residents of the Greek, Spanish, Italian, etc. islands with reception centres are suffering serious safety, health and economic damage due to mass migration. It is also part of the Ombudsman’s mission to protect the interests and human rights of European citizens;

Or. fr

Amendment 67

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12 b (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	12 b. Endorses the Ombudsman's suggestions aimed at ensuring that the European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) complies with its fundamental rights obligations with regard to search and rescue in the context of its maritime surveillance activities; calls on the Council of the European Union and the Commission to work with the Parliament to establish an independent commission of inquiry to assess the reasons for the large numbers of deaths in the Mediterranean sea and make the necessary changes to prevent any tragic loss of lives from reoccurring;

Or. en

Amendment 68

Maria Zacharia, Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;	13. Congratulates the Ombudsman on her own-initiative inquiry into how the Commission ensures EU funds for Greek border management do not contribute to fundamental rights violations; welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece;

Or. el

Amendment 69

Fredis Beleris

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;	13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with national and local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities, following a relevant own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman;

Or. en

Amendment 70

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;	13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local and national authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;

Or. en

Amendment 71

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;	13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights and rule of law in these facilities; Underlines that respect for the rule of law is a prerequisite for access to EU funding; considers that this requirement to uphold the rule of law and the European Union's unwavering commitment to its values contribute to strengthening citizens' trust in the Union and attest to the EU's explicit pledge to ensure the quality of democracy throughout its territory;

Or. en

Amendment 72

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;	13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities; points out the Ombudsman call on the Commission to establish an independent commission of inquiry to assess the reasons for the large numbers of deaths in the Mediterranean and to learn from the Adriana shipwreck;

Or. en

Amendment 73

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;	13. Notes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities; stresses that local residents also have rights;

Or. fr

Amendment 74

Nadine Morano

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
13. Welcomes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;	13. Notes the Commission’s decision to work with local authorities to draw up a fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities in Greece, following an own-initiative inquiry by the Ombudsman into how the Commission ensures respect for fundamental rights in these facilities;

Or. fr

Amendment 75

Maria Zacharia, Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	13a. Supports the Ombudsman’s proposals to the European External Action Service regarding the assessment of human rights risks prior to providing support to non-EU countries;

Or. el

Amendment 76

Fidias Panayiotou, Maria Zacharia

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	13 a. Calls on the Commission to extend the fundamental rights impact assessment of EU-funded migration management facilities to other Member States, like Spain, Italy, Cyprus and Malta

Or. en

Amendment 77

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 b (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	13 b. Regrets that the Commission failed to launch a public consultation on the tri-annual European Citizenship report 2023 pursuant to Article 25 of the TFEU; calls on the Commission to take actions to ensure that all EU citizens can effectively exercise their rights and to draw up a clear guidelines for future reports, with consultations on every tri-annual report on EU citizenship and subsequent legislative proposals;

Or. en

Amendment 78

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;	14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels;

Or. en

Amendment 79

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;	14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; highlights the need for the Parliament to always pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest;

Or. en

Amendment 80

Kosma Złotowski, Ivaylo Valchev, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;	14. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s activities following the Qatargate scandal in the European Parliament; strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency; underlines that ethics rules have to be rigorously followed in order to restore citizens’ confidence in the European institutions;

Or. en

Amendment 81

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;	14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels, beginning with that of their presidency; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;

Or. fr

Amendment 82

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;	14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament as well as in the European Commission, that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;

Or. en

Amendment 83

Nadine Morano

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; invites the Ombudsman, in this context, to suggest improvements to the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;	14. Strongly supports the Ombudsman’s conclusions that the EU’s ethical and anticorruption rules need to be respected and strengthened by the EU institutions and that Parliament’s implementation of reforms in this area must be properly monitored and enforced at all levels; urges the Ombudsman to pay close attention to direct and indirect lobbying practices in Parliament that might increase the risk of potential conflicts of interest; welcomes the considerable progress achieved in the current Code of Conduct for Members of the European Parliament regarding integrity and transparency;

