What changed

From · report parliamentary committee draft · 1 Apr 2026 ITRE-PR-785244 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of European Business Wallets

To · Plenary report · 23 Sept 2026 A-10-2026-0240 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the establishment of European Business Wallets

These two texts have too little in common to be compared paragraph by paragraph — they are different documents rather than versions of one (for example one group's motion against the joint text that was adopted).

hide unchanged text

+524 added · −163 removed · 3 modified paragraphs (every paragraph that differs, packaging included)

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

– having regard to Article 294(3) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union,

– having regard to the European Parliament draft report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing the Single Market and Customs Programme for the period 2028- 2034 and repealing Regulations (PE785.258v01-00),

– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee of 18 March 2026,

– having regard to the ~~report~~opinion of the Committee onof ~~Industry,~~the ~~Research~~Regions ~~and~~of ~~Energy~~18 ~~(A100000/2026),~~July 2026,

~~– having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee,~~

– having regard to Rule 60 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the opinions of the Committee on the Internal Market and Consumer Protection and the Committee on Legal Affairs,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (A10-0240/2026),

1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

3. Instructs its President to forward its position to the Council, the Commission and the national parliaments.

Recital 1: (1) In its Communication of 29 January 2025 ‘A Competitiveness Compass for the EU’(2 ) the Commission announced that European Business Wallets, building on the European Digital Identity Framework, will constitute the cornerstone for conducting business in a simple, secure and digital manner within the Union, providing companies with a seamless environment in which to interact with public administrations and with other economic operators.

2025/0358 (COD)

Recital 2: (2) Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council(3 ) establishes the European Digital Identity Framework and introduces the European Digital Identity Wallets, intended for voluntary use by individuals, enabling users to securely store and manage their digital identity and electronic attestations of attributes, and to access a wide range of online services. The European Digital Identity Framework features new trust services, including the issuance of electronic attestations of attributes, thereby enhancing the security and reliability of online transactions and interactions.

Proposal for a

Recital 4: (4) In order to ensure trust and a high degree of interoperability and security of European Business Wallets as well as effective standardisation, the technical specifications established in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and subsequent implementing regulations established pursuant to that Regulation as well as the technology and standards developments and the work carried out on the basis of Recommendation (EU) 2021/946, and in particular the Architecture and Reference Framework, should apply, with the specifications laid down in this Regulation taking precedence in the event of any inconsistency. The technical trust architecture underpinning European Business Wallets should support innovation and new market-driven solutions, without compromising on security.

REGULATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Recital 5: (5) In order to enhance the functioning of the digital single market, ensure interoperability and reduce administrative burdens, duplication and unnecessary costs, it is essential to ensure compatibility between European Business Wallets and existing systems and solutions at both Union and national level. As prescribed by the Interoperable Europe Act and to enhance secure and efficient data exchanges across the Union, the implementation of the European Business Wallets should, to the extent possible, where appropriate and following technical analysis, make use of existing EU digital infrastructures and building blocks, including those developed under the Once Only Technical System, the Business Registers Interconnection System and the European Digital Identity Wallet, thereby ensuring complementarity, interoperability, and efficient use of public resources.

on the establishment of European Business Wallets

Recital 6: (6) The European Business Wallets are a digital tool which enable economic operators to interact with public sector bodies in the context of meeting reporting obligations and fulfilling administrative procedures and which enable secure interaction with other economic operators. The use of the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets to identify and authenticate, sign or seal, request or share electronic attestations of attributes, submit documents and send or receive notifications should be without prejudice to procedural requirements that might be part of an administrative procedure and that cannot be fulfilled by the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets. These procedural requirements may include any additional safeguards or verifications, such as checks to ensure the awareness or understanding of the contents of a document or the implications of the signature of a contract, or specific actions that are required as part of an administrative procedure and are not supported by the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets. Public sector bodies should therefore ensure that all relevant procedural requirements are met, including any specific actions or processes which need to be fulfilled as part of an administrative procedure and which cannot be performed through the European Business Wallets.

THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL OF THE EUROPEAN UNION,

Recital 10: (10) This Regulation should be without prejudice to the right of legal persons to submit only once information to public sector bodies as well as to the right of Member States to continue using other systems for the submission of documents and data between competent authorities as established under Union law, such as in Regulation 2018/1724(4 ) establishing the Single Digital Gateway and Once-Only Technical System and Directive (EU) 2017/1132 establishing the Business Registers Interconnection System.

Having regard to the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and in particular Article 114 thereof,

Recital 11 a (new): (11a) In order to avoid single points of failure and ensure competition among solution providers, more than one QERDS should serve as a mandatory secure legal communication channel for European Business Wallets as set out in the Annex to this Regulation. In light of the role of European Business Wallets in the Union’s digital infrastructure and in order to safeguard integrity and accountability and ensure the security of data stored or exchanged in the European Business Wallets ecosystem, the providers of QERDS, which are integrated into the European Business Wallets, should be established within the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular, they should not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity.

Having regard to the proposal from the European Commission,

Recital 12: (12) In order to provide a tailored solution for self-employed persons and sole traders, it is essential to ensure the seamless integration of European Digital Identity Wallets with European Business Wallets, while also preserving privacy. That integration should enable those persons to authenticate using their European Digital Identity Wallet and access trust services offered for the European Business Wallets, including the QERDS established as a secure communication channel in this Regulation, using those Wallets. Access to European Business Wallet services should take place in a way that clearly distinguishes whether an individual is using their European Digital Identity Wallets, for business purposes or as an individual. Providers of European Business Wallets should be allowed to offer the secure communication channel as a standalone service to self-employed persons and sole traders that use European Digital Identity Wallets in a business capacity, with ensured interoperability to facilitate app switching, as well as trust services such as electronic signatures and qualified and non-qualified time stamping services. Such access to the secure communication channel for self-employed persons and sole traders, should be promoted by ensuring an offer, at reasonable and affordable prices, that reflects the usage needs and is accompanied by terms of use that do not impose an undue burden on those persons. Self-employed persons and sole traders that would use the European Busines…

After transmission of the draft legislative act to the national parliaments,

Recital 13: (13) The European Business Wallets, in combination with Regulation (EU) 2018/1724, should support the forthcoming 28th Regime(5 ) by providing the digital infrastructure for fully digital procedures, enabling start-ups and scale-ups to conduct EU-wide operations in a rapid and efficient manner. The Business Wallets should provide the digital infrastructure for the 28th Regime's digital-first strategy, streamlining cross-border interactions and reducing administrative burden, such as facilitating the secure storing and signature of contracts and certificates or submitting, receiving and sharing electronic applications and documents, including structured, machine-readable data as electronic attestations of attributes. By providing this infrastructure, the Business Wallets should help make the "digital by default" principle a reality, facilitating the growth and development of EU companies and enhancing their competitiveness.

Having regard to the opinion of the European Economic and Social Committee() ,

Recital 14: (14) Given the objective of creating a unified digital ecosystem for electronic identification, authentication, and the exchange of electronic documents, notifications, and attestations of attributes, the inclusion of Union entities among public sector bodies covered by this Regulation, is necessary. Such an inclusion should create a coherent framework for owners of European Business Wallets to engage with all levels of public administration thereby reducing administrative complexities and driving uptake of the European Business Wallets.

Acting in accordance with the ordinary legislative procedure,

Recital 15: (15) In order to ensure the proper issuance and integration of European Business Wallets throughout the operations and systems of Union entities, this Regulation should have due regard to the specific nature and structure of such institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. To ensure the respect of administrative autonomy and security of Union entities, they should be allowed to acquire European Business Wallets from established providers of European Business Wallets, or develop their own European Business Wallets or act themselves as provider for Union entities. Where Union entities act as providers of European Business Wallets to other Union entities, they should also be subject to a supervisory framework. In such cases, the Commission should be tasked to the supervise the provision of European Business Wallets by Union entities.

