Sittings · Document

Draft report (2025/2052(INI)) 2025-04-24

The future of agriculture and the post-2027 common agricultural policy

Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development

Amendment 727

Luke Ming Flanagan

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production, with a view of further improve the performance of the CAP, income support should be targeted to farmers who are actively engaged in a farming enterprise, including the provision of both public and private goods, In order to ensure a common approach at Union level for such a targeting of support, a framework definition for a "farmer’ displaying the essential elements and a clear definition of a "farmer" for the purposes of eligibility for support should be set out. On the basis of this framework, Member States should define which farmers are eligible for support. It should also not result in precluding support to pluri-active farmers, who are actively farming but who are also engaged in non-agricultural activities outside their farm, as their multiple activities often strengthen the socio-economic fabric of rural areas.

Or. en

Amendment 728

Veronika Vrecionová

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; Calls for a comprehensive study to assess whether introducing mechanisms such as capping or degressivity of direct payments under the CAP could improve fairness and ensure that small and medium-sized farms receive more targeted and effective support; underlines that such measures could also help preserve the diversity of farming models across Europe, reduce land speculation, and strengthen rural cohesion by avoiding an excessive concentration of aid; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 729

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding and reinforcing direct aid, which is qualified for the provision of public goods; stress the importance of focusing further direct aid in Pillar I on professional farmers most in need, with a particular attention to farmers in areas with natural constraints, young and new farmers and multi-activity farmers under the CAP; underlines in this regard important instruments like capping, degressivity and redistribution mechanisms to support farmers in need, including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to a model which increasingly remunerates farms for public goods and services with an attractive income to give farmers further stability to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 730

Carola Rackete

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid, that is qualified to the provision of public goods, for all professional farmers under the CAP, taking into account their size and type of production by focussing on those needing the most support with capping, degressivity and redistribution mechanisms – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to a model remunerating farms for their services for climate, environment and animal welfare with attractive measures based on area or livestock units, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU; insists that fair markets and prices are a prerequisite for this shift to qualified direct payments for public goods;

Or. en

Amendment 731

Christine Schneider, Stefan Köhler, Monika Hohlmeier, Norbert Lins, Marion Walsmann

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU; calls for direct CAP payments, in particular, to a natural person not to exceed EUR 500 000 and for the Commission to record the amount of the payments per natural person; points out that the Commission is setting up a suitable tool for redistributing direct payments to strengthen small and medium-sized enterprises;

Or. de

Amendment 732

Sebastian Everding

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for small and medium sized farmers under the CAP

Or. en

Amendment 733

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of targeting the various direct income support instruments to meet the real needs of professional farmers under the CAP, including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to the limitations of an area-based model for distributing support because it grants more aid to larger farms, provides support even when prices are very high, and contributes to increasing land and farm prices, which in turn increases disparities in agricultural incomes, weakens the stability of farmers’ incomes and fails to maintain the economic viability and competitiveness of food production in all regions of the Union;

Or. fr

Amendment 734

Stanislav Stoyanov

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU; acknowledges that coupled support is an important part of direct payments and should be maintained with adequate budget; underlines that external convergence of direct payments is an important issue for enhancing competitiveness of agriculture across Europe.

Or. en

Amendment 735

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding aid for sustainable, agro-ecological farmers under the CAP, who contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas;

Or. en

Amendment 736

Krzysztof Hetman

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all active farmers under the CAP. Direct payments should remain a key tool in the new CAP. Notes that as a result of successive reforms of the CAP, direct payments are increasingly being used to pursue objectives other than income support, i.e. in particular objectives related to environment and climate. Linking direct payments to other objectives adversely affects the effectiveness of this instrument. Furthermore, direct payments have not been subject to valorisation for years and their effectiveness as an income support instrument - given the rising costs and increasingly frequent crises - is diminishing.

Or. en

Amendment 737

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for active farmers under the CAP, especially those that need it most, in line with the Vision for Agriculture and Food, – including multi-activity farmers , as all farmers contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points also to an model that also considers the level and quality of employment (including wages and social security contributions paid) , to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU; Calls for external convergence of CAP payments between older and newer member states.

Or. en

555Amendment 738

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid exclusively for professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, also based on new distribution criteria, taking account of the fact that specific sectoral and territorial support for incomes will also be necessary to address structural disadvantages, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. it

Amendment 739

Esther Herranz García, Gabriel Mato

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to a mainly area-based model that continues to provide for specific support schemes for some sectors as well as for young or small farmers and family farming models, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. es

Amendment 740

Herbert Dorfmann

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; Stresses the need for an appropriate instrument for redistribute the direct payments to strengthen small and medium-sized farms, applying degressive payment and absolute capping; point to a model that gives stability to farmers’ incomes and maintains economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 741

Camilla Laureti, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid under the CAP for those who need it most, in particular small and medium-sized enterprises located in inland and rural areas, young and women farmers, and those who adopt sustainable practices – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to overcome the area-based model, while giving stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintaining economic viability, competitiveness and sustainability in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 742

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU; in order to achieve this objective, it is essential to restore basic income support that is adequate to ensure the viability of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 743

Daniel Buda

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all active professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas, thereby avoiding wastage of resources on non-productive or speculative entities; points to an area-based model, including semi-subsistence and traditional farms, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. ro

Amendment 744

Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid, while better targeting persons actively engaged in agricultural production and the provision of public goods, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; underlines that direct payments in their current form generate a clear EU added value, give stability to farmers’ incomes and maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 745

Carmen Crespo Díaz, Gabriel Mato, Francisco José Millán Mon, Susana Solís Pérez, Elena Nevado del Campo, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to a mainly area-based model, which continues to provide for specific support for the most vulnerable farmers and stockbreeders, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. es

Amendment 746

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, with a specific focus on young, female and new farmers, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 747

Csaba Dömötör

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to the currently used area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 748

Maria Grapini

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production and country – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. ro

Amendment 749

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of ensuring direct income support for all professional farmers under the CAP, because of their contribution to food security and the maintenance of the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to a model that contributes effectively to the stability of farmers’ incomes and maintains economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions and territories of the EU;

Or. es

Amendment 750

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid exclusively for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 751

Barry Cowen, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all active and commercial farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 752

Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; recalls the importance of a per-hectare aid model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. fr

Amendment 753

Ciaran Mullooly

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all professional farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;5. Stresses the importance of safeguarding direct aid for all active farmers under the CAP, regardless of their size and type of production – including multi-activity farmers and livestock breeders, who also contribute significantly to the social and economic fabric of rural areas; points to an area-based model, to give stability to farmers’ incomes and to maintain economic viability and competitiveness in food production in all regions of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 754

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 – point a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
(a) Calls for the pursuit of equitable distribution of the value produced in the agri-food sector, by means of framework laws and interventions aimed at increasing the returns from entrepreneurship and agricultural incomes, by rebalancing the relationships within the chain towards distributors and producers.
In particular: - Incentives and investments for new agri-food business models that deliver long-term financial sustainability,
- Rebalancing of the commercial relationship between farmers, distributors and producers beyond the current EU approach of prohibited practices, by designing reference framework legislation inspired by the ‘EGAlim’ law;

Or. it

Amendment 755

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Notes, in line with the Vision for Agriculture and Food, the need to cap direct payments in order to redistribute and so target aid to those who need it most, considering the limited budget available and that larger structures receive very considerable sums of public aid due solely to their size but also benefit from economies of scale. Notes the Vision conclusions that, as well as constituting the vast majority of farms, “small and medium-sized farmers form the social fabric of rural areas, protecting nature and livelihoods” and that aid should be directed “with a particular attention to the farmers in areas with natural constraints, young and new farmers, and mixed farms”. 1a
__________________
1a ref Vision, p. 7: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52025DC0075

Or. en

Amendment 756

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Christine Singer, Ciaran Mullooly, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Recognises the EU’s commitment to pursue the full implementation of internal convergence, ensuring that all payment entitlements within a Member State or region attain a uniform unit value in accordance with the established policy objectives;​ Acknowledges the potential adverse effects that full payment equalisation may impose on certain family farms which are integral to the socio-economic fabric of rural communities; Insists that the full implementation of internal convergence be conditional upon well-funded and rewards based schemes and coupled income support being made available to farms negatively impacted.

Or. en

Amendment 757

Christine Singer

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Underlines that family farms form the structural backbone of European agriculture and play a key role in ensuring stability, sustainability and generational continuity in land management; stresses that their regional rootedness, long-term perspective and entrepreneurial responsibility make them indispensable for the vitality of rural areas; calls for dedicated, targeted and accessible support measures within the post 2027 CAP to safeguard and further strengthen this model as a foundation for a resilient and future-oriented agricultural sector.

