On public access to documents – report covering the years 2022 - 2024
LIBE-PR-778284
Committee on Civil Liberties, Justice and Home Affairs · Rapporteur: Veronika Cifrová Ostrihoňová
Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.
This draft report assesses public access to EU documents in 2022-2024, noting progress and shortcomings, and makes recommendations to improve transparency.¶¶¶ It calls for updated rules to make disclosure the rule, address delays and over-classification, and ensure proactive publication.¶¶¶
Committee position. The rapporteur proposes a resolution that reaffirms access to documents as a fundamental right, assesses recent developments, and makes recommendations to improve transparency, including addressing delays, over-classification, and the need for updated legislation.¶¶
Key points
- Notes that in 2024 the Commission received 6 938 initial requests and 641 confirmatory applications, a 7 % increase from 2023.¶
- Highlights that Parliament's register contained 918 803 references by end 2024, with a 91 % positive response rate.¶
- Calls for partial disclosure where feasible, given the public interest in transparency.¶
- Expresses concern over over-classification and reiterates the call for binding rules on classification and declassification.¶
- Deplores lack of follow-up by Commission and Council on previous recommendations.¶
- Calls on the Commission to base legislative proposals on verifiable data and ensure transparency in stakeholder selection.¶
- Regrets persistent transparency shortcomings in the Council, including refusal of access to trilogue documents.¶
- Welcomes the CJEU judgment in Stevi and The New York Times v Commission but regrets it did not reinterpret the regulation for modern communications.¶
- Calls on the Commission to review its revised internal rules on access to documents to ensure compatibility with EU law and highest transparency.¶
- Regrets withdrawal of 2008 and 2011 proposals and calls for a new proposal narrowing exceptions and setting a new openness standard.¶
- Recommends addressing systemic delays in confirmatory applications by improving procedures, resources, and communication.¶
- Stresses that transparency must be the rule, exceptions strictly interpreted, and citizens must be able to understand and participate in the legislative process.¶¶