Whereas:

Recital 17: (17) The European Business Wallets should allow individuals granted the power to act on behalf of an entity in legal, financial, and administrative matters to exercise their functions by signing any attestations, declarations, or documents executed through a legally valid electronic signature within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 910/2014, which establishes that qualified electronic signatures shall have the equivalent legal effect of a handwritten signature.

(1) In its Communication of 29 January 2025 ‘A Competitiveness Compass for the EU’() the Commission announced that European Business Wallets, building on the European Digital Identity Framework, will constitute the cornerstone for conducting business in a simple, secure and digital manner within the Union, providing companies with a seamless environment in which to interact with public administrations and carry out business transactions with other economic operators.

Recital 18: (18) To support the delegation of powers and mandates within a professional context, the European Business Wallets should incorporate a mandate and role-based authorisation system that governs access to services and transactions within the European Business Wallet in such a way as to support the various business needs and to preserve the integrity of the identity of the owner of that Wallet. That system should enable economic operators and public sector bodies, within a comprehensive framework, to assign rights to authorised representatives through clearly defined technical mandates allowing the owner of a specific European Business Wallet to grant full rights to generally use the solution and act on its behalf, and an administrative mandate, allowing the owner of a Business Wallet to assign and manage clearly defined and restricted roles and responsibilities to various users of the solution within their organisation. This authorisation system should allow the use of European Digital Identity Wallets, but should not require users to have them, as the use of European Digital Wallets remains voluntary. The authorisation system should ensure compatibility with the EU digital power of attorney, as established by Directive (EU) 2025/25 of the European Parliament and of the Council6 . This authorisation system should be robust and scalable, to ensure that economic operators and public sector bodies, as the owners of European Business Wallets, can delegate authority to multiple user…

(2) Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council() establishes the European Digital Identity Framework and introduces the European Digital Identity Wallets, intended for voluntary use by individuals, enabling users to securely store and manage their digital identity and electronic attestations of attributes, and to access a wide range of online services. The European Digital Identity Framework features new trust services, including the issuance of electronic attestations of attributes, thereby enhancing the security and reliability of online transactions and interactions.

Recital 18 a (new): (18a) Given the highly sensitive nature of the information exchanged via the European Business Wallet, including trade secrets and sensitive corporate attributes, it is essential that Business Wallet-relying parties adhere to strict security and transparency requirements. To prevent unauthorised access to business data or the misuse of such data, Business Wallet-relying parties should be technically and legally restricted to requesting only those attributes which are strictly necessary for the administrative or commercial procedure concerned. Furthermore, where a Business Wallet-relying party processes credentials provided by a European Business Wallet, they should implement state-of-the-art security measures to ensure the confidentiality and non-repudiation of the exchange, ensuring that the legal entity's data is protected against unauthorised access or exfiltration.

(3) In order to foster a competitive, resilient and digital European economy, to reduce administrative burden and economic disparities within the Union, and to facilitate cross-border business, it is necessary to establish a seamless and secure environment for digital interactions among economic operators andbetween economic operators and public sector bodies in different configurations.

Recital 19: (19) In order to facilitate the conduct of cross-border business transactions, reduce administrative burdens, and promote economic growth, it is necessary to establish a clear and predictable legal framework that recognises the legal equivalence between the use of the European Business Wallets, or their core functionalities that are based on qualified trust services, and the secure communication channel where the latter is used by self-employed persons and sole traders, and other accepted methods for economic operators to identify, authenticate, submit documents and receive notifications when interacting with public sector bodies in the Union. To that end, the use of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet or the secure communication channel where the latter is used by self-employed persons and sole traders, should have the same legal effect as if lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or process that would otherwise be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements.

(4) In order to ensure trust in and a high degree of interoperability and security, as well as the technological neutrality of, European Business Wallets, the technical specifications established in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and subsequent implementing regulations established pursuant to that Regulation as well as the technology and standards developments and the work carried out on the basis of Recommendation (EU) 2021/946, and in particular the Architecture and Reference Framework, should apply, with the specifications laid down in this Regulation taking precedence in the event of any inconsistency. The technical trust architecture underpinning European Business Wallets should support innovative market-driven solutions and allow economic operators to easily switch between different providers, without compromising on security. It should also rely on open standards, thereby ensuring interoperability between systems and fostering innovation and market-driven solutions.