Or. en

Amendment 758

Arash Saeidi

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Proposes, in order to better support farmers, that CAP Pillar I support be modulated to ensure that the size and type of farming are better taken into account, in particular small family farms, agroecological systems and local production; calls for the introduction and strengthening of redistributive payments for the first hectares, in order to ensure a fairer and more sustainable distribution of CAP funds;

Or. fr

Amendment 759

Bert-Jan Ruissen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Stresses that direct aid should go to active farmers, which means that they must make a substantial contribution to food production; stresses that the terminology used by the Commission that aid should go to those who need it most must be interpreted as supporting future-oriented and productive farms in making a substantial contribution to food production;

Or. nl

Amendment 760

Veronika Vrecionová

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Emphasises the importance of transparency in the allocation of CAP funds and calls for the systematic identification of final beneficiaries and interconnected companies; urges the Commission and Member States to introduce control mechanisms to prevent concentration of aid through complex ownership structures or artificial fragmentation of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 761

Camilla Laureti, Stefano Bonaccini

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Strongly believes that providing for a greater number of eco-schemes may encourage greater uptake of this mechanism by farmers; calls therefore on the Member States to invest in training and support to ensure that the benefits and application of eco-schemes are better understood by all farmers and livestock breeders;

Or. en

Amendment 762

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Calls for work to be done on the possibility of defining a simplified small farmers’ scheme, based on flat-rate aid, to provide support for this type of multi-activity farmer, which has significant social importance in a large part of the territory of the EU;

Or. es

Amendment 763

Stefan Köhler, Norbert Lins, Christine Schneider, Marion Walsmann, Lena Düpont

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Calls for a balanced, comparable and profitable approach to eco-schemes in all EU member states under Pillar I, encourages the European Commission to foster better EU-wide coordination as well as better collaboration between national and regional authorities in this regard;

Or. en

Amendment 764

Krzysztof Hetman

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Stresses the need to review direct support instruments in order to make the support more targeted and to reduce the administrative burden, especially related to the fulfilment of objectives other than income support, for example requirements under social conditionality;

Or. en

Amendment 765

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Underlines that eco-schemes, as a new instrument of the CAP and an incentive-based system encouraging the voluntary provision of public goods through agricultural practices that promote environmental and climate protection, have proven effective;

Or. en

Amendment 766

André Rodrigues

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Emphasizes the vital role played by the Common Agricultural Policy in strengthening the socio-economic fabric of rural areas, including through the promotion of economic diversification, job creation, population retention, and social inclusion

Or. en

Amendment 767

Luke Ming Flanagan

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Stresses the need to complete the process of both internal and external convergence to ensure a fair distribution of CAP support between and within Member States, including direct payments and to strengthen the credibility of the policy ;

Or. en

Amendment 768

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Recognises the critical issues arising from the application of eco-schemes, which were intended as incentives but, in fact, reduced a significant portion of direct payments previously guaranteed to farms, partly by increasing bureaucracy;

Or. en

Amendment 769

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Stresses the importance of supporting the role played by farmers as custodians of the land particularly in remote and mountainous areas while promoting and enhancing the family-farming dimension of agriculture in said EU areas;

Or. en

Amendment 770

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Calls for an adjustment of the system for reallocating funds - from Pillar 1 to Pillar 2 as well as direct payments to farms - in order to ensure equal competition conditions throughout the EU.

Or. en

Amendment 771

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Calls for an assessment of the introduction of countercyclical aid, which involves adjusting aid in line with market prices in order to stabilise farmers’ incomes;

Or. fr

Amendment 772

Maria Walsh

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5a. Stresses the increasingly volatile global marketplace and calls for an increase in the CAP budget dedicated to promotion of agri-food products in the EU and worldwide;

Or. en

Amendment 773

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5b. notes that the average size farm in the EU is in the region of 17HA; point out that as a result of this many farms in the EU are part time enterprises; Calls for this reality to be acknowledged in policy formation and for recognition of the positive benefits to the social fabric of rural areas this brings in retaining populations, particularly in peripheral areas; points out that it is essential for the maintenance of biodiversity that the low intensity agriculture that shaped these areas over centuries in maintained and adequately supported; highlights that special attention must be given to farmers developing short supply chains, creating niche products to add value within the farm gate as these initiatives add complexity to the farming enterprise;

Or. en

Amendment 774

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Ciaran Mullooly, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5b. Recalls that the Vision for Agriculture and Food stipulates that the increased application of mechanisms such as degressivity and capping shall be examined, taking into consideration the distinct structural and sectoral characteristics of the Member States. Emphasises that due consideration should be given to leased-in entitlements and family employment. Stresses capping should not be applied to targeted payments, including but not limited to eco-schemes and agri-environmental or climate-related payments, in order to preserve and promote their uptake.

Or. en

Amendment 775

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5b. Calls for the eco-schemes instrument to be consolidated in the form of a 'public goods bonus', and for the Commission to provide a catalogue of proven, efficient, and effective measures to enhance the environmental and climate performance of agriculture; this catalogue should be based on the evaluations of the current funding period, coordinated with other relevant interventions, and made available to the Member States in the national strategic plan, taking into account national requirements and farm conditions;

Or. en

Amendment 776

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5b. Calls for CAP direct payments to be granted to active farmers whose main activity consists of agricultural and food production, as well as to farmers who are actively engaged in the provision of public goods, with priority given to the production of agricultural products considered essential for the EU’s strategic autonomy and resilience.

Or. en

Amendment 777

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5b. Considers it necessary to reassess the fundamental role of coupled support, exploring a new framework that provides enhanced support for strategic sectors in terms of resources and greater flexibility in their use;

Or. en

Amendment 778

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5b. Calls on the Commission to assess the WTO rules on subsidies and countervailing measures with the same flexibility as shown by international competitors;

Or. fr

Amendment 779

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5c. Stresses the importance of supporting within the framework of the CAP the role played by farmers as custodians of the land particularly in remote and mountainous areas while promoting and enhancing the family-farming dimension of agriculture in said EU areas;

Or. en

Amendment 780

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5c. Calls for the establishment of a specific fund, separate from CAP funds, to provide support to farmers who, through their activity, are committed to the production of environmental goods and services for the benefit of society as a whole;

Or. en

Amendment 781

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 5 d (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
5d. Calls for the establishment of a specific fund, separate from the CAP, to provide support to farmers affected by natural disasters and catastrophes, who have suffered direct damage to their agricultural production and whose future production is at risk, thereby endangering the EU’s food security;

Or. en

Amendment 782

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for a CAP – especially a strong Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions; is convinced that strengthening the resilience of rural areas via the EAFRD has a big positive impact on ecology, social structure, the economy and is a key requirement for the success of the necessary transformation processes, including energy and the protection of biodiversity

Or. en

Amendment 783

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for a Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions; In this regard, it would be appropriate for rural development funding to be exclusively allocated to agricultural activities, while other actions supporting territories or infrastructure can be financed through cohesion funds

Or. en

Amendment 784

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions, Emphasises in this sense the crucial role of local governments and stakeholders such as cooperatives and local action groups in streamlining the efforts of Pillar 2;

Or. en

Amendment 785

Luke Ming Flanagan

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions; Further calls for the Commission to ensure that CAP supports and in particular Pillar II measures are delivered in timely manner to beneficiaries;

Or. en

Amendment 786

Daniel Buda

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring synergies and effective support for the agricultural sector within a coherent framework ensuring efficient use of EU funds without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;

Or. ro

Amendment 787

Csaba Dömötör

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for an independent CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected by ideological and political conflicts nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;

Or. en

Amendment 788

André Rodrigues

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, promoting policy coherence in order to facilitate integrated territorial approaches in rural areas and maximise their positive impact;

Or. en

Amendment 789

Camilla Laureti, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6. Calls for a CAP – especially Pillar II – separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;6. Calls for a CAP separate from but closely coordinated with cohesion policies, to ensure that rural development policies and investments are neither affected nor sidelined, thus ensuring effective support for the agricultural sector without compromising other key objectives for rural regions;

Or. en

Amendment 790

Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6a. stresses that the regions should have the capacity to design, implement and manage rural development measures autonomously, while respecting the constitutional specificities of each Member State; calls for the regionalised architecture within the EAFRD to be reinstated in the post-2027 period, with regional managing authorities and dedicated monitoring committees; considers it essential to re-establish a direct and structured channel of communication between regional governments and the European Commission, ensuring effective coordination and full respect for the principle of subsidiarity;

Or. pt

Amendment 791

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Christine Singer, Ciaran Mullooly, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6a. Emphasises the need for a well-funded Rural Development Programme (RDP) under Pillar II to support rural areas. Calls for a strong EU financial contribution, complemented by substantial national co-financing, to ensure the programme's effectiveness and long-term sustainability.

Or. en

Amendment 792

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6a. Advocates for the recognition of CAP environmental voluntary measures as adding value through dedicated incentives, without undermining the funds allocated to direct payments and investments;

Or. en

Amendment 793

Maria Walsh

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6a. Calls for an increase in the minimum budget dedicated to the LEADER programme, to ensure adequate funding for local action groups in developing community-led programmes;

Or. en

Amendment 794

Csaba Dömötör

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6a. Stresses that in case of the accession of Ukraine, the current level of area based payments would become unsustainable;

Or. en

Amendment 795

Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6b. calls for the reinstatement of the 85 % co-financing rate under the EAFRD for the outermost regions, taking into account the permanent structural constraints facing these regions, in particular their geographical isolation, small markets, dependence on imports and higher production and transport costs; stresses that these specific characteristics require differentiated and proportionate treatment in terms of access to agricultural policy funds, as is already the case with other European Union financial instruments, in full compliance with Article 349 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;

Or. pt

Amendment 796

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6b. Calls for the establishment of a specific and separate fund, distinct from the CAP, to provide support to farmers affected by natural disasters and calamities, who have suffered direct damage to their agricultural production and face the risk of compromising their future output, thereby jeopardising the food security of the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 797

Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 6 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
6c. recognises the importance of LEADER in post-2027 rural development policy, in particular its added value as a territorially integrated, participatory and community-based approach; stresses that LEADER has a central role to play in promoting attractive, prosperous, resilient and interconnected rural areas by supporting initiatives that generate local value, stimulate entrepreneurship, foster social innovation and strengthen the economic and social fabric of territories; stresses that attractive rural areas are essential for retaining and attracting human capital, especially young people and women, contributing to demographic and territorial balance, generational renewal and the reduction of regional disparities; also emphasises that the attractiveness of rural areas embodies, in practice, the ‘right to remain’, namely the right of people to live with dignity, opportunities and quality of life in their home regions, on an equal footing with urban areas; advocates, therefore, that LEADER should receive increased funding, greater administrative simplification and more predictable support, ensuring its structural impact on the balanced development of the European Union; also emphasises the importance of systematically applying the principle of rural proofing in European policies, ensuring that the needs, specificities and impacts on rural areas are properly taken into account at all stages of the policy cycle;

