Sittings · Compare
What changed
DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION
on the proposalCouncil forposition at first reading with a view to the adoption of a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on driving licences, amending Directive (EU) 2022/2561 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Regulation (EU) 2018/1724 of the European Parliament and of the Council and repealing Directive 2006/126/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Commission Regulation (EU) No 383/2012 (08353/1/2025 – C100233/2025 – 2023/0053(COD))
(COM(2023)0127 – C90035/2023 – 2023/0053(COD))
(Ordinary legislative procedure: second reading)
(Ordinary legislative procedure: first reading)
The European Parliament,
– having regard to the CommissionCouncil proposalposition toat Parliamentfirst andreading the(08353/1/2025 Council– (COM(2023)0127),C100233/2025),
– having regard to Article 294(2) and Article 91(1) of the Treaty on the Functioningopinion of the European Union, pursuant to which theEconomic Commissionand submittedSocial theCommittee proposalof to14 ParliamentJune (C90035/2023),2023,
– having regard to the opinionafter ofconsulting the Committee on Legal Affairs onof the proposed legal basis,Regions,
– having regard to Articleits 294(3)position ofat thefirst Treatyreading on the FunctioningCommission ofproposal to Parliament and the EuropeanCouncil Union,(COM(2023)0127),
– having regard to RulesArticle 59294(7) andof 40the ofTreaty itson Rulesthe Functioning of Procedure,the European Union,
– having regard to the reportprovisional ofagreement approved by the Committeecommittee onresponsible Transportunder andRule Tourism75(4) (A90000/2023),of its Rules of Procedure,
1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;
– having regard to Rule 68 of its Rules of Procedure,
2. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
– having regard to the recommendation for second reading of the Committee on Transport and Tourism (A100000/2025),
Amendment 1
1. Approves the Council position at first reading;
Proposal for a directive
2. Notes that the act is adopted in accordance with the Council position;
Recital -1 (new)
3. Instructs its President to sign the act with the President of the Council, in accordance with Article 297(1) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union;
Or. en
4. Instructs its Secretary-General to sign the act, once it has been verified that all the; procedures have been duly completed, and, in agreement with the Secretary-General of the Council, to arrange for its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union;
Amendment 2
5. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.
Proposal for a directive
SHORT JUSTIFICATION
Recital -1 a (new)
The Council position at first reading reflects the political agreement reached between the Parliament and the Council during interinstitutional negotiations at early second-reading stage.
Or. en
The adopted provisions aim to enhance road safety and facilitate the free movement of persons by introducing mutually recognisable EU mobile driving licences, amending and clarifying minimum age requirements, establishing basic medical fitness requirements and default validity periods for driving licences, as well as strengthening rules for novice drivers, introducing Union-wide accompanied driving schemes for certain categories of licences, and setting specific rules for certain types of vehicles, such as emergency vehicles, motorhomes, or alternatively fuelled vehicles.
Amendment 3
The agreed text is the result of extensive negotiations. The co-legislators have reached a balanced compromise on the revision of the Driving Licences Directive, ensuring that it reflects current needs and realities.
Proposal for a directive
Recital 1
Or. en
Amendment 4
Proposal for a directive
Recital 2
Or. en
Amendment 5
Proposal for a directive
Recital 4
Or. en
Justification
E-Privacy Directive, which would cover the digital (mobile) driving licenses. See EDPS opinion paragraph 8.
Amendment 6
Proposal for a directive
Recital 5
Or. en
Justification
EDPS, paragraph 25. Already primary law (Art. 8 Charter of Fundamental Rights) requires that personal data is processed for "specified purposes".