Recital 20: (20) To ensure a consistent user experience and to guarantee the utility, reliability, and interoperability of European Business Wallets across the Union, providers of European Business Wallets should implement a core set of functionalities. They should retain the freedom, as part of their commercial offering, fostering innovation and responding to market needs, to offer additional features, which adhere to the security requirements laid down in this Regulation. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the development and use of the core functionalities, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to set out requirements and technical specifications necessary to ensure security, interoperability and seamless functioning across the Union. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and the Council(7 ) and should include the powers to define the necessary standards and protocols for the secure communication channel, taking into account the latest technological developments. The technical specifications should enable the incorporation of new models for authorisation, automation and data exchange, as they become available, while preserving interoperability and a consistent level of security and assurance.

(5) In order to enhance the functioning of the digital single market, ensure interoperability and avoid duplication, reduce unnecessary administrative burdens and costs for businesses and public sector bodies, it is essential to ensure compatibility between and European Business Wallets and existing systems and solutions at both Union and national level. That endeavour should be supported by the European Digital Identity Cooperation Group. As prescribed by the Interoperable Europe Act and to enhance secure and efficient data exchanges across the Union, the implementation of the European Business Wallets should, to the extent possible, where appropriate and following technical analysis, make use of existing EU digital infrastructures and building blocks, including those developed under the Once Only Technical System, the Business Registers Interconnection System and the European Digital Identity Wallet, thereby ensuring complementarity, interoperability, and efficient use of public resources.

Recital 20 a (new): (20a) European Business Wallets could facilitate automated processes which do not require manual intervention or direct user action. Such automated processes could entail enabling automated transactions executed by, for example, a digital agent or AI-driven agent authorised to perform actions under a valid, auditable and revocable authorisation issued by the European Business Wallet owner or user. Such automated processes should always be verifiable and auditable and ensure an equivalent level of assurance and accountability compared with actions performed by a user.

(6) The European Business Wallets are a digital tool for economic operators to interact securely with public sector bodies in the context of meeting reporting obligations and fulfilling administrative procedures and which enable secure interaction with other economic operators. The use of the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets to identify and authenticate, sign or seal, submit documents and send or receive notifications and request or share electronic attestations of attributes, communication logs and interaction records in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format which will facilitate machine translation of such data, should be without prejudice to procedural requirements that might be part of an administrative procedure and that cannot be fulfilled by the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets. The core functionalities of European Business Wallets should not be used to circumvent Union or Member State laws that aim to protect the public interest by fighting against money laundering and the financing of terrorism. These procedural requirements may include any additional safeguards or verifications, such as checks to ensure the awareness or understanding of the contents of a document or the implications of the signature of a contract, or specific actions that are required as part of an administrative procedure and are not supported by the core functionalities of the European Business Wallets. Public sector bodies should therefore ensure that all relevant procedural requirements are met, including any specific actions or processes which need to be fulfilled as part of an administrative procedure and which cannot be performed through the European Business Wallets.

Recital 21: (21) European Business Wallets should simplify the complex interactions between economic operators and public sector bodies, and should also facilitate interactions among economic operators themselves, reducing administrative burden on economic operators in a broad range of economic sectors. In order to foster innovation and competitiveness, the European Business Wallets should enable sector-specific use cases and enhance operational efficiencies, while ensuring flexibility and adaptability to support the unique requirements of different sectors, including, but not limited to, agriculture, energy, environment, social security coordination.

(7) Public sector bodies have the flexibility to decide how to ensure that they can accept European Business Wallets considering the diversity of their IT infrastructure and their needs for interoperability. This approach allows public sector bodies to maintain their existing operational frameworks, while benefiting from the advantages of the European Business Wallets. However, that flexibility should be exercised with due regard to the principle of proportionality and the need to avoid imposing disproportionate technical or administrative burden, especially on micro-enterprises and small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs). To the extent that public sector bodies have already developed effective and secure solutions for core functionalities, those solutions should be duly taken into account.

