Skip to content
MOTION FOR A RESOLUTION (2024/2840(RSP))

On Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/1828 renewing the authorisation for the placing on the market of feed containing, consisting of and of food and feed products produced from genetically modified maize MON 810 pursuant to Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2017/1207

B-10-2024-0146

Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety · Rapporteur: Martin Häusling, Biljana Borzan, Anja Hazekamp

✦ In short · AI summary of this text, generated 6 Sept 2026

Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.

Parliament objects to Commission Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/1828 renewing authorisation for genetically modified maize MON 810, considering it exceeds implementing powers and is inconsistent with Union law. It calls on the Commission to repeal the decision and urges it to respect international obligations and the 'do no harm' principle.

Key points

  1. Considers that the decision exceeds the implementing powers of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003.
  2. Finds the decision incompatible with Union law, as it fails to ensure a high level of protection of human life, animal health, and the environment.
  3. Calls on the Commission to repeal Implementing Decision (EU) 2024/1828.
  4. Welcomes the Commission's 2020 recognition of sustainability, but expresses disappointment that it continues to authorise GMOs despite objections.
  5. Urges the Commission to take into account international agreements such as the Paris Climate Agreement, the UN CBD and UN SDGs, and to explain how draft acts uphold 'do no harm'.

Who is affected

  • The Commission, which is called on to repeal the decision and change its authorisation practice.
  • Bayer Agriculture BV and Bayer CropScience LP, the applicants for renewal, whose authorisation is contested.

Legal basis: Article 11(3) and Article 23(3) of Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003