Amendment 7
Proposal for a directive
Recital 10
Or. en
Amendment 8
Proposal for a directive
Recital 11
Or. en
Amendment 9
Proposal for a directive
Recital 12
Or. en
Amendment 10
Proposal for a directive
Recital 13 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 11
Proposal for a directive
Recital 14
Or. en
Amendment 12
Proposal for a directive
Recital 15
Or. en
Amendment 13
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16
Or. en
Amendment 14
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 15
Proposal for a directive
Recital 16 b (new)
Or. en
Amendment 16
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17
Or. en
Amendment 17
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 18
Proposal for a directive
Recital 17 b (new)
Or. en
Amendment 19
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18
Or. en
Amendment 20
Proposal for a directive
Recital 18 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 21
Proposal for a directive
Recital 19
Or. en
Amendment 22
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20
Or. en
Amendment 23
Proposal for a directive
Recital 20 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 24
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23
Or. en
Amendment 25
Proposal for a directive
Recital 23 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 26
Proposal for a directive
Recital 27
Or. en
Amendment 27
Proposal for a directive
Recital 28
Or. en
Amendment 28
Proposal for a directive
Recital 29
Or. en
Amendment 29
Proposal for a directive
Recital 30
Or. en
Amendment 30
Proposal for a directive
Recital 31
Or. en
Amendment 31
Proposal for a directive
Recital 32
Or. en
Amendment 32
Proposal for a directive
Recital 33
Or. en
Amendment 33
Proposal for a directive
Recital 34
Or. en
Amendment 34
Proposal for a directive
Recital 35
Or. en
Amendment 35
Proposal for a directive
Recital 36
Or. en
Amendment 36
Proposal for a directive
Recital 38
Or. en
Amendment 37
Proposal for a directive
Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point d
Or. en
Amendment 38
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 1
Or. en
Amendment 39
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 40
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11 b (new)
Or. en
Justification
RISM Directive definition 2019/1936, with additional inclusion to personal mobility devices (eScooters).
Amendment 41
Proposal for a directive
Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 42
Proposal for a directive
Article 3 – paragraph 5
Or. en
Amendment 43
Proposal for a directive
Article 4 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1
Or. en
Justification
EDPS opinion, paragraph 26.
Amendment 44
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Or. en
Justification
EDPS opinion paragraph 24. .
Amendment 45
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 46
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2
Or. en
Justification
Aligned with Article 4(7).The Digital Covid Certificate e.g. can be verified by checking the authenticity of its electronic signature without asking the issuing authority. If certificates are revoked, this is done through publishing a revocation list that only contains the identifier of the certificate, no other personal information, so nobody else can see which certificates have been revoked. Note that this goes further than EDPS para 21, but has already been done before (Digital Covid Certificate).
Amendment 47
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 5
Or. en
Amendment 48
Proposal for a directive
Article 5 – paragraph 7
Or. en
Amendment 49
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point a – indent 2
Or. en
Amendment 50
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b – point i – indent 2 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 51
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b – point ii – indent 1 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 52
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b – point iii – indent 2 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 53
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i – indent 1 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 54
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i – indent 1 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 55
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i – indent 1 – paragraph 3
Or. en
Amendment 56
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – indent 1
Or. en
Amendment 57
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – indent 1 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 58
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – indent 2 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 59
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – indent 2 – paragraph 3
Or. en
Amendment 60
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii – indent 2 – paragraph 4
Or. en
Amendment 61
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 62
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point iii – indent 1
Or. en
Amendment 63
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point v – indent 2
Or. en
Amendment 64
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c – point viii – indent 1
Or. en
Amendment 65
Proposal for a directive
Article 6 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 66
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 67
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point b
Or. en
Amendment 68
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c – point i
Or. en
Amendment 69
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 70
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part
Or. en
Amendment 71
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 72
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c – introductory part
Or. en
Amendment 73
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 74
Proposal for a directive
Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point d
Or. en
Amendment 75
Proposal for a directive
Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 76
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 77
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 78
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 b (new)
Or. en
Amendment 79
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point b
Or. en
Amendment 80
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point c
Or. en
Amendment 81
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point e
Or. en
Amendment 82
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point g
Or. en
Amendment 83
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h
Or. en
Amendment 84
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 85
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 86
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – point b
Or. en
Amendment 87
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 88
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b – introductory part
Or. en
Amendment 89
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c
Or. en
Amendment 90
Proposal for a directive
Article 9 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 91
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 92
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 93
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 94
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point d
Or. en
Amendment 95
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Or. en
Justification
The UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities that obliges member states to take all appropriate legislative, administrative and other measures to amend or abolish existing laws, regulations, customs and practices that are a source of discrimination against persons with disabilities. This provision is purposely general so as not to have to list all possible impairments and instead leave to the discretion -and obligation- of the examiner to determine the applicable exemptions with regard to the applicant’s impairment on a case-by-case basis.