Or. fr

Amendment 84

Jana Toom, Michał Kobosko

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 15

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
15. Emphasises the essential role of transparency, good administration and institutional checks and balances in the work of the EU institutions;	15. Emphasises the essential role of transparency, good administration and institutional checks and balances in the work of the EU institutions; welcomes the adoption of an agreement for establishing an Interinstitutional Ethics Body but regrets that the negotiations between the signing institutions could not deliver a more ambitious framework that would set-up a genuine, independent ethics body; urges all the signatory institutions to go beyond the framework when implementing their respective ethical requirements and standards;

Or. en

Amendment 85

Maria Zacharia, Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	15a. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s intention, after the Qatar scandal, to launch an inquiry into travel expenses paid for by third parties since 2021 and to determine whether the Commission took appropriate measures to mitigate potential conflicts of interest in these cases;

Or. el

Amendment 86

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 15 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	15 a. Calls on the Ombudsman to exercise stricter supervision over how the Union's funds and budget are expended and to ensure that the EU's interests are not undermined by violations of the rule of law, infringements of EU principles and values, corruption, or conflicts of interest;

Or. en

Amendment 87

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 15 b (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	15 b. Calls on the Ombudsman to inquire into the potential conflict of interest concerning the portfolios of designated commissioners at the start of each legislative term.

Or. en

Amendment 88

Nadine Morano

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
16. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s investigations into risks of conflicts of interest in the Commission, especially in the area of the European Defence Fund (EDF); finds it problematic that the Commission is not required to make public the names of the experts it consults on EDF-related projects, and invites the Commission to reflect on how to increase transparency and public scrutiny in this sensitive policy area;	16. Notes the Ombudsman’s investigations into risks of conflicts of interest in the Commission, especially in the area of the European Defence Fund (EDF);

Or. fr

Amendment 89

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
16. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s investigations into risks of conflicts of interest in the Commission, especially in the area of the European Defence Fund (EDF); finds it problematic that the Commission is not required to make public the names of the experts it consults on EDF-related projects, and invites the Commission to reflect on how to increase transparency and public scrutiny in this sensitive policy area;	16. Takes note of the Ombudsman’s investigations into risks of conflicts of interest in the Commission, especially in the area of the European Defence Fund (EDF);

Or. en

Amendment 90

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 16

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
16. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s investigations into risks of conflicts of interest in the Commission, especially in the area of the European Defence Fund (EDF); finds it problematic that the Commission is not required to make public the names of the experts it consults on EDF-related projects, and invites the Commission to reflect on how to increase transparency and public scrutiny in this sensitive policy area;	16. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s investigations into risks of conflicts of interest in the Commission, especially in the area of the European Defence Fund (EDF); finds it problematic that the Commission is not required to make public the names of the experts it consults on EDF-related projects; urges the Commission to increase transparency and public scrutiny in this sensitive policy area; calls on the EU institutions to maintain and enhance public trust in the impartiality of administrative bodies involving experts;

Or. en

Amendment 91

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 16 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	16 a. Welcomes Ombudsman’s call on the Commission to publish the declarations of interest made by the members of the Regulatory Scrutiny Board, a body which has an essential role in the preparation of the Commission’s legislative proposals, proactively and, if needed, amend the relevant rules governing the Board;

Or. en

Amendment 92

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 17

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
17. Supports the Ombudsman’s call on the European Investment Bank (EIB) to improve its rules on conflicts of interest and to strengthen the oversight role of its Ethics and Compliance Committee, following the move of its vice-president to become the CEO of a national promotional bank; encourages the Ombudsman, in this regard, to continue focusing on the issue of cooling-off periods and revolving door moves by senior staff members from all EU institutions, agencies and bodies in order to ensure the highest ethical standards of transparency and public accountability;	17. Takes note of the Ombudsman’s call on the European Investment Bank (EIB) to improve its rules on conflicts of interest and to strengthen the oversight role of its Ethics and Compliance Committee, following the move of its vice-president to become the CEO of a national promotional bank; encourages the Ombudsman, in this regard, to continue focusing on the issue of cooling-off periods and revolving door moves by senior staff members from all EU institutions, agencies and bodies in order to ensure the highest ethical standards of transparency and public accountability;