Or. pt

Amendment 798

Luke Ming Flanagan

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices; cautions however that the move from compliance based towards results based schemes may have its disadvantages in attaining high level of ambition in the delivery of environmental goals; notes that it is well recognized that environmental actions and the assessment and reporting of these can be highly subjective and variable year on year, for reasons well beyond the control of the landowner carrying out the measures; points out that landowners may be unwilling to participate in results based schemes as the targets may be unrealistic to attain, in addition the Members State may set the bar at a lower level in order to avoid conflict with beneficiaries; is of the opinion with the vast array of technical expertise at the disposal of the Commission and the Member States combined with the knowledge gained from the many EIPs is should be possible to develop schemes that can deliver positive environmental outcomes and that if landowners comply with the terms of the scheme in good faith they should be remunerated for their work; highlights that farmers may be more willing to take on higher level ambitious actions, that may be necessary to demonstrate innovative best practice, if they are secure in the knowledge that if they engage fully with the requirements of the scheme to the satisfaction of the managing authority then they will be remunerated; landowners may be unwilling to assume all the risk if they alone are left to carry the loss if the desired outcomes are not achieved; knowledge is also gained from finding out what doesn’t work, however the landowner cannot be expected to carry the cost of this;

Or. en

Amendment 799

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures (AECM) under Pillar II and voluntary eco-schemes under pillar I, especially if designed multi-annually, using an incentive-based approach 1a, are a key instrument for paying farmers more for delivering more of the public goods demanded by society, adapting to climate change, safeguarding the environment and promoting sustainable practices; Notes that since the reform of 2021, member states have already established 158 eco-schemes, using a cost incurred, income forgone approach similar to AECMs, and also needing to deliver climate-adaptive, resource-saving, resilience- and food security-boosting public goods above the baseline of conditionality. Notes the need to reward farmers generously for these deliverables, even beyond costs incurred and income forgone.
__________________
1a Sustainable practices are not an end unto themselves; they help adaptation to climate change but may involve additional effort and cost. Achieving, and paying the extra public money, for more complex deliverables is not necessarily a simplification, but needs to be done for climate adaptation and so food security. And of course these schemes must still be arranged and made available in the simplest way for farmers by the paying agencies, to aid their uptake.

Or. en

Amendment 800

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices and are more effective than eco-schemes, which have not achieved the desired results because they are highly complex for farmers; calls on the European Commission to be inventive in developing a new generation of agri-environmental and climate measures that can reduce the risks for farmers who choose to adopt agricultural practices that are more risky for their income because they make less use of plant protection products;

Or. fr

Amendment 801

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices and emphasises the importance of creating a legislative and policy framework which builds farmers capacitie for sustainable agri-ecological production;

Or. en

Amendment 802

Benoit Cassart, Elsi Katainen, Barry Cowen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices; underlines that agri-environmental and climate measures must not lead to a decrease in food production.

Or. en

Amendment 803

Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices while at the same time contributing to a decent income for farmers that are implementing such measures;

Or. en

Amendment 804

Norbert Lins, Stefan Köhler, Christine Schneider, Marion Walsmann, Herbert Dorfmann

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures, animal health and animal welfare measures as well as plant health measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;

Or. en

Amendment 805

Emma Wiesner

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices, and should receive an increased share of the funding within the next CAP.

Or. en

Amendment 806

Carola Rackete

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary eco schemes under Pillar I and the agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;

Or. en

Amendment 807

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary eco-schemes under Pillar I and agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;

Or. en

Amendment 808

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary second-pillar agri-environmental measures should adopt a simplified approach based on dedicated incentives; only through this can they serve as a valuable tool for environmental protection and the promotion of sustainable practices;

Or. en

Amendment 809

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Stresses the need to lighten and simplify the environmental conditions for receiving aid under Pillar II in order to improve agricultural production and facilitate the work of farmers;

Or. fr

Amendment 810

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II have failed to achieve the necessary safeguard for the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;

Or. en

Amendment 811

Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7. Recognises that voluntary agri-environmental and climate measures under Pillar II, using an incentive-based and simplified approach, are a key instrument for safeguarding the environment and the promotion of sustainable practices;7. Stresses the need to lighten and simplify environmental conditions for Pillar II support in order to improve agricultural production and facilitate the work of farmers;

Or. es

Amendment 812

Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Calls for the maintenance and strengthening, under Pillar II of the Common Agricultural Policy, of support measures for disadvantaged areas and areas with natural or specific constraints, recognising the fundamental role they play in enhancing the value of rural areas, protecting ecosystems and maintaining agricultural activity in areas with lower competitiveness; stresses that these measures are essential to ensure the economic viability of farms located in the outermost regions, in mountain areas, regions with poor soils, adverse climatic conditions or limited accessibility, helping to prevent land abandonment, preserve the landscape, maintain biodiversity and ensure active land management; also emphasises that these measures have a significant strategic value in terms of territorial cohesion and social justice, acting as instruments of compensation for the public service provided by farmers in maintaining areas of high natural and cultural value; calls, therefore, for the future framework of the post-2027 CAP to strengthen the budgetary allocation and stability of measures for disadvantaged areas, ensuring predictability, fairness and effectiveness in support for agriculture throughout the Union;

Or. pt

Amendment 813

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Stresses that in order to get farmer “buy in” and for the success of environmental measures, the food sovereignty of local and regional areas is not undermined by the implementation of measures; reaffirms the fundamental human right of people to food, and the right of populations who in the past, provided for themselves and their region to continue to do so into the future; firmly believes that it is critical for the success of any environmental program that sufficient funds are mobilised to underpin the economic viability of the landowners and communities providing the public goods; in light of the Commissions own estimation that for every €1 invested in nature restoration there is an economic return of €8 to €38, there is a legitimate expectation that those delivering the essential public goods will be adequately and fully remunerated for the services that they are providing for the benefit of wider society;

Or. en

Amendment 814

Cristina Guarda, Pär Holmgren

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Considers that Payments for Ecosystem Services (PES) should be further developed as a tool to incentivise farmers for delivering tangible environmental benefits; stresses that PES schemes follow a whole-farm approach, encouraging integrated, long-term sustainability rather than isolated or short-term actions; highlights that low or unattractive payment levels have discouraged participation in some eco-schemes and that better-calibrated incentives adapted to regional conditions and farm diversity can improve uptake; underlines the importance of multi-annual payment structures, particularly for practices with long-term impacts on soil health, biodiversity, and water quality; calls for equitable access, especially for smaller farms and operators;

Or. en

Amendment 815

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Calls for support for maintaining organic farming to be made mandatory in national strategic plans, given the environmental services it provides in terms of air, water and soil quality, in accordance with the principle of ‘public money for public good’; considers that organic products should benefit from a specific crisis management measure allowing for calls for tenders to be issued to withdraw surpluses and redirect them to the conventional market or to food aid programmes for the most deprived;

Or. fr

Amendment 816

Arash Saeidi

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Calls for part of the CAP budget to be set aside to support organic farming in order to improve the health of European farmers and consumers, with the aim of achieving 25 % of the EU’s usable agricultural area under organic farming by 2030; calls on Member States to allocate at least 25 % of the budget for Pillar I and at least 30 % for Pillar II to measures supporting organic farming or conversion to organic farming, in order to better support farmers engaged in practices that are more beneficial to public health;

Or. fr

Amendment 817

André Rodrigues

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Recalls the importance of the investments measures within the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development to enable farmers to modernize their operations, enhance productivity and improve product quality, enabling farmers to remain competitive and environmentally responsible;

Or. en

Amendment 818

Maria Walsh

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Calls on the Commission to provide tools to guarantee a simple implementation of the CAP by Member States, as well as to coordinate and disseminate best administrative practices in order to avoid distortions and divergent approaches that could potentially disadvantage farmers;

Or. en

Amendment 819

Carmen Crespo Díaz, Esther Herranz García, Gabriel Mato, Elena Nevado del Campo, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Calls for a modernisation of the climate, environmental and animal welfare schemes under Pillar I, to make them a flexible tool that truly incentivises and makes them affordable for the adoption of more sustainable practices;

Or. es

Amendment 820

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Calls for the reformulation of the eco-schemes as proper incentives to counterbalance the current disincentives or the fear of transitioning to a ‘double supply’ agriculture, focusing them resolutely on sustainable means of production;

Or. it

Amendment 821

Carola Rackete

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. calls for the mainstreaming of agroecological practice in EU agriculture and calls on the Commission to set a target of 50%of EU agricultural area to be managed through agroecological systems, including organic farming, by 2050;

Or. en

Amendment 822

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Recognises that agricultural practices with a direct and positive impact on preventing and addressing hydrogeological instability and the effects of natural disasters should be identified and adequately incentivised;

Or. en

Amendment 823

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7a. Calls for eliminating annual changes to tariffs and points allocations and for establishing a unified resting crop list;

Or. en

Amendment 824

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Cristina Guarda

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7b. Stresses that diversifying cropping systems is essential to improve soil health, reduce input dependency, enhance biodiversity, and strengthen resilience to climate change; highlights in this regard the potential of low-input, multipurpose crops such as hemp, legumes, and buckwheat that fit well into diverse rotations and provide raw materials for food, feed, health and industrial applications; calls for their promotion through targeted support under the CAP, including for the development of related processing and value chains that fully valorise all parts of the plant, to encourage rural innovation, strengthen circular bioeconomies, and enhance the resilience and multifunctionality of EU agriculture;