Amendment 96
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 97
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 4
Or. en
Amendment 98
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 6
Or. en
Amendment 99
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 100
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 101
Proposal for a directive
Article 10 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 102
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 6 – subparagraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 103
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 8 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 104
Proposal for a directive
Article 12 – paragraph 9
Or. en
Amendment 105
Proposal for a directive
Article 13 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 106
Proposal for a directive
Article 14
Or. en
Amendment 107
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 108
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 109
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2 b (new)
Or. en
Amendment 110
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 2 c (new)
Or. en
Amendment 111
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 3
Or. en
Amendment 112
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 4 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 113
Proposal for a directive
Article 15 – paragraph 5 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 114
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 115
Proposal for a directive
Article 16 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 116
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 117
Proposal for a directive
Article 18 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 118
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 119
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point c
Or. en
Justification
Based on EDPS Opinion paragraph 19.Neither COM proposal, nor EP position on Prüm II (automated data exchange among police authorities) have driving licenses.
Amendment 120
Proposal for a directive
Article 19 – paragraph 2 – point d a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 121
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 1
Directive (EU) 2022/2561
Article 5 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 122
Proposal for a directive
Article 23 – paragraph 1 a (new)
Directive (EU) 2022/2561
Article 5 – paragraph 3 (new)
Or. en
Amendment 123
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part A1 – point 2 – Side 2
Or. en
Amendment 124
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part B1 – point 4 – point 3 – paragraph 2 – point d
Or. en
Amendment 125
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part B1 – point 4 – point 3 – paragraph 2 – point e
Or. en
Amendment 126
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part B1 – point 6 – point 2 – paragraph 3 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 127
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part C – point 5 – paragraph 4
Or. en
Justification
This would mean that the issuing authority is always aware whenever somebody verifies a driving license.Same logic of privacy as with the COVID certificate should apply.
Amendment 128
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part C – point 5 – paragraph 5
Or. en
Justification
Same functionality as for the Digital COVID Certificate, in a privacy-friendly logic.
Amendment 129
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part E – table
Or. en
Amendment 130
Proposal for a directive
Annex I – Part E – table
Or. en
Amendment 131
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point b – indent 2 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 132
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 2
Or. en
Amendment 133
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point d – indent 2 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 134
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point d a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 135
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point e – indent 2 a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 136
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point f
Or. en
Amendment 137
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point i
Or. en
Amendment 138
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point i a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 139
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point i b (new)
Or. en
Amendment 140
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point i c (new)
Or. en
Amendment 141
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point i d (new)
Or. en
Amendment 142
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point i e (new)
Or. en
Amendment 143
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 4 – point 1 – point f a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 144
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 4 – point 1 – point g
Or. en
Amendment 145
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 4 – point 1 – point h a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 146
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 4 – point 1 – point i a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 147
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point A – point 4 – point 1 – point j
Or. en
Amendment 148
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 5 – point 1 – point c – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 149
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 5 – point 1 – point c – paragraph 2 – point i
Or. en
Justification
With the increase in electric driving and its growing share of new sales (2035 EU requirement 100% zero emission) more and more new drivers are coming into touch with driving an electric vehicle. Young people increasingly want driver training in an electric vehicle for sustainability reasons or because they have access to an electric vehicle at home, and driving schools are progressively adapting their fleet to these demands.