Or. en

Amendment 93

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 18

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
18. Welcomes the Commission’s changes to its internal guidance on public procurement, positively assessed by the Ombudsman’s inquiry, which strengthen its handling of potential professional conflicts of interest in calls for tender;	18. Welcomes the Commission’s changes to its internal guidance on public procurement, positively assessed by the Ombudsman’s inquiry, which strengthen its handling of potential professional conflicts of interest in calls for tender; regrets, however, that no serious clarification has yet been provided as regards the conditions for the award of more than EUR 70 billion worth of public contracts concluded with the pharmaceutical industries since 2020, which will have a long-term financial impact on the finances of the Union and its Member States;

Or. fr

Amendment 94

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
19. Encourages the Commission to step up its efforts to increase transparency with regard to the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and supports the Ombudsman’s call on the Commission to improve its handling of requests for public access to RRF-related documents and to continue publishing preliminary assessments of Member States’ payment requests;	19. Encourages the Commission to step up its efforts to increase transparency with regard to the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and supports the Ombudsman’s call on the Commission to improve its handling of requests for public access to RRF-related documents and to continue publishing preliminary assessments of Member States’ payment requests; strongly recommends that the Ombudsman investigate the activities of the Commission in the area of border protection; instead of criticising the Member States and border protection agencies, the Commission should support Member States that are defending their borders and not threaten them or punish them with withdrawal of funding and with fines. The activities of the European Ombudsman should take into account the interests of European citizens;

Or. fr

Amendment 95

Maria Zacharia, Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
19. Encourages the Commission to step up its efforts to increase transparency with regard to the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and supports the Ombudsman’s call on the Commission to improve its handling of requests for public access to RRF-related documents and to continue publishing preliminary assessments of Member States’ payment requests;	19. Encourages the Commission to step up its efforts to increase transparency with regard to the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and supports the Ombudsman’s call on the Commission to improve its handling of requests for public access to RRF-related documents and to continue publishing preliminary assessments of Member States’ payment requests; emphasises the need for all Member States to set up public portals informing citizens about all recipients of RRF funds;

Or. el

Amendment 96

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 19

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
19. Encourages the Commission to step up its efforts to increase transparency with regard to the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and supports the Ombudsman’s call on the Commission to improve its handling of requests for public access to RRF-related documents and to continue publishing preliminary assessments of Member States’ payment requests;	19. Encourages the Commission to step up its efforts to increase transparency with regard to the Recovery and Resilience Facility (RRF) and invites the Commission to improve its handling of requests for public access to RRF-related documents and to continue publishing preliminary assessments of Member States’ payment requests;

Or. en

Amendment 97

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	19 a. Highlights that the EU planned unprecedented levels of investments, involving both the public and private sectors, under the Next Generation EU, thus becoming even more crucial to have in place at EU level a decision-making process based on full transparency and on the strongest ethical rules; calls on the Ombudsman to adopt a reinforced oversight on the implementation of the rules and procedures concerning the allocation and use of EU funds under Next Generation EU in order to ensure integrity, full transparency and democratic accountability of the EU Institutions as well as helping to prevent conflicts of interest, rule of law's breaches and corruption cases from occurring;

Or. en

Amendment 98

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 19 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	19 a. Calls on the Commission to take all necessary steps to ensure that all Member States have set up public portals containing data on major funding recipients and publish all RRF beneficiaries on these public portals;

Or. en

Amendment 99

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 20

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
20. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s decision to open an own-initiative inquiry into the Commission’s delays related to risk management of dangerous chemicals, the aim of which is to examine delays in introducing restrictions to mitigate the risks of specific chemicals and in placing chemicals on the list of substances where use is subject to prior authorisation;	20. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s decision to open an own-initiative inquiry into the Commission’s delays related to risk management of dangerous chemicals, the aim of which is to examine delays in introducing restrictions to mitigate the risks of specific chemicals and in placing chemicals on the list of substances where use is subject to prior authorisation; underlines that concerns were also raised on the lack of transparency of the 'comitology procedures', which the Commission has to follow in the adoption of implementing regulations and decisions, as these procedures provide limited information being made publicly available, thus making very difficult for the public to hold the Commission and Member States to account for their actions;

