Skip to content
OPINION (COM(2024)0576 – C100208/2024 – 2024/0318(COD))

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on cooperation among enforcement authorities responsible for the enforcement of Directive (EU) 2019/633 on unfair trading practices in business-to-business relationships in the agricultural and food supply chain

IMCO-AD-770204

Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection · Rapporteur: Adnan Dibrani

✦ In short · AI summary of this text, generated 4 Sept 2026

Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.

The committee opinion amends the proposed regulation on cross-border cooperation between enforcement authorities against unfair trading practices in the agri-food chain, clarifying procedures, costs, and coordination. It extends application to non-EU buyers, sets timeframes, requires justification for refusals, and gives the Commission a role in disputes and standard forms.

Committee position. The committee proposes amendments to improve cooperation, including clarifying refusal grounds, cost sharing, coordinator designation, and Commission involvement.

Key points

  1. The opinion supports the Commission's proposal to strengthen cross-border cooperation between enforcement authorities against unfair trading practices.
  2. Requests for information must be answered within 45 days, and authorities may refuse if requests are disproportionate, out of scope, or conflict with national law, with justification.
  3. The regulation applies to unfair trading practices prohibited under Directive (EU) 2019/633 and stricter national rules if prohibited in both member states concerned.
  4. It also applies to practices by buyers established outside the EU if their activities target the internal market; such buyers may appoint an 'EU Responsible Person'.
  5. Member states must waive claims for reimbursement of expenses, except for costs from measures dismissed as unfounded by a court; translation costs shall not be passed to suppliers.
  6. Enforcement authorities must notify others and the Commission within 30 days of a decision establishing a cross-border unfair trading practice.
  7. The Commission shall adopt standard forms for mutual assistance requests within six months of the regulation's application.
  8. In disagreements between authorities, either may refer the matter to the Commission, which shall issue an opinion; the Commission may also act on its own initiative.
  9. If authorities cannot agree on a coordinator for coordinated actions, the authority of the member state where the suspected buyer is established shall be coordinator.
  10. The Commission shall issue guidelines on mutual assistance requests, including deadlines and escalation protocols.
  11. The Commission must report to Parliament and Council three years after application, assessing effectiveness, administrative burden, and enforcement trends.

Who is affected

  • Enforcement authorities in member states: must cooperate, justify refusals, and follow new timeframes and procedures.
  • Buyers established outside the EU: may be subject to cooperation if targeting the internal market and may appoint an EU Responsible Person.
  • Suppliers, especially small and medium-sized enterprises and farmers: protected from bearing translation costs and supported in reporting practices.
  • The Commission: issues opinions, standard forms, guidelines, and reports on the regulation's application.

Figures and deadlines

  • 45 days from receipt of request for providing information, unless otherwise agreed.
  • 30 days after adopting a decision to notify other authorities and the Commission.
  • Six months after entry into force for the regulation to apply.
  • Three years after application for the Commission's report.