Or. en

Amendment 825

André Rodrigues

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7b. Stresses the importance of promoting and guaranteeing the participation of local and regional authorities, from decision-making to the implementation and evaluation of the CAP policy; calls on the Commission and the Member States to bolster initiatives for the effective application of the principles of partnership and subsidiarity in the next programming framework, reinforcing both the importance and responsibility of social partners in the realisation of European policy objectives;

Or. en

Amendment 826

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7b. Calls on the Commission to introduce a target-based approach within the framework of the CAP and to provide guarantee instruments that are easily implemented by the Member States, as well as coordinating and disseminating administrative best practices to avoid distortions and diverging approaches that could disadvantage farmers;

Or. it

Amendment 827

André Rodrigues

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7c. Highlights the Commission study’s conclusions on LEADER’s effectiveness in delivering solutions to address economic, social and development challenges and opportunities at local level and in contributing to for sustainable rural development; insists on a meaningful earmarking of the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development for the LEADER approach 1a;
__________________
1a European Commission, Directorate-General for Agriculture and Rural Development, Dwyer, J., Kubinakova, K., Powell, J., et al., Evaluation support study on the impact of leader on balanced territorial development : final report, 2022, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2762/01039

Or. en

Amendment 828

Carola Rackete

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7c. Calls on the Commission to provide an assessment of all subsidies harmful to the environment with a view to their phasing out by 2030 at the latest;

Or. en

Amendment 829

André Rodrigues

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 7 d (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
7d. Calls for the CAP financial support to be made simpler and more accessible for small projects, which are more often than not the drivers of the most innovative initiatives; calls on the Commission and Member States to promote and extend the use of simplified cost options;

Or. en

Amendment 830

Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency; warns, however, according to Eurobarometer data, that price is the main factor influencing consumers’ purchasing decisions, and that the competitiveness of businesses, farmers and the European economy cannot therefore be jeopardised by requirements that are disproportionate to those of their external competitors; argues, therefore, that any commitment made in the field of trade policy should guarantee fair competition and protect European production standards, while ensuring the economic viability of the agricultural sector;

Or. pt

Amendment 831

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies; underlines that Free Trade Agreements should never expose the EU agriculture, and food producers to unfair competition with negative consequences of creating new dependencies for imported inputs and on working conditions and employment; stresses the need to ensure equivalence on production standards and coherence between the ambitious environmental goals of the EU and the potential consequences of FTAs; stresses that reinforcement and implementation of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency is vital;

Or. en

Amendment 832

Daniel Buda

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity on all levels, particularly in relation to production and quality standards, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency; in view of the new economic and geopolitical circumstances, including the imposition of customs tariffs by the United States of America, the escalation of international trade tensions and their effects on the competitiveness of European agriculture, the impact assessment must be based on the development of concrete and differentiated strategies;

Or. ro

Amendment 833

Carola Rackete

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency; believes agriculture should be excluded from EU free trade agreements, including the EU Mercosur FTA; believes achieving food sovereignty and respecting farmers and Indigenous Peoples' rights should form the basis for a new EU framework for international food exchanges, ensuring the trade system is fair and contributes to justice and peace;

Or. en

Amendment 834

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the European Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements to determine their cumulative impact, and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency; further calls for an overall assessment of the cumulative impact of all existing and forthcoming trade agreements on the agricultural sector, in light of the evolving geopolitical context, increasing global market instability, and the escalation of trade tensions;

Or. en

Amendment 835

Carmen Crespo Díaz, Esther Herranz García, Gabriel Mato, Elena Nevado del Campo, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission, in its efforts to open up new markets and consolidate existing ones, to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency that provides greater guarantees of fair competition for European producers;

Or. es

Amendment 836

Marion Maréchal, Sergio Berlato

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency; recalls the serious concerns which have raised in Europe following the recent audits carried out in the Brazilian poultry sector;

Or. en

Amendment 837

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements, to stop using agricultural interests as a bargaining chip for other sectors and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity of standards in international trade, ensuring that its trade policy supports its sustainability policy, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. fr

Amendment 838

Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency; considers that agriculture continues to be a regular adjustment variable in trade agreement negotiations;

Or. fr

Amendment 839

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure mandatory reciprocity through, including but not limited to mirror clauses, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. en

Amendment 840

Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the cumulative impacts of market access concessions and of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. en

Amendment 841

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity and enforceability of sustainability chapters, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency

Or. en

Amendment 842

Maria Grapini

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements, to have discussions with all interested parties and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. ro

Amendment 843

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements to determine their cumulative impact, and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. en

Amendment 844

Benoit Cassart, Elsi Katainen, Barry Cowen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure a level-playing field, reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. en

Amendment 845

Krzysztof Hetman

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity and to create a level playing field, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. pl

Amendment 846

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure full reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;

Or. en

Amendment 847

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between its trade and sustainability policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, through a European control agency;8. Calls on the Commission to carry out a systematic impact assessment of the agricultural sector provisions in each of its trade agreements and to provide specific strategies to ensure reciprocity, maintaining consistency between the EU’s various policies, as well as a reinforcement of controls at origin and border, by the Commission and the Member States;

Or. es

Amendment 848

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. Insists that the respect of labour rights should constitute an essential element of all trade and investment agreements, including possible suspension of the agreement in case of sustained breaches; recalls that the ratification and implementation of the eight ILO Core Labour Standards, as well as compliance with up-to-date ILO conventions, should be a precondition for entering into trade negotiations; Recalls that Free trade agreements should promote a broad range of fundamental rights, the right to adequate, nutritious and safe food, the right to food security and food sovereignty, the right to a safe working and living environment, the right to livelihood protection, and multiple democratic rights including the rights of workers and their trade unions;

Or. en

Amendment 849

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Christine Singer, Ciaran Mullooly, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. Recalls Article 39 of TFEU and highlights the necessity of promoting profitable agricultural practices throughout all Member States. In this regard, emphasises the importance of enhancing the position of farmers within the food supply chain, advocating for policies that ensure fair distribution of value and income across all stages of production. Furthermore, calls for a comprehensive review of the EU's trade policy to ensure it effectively supports the competitiveness and sustainability of European agriculture, while promoting mutual benefits for both EU farmers and trading partners in line with the Union's broader economic and environmental goals;

Or. en

Amendment 850

Arash Saeidi

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. deplores the fact that current trade policy exposes European farmers to unfair competition through imports of products that do not meet EU environmental, health and social standards; emphasises that this chemical dumping endangers public health, natural resources and the economic viability of European farms; affirms that European agriculture must be reoriented as a priority towards meeting the food needs of European populations, in line with the principle of food sovereignty;

Or. fr

Amendment 851

Camilla Laureti, Dario Nardella, Stefano Bonaccini, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. Calls on the European Commission to adopt concrete measures to guarantee the same environmental and animal welfare standards in the import of agri-food products from third countries, in order to ensure a high level of food safety, traceability and sustainable production in the EU, without compromising the competitiveness of EU agri-food production with respect to imported products;

Or. en

Amendment 852

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. Calls for the adoption of legislation based on localized environmental impact assessments, granting farmers increased flexibility in meeting standards and promoting a cooperative framework between the EU and national parliaments to ensure effective and practical implementation of European laws;

Or. en

Amendment 853

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. Calls on the Commission to deliver the remaining legislative proposals for a revision of the animal welfare legislation, as promised to citizens through the European Green Deal, namely on a ban on the use of cages and the protection of animals kept for farming purposes and at the time of killing;

Or. en

Amendment 854

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. Further calls for an overall assessment of the cumulative impact of all existing and forthcoming trade agreements on the agricultural sector, in light of the evolving geopolitical context, increasing global market instability, and the escalation of trade tensions;

Or. en

Amendment 855

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. calls for the rigorous defence of European agricultural interests through effective protection of the internal market and by giving priority to the European market and national markets;

Or. fr

Amendment 856

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8a. Invites the Commission to finance climate change mitigation measures through the Just Transition Fund;

Or. en

Amendment 857

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. Believes that the international trade policy of the EU should be mindful of its effects on developing countries; urges the Commission to ensure that its trade policy is aligned with its commitments and obligations to policy coherence for development; notes that Policy Coherence for development is an approach and policy tool to integrate the economic, social, environmental and governance dimensions of sustainable development at all stages of domestic and international policy making; expresses concern regarding the worldwide increase of food insecurity over the last few years and the prospects of a further increase of food insecurity in the near future; notes that, even today, almost 820 million people living primarily in developing countries do not have enough to eat and 2 billion people suffer from malnutrition; stresses that this drastic situation is forcing them to leave the countryside, expanding urban slums and fuelling migratory flows; Considers that it is important to help developing countries to put in place public policies on agriculture and food that can meet the needs of their rapidly growing populations; stresses that a policy on food security must mirror the founding principles of the common agricultural policy, in that its primary goal must be to provide sufficient, nutritious, safe affordable, food throughout the year for its citizens while guaranteeing a fair income and standard of living for farmers as well as stimulating agricultural productivity to ensure the economic well-being of agricultural supply chains;

Or. en

Amendment 858

Arash Saeidi

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. calls for a moratorium on the negotiation and ratification of free trade and investment agreements that place European farmers at a disadvantage or expose them to unfair competition, in particular through chemical or social dumping practices; believes that this moratorium should remain in force until an extensive European public debate has enabled a democratic consensus to be re-established on the aims and conditions of international trade, particularly in the interests of food sovereignty and the relocation of agricultural supply chains;

Or. fr

Amendment 859

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the principle of reciprocity becomes a binding and enforceable operational standard across all EU trade agreements and unilateral import regimes, including through the systematic application of mirror clauses, strengthened traceability requirements, and effective trade defence mechanisms; underlines that the future CAP must incorporate these instruments in a coherent and proactive manner to protect EU producers and consumers from distortions caused by imports that do not comply with equivalent environmental, social, and health standards;