Recital 22: (22) The use of the European Business Wallets in such contexts can aid in the reduction of costs and promote a wide range of applications and use cases across the Union, such as Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business partner (KYB) processes, beneficial ownership verification, business permits, public procurement, digital product passports, the submission of declarations, certificates and compliance data, applications for public funding, access to public services and facilitating secure cross-border data sharing and access within data spaces, such as the submission of A1 certificates concerning posted workers provided for under Regulation (EU) 883/2004.

(7a) In order to ensure the effective deployment of European Business Wallets across the Union, public authorities at the national, regional and local level should be able to receive, process and make use of data and documents provided through European Business Wallets where relevant for the exercise of their public tasks.

Recital 23: (23) The establishment of the European Business Wallets alongside the Once Only Technical System is expected to create powerful synergies that maximise efficiency and operational ease. To maximise coherence and reduce duplication, the European Business Wallets should function as an interoperable unifying architectural layer rather than an additional platform, enabling integration with existing and future national and Union-level digital gateways for efficient interaction of economic operators with public sector bodies. In particular, economic operators should be able to use the European Business Wallet to hold and transmit evidence retrieved from competent public authorities through the Once-Only Technical System. Where appropriate, economic operators should also be able to combine evidence held in the European Business Wallet with evidence retrieved via the Once Only Technical System in the context of public procedures. Consequently, by providing a secure digital platform for storing and exchanging business documents, the European Business Wallets should facilitate the exchange of such documents between public sector bodies through the mechanisms established under Once-Only Technical System. The technical system supporting such interactions should also enable the exchange of machine-readable structured data.

(7b) In order to promote the effective implementation and widespread uptake of European Business Wallets across the Union, their deployment and use should take into account differences in digital infrastructure, administrative capacity and levels of digitalisation across Member States and regions, including rural, remote and less developed areas. Particular attention should be paid to the challenges faced by smaller municipalities and local authorities. Those challenges could be addressed, for instance, through adequate financial support, shared IT infrastructure and targeted technical assistance. Union funding instruments should facilitate the deployment and uptake of European Business Wallets, especially in less developed regions.

~~Recital~~(7c) 23In aorder ~~(new):~~to ~~(23a)~~support ~~The~~the consistent implementation of European Business Wallets, the Commission should provide ~~further~~technical guidance ~~on how~~to ~~possible~~Member ~~overlaps~~States ~~between~~on ~~the~~how ~~requirements~~to ~~stemming~~support ~~from~~public ~~Regulation~~sector ~~2018/1724~~bodies ~~and~~in ~~this~~complying ~~Regulation~~with ~~could~~this beRegulation, ~~avoided,~~thereby infacilitating ~~order~~the toproper ~~improve~~functioning ~~synergies,~~of ~~efficiencies~~the ~~and~~internal ~~interoperability.~~market.

Recital 25: (25) To facilitate a flexible and efficient exchange of information and services when using European Business Wallets, and to ensure seamless integration of European Business Wallets with existing digital identity solutions, in addition to other electronic identification means, which meet the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 with regard to the assurance levels ‘high’, it should be possible to use European Digital Identity Wallets and electronic attestations of attributes for onboarding to and access management of the European Business Wallets. This should enable users to leverage existing digital identities and electronic attestations of attributes to access European Business Wallets, thereby streamlining the onboarding process and enhancing the overall user experience. The use of electronic attestations of attributes in the context of the European Business Wallets should cater to the diverse needs of European Business Wallet owners and may be used to issue and enable the secure and trustworthy verification of key attributes, such as an owner's current address, VAT registration number, tax reference number, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), Economic Operator Registration and Identification (EORI) number and excise number. European Business Wallets should support a wide range of use cases, from simple authentication and identification to more complex transactions and interactions.

