On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council RESTORE – Regional Emergency Support to Reconstruction amending Regulation (EU) 2021/1058 and Regulation (EU) 2021/1057
A-10-2024-0031
Committee on Employment and Social Affairs; Committee on Regional Development · Rapporteur: Andrzej Buła, Younous Omarjee
- Voted on · Adopted 638–10–5 · See the decision →
- Full procedure 2024/0275
Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.
Parliament's amended version of the proposed RESTORE regulation supports reconstruction after natural disasters by amending the ERDF and ESF+ rules, adding flexibility and funding.¶¶ It stresses 'build back better' without extra burdens, and warns against using cohesion policy as an emergency tool.¶¶
Committee position. The co-rapporteurs support the proposal and urge rapid implementation, emphasizing solidarity and 'build back better' without extra burdens.¶¶
Key points
- Parliament adopts its position at first reading, taking over the Commission proposal.¶
- Calls on the Commission to refer the matter again if it substantially amends its proposal.¶
- Underlines the 'build back better' principle for sustainable infrastructure, without additional administrative or legal burden.¶
- Concerned that cohesion policy is used as an emergency response, risking long-term objectives.¶
- Notes the proposal is budgetary neutral and does not modify existing commitments.¶
- Regrets inconsistency in figures between the amending letter and the Legislative Financial Statement; urges consistent information.¶
- Calls on the Commission to assist Member States in reprogramming and to provide traceable reports on RESTORE impact.¶¶
- Asks for analysis of RESTORE's impact on the European Union Recovery Instrument.¶
- Calls for monitoring of payments and remedial action if needed.¶
- Regrets lack of impact assessment on climate spending; welcomes 'build back better' commitment.¶
- Fears broad definition of 'natural disaster' could lead to higher payment needs.¶
- Highlights importance of preventing double financing; support under RESTORE should be additional to other Union support.¶
Who is affected
Figures and deadlines
Legal basis: Article 294(2), Article 164, Article 175(3) and Article 178 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union¶