Or. en

Amendment 860

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to ensure that the principle of reciprocity becomes a binding and enforceable operational standard across all EU trade agreements and unilateral import regimes, including through the systematic application of mirror clauses, strengthened traceability requirements, and effective trade defence mechanisms;

Or. en

Amendment 861

Camilla Laureti, Stefano Bonaccini, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. Welcomes the principle that the most dangerous pesticides banned in the EU for health or environmental reasons will not be allowed to re-enter the EU on imported products in order to allow European farmers to better embrace the green transition ambitions without being threatened by unfair foreign competition;

Or. en

Amendment 862

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Benoit Cassart, Ciaran Mullooly, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. Stresses that any future trade agreement must include binding provisions ensuring that agri-food imports are subject to production standards that are equivalent to those applicable within the Union, particularly in the areas of animal welfare, environmental protection, food safety, and traceability;

Or. en

Amendment 863

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. Calls on the Commission to effectively monitor Member States' implementation of the Union's animal welfare legislation and to enforce appropriate deterring measures;

Or. en

Amendment 864

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8b. calls for the introduction of an agricultural exception, treating agricultural production separately in the negotiation of new trade agreements;

Or. fr

Amendment 865

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8c. Calls on the Commission to make the necessary adjustments in the next CAP in order to implement Parliament’s call not to use any agricultural subsidies for financing the breeding of bulls for bullfighting;

Or. en

Amendment 866

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Raffaele Stancanelli

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8c. calls for an assessment of the impact on European agriculture of the various free trade agreements signed by the European Union;

Or. fr

Amendment 867

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 8 d (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
8d. Calls on the Commission and the Member-States to reject the planned Free Trade Agreement with the Mercosur countries;

Or. en

Amendment 868

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments;9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund and others such as the Digital Agenda for Europe or those derived from the R&D&I policy, and with national instruments; calls on the Commission to put in place an internal procedure, at the beginning of each financial programming period, to ensure complementarity and consistency between the different support instruments at European level that are planned in rural areas;

Or. es

Amendment 869

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments;9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments; further calls for enhanced integration with other relevant programmes, including Horizon Europe, Digital Europe, the LIFE programme, and InvestEU, in order to maximise the impact of innovation, digitalisation, sustainability and resilience objectives in agriculture and rural areas;

Or. en

Amendment 870

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments;9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments, as well as to open direct lines of cooperation with local authorities in managing and implementing the existing funds;

Or. en

Amendment 871

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments;9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies, complementarities, and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments; this must also be subject to simplification to avoid duplications between schemes;

Or. en

Amendment 872

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments;9. Calls on the Commission to improve synergies and coordination among EU funding instruments, such as the Cohesion Fund, the NextGenerationEU recovery instrument and the Just Transition Fund, and with national instruments through harmonized administrative regulations;

Or. en

Amendment 873

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
(a) Calls on the European Commission and Parliament to give priority to the development of agri-tech and food-tech solutions through targeted investment support, production techniques and technologies (AI and the Internet of Things) aimed at improving soil productivity, increasing agri-food supply and improving the efficiency of the food sector, with the aim of becoming a global Digital Hub for incentivising startups and attracting young talent;

Or. it

Amendment 874

Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that Smart Specialisation Strategies (S3) and the Talent Booster Mechanism are fully integrated into the programming and implementation of the post-2027 CAP, in particular by strengthening their connection with CAP funding instruments under both Pillars I and II; Stresses the need to boost synergies with other EU funding programmes such as the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF), the European Social Fund Plus (ESF+), Horizon Europe and InvestEU, in order to support talent development, innovation ecosystems, and the retention and attraction of skilled human capital in rural areas; Underlines that talent retention and attraction strategies should become a mandatory component of the CAP national strategic plans, to be assessed and approved as a core eligibility criterion by the European Commission during the approval process;

Or. en

Amendment 875

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9a. Stresses that access to finance for the agri-food sector is essential to implement investments, facilitate access to land and ensure the continuity of agricultural activity on farms; calls on the Commission to promote the use of financial instruments within the CAP, as an additional complementary measure of this policy, through a flexible and simplified regulatory framework that facilitates their use for both beneficiaries and competent authorities;

Or. es

Amendment 876

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Benoit Cassart, Ciaran Mullooly, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9a. Calls on the Commission to strengthen health measures in the agricultural sector by coordinating the research, purchase and supply of veterinary vaccines at EU level trough a preparedness mechanism and by fostering the development of these vaccines in the EU; Calls for adequate funding for this mechanism;

Or. en

Amendment 877

Maria Walsh

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 9 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
9a. Highlights the recent outbreaks of animal diseases in several Member States; calls on the Commission and Member States to strengthen eradication measures and increase CAP funding allocations dedicated to risk management and improved on-farm biosecurity investments;

Or. en

Amendment 878

Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods; stresses, furthermore, the need to make the rules and conditions for mobilising the agricultural reserve more flexible and responsive, ensuring a swift, effective and proportionate response to farmers’ needs in crisis situations; recalls that the current CAP and the agricultural reserve were negotiated before the various crises (pandemic, inflation), the war in Ukraine and the Middle East, and US trade tariffs, among other things; considers that the current activation mechanisms are often too slow and bureaucratic, compromising their usefulness in urgent situations where damage accumulates rapidly; advocates, therefore, a review and simplification of eligibility criteria, mobilisation deadlines and administrative procedures, ensuring greater predictability, transparency and accessibility for beneficiaries; stresses, however, that the agricultural reserve cannot be the only instrument for responding to crises, and that it is essential to develop a broader range of risk management and rapid response tools, including more effective agricultural insurance, mutual mechanisms, climate emergency funds and extraordinary liquidity support, capable of protecting the economic viability of farms and the resilience of the European agricultural sector;

Or. pt

Amendment 879

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Pär Holmgren

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; notes that the crisis reserve was not designed to cope with the currently increasing amounts of climate change related disasters impacting EU production and the levels of budget implicated by disaster relief; Notes that the reserve as is currently designed is not big enough to cope on its own with all the requests provoked by climate change without MS putting more emphasis on crisis prevention, and notes that the prevention is more effective and far less costly than “cure”; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;

Or. en

Amendment 880

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market failures, external economic shocks and climate change such as drought and floods; calls on the European Commission to define its ex-ante crisis management strategy on a product-by-product basis, with a view to using the agricultural reserve in a way that maximises efficiency and Community added value;

Or. fr

Amendment 881

Stefano Bonaccini, Dario Nardella

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase and reform of the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods; calls for the establishment of new tools for managing risks, in particular an EU reinsurance scheme to better mitigate the effects of future crises and provide greater stability for farmers;

Or. en

Amendment 882

Daniel Buda, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods; also underlines the importance of accelerating the provision of support to affected farmers, so that they can quickly obtain capital in order that their agricultural activity can recover;

Or. ro

Amendment 883

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States must face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, the need to appropriately increase the agricultural reserve with resources outside the CAP to address unpredictable market distortions caused by fluctuations in agricultural product prices. The reserve should not be used to address market distortions caused by political decisions that are independent of the will or fault of farmers.

Or. en

Amendment 884

Benoit Cassart, Barry Cowen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks such as vector-borne diseases and natural disasters such as droughts and floods ; stresses, in this regard, that it is essential to revise and increase the agricultural crisis reserve and establish new tools, such as an EU reinsurance scheme, for managing unpredictable market risks, vector-borne diseases and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;

Or. en

Amendment 885

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the common agricultural reserve with resources outside the CAP is necessary to cope with unpredictable market resulting from fluctuations in agricultural product prices; the reserve should not be used to address market distortions caused by political decisions beyond the control or fault of farmers;

Or. en

Amendment 886

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market distortions or the impact of animal and plant diseases; believes that the management of recurrent crises resulting from climate change, such as drought or floods, should be funded outside the CAP;

Or. es

Amendment 887

Camilla Laureti, Stefano Bonaccini, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve as well as new financial instruments outside the CAP are necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought, floods, plant and animal diseases;

Or. en

Amendment 888

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve and the definition of suitable and specific new financial instruments is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;

Or. it

Amendment 889

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Raffaele Stancanelli

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve, using extraordinary funds outside the CAP budget, is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;

Or. fr

Amendment 890

Krzysztof Hetman

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods, as well as geopolitical tensions1a;
__________________
1a Justification: Growing geopolitical pressure is particularly experienced by farmers in regions bordering Ukraine, Belarus and Russia, who face difficulties in planning the directions of development of their farms and experience higher investment risk.