Amendment 150
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 5 – point 2 – point d a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 151
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 6 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
Or. en
Amendment 152
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 6 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
Or. en
Amendment 153
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 6 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 154
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 6 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point j
Or. en
Amendment 155
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – introductory part
Or. en
Amendment 156
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – point 2 – introductory part
Or. en
Amendment 157
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – point 4 – paragraph 1 – point g
Or. en
Amendment 158
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – point 4 – paragraph 1 – point g a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 159
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – point 4 – paragraph 1 – point h
Or. en
Amendment 160
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – point 4 – paragraph 1 – point h a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 161
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – point 4 – paragraph 1 – point i
Or. en
Amendment 162
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 7 – point 4 – paragraph 1 – point j
Or. en
Amendment 163
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 2 – paragraph 1 – point a a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 164
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point e
Or. en
Amendment 165
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point e a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 166
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point g
Or. en
Amendment 167
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point h
Or. en
Amendment 168
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 3 – paragraph 1 – point i
Or. en
Amendment 169
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 4 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 170
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 8 – point 4 – point b
Or. en
Amendment 171
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 9 – point 1 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 172
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 9 – point 3 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 173
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 9 – point 3 – point b
Or. en
Amendment 174
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 9 – point 3 – point c
Or. en
Amendment 175
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 9 – point 3 – point j
Or. en
Amendment 176
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part I – point B – point 10 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 177
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part II – paragraph 1 – indent 7
Or. en
Amendment 178
Proposal for a directive
Annex II – Part II – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 179
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 1 – point 3
Or. en
Amendment 180
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 3 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 181
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 3 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 182
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 6 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 183
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 6 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 184
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 6 – paragraph 3 – point 1 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 185
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 6 – paragraph 3 – point 2
Or. en
Amendment 186
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 6 – paragraph 4 – point 4 – paragraph 1
Or. en
Amendment 187
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 13 – paragraph 2 – point 1 – point a
Or. en
Amendment 188
Proposal for a directive
Annex III – point 13 – paragraph 2 – point 1 – point c
Or. en
Amendment 189
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part 1 – point 3 – point g a (new)
Or. en
Amendment 190
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part 2 – point 1 – introductory part
Or. en
Amendment 191
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part 2 – point 1 – point d
Or. en
Amendment 192
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part 2 – point 2 – point d
Or. en
Amendment 193
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part 4 – point 1 – point e
Or. en
Amendment 194
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part 4 – point 2 – point a – point i – indent 1
Or. en
Amendment 195
Proposal for a directive
Annex IV – Part 5 – point 1
Or. en
Amendment 196
Proposal for a directive
Annex V – point 4 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 197
Proposal for a directive
Annex VI – point 4 – paragraph 2
Or. en
Amendment 198
Proposal for a directive
Annex VI a (new)
Or. en
EXPLANATORY STATEMENT
Background to the proposal
Road safety has been a major pillar of European Union transport legislation for some twenty years. Chiefly as a result of the efforts undertaken by the authorities over this period, the number of deaths on the EU’s roads has been cut significantly, from 51 400 in 2001 to 19 800 in 2021. While these figures may look positive, they still fall well short of the initial target of reducing deaths by 75% between 2001 and 2020.
Moreover, this downward trend in the number of EU road deaths has become somewhat less pronounced recently, and in 2021 the number of victims rose by 6% on the previous year, a figure that should be nonetheless be seen in the light of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The statistics from recent years therefore called for renewed efforts to improve new road safety.
In 2017 the EU transport ministers, meeting in Valletta, took note of these figures on deaths and serious injuries, which were incompatible with the EU’s long-term objectives. The informal meeting culminated in the signing of a declaration calling on the European Commission to take political initiatives for the decade 2020 from 2030 with a view to cutting numbers of deaths and better protecting road users, especially the most vulnerable among them (cyclists and pedestrians), who make up the greatest proportion of road deaths.
In its Sustainable and Smart Mobility Strategy of 2020, the Commission reiterated the target of zero fatalities by 2050 (the ‘Vision Zero’ objective) and announced that it would submit a revision of the Driving Licence Directive. In October 2021, meanwhile, the European Parliament adopted a resolution on road safety from 2021 to 2030, calling on the Commission to further promote road safety, notably through higher standards on driver training.
The proposal for the third revision of Directive 2006/126/EC on driving licences [COM (2023) 0127] formed part of the ‘road safety package’ published in March 2023, which contained three interdependent pieces of legislation. The other two proposals concerned the Union-wide effect of driving disqualifications [COM (2023) 128] and the cross-border exchange of information on road-safety-related traffic offences [amending Directive (EU) 2015/413].
