The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

12.5.2026 A10-0120/1

Amendment 1

France Jamet, António Tânger Corrêa, Ton Diepeveen

on behalf of the PfE Group

Report A10-0120/2026

Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

(2024/2126(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Recital C a (new)

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

Ca. whereas the EU still accounts for less than 1 % of global aquaculture production and bears a considerable administrative burden, with the aquaculture sector experiencing a 22 % decrease in return on investment between 2017 and 2022;

Or. en

12.5.2026 A10-0120/2

Amendment 2

France Jamet, António Tânger Corrêa, Ton Diepeveen

on behalf of the PfE Group

Report A10-0120/2026

Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

The impact of the implementation of the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU on fisheries in selected fishing areas and sea basins

(2024/2126(INI))

Motion for a resolution

Paragraph 31

Motion for a resolution

Amendment

31. Emphasises that fisheries and aquaculture are often overshadowed by other, more powerful or economically important sectors, such as offshore energy; takes note of reports of structural power imbalances between maritime sectors; deplores the fact that certain sectors and operators often bypass consultation processes, at the expense of less organised actors, such as small-scale fishers, including fishers on foot, such as shellfish gatherers; calls for comprehensive, accessible and inclusive consultation processes with all stakeholders and the creation of corrective governance mechanisms, including transparent guidelines aimed at ensuring balanced and transparent decision-making, alleviating the potential for conflict and creating a level playing field between fisheries and other sectors;

31. Emphasises that fisheries and aquaculture are often overshadowed by other, more powerful state-backed or economically important sectors, such as offshore energy, especially wind farms; recalls that the vast majority of offshore energy infrastructure has significant disadvantages and does not compensate for the damage caused to fisheries and food sovereignty; takes note of reports of structural power imbalances between maritime sectors; deplores the fact that certain sectors and operators often bypass consultation processes, at the expense of less organised actors, such as small-scale fishers, including fishers on foot, such as shellfish gatherers; calls for comprehensive, accessible and inclusive consultation processes with all stakeholders and the creation of corrective governance mechanisms, including transparent guidelines aimed at ensuring balanced and transparent decision-making, alleviating the potential for conflict and creating a level playing field between fisheries and other sectors;

Or. en