Or. en

Amendment 891

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that greatly due to political climate inaction, Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;

Or. en

Amendment 892

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to develop and implement prevention, mitigation and adaption strategies to reduce the frequency and severity of adverse weather events

Or. en

Amendment 893

Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse market as well as climate related risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;

Or. en

Amendment 894

Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that a reform and an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve are necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;

Or. fr

Amendment 895

Maria Walsh

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought and floods;10. Notes that Member States face increasing and diverse risks; stresses, in this regard, that an appropriate increase in the agricultural reserve is necessary to cope with unpredictable market and climate change distortions such as drought, storms and floods;

Or. en

Amendment 896

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Pär Holmgren

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. Notes that the impact of climate change on agricultural production is becoming more evident, with crops and yields being negatively impacted by the increased frequency of droughts, floods and other extreme weather conditions; Recalls that biodiversity degradation, especially of melliferous species, contributes to poorer agricultural yields, therefore undermining our food security; highlights that agriculture relies on resilient ecosystems, in particular functional soil ecosystems, and sufficient populations of pollinators and pest predators; underlines that increasing the climate resilience of European agriculture will enable the sector to remain competitive on the global market, providing employment and economic growth; Welcomes the Commission’s comprehensive analysis of the drivers of food security 1b; underlines its conclusions pointing to the urgency of transitioning to a sustainable food system capable of ensuring food security in both the short and long term; 1a
__________________
1a copy-paste of art.s 89 and 90 from Mortler (EPP, DE) 2023 Report on ensuring food security and long-term resilience of the EU agriculture (2022/2183(INI)) https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-9-2023-0238_EN.html
1b https://commission.europa.eu/publications/analysis-main-drivers-food-security_en

Or. en

Amendment 897

Daniel Buda

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. notes that the funding of measures to prevent, control and eradicate certain animal diseases through the Single Market Programme is insufficient and inadequate to support farmers and the Member States in relation to new animal diseases, such as outbreaks of foot-and-mouth disease or peste des petits ruminants; calls for more substantial funding for animal diseases under the Single Market Programme in order to compensate farmers and take more effective prevention and control measures, especially for emerging animal diseases;

Or. ro

Amendment 898

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. calls on the European Commission to draw on the successful experience of aid for voluntary reduction of milk production in 2016 to develop tools for managing overproduction crises for key production areas; considers that, in the case of price spikes, the suspension of biofuel production and the prior establishment of strategic agricultural and food stocks are essential levers for preventing speculation, panic and food inflation;

Or. fr

Amendment 899

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Christine Singer, Ciaran Mullooly, Elsi Katainen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. Calls for the next CAP to continue supporting Producer Organisations (POs) across all sectors. Emphasises the need to simplify the costs, rules, regulations, and administrative burdens—including reporting and inspections—to encourage greater participation. Stresses the importance of additional funding to support both the establishment and ongoing operation of POs. Calls for stronger protections against unfair treatment of POs by buyers and urges the inclusion of potato producers under the EU Fruit and Vegetable PO scheme.

Or. en

Amendment 900

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. Calls for the rejection of any legal obligation for organic farming or political preference for a particular agricultural method, thereby allowing market dynamics to determine the demand for organic products and the corresponding agricultural land allocation and further urges the Commission to abandon the fixed target of achieving 25% organic farming in favour of a truly market-driven approach.

Or. en

Amendment 901

Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. emphasises the important role played by CAP public intervention mechanisms in stabilising agricultural markets and protecting farmers from price fluctuations; recalls that the reference thresholds have not been reassessed for several years and should be reviewed as soon as possible to take account of price changes;

Or. fr

Amendment 902

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. Calls for a wide range of tools and mechanisms to be created and made available to farmers and agricultural SMEs for mitigating the risks faced by the sector, including but not limited to global market fluctuations, natural disasters, changes in consumer behaviour;

Or. en

Amendment 903

Arash Saeidi

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10a. Calls on the European Commission to look into the feasibility of a European system of guaranteed minimum prices or countercyclical payments for certain agricultural products, to make incomes more stable when markets are volatile;

Or. fr

Amendment 904

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10b. Recalls that, during the previous CAP reform, the European Parliament included in its negotiating mandate the addition of sugar, pork, sheepmeat and poultry to the list of products eligible for public intervention, namely those covered by a guaranteed minimum European price; considers that intervention prices for products already covered by such prices should be raised to take account of general inflation and to prevent European prices from falling too far below average European production costs, but that this is a matter for the Council to decide;

Or. fr

Amendment 905

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10b. Calls for enhanced protection measures for regional products, including the strengthening of Protected Designation of Origin (PDO), Protected Geographical Indication (PGI) and Traditional Specialities Guaranteed (TSG) regimes through streamlined procedures that safeguard against misuse and counterfeiting and remove prior user prorogation from trade agreements;

Or. en

Amendment 906

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 10 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
10c. Considers that raising intervention prices is a measure to protect against international market prices when these are too far below their equilibrium level; stresses that this is a sufficiently simple, effective and inexpensive measure, provided that it is accompanied by crisis management or supply management measures to limit overproduction as soon as it arises; calls for improvements to the minimum entry price regime for tomato imports to restore its effectiveness and for the extension of this regime to other products if necessary;

Or. fr

Amendment 907

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers as well as rural communities and local authorities affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an emergency intervention fund which would serve as an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); Emphasises that the funds through this instrument should be made available directly to farmers and local governments affected by natural disasters with minimum administrative burden;

Or. en

Amendment 908

Herbert Dorfmann

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);11. Calls in view of the increasing natural damages, the creation of specific tools for risk management based on active and passive measures which are affordable for the farmers;

Or. en

Amendment 909

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);11. Calls for better coordination and simplification between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climate change disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); stresses, however, that the use of EAFRD for extraordinary measures should remain limited and not come at the expense of long-term rural development objectives and structural investments;

Or. en

Amendment 910

Maria Grapini

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD); calls for immediate support for livestock breeders affected by animal diseases;

Or. ro

Amendment 911

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier legal access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);

Or. en

Amendment 912

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);11. Calls for better coordination of all available mechanisms so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);

Or. es

Amendment 913

Camilla Laureti, Stefano Bonaccini, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11. Calls for better coordination between the Solidarity Fund and the CAP so that farmers affected by natural disasters can access faster and more targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);11. Calls for better coordination between all available instruments to allow farmers affected by natural disasters to access to fast and targeted aid; calls for the creation of an automatic trigger mechanism to speed up the arrival of funds in the event of climatic disasters and the reduction of bureaucracy for easier access to exceptional aid from the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD);

Or. en

Amendment 914

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11a. Notes that as such EU funds are limited, Member States must also prioritise preventive measures in their strategic planning to reduce risk of or susceptibility to such climate change related shocks, which are expected to increase in number and magnitude as climate change kicks in;

Or. en

Amendment 915

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11a. Calls for allowing the use of unspent CAP funds within the National Strategic Plan (NSP) for alternative measures within the national agricultural reserve, thereby preventing the return of funds;

Or. en

Amendment 916

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11a. Asks that the CAP, and in particular the rural development funds, be used to finance the loss of income generated by losses resulting from natural disasters, epizootics, and plant diseases;

Or. en

Amendment 917

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 11 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
11b. Asks the Commission to introduce, in the First Pillar, risk management measures such as insurance or reinsurance, creating a true pillar for prevention and compensation for farmers affected by natural disasters, epizootics, and plant diseases;

Or. en

Amendment 918

Dario Nardella, Stefano Bonaccini

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition; stresses, in particular, the importance of bioenergy and bioeconomy development to both support the resilience of the agricultural sector and reach the EU climate and energy targets; accordingly, calls for a consistent regulatory framework that contributes to unleash the full potential of all sustainable bio-based products and fuels;

Or. en

Amendment 919

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate action, biodiversity, fisheries and regional development, it is relevant and welcome that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition, as is already the case for e.g. LIFE, Horizon, Copernicus; notes that given the scale of the challenges needing to be faced, prioritising existing and finding additional funding streams is necessary;

Or. en

Amendment 920

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Recalls that the purpose of agriculture is to produce high-quality, abundant and affordable food to meet the needs of Member States;

Or. fr

Amendment 921

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition and rural development; and that these other policies should be aligned with the CAP and with the objective of developing a bio-economy based on agricultural production and the EU’s biomass.

Or. it

Amendment 922

Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition and provision of services going beyond production of food and biogenic resources;

Or. en

Amendment 923

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture should significantly enhance its contributions through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity, animal health and welfare, public health and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;

Or. en

Amendment 924

Camilla Laureti, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies continue to contribute to the sustainability of agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;

Or. en

Amendment 925

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support rural development;

Or. en

Amendment 926

Krzysztof Hetman

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;12. Stresses that, while agriculture contributes through the CAP to other policies and strategies, such as environment, energy, trade, climate, biodiversity and regional development, it is relevant that other policies also contribute to agriculture, especially in terms of instruments to support the green transition;

Or. pl

Amendment 927

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12a. Calls for priority to be given to balanced nutrition, supported by dietary education and informed choice for European consumers rather than the use of prescriptive and static labelling, while also recognising that balancing portions and the frequency of consuming foods, as in the Mediterranean Diet model, creates the conditions for preventing non-transmissible diseases (as evidenced by the scientific literature and in accordance with WHO provisions);

Or. it

Amendment 928

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12a. Notes that there is a two way process and a strong local and rural development contributes and its a precondition for sustainable agricultural production; Calls on the Commission to implement an EU wide Rural proofing mechanism across all policy areas and to include the Rural Pact community, as well as the Committee of Regions, in all activities related to the rural development framework;

Or. en

Amendment 929

Daniel Buda, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 12 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
12a. regrets that although the Commission included the ‘rural proofing’ rural verification mechanism through which EU policies would be reviewed through a rural lens in the ‘Vision for rural areas towards 2040’, this mechanism appears to have been implemented in practice only in a limited manner;

Or. ro

Amendment 930

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that thanks to the application of the precautionary principle the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, which are cornerstones of the competitiveness of high quality EU agricultural products; stresses that any proposed legislation should be based on peer-reviewed science and international academic consensus, accompanied by comprehensive impact assessments as per the EU’s Better Regulation principles, with proposals of the financial means to achieve the proposed actions; stresses that measures such as labelling of origin and mirror clauses are necessary to promote sustainability, social stability, justice, economic competitiveness, and resilience of EU farms;

Or. en

Amendment 931

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare, and environmental and social protection, and underlines that all legislation in these areas should be science-based, fully aligned with these standards, and designed to strengthen the economic competitiveness and resilience of European farms; stresses that scientific evidence has always been and must remain the foundation for the design, implementation and continuous improvement of EU rules, ensuring that high standards are both credible and adaptable in the face of global competition and technological change;