(7d) The early and effective use of European Business Wallets by public authorities could encourage economic operators, including SMEs, sole traders and self-employed persons, to adopt and use those wallets in their interactions with public authorities and with other economic operators, thereby contributing to the effective functioning of the internal market and reducing administrative burden.

Recital 27 a (new): (27a) In order to ensure a competitive market for providers of European Business Wallets, to enhance consumer choice and avoid vendor lock-in, European Business Wallet owners should be able to export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication logs, and interaction records, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format to another European Business Wallet;

(8) This Regulation is without prejudice to the procedural autonomy, the constitutional requirements and the judicial independence that govern the organisation and functioning of national justice systems of the Member States, as well as to the framework, integrity and procedural safeguards of judicial proceedings.

Recital 28: (28) In order to ensure that the standards and technical specifications for European Business Wallets ensure harmonisation across various solutions, it is necessary to define the standards and protocols for the core functionalities and technical requirements for European Business Wallets in an Annex to this Regulation. The common protocols and interfaces should be clear and unambiguous to avoid giving rise to different interpretations. The Annex should set out the requirements for the implementation of European Business Wallets. To ensure the long-term viability and effectiveness of the European Business Wallets, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to establish and update the procedures and technical specifications on the implementation of core functionalities, thereby allowing for the integration of additional features and new technologies that would enable new use cases, such as agentic AI or the provision of a digital identity to an owner’s asset, and enabling the European Business Wallets to continue to support the evolving needs of economic operators in a secure and trustworthy manner. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and the Council. To the extent possible, the standards and technical specifications of the European Business Wallet should take into account relevant technical solutions and standards used by existing ICT systems by economic operators, facilitating the alignment …

(9) This Regulation is without prejudice to the Member States’ responsibility for safeguarding national security and their power to safeguard other essential State functions, including ensuring the territorial integrity of the State and maintaining law and order.

Recital 30: (30) To ensure the high level of trust, functionality, and security of European Business Wallets necessary to the cross-border provision of their services, and in particular to mitigate the risk of fraud, providers of European Business Wallets should be subject to clear and proportionate requirements and obligations without being subject to additional national requirements. Providers should notify the Member State supervisory body without undue delay of any substantive changes to their services or overall structure which could impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation.

(10) This Regulation should be without prejudice to the right of legal persons to submit ▌information only once to public sector bodies as well as to the right of Member States to continue using other systems for the submission of documents and data between competent authorities as established under Union law, such as in Regulation 2018/1724() establishing the Single Digital Gateway and Once-Only Technical System and Directive (EU) 2017/1132 establishing the Business Registers Interconnection System.

Recital 30 a (new): (30a) To facilitate trusted participation of economic operators, the European Business Wallets and supporting infrastructure must be secure-by-design and adhere to high standards in protecting confidentiality, availability and integrity of data processed by the European Business Wallets. Providers of European Business Wallets should comply with Directive (EU) 2022/2555 to ensure a high level of cybersecurity and trust in the European Business Wallets. Given the key role of European Business Wallets in the Union’s digital infrastructure, the providers of European Business Wallets and QTSPs should be ready to adapt to the quantum era and ensure they are PQC ready in advance of the quantum breakthrough.

(10a) In order to encourage a broad uptake of European Business Wallets, especially by micro-enterprises and SMEs, the design and deployment of European Business Wallets should take into account the needs, as well as the limited administrative capacities and resources of smaller businesses, to deliver affordable and user-friendly solutions, offered under transparent, fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory conditions. Member States and the Commission should explore appropriate incentive mechanisms to encourage the uptake of European Business Wallets by economic operators. The mobilisation of relevant Union funding instruments could help contribute to covering the costs of initial onboarding, training or integration for SMEs.