Or. en

Amendment 100

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 20 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	20 a. Welcomes the Ombudsman’s decision to open an own-initiative inquiry into the Commission’s practice of inviting only industry representatives to certain workshops on pesticides;

Or. en

Amendment 101

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 21

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
21. Is worried that the Ombudsman identified several transparency concerns in the Commission’s interactions with the tobacco industry; notes, however, that the Commission committed to further assessing the exposure of its departments to lobbying by the tobacco industry; reminds the Commission that the EU and all its Member States are signatories to the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and that they are therefore obliged, in setting and implementing their public health policies with respect to tobacco control, to take action to protect these policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry;	21. Is worried that the Ombudsman identified several transparency concerns in the Commission’s interactions with the tobacco industry, as is still the case with the pharmaceutical industries; notes, however, that the Commission committed to further assessing the exposure of its departments to lobbying by the tobacco industry; reminds the Commission that the EU and all its Member States are signatories to the World Health Organization’s Framework Convention on Tobacco Control and that they are therefore obliged, in setting and implementing their public health policies with respect to tobacco control, to take action to protect these policies from commercial and other vested interests of the tobacco industry;

Or. fr

Amendment 102

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 21 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	21 a. Invites the Ombudsman to take into consideration investigating the level of transparency of Commission’s interactions with the pharma industry;

Or. en

Amendment 103

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 22

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
22. Points out that the Ombudsman conducted an inquiry into how EPSO carried out ‘pre-selection’ tests as part of a procedure to recruit new staff into the EU civil service, and identified issues concerning the organisation of tests which are exclusively carried out remotely; calls on EPSO to improve its recruitment procedures by ensuring that technical requirements do not disadvantage certain candidates and to provide clear information to candidates; is of the opinion that candidates should be given the option, if they so choose, to participate in these tests while physically present at a test centre, as was common practice prior to the COVID-19 pandemic;	22. Recalls the imperative obligation of the EU institutions to secure the services of independent and well qualified officials recruited in an open manner and with due geographical balance between nationalities and languages. Points out that the Ombudsman conducted an inquiry into how European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) carried out ‘pre-selection’ tests as part of a procedure to recruit new staff into the EU civil service, and identified issues concerning the organisation of tests which are exclusively carried out remotely; calls on EPSO to improve its recruitment procedures by ensuring that technical requirements do not disadvantage certain candidates and to provide clear information to candidates; is of the opinion that candidates should be given the option, if they so choose, to participate in these tests while physically present at a test centre, as was common practice prior to the COVID-19 pandemic;

Or. en

Amendment 104

Emmanouil Fragkos, Galato Alexandraki

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 22 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	22a. Highlights the lack of adequate initiatives for further investigation into the scandal over the supply of vaccines without due transparency;

Or. el

Amendment 105

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 23 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	23 a. Calls for a Eurobarometer survey to be carried out regarding EU citizens' awareness of the right to submit complaints to the European Ombudsman, in order to gather data that will enable the launch of a robust and accessible awareness-raising campaign; considers that regular EU-wide surveys based on cross-border opinion polls help to raise awareness of citizens' concerns among EU institutions;

Or. en

Amendment 106

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	24 a. Stresses that the 'European Accessibility Act'1a was adopted on 17 April 2019 and that the deadline sets out in it for its transposition by Member States was on 28 June 2022; underlines that the main scope of the European Accessibility Act was to make life easier for at least 87 million of persons with disabilities, facilitating their access to, inter alia, public transport, banking services, computers, TVs, e-books, online shops; strongly regrets that all Member States are still failing to ensure its full and consistent transposition and are keeping accumulating delays, as confirmed by the ongoing infringement proceedings launched against all of them by the Commission; calls on the Ombudsman to raise this very serious EU law's violation, which severely undermìnes the rights of persons with disabilities, as part of the overall activities carried out in the EU framework for the UN CRPD, in order to help solving it as a matter of priority;
	_________________
	1a Directive (EU) 2019/882 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on the accessibility requirements for products and services