Content of the proposal
The proposal builds on the objectives of the existing directive, namely to improve road safety and facilitate free movement, while catering for the need for greater sustainability and a digital transition in road transport.
The Commission wishes to improve drivers’ skills and knowledge by amending the rules on training, testing and probationary periods, particularly with regard to new technologies.
The proposal also addresses the issue of dangerous behaviour on the road, particularly by novice drivers.
It also aims to ensure that drivers are physically and mentally fit to take the wheel of a car by introducing stricter medical procedures throughout the European Union.
It further tackles obstacles that applicants for or holders of driving licences may face, particularly difficulties posed in driving tests by insufficient language skills or the lapsing of certain entitlements owing to a change of residence within the EU.
Lastly the proposal aims to help the EU to meet its climate targets.
Rapporteur’s position
At a time when the EU is behind schedule in meeting its stated aim of ‘Vision Zero’ by 2050, strong and binding measures are needed to combat road accidents over the next few years.
Road safety is a major concern for us all, including young people. That is why the Member States should include lessons on road safety and alternative forms of mobility in secondary-school curricula. The issue of the affordability of driving licences also needs to be addressed.
The rapporteur would like to see a points-based licence system introduced throughout the entire European Union. The establishment of such a scheme, coupled with effective enforcement measures, has the potential to slash the number of accidents and deaths on our roads. Most EU countries have introduced such a system at national level, and the rapporteur believes there is ample justification for extending it to all Member States.
Speed is a very important factor in causing road crashes and fatalities. Indeed, 30% of accidents are attributable at least in part to drivers’ breaching the speed limit. This is why the rapporteur is proposing speed limits that vary according to the category of driving licence held by drivers, a factor that reflects their vehicles’ likelihood of being involved in an accident.
Heavy passenger vehicles (SUVs) are also more prone to collisions than light passenger cars. Given that increasingly large and heavy cars are being placed on the EU’s roads, a category B licence is no longer suitable for driving them. The rapporteur therefore wishes to establish a new category of driving licence – category B+, for cars weighing over 1.8 tonnes – which could be obtained by applicants of 21 years or older only and after a two-year probationary period after gaining a category B licence.
The category B driving licence would thus entitle an individual to drive a private car of a maximum weight of 1.8 tonnes. Exemptions could be granted, however, for professional reasons or special purposes (to drive emergency vehicles, for example).
Furthermore, European and national statistics clearly show that young people are disproportionately prone to road accidents. The rapporteur therefore believes that the flexibility in the current directive and the proposal enabling the Member States to lower the minimum age for certain categories of driving licence should be removed. Although accompanied driving should be encouraged throughout the European Union, the rapporteur is not in favour of the proposed provisions on it since they are inconsistent with the idea of a uniform minimum age for obtaining a driving licence.
The rapporteur also suggests raising the minimum age for the A1 driving licence.
She is also believes that non-commercial driving licences should continue to be valid for a maximum of 10 years. Given the need to combat road accidents among novice drivers, the administrative validity of their licences should be reduced to a maximum of two years, after which time they will be required to attend a refresher course on how to behave while driving.
The administrative validity of licences for drivers aged 60 or over should also be reduced to ensure that they are fully fit to drive.
Drivers’ mental and physical health is a further issue of crucial importance in road safety. This is why the rapporteur is against the Commission’s proposal for the self-assessment of driver fitness. A medical examination should be compulsory for anyone taking a driving test or renewing a driving licence.
The rapporteur calls for specific measures on speed limits for novice drivers and encourages the Member States to establish stricter rules for them, for example in respect of night driving, the accrual of penalty points or the loss of points on their licences.
The rapporteur would also like to see the introduction of a harmonised EU-wide framework covering both instructors and training for candidates.
She also suggests placing particular emphasis on the safety of vulnerable road users and on eco-driving. Lastly, she hopes that tests will be long enough to properly assess the aptitude of each candidate