Or. en

Amendment 932

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety and animal welfare and that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should uphold the precautionary principle; stresses that antimicrobial resistance is a major threat to human health and reducing and minimizing the use of antibiotics in animal husbandry will help slow down its emergence and spread, particularly in settings of intensive animal production, noting that in many countries much of the antibiotics used in animals are for growth promotion and prevention of disease, not to treat sick animals;

Or. en

Amendment 933

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for social, food safety, animal welfare and environmental protection, but that in order to maintain this level, any proposed legislation or free trade agreement should be science-based and should aim to maintain the economic competitiveness of farms through compensation for additional costs incurred, border adjustment mechanisms or reciprocal standards for imports;

Or. fr

Amendment 934

Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms; calls for the introduction of a principle of non-regression in agriculture so that no measures that would hinder farmers’ production or activity can be adopted;

Or. fr

Amendment 935

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy, Raffaele Stancanelli

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms, in particular through the development of new technologies such as NGTs, drones and research into new, more virtuous plant protection products;

Or. fr

Amendment 936

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food security, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be preceded by a rigorous and balanced impact analysis from the point of view of social, economic and environmental sustainability, be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;

Or. es

Amendment 937

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms; recalls that the CAP establishes a support scheme that must enable farmers to compete effectively with global players in the primary sectors;

Or. en

Amendment 938

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has relatively high standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that additional science-based measures and legislative proposals are needed to ensure agriculture reduces its enormous pressure on the climate, biodiversity and the environment, and that the welfare of animals is significantly improved

Or. en

Amendment 939

Zsuzsanna Borvendég

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms, and should prioritise the purity of produced foods.

Or. hu

Amendment 940

Daniel Buda, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be primarily based on realities on the ground, robust impact assessments and a balanced approach to ensure the competitiveness and sustainability of European farms;

Or. ro

Amendment 941

Maria Grapini

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms; calls for funds to be allocated to research and medicines for animals.

Or. ro

Amendment 942

Csaba Dömötör

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms and should not result in any increase in productions costs;

Or. en

Amendment 943

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection which must be respected, protected and enhanced and any proposed legislation should be science-based and aim to also contribute to the economic competitiveness of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 944

Benoit Cassart, Elsi Katainen, Barry Cowen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based, presented after a comprehensive impact assessment and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 945

André Rodrigues

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based, pursue policy coherence and take into account the need to ensure the economic competitiveness of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 946

Carola Rackete

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue sustainability including social stability and economic competitiveness of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 947

Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, therefore any proposed legislation on a possible increase of those standards should be science-based and pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 948

Sebastian Everding

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU food-production standards, including animal welfare, have to be improved, and stresses that several countries and regions took further steps, for instance by banning some forms of caged farming and banning live exports and the transport of specific animals;

Or. en

Amendment 949

Camilla Laureti, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, and that any proposed legislation should pursue the economic competitiveness as well as the environmental and social sustainability of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 950

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic, environmental and social sustainability of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 951

Emma Wiesner

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, but that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;13. Reaffirms that the EU has the highest standards in the world for food safety, animal welfare and environmental and social protection, and that any proposed legislation should be science-based and should pursue the economic competitiveness of farms;

Or. en

Amendment 952

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13a. Highlights the emergence of zoonotic diseases that are transferred from animals to humans, avian influenza and the new strain of influenza A (H1N1), which is exacerbated by anthropogenic climate change, the destruction of biodiversity, environmental degradation and our current food production systems; draws attention to the fact that workers in the food chain are at risk of contracting Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR) diseases; stresses the need to take appropriate measures to contain this serious occupational health hazard and minimize its potential impact on worker health. Calls on the Commission and national regulatory agencies to recognize antimicrobial resistant pathogens as a work-related disease;

Or. en

Amendment 953

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Cristina Guarda

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13a. Recognises the major achievements of social conditionality for those employed in agriculture, but points out the risk of a lack of effectiveness if it is not accompanied by effective and proportionate opportunities for sanctions; calls for strengthening its application especially in the fruit and vegetable sector; underlines the need to address the specific vulnerabilities of migrant and seasonal workers, who are often subject to exploitation and precarious employment conditions; Emphasises the importance of aligning with International Labour Organisation (ILO) standards; points to the need of better coordination with labour inspectorates, trade unions, and civil society organisations;

Or. en

Amendment 954

Veronika Vrecionová

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13a. Emphasises that improving animal welfare is not only an ethical imperative, but also a pathway to more resilient and profitable livestock systems; underlines that healthier animals with lower stress levels generally require less veterinary intervention, have higher fertility rates, and perform better, leading to greater economic efficiency; calls for CAP measures to continue supporting investments and training in higher animal welfare standards, aligned with market expectations and scientific recommendations;

Or. en

Amendment 955

Marta Wcisło

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13a. Calls on the Commission to take into account the concerns of the European farming sector related to increased trade liberalisation, particularly in the context of the ongoing negotiations between the EU and Mercosur countries, as well as the revision of the Association Agreement with Ukraine, to ensure that any trade commitments do not undermine the competitiveness of EU farmers.

Or. en

Amendment 956

Bert-Jan Ruissen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13a. Calls on Member States not to gold-plate EU legislation during its transposition into national law in order to promote a level playing field within and outside the EU;

Or. nl

Amendment 957

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13a. Calls on the Commission to ensure that all imported agricultural products meet the same production and environmental standards as those produced within the EU;

Or. en

Amendment 958

Gilles Pennelle, Valérie Deloge, Marie Dauchy

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13a. Calls for plant protection substances to be banned only if there is another technically and economically viable alternative;

Or. fr

Amendment 959

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13b. Believes that while Europe’s food system can deliver food and nutrition in a way that contributes to social well-being and maintains and restores ecosystem, currently the food system is the single largest driver of global deforestation and biodiversity loss in Europe as well as responsible for a range of adverse impacts on human and animal health and on the environment; calls for primary producers to be supported in making the transition to greater sustainability; stresses that a more sustainable EU food system is a prerequisite for securing supply of safe and healthy food in the long term and that food security and food sustainability are not conflicting or competing objectives but rather interrelated and interdependent, highlights that food availability is generally not a major challenge in the EU, however food affordability for low income households and food poverty are persistent problems along with issues such as food waste, overconsumption and obesity, as well as the environmental footprint of European households’ food consumption are more significant challenges facing the EU food system today;

Or. en

Amendment 960

Veronika Vrecionová

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13b. Calls for a cumulative assessment of the impact of Green Deal-related legislation on the agri-food sector, including its interaction with international trade rules and obligations, in order to avoid regulatory overburdening, safeguard competitiveness, and evaluate effects on the strategic resilience of EU agriculture, particularly the sector’s capacity to reduce dependency on external inputs and imports and to adapt sustainably to global market dynamics;

Or. en

Amendment 961

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13b. Points to the need to secure an ambitious CAP budget ensuring member states promote social objectives such as quality job creation, the strengthening of collective bargaining, the reduction of work accidents and undeclared work are rewarded with additional resource allocations; calls for the use of CAP funding to fund education and training programmes for agricultural workers;

Or. en

Amendment 962

Bert-Jan Ruissen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13b. Calls on the Commission to give Member States the opportunity to reverse their past gold-plating of EU legislation, often done without overseeing its scope, for example in relation to the designation of sites under the Habitats Directive;

Or. nl

Amendment 963

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13b. Calls for maintaining hectare-based direct payments linked to the production of agricultural products, which are essential for farm stability and food security, while ensuring that food is produced on a significant portion of the available agricultural land;

Or. en

Amendment 964

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13c. Notes that the European food system delivers a sufficient and varied supply of safe, nutritious, food to people at all times encourages the Commission to consider the food supply chain and its workers as a strategic asset for the safety and well-being of all Europeans; highlights however that the Covid-19 pandemic shed new light on the challenging working and living conditions of millions of farm workers in Europe; calls for the recognition of the importance of protecting workers’ individual and collective labour and social rights, thereby reinforcing the ‘social dimension’ of EU agriculture; calls on the Commission to strengthen measures focusing on the rights, working and employment conditions and social protection of farm labourers including migrants and other mobile workers, and to ensure coherence between policy areas on this issue;

Or. en

Amendment 965

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit, Céline Imart

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13c. Calls for the introduction of binding convergence clauses in trade agreements with third countries, including the establishment of specific and binding timelines for aligning production standards, in order to prevent market distortions and unfair competition;

Or. en

Amendment 966

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 d (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13d. Calls for stricter enforcement of existing animal welfare legislation within the European Union;

Or. en

Amendment 967

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 e (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13e. Calls for the adoption of animal welfare standards inclusion in trade agreements to ensure fair competition and a balanced approach to environmental and production-related challenges;

Or. en

Amendment 968

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 f (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13f. Calls for the introduction of strict, EU-level animal health standards to safeguard livestock farming, including provisions for the reduction or exclusion of wild animal populations posing infection risks and for the targeted vaccination of animals when necessary;

Or. en

Amendment 969

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 13 g (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
13g. Calls for the implementation of proportional administrative requirements for preventive animal health measures for hobby animal keepers, coupled with stricter enforcement of measures to reduce antibiotic use and the expedited approval of natural, health-promoting alternatives;