Recital 31: (31) To ensure proper supervision in line with this Regulation, entities that would like to become providers of European Business Wallets should be required to notify their intention to provide such European Business Wallets to the supervisory bodies prior to offering their services so that supervisory bodies can assess whether providers meet the relevant requirements of this Regulation. In order to safeguard the integrity and accountability of European Business Wallet providers and to ensure the security of data stored or exchanged in the European Business Wallets ecosystem, providers should be established within the Union. This should ensure that such providers fall under the jurisdiction and supervision of a competent body in a Member State, allowing for effective enforcement of this Regulation and the protection of users' rights and data. Furthermore, providers of European Business Wallets should not present a risk to the security of the Union, namely by not being subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity, to ensure that the Union's critical digital infrastructure remains secure and resilient. In line with the requirements set out in this Regulation, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to ensure cooperation and interoperability with solutions established or endorsed by like-minded partners of the Union.

(10b) Whilst transitioning towards a fully digital ecosystem, Member States should take the necessary measures to ensure that no barriers arise to participation in the internal market, in particular for SMEs, start-ups, self-employed persons and other actors with limited resources or digital skills, or having particular accessibility requirements.

Recital 31 a (new): (31a) In order to safeguard security and trustworthiness of the whole European Business Wallets ecosystem, given its role in the Union’s digital infrastructure, the providers of QERDS, as well as the providers of supporting infrastructure services for hosting European Business Wallets data, namely cloud providers should be established in the Union, in line with the requirements and obligations for providers of European Business Wallets outlined in this Regulation. This is particularly important because Wallet services rely on cloud environments for the storage, processing, and exchange of data. Applying the requirements and obligations for providers of European Business Wallets outlined in this Regulation would limit exposure to the extraterritorial application of third-country laws that could adversely affect the confidentiality, availability and integrity of data, as well as the control over data processed within the European Business Wallet ecosystem. Furthermore, cloud providers should ensure that European Business Wallets data is exclusively processed and stored within the Union.

(11) In order to reduce unnecessary administrative burden and improve competitiveness, all entities conducting economic activities, including companies, organisations, self-employed persons and sole traders acting in a business capacity and any other type of business, regardless of size, sector or legal form, should be able to use European Business Wallets on a voluntary basis. Those entities should be able to become European Business Wallet owners in a variety of ways, including through ownership, licence, subscription or any other agreement granting a right of use of a European Business Wallet, without restrictions to transparent, fair, reasonable, non-discriminatory and interoperable access to European Business Wallets, including across borders. To ensure that legally valid notifications, and documents can be exchanged, and reporting obligations fulfilled by means of European Business Wallets, it is necessary to establish a reliable and secure communication channel that can be used by European Business Wallet owners across the Union. A qualified electronic registered delivery service (‘QERDS’) should therefore be integrated as a secure communication channel in the European Business Wallets, and should enable the secure and legally valid exchange of information between parties, as provided for in Article 43 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.

Recital 31 b (new): (31b) Entities operated or controlled by entities established outside the Union, as well as the concepts of control, should be understood in line with the concepts and definitions used in the Regulation on the screening of foreign investments in the Union and repealing Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Control should encompass the decisive influence over the management, strategic decisions or essential operations of an entity. Direct or indirect control by a third-country government may be exercised in several ways and may be determined on the basis of, inter alia, ownership structure, government funding, specific governance arrangements such as golden shares, or other mechanisms aimed at influencing management decisions.

(11a) In order to ensure interoperability and competition among solution providers, the Commission should establish a common set of technical and operational requirements, including a standardised interface, for QERDS.

Recital 37: (37) To ensure that all European Business Wallet owners can be reliably identified and their electronic attestation of attributes are associated with a unique entity, it is also necessary to assign a unique identifier to other economic operators and public sector bodies. A unique identifier should upon request by the economic operator be created, without undue delay. To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of unique identifiers, in particular their effectiveness and consistency, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to specify the detailed requirements for the unique identifiers. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Given the diverse approaches among Member States regarding the registration of some economic operators and public sector bodies, it is important to ensure transparency and accessibility for providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data. To this end, Member States should notify to the Commission the authentic sources that are relevant for the issuance of European Business Wallet owner identification data.