Or. en

Amendment 107

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 24 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	24a. Stresses that, although progress has been made within the EU institutions in the implementation of the provisions of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, the achievement of many accessibility targets is still delayed and insufficiently effective; recommends that the next Ombudsman intervene to examine and accelerate accessibility measures in the European institutions and to examine whether people with disabilities are proportionally represented in the institutions;

Or. fr

Amendment 108

Virginie Joron, Pál Szekeres, Georg Mayer, Fabrice Leggeri, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Sebastian Kruis

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 25 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	25a. Calls on the Ombudsman to open an inquiry into the case of the European Schools and to examine how children with disabilities could be integrated into that institution, so that their parents can participate in the work of the institutions under equal opportunities;

Or. fr

Amendment 109

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
26. Stresses the importance of the European Network of Ombudsmen (ENO) and the annual meetings hosted with national and regional ombudsmen through the ENO in further raising awareness of what the European Ombudsman can do for European citizens; encourages the Ombudsman to continue to take part in exchanges of experience and best practice with national ombudsmen through the ENO; takes note of the fact that the 2023 ENO annual conference focused on the protection of human rights and addressing the benefits and potential drawbacks of the use of AI in public administration;	26. Stresses the importance of the European Network of Ombudsmen (ENO) and the annual meetings hosted with national and regional ombudsmen through the ENO in further raising awareness of what the European Ombudsman can do for European citizens; encourages the Ombudsman to continue to take part in exchanges of experience and best practice with national ombudsmen through the ENO; takes note of the fact that the 2023 ENO annual conference focused on the protection of human rights and addressing the benefits and potential drawbacks of the use of AI in public administration; welcomes the joining of ENO by the Institution of the Human Rights Ombudsman of Bosnia and Herzegovina; calls on the Ombudsman to strengthen cooperation with the national Ombudsman's offices of the EU candidate countries in order to enhance those countries public authorities' capacity to align with the EU good administration, integrity and accountability standards;

Or. en

Amendment 110

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 26

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
26. Stresses the importance of the European Network of Ombudsmen (ENO) and the annual meetings hosted with national and regional ombudsmen through the ENO in further raising awareness of what the European Ombudsman can do for European citizens; encourages the Ombudsman to continue to take part in exchanges of experience and best practice with national ombudsmen through the ENO; takes note of the fact that the 2023 ENO annual conference focused on the protection of human rights and addressing the benefits and potential drawbacks of the use of AI in public administration;	26. Stresses the importance of the European Network of Ombudsmen (ENO) and the annual meetings hosted with national and regional ombudsmen through the ENO in further raising awareness of what the European Ombudsman can do for European citizens; encourages the Ombudsman to continue to take part in exchanges of experience and best practice with national ombudsmen through the ENO; takes note of the fact that the 2023 ENO annual conference focused on the protection of human rights and addressing the benefits and potential drawbacks of the use of AI in public administration; Encourages civil society organizations to better utilize the services of the European Ombudsman for scrutiny over the EU institutions, transparency guarantees, and handle cases of non-compliance with Union law;

Or. en

Amendment 111

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
27. Calls for the continuation of the close cooperation between the Ombudsman and the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions, which have the shared mission of bringing the EU institutions closer to citizens; expresses its great appreciation for the attention and follow-up that the Ombudsman affords to all complaints, including those falling outside the mandate of the European Ombudsman, such as citizens’ complaints about specific issues related to EU legislation, and supports the Ombudsman in advising those complainants to turn to Parliament’s Committee on Petitions;	27. Calls for the continuation of the close cooperation between the Ombudsman and the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions, which have the shared mission of bringing the EU institutions closer to citizens; expresses its great appreciation for the attention and follow-up that the Ombudsman affords to all complaints, including the referral of complaints, falling out of its remit concerning implementation of EU legislation, to the European Parliament Petitions Committee;