Or. en

Amendment 970

Thomas Waitz

on behalf of the Greens/EFA Group

Pär Holmgren

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP comprehensively include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate leguminous and protein-crop production and feed and grazing autonomy strategies 1a to promote the competitive sustainable transition of livestock farming enabling extensive high quality systems, given the selective advantage of ruminants, the leguminous protein-crop deficit, and to take into account market demand and the progressive decrease of livestock in the EU, and consequent impacts on biodiversity, soil fertility, profitability and farmer income, and rural economies; Notes that they should also include employment, as well as strategies to decrease dependence on imports from third countries where protein feed crops are grown at high social, environmental and climate cost, and contribute to increasing production costs for farmers; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission; given the importance of leguminous crops in European diets, calls for an assessment in the strategy of availabilities of leguminous crops and vegetable proteins for both food and feed;
__________________
1a EP has called for a protein strategy for the past 3 mandates. With the changed geopolitical context, a comprehensive assessment that also includes grazing and feed autonomy is now needed

Or. en

Amendment 971

Luke Ming Flanagan, Sebastian Everding

on behalf of The Left Group

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; calls on the EU to address the embedded land use emissions from imported feed and food; points out that the EU is increasingly outsourcing the environmental footprint of its food systems, the EU imports millions of tons of soya-based animal feed every year, including from South American countries where deforestation (responsible for 20% of global CO2 emissions), is incentivised by EU agricultural policy direction, including the negative repercussions of the proposed trade deal with the Mercosur bloc, ; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. en

Amendment 972

Raffaele Stancanelli, Isabella Tovaglieri, Tomáš Kubín, Marie Dauchy, Vilis Krištopans, Mireia Borrás Pabón

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, also in the circular economy and in its capacity to produce renewable energy and to generate by-products that are useful for increasing soil fertility, such as digestate. This approach is necessary given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries, characterized by environmental and quality standards below European ones; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. en

Amendment 973

Sergio Berlato, Carlo Fidanza, Francesco Ventola, Claudiu-Richard Târziu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, also in the circular economy and in its capacity to produce renewable energy and to generate by-products that are useful for increasing soil fertility, such as digestate. This approach is necessary given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries, characterized by environmental and quality standards below European ones; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. en

Amendment 974

Anja Hazekamp

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production for human consumption and promote the necessary transition to more plant-based diets, given the protein-crop deficit and the disproportionate negative impact of animal farming on global warming, biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on animal farming announced by the European Commission, which should include binding reduction targets for the numbers and density of farm animals in the EU and its Member States, as advised by the European Court of Auditors2b,
__________________
2b European Court of Auditors (2021). "Common Agricultural Policy and climate: Half of EU climate spending but farm emissions are not decreasing"

Or. en

Amendment 975

Camilla Laureti, Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate quality protein-crop production as to promote the competitiveness of sustainable livestock farming as well as a shift towards extensive livestock farming practices, given the protein-crop deficit and the significant shifts in dietary preferences in the EU which is leading to a declining in meat consumption; in this regard recalls the role of extensive livestock farming practices in preserving biodiversity, reducing fire risk, enhance soil fertility, sustain rural economies, and decrease dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. en

Amendment 976

Daniel Buda, Dan-Ştefan Motreanu

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitive and sustainable development of livestock breeding, ensuring compliance with welfare standards, and the economic viability of mixed and family farms, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. ro

Amendment 977

Sebastian Everding

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production to provide incentives for the local production and consumption in the EU, given the increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. en

Amendment 978

Maria Noichl

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production with the aim of largely reducing the protein deficit of the EU and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission; calls on the Commission to present an ambitious and comprehensive protein strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 979

Carmen Crespo Díaz, Esther Herranz García, Gabriel Mato, Elena Nevado del Campo, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production, including sunflower cultivation, and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock and the comprehensive plan on EU protein supply announced by the European Commission;

Or. es

Amendment 980

Krzysztof Hetman

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production through the cultivation and processing of these crops for feed in the EU and also their use in nutritional programmes for humans and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. pl

Amendment 981

Alexander Bernhuber

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission as well as the provision of a EU protein strategy;

Or. en

Amendment 982

Cristina Maestre, Elena Sancho Murillo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate high-quality protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the plant protein deficit and to stop the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. es

Amendment 983

Zsuzsanna Borvendég

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;14. Also calls on the Commission to ensure that its legislative proposals for the next CAP include appropriate measures and instruments to integrate non-GMO protein-crop production and promote the competitiveness of livestock farming, given the protein-crop deficit and the progressive loss of livestock in the EU, and the consequent threats to biodiversity, fire risk, soil fertility and rural economies, as well as increased dependence on imports from third countries; on this point, looks forward to the recommendations of the working group on livestock announced by the European Commission;

Or. hu

Amendment 984

Paulo Do Nascimento Cabral

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Emphasises the need to invest strategically and systematically in the continuous training of farmers, covering multiple areas, from farm management, digitalisation and technological innovation to environmental sustainability, animal welfare, adaptation to climate change and the reuse of agricultural by-products for energy production; stresses that training for farmers is essential to ensure the modernisation of the sector, its competitiveness and its ability to respond to current and future socio-economic and environmental challenges; advocates, in this context, the creation of a European knowledge exchange programme enabling farmers to learn from practical experience, share best practices and establish cooperation networks between territories and Member States by promoting training mobility, intergenerational learning and the enhancement of agricultural know-how, with a particular focus on young farmers, women in the sector and the most remote rural areas and outermost regions;

Or. pt

Amendment 985

Salvatore De Meo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Reaffirms the need to develop an overarching food strategy for the EU based on scientific experiment, which incorporates arable and livestock farming while simultaneously guaranteeing equitable treatment for all agricultural sectors; support science-based environmental assessments that take account of the entire life cycle of food products, support nutrition based on scientific evaluations that confirm the importance of foods of animal origin for human health, in particular for vulnerable populations such as children, the elderly and women;

Or. it

Amendment 986

Christine Singer

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Emphasises the strategic importance of livestock farming for rural development, biodiversity conservation and landscape management, particularly in less-favoured areas; underlines that animal products are not only of nutritional value, but their production plays a crucial role in preserving traditional cultural landscapes; calls on the post 2027 CAP to promote an active regional policy for livestock production that supports sustainable value creation in rural areas, maintains extensive and locally adapted farming systems, and ensures long-term food security with animal products of EU origin;

Or. en

Amendment 987

Carola Rackete

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Notes that according to Eurostat, in 2019, the ruminant livestock population of the EU consisted of 77 million bovine animals and 74 million sheep and goats, resulting in an enormous environmental impact, the emission of many greenhouse gases and harmful substances including methane, as well as biodiversity loss; notes that farmers rarely get fair prices for their animal products; emphasises that a reduction in the number of animals kept for agricultural purposes and stocking densities should be encouraged;

Or. en

Amendment 988

Benoit Cassart, Barry Cowen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Calls on the Commission to create a high-level group on livestock farming involving all relevant stakeholders to reflect on pathways to relocate production in the EU, to increase the renewal of generations, to maximise the positive contribution of livestock farming on nature conservation and restoration, biodiversity and soil health, and promote investments to foster the competitiveness of livestock farming;

Or. en

Amendment 989

Sebastian Everding

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Calls on the Commission to aim for sustainable feed production by introducing a ban on imports of soya, fish meal and palm products used as feed in intensive livestock farming, as the EU is responsible for deforestation, water shortages, loss of biodiversity and land grabbing elsewhere in the world as a result of these imports;

Or. en

Amendment 990

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Calls for the establishment of fair competitive conditions ensuring that imported agricultural products comply with the same strict production and environmental standards as those produced within the EU, and urges decisive action against unfair trade practices throughout the food supply chain;

Or. en

Amendment 991

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Considers that livestock farming is essential for soil fertility and carbon storage, provided that it is distributed in a balanced manner across Europe and that excessive concentration in overly specialised regions is avoided;

Or. fr

Amendment 992

Barry Cowen, Charles Goerens, Ciaran Mullooly

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Emphasises that, under the CAP 2027–2034 framework, Member States shall have the option to introduce an increased level of coupled support, thereby ensuring a more targeted allocation of payments to active farmers operating in vulnerable sectors;

Or. en

Amendment 993

Marko Vešligaj

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 a (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14a. Welcomes the Commission's new package for the wine sector and calls on the Commission to further allocate financial resources for the implementation of the proposed measures and for a long-term sustainable revival of the wine sector;

Or. en

Amendment 994

Barry Cowen

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14b. Highlights the importance of clarifying the legal status of hemp in the EU and recommends the Commission to adopt provisions ensuring that all parts of the hemp plant can be produced, harvested, processed, and marketed. Notes the potential to harmonise national legislations and align with EU Court of Justice rulings and international law, while simplifying and adapting rules to the needs of an emerging agricultural sector. Stresses that hemp cultivation can bring new economic opportunities and additional income to farmers, stimulate innovation in rural areas, and strengthen the resilience of European agriculture in line with the Commission’s Vision for Agriculture and Food;

Or. en

Amendment 995

Eric Sargiacomo

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14b. Emphasises the efforts made by several Member States to reduce their excessive specialisation in livestock farming; believes that the introduction of a new agricultural ETS would create excessive complexity without any guarantee of effectiveness, and that Member States wishing to reduce their livestock production could be allowed to introduce supply management systems;

Or. fr

Amendment 996

Jessika Van Leeuwen, Sander Smit

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14b. Calls for establishing sector- or branch-specific premiums, such as for dairy cattle and sheep producers, and for providing more flexible access to sector specific support for fruit and vegetable farmers who are not organized in producer groups, with particular attention to those operating on limited landholdings;

Or. en

Amendment 997

Sebastian Everding

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 b (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14b. Urges for the policies to support reduction in production and consumption of meat and dairy products in the EU in order to make EU agriculture sustainable;

Or. en

Amendment 998

Sebastian Everding

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 14 c (new)

Motion for a resolutionAmendment
14c. Calls for targeted support for sectors of new plant-based protein alternatives to animal products;

Or. en