Or. en

Amendment 112

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 27

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
27. Calls for the continuation of the close cooperation between the Ombudsman and the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions, which have the shared mission of bringing the EU institutions closer to citizens; expresses its great appreciation for the attention and follow-up that the Ombudsman affords to all complaints, including those falling outside the mandate of the European Ombudsman, such as citizens’ complaints about specific issues related to EU legislation, and supports the Ombudsman in advising those complainants to turn to Parliament’s Committee on Petitions;	27. Calls for the continuation of the close cooperation between the Ombudsman and the European Parliament’s Committee on Petitions, which have the shared mission of bringing the EU institutions closer to citizens; expresses its great appreciation for the attention and follow-up that the Ombudsman affords to all complaints, including those falling outside the mandate of the European Ombudsman, such as citizens’ complaints about specific issues related to EU legislation, and supports the Ombudsman in advising those complainants to turn to Parliament’s Committee on Petitions; Encourages the Ombudsman office to continue their efforts to that end, given that cooperation with the Committee on Petitions, timely information and access to documents in all 24 official EU languages may increase the effective participation of citizens and civil society in the decision-making process;

Or. en

Amendment 113

Gordan Bosanac

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 27 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	27 a. Appreciates that the acceptance rate by the EU institutions, namely the percentage of positive replies to the total number of proposals made by the Ombudsman to correct or improve their administrative practices, stood at 81%, representing an improvement on the previous year; strongly believes, however, that the Union institutions, agencies, bodies and offices, must fully and consistently comply with all Ombudsman's solutions, recommendations and suggestions;

Or. en

Amendment 114

Nikos Pappas

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
29. Appreciates and welcomes the efforts of the Ombudsman and her office to constantly improve their internal procedures to ensure that complainants have an optimal experience and that complaints are dealt with as efficiently as possible; welcomes the improvements to the Ombudsman’s online complaint system, which have made it more user-friendly; welcomes the Ombudsman’s multilingual website, which reflects the Ombudsman’s commitment to offer assistance in the 24 official languages of the EU;	29. Appreciates and welcomes the efforts of the Ombudsman and her office to constantly improve their internal procedures to ensure that complainants have an optimal experience and that complaints are dealt with as efficiently as possible; welcomes the improvements to the Ombudsman’s online complaint system, which have made it more user-friendly; welcomes the Ombudsman’s multilingual website, which reflects the Ombudsman’s commitment to offer assistance in the 24 official languages of the EU; Emphasises the significance of guaranteeing full access for disabled persons to the whole range of resources provided by the EU to its citizens, especially through systematic translation and interpretation services offered for all official languages, including sign language;

Or. en

Amendment 115

Peter Agius

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 29

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
29. Appreciates and welcomes the efforts of the Ombudsman and her office to constantly improve their internal procedures to ensure that complainants have an optimal experience and that complaints are dealt with as efficiently as possible; welcomes the improvements to the Ombudsman’s online complaint system, which have made it more user-friendly; welcomes the Ombudsman’s multilingual website, which reflects the Ombudsman’s commitment to offer assistance in the 24 official languages of the EU;	29. Appreciates and welcomes the efforts of the Ombudsman and her office to constantly improve their internal procedures to ensure that complainants have an optimal experience and that complaints are dealt with as efficiently as possible; encourages the Ombudsman’s efforts to further improve the visibility of its activities and welcomes the improvements to the Ombudsman’s online complaint system, which have made it more user-friendly; welcomes the Ombudsman’s multilingual website, which reflects the Ombudsman’s commitment to offer assistance in the 24 official languages of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 116

Fidias Panayiotou

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 29 a (new)

Motion for a resolution	Amendment
	29 a. Calls on the Commission and Council to answer in a positive manner to any budget increase request regarding the financial allocation for the European Ombudsman institution, taking into consideration the increasingly complex EU decision-making environment and the Ombudsman's role in ensuring that the European administration remains accountable and transparent;

Or. en