(12) In order to provide a tailored solution for self-employed persons and sole traders, it is essential to ensure the seamless integration of European Digital Identity Wallets with European Business Wallets, while also preserving privacy. That integration should enable the authentication of those persons using their European Digital Identity Wallet and access trust services offered for the European Business Wallets, including the QERDS established as a secure communication channel in this Regulation, using those Wallets▌. Access to European Business Wallet services should take place in a way that clearly distinguishes whether an individual is using their European Digital Identity Wallets for business purposes or as an individual. Providers of European Business Wallets should ▌be allowed to offer the secure communication channel as a standalone service to self-employed persons and sole traders that use European Digital Identity Wallets in a business capacity, with ensured interoperability to facilitate app switching, as well as trust services such as electronic signatures and qualified and non-qualified time stamping services. Such access to the secure communication channel for self-employed persons and sole traders, should be promoted by ensuring an offer, at reasonable and affordable prices, that reflects the usage needs and is accompanied by terms of use that do not impose an undue burden on those persons. Self-employed persons and sole traders that would use the European Business Wallet should be considered data subjects under Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

Recital 39: (39) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council applies to all personal data processing activities under this Regulation. Where the European Digital Directory includes the processing of personal data this will be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. The relevant data protection principles, such as the data minimisation and purpose limitation principle, obligations, such as data protection by design and by default, and include, where appropriate, features of pseudonymisation should apply to all personal data processing under this Regulation.

(13) The European Business Wallets, in combination with Regulation (EU) 2018/1724, should support the newly proposed EU Inc., a new harmonised corporate legal regime and a starting point for the Union's 28th Regime() by providing the digital infrastructure for fully digital procedures, enabling innovative SMEs, start-ups and scale-ups to conduct EU-wide operations in a rapid and efficient manner. The Business Wallets should provide the digital infrastructure for the EU Inc.’s digital-only strategy, streamlining cross-border interactions and reducing unnecessary administrative burden, such as facilitating the secure storing and signature of contracts and certificates or submitting, receiving and sharing electronic applications and documents, including structured, machine-readable data as electronic attestations of attributes. By providing this infrastructure, the Business Wallets should help make the "digital by default" and the once-only principle a reality, facilitating the growth and development of EU companies and enhancing their competitiveness.

Recital 40: (40) To avoid excessive regulatory burdens, ex post supervision of providers of European Business Wallets and monitoring of their activities should be provided for, along with proportionate compliance verification. This approach should allow for a more flexible and efficient regulatory environment, while maintaining the necessary safeguards to protect users and ensure compliance with the requirements of the European Business Wallets framework. The notification process for providers of European Business Wallets should be streamlined and efficient, with clear requirements and timelines for applicants. National supervisory authorities should, however, be given adequate time to review, assess, and validate the notified information to ensure the providers comply with the relevant requirements of this Regulation.

(14) Given the objective of creating a unified and secure digital ecosystem for electronic identification, authentication, and the exchange of electronic documents, notifications, and attestations of attributes, the inclusion of Union entities among public sector bodies covered by this Regulation, is necessary. Such an inclusion should create a coherent framework for owners of European Business Wallets to engage with all levels of public administration thereby reducing administrative complexities and driving uptake of the European Business Wallets.

~~Recital 41: (41)~~(15) In order to ensure ~~transparency~~the ~~and~~proper ~~accountability~~issuance inand ~~the~~integration of European Business ~~Wallet~~Wallets ~~ecosystem,~~throughout athe ~~publicly~~operations ~~available~~and ~~list~~systems of ~~notified~~Union ~~providers~~entities, ofthis ~~European~~Regulation ~~Business~~should ~~Wallets~~have ~~should~~due beregard ~~established~~to the specific nature and ~~maintained~~structure byof such institutions, bodies, offices and agencies. To ensure the ~~Commission.~~respect ~~That~~of ~~list~~administrative ~~should~~autonomy ~~include~~and ~~information~~security ~~transmitted~~of byUnion ~~the~~entities. ~~national~~They ~~supervisory~~should ~~bodies~~be ~~concerning~~allowed ~~providers,~~to ~~including~~acquire ~~qualified~~European ~~trust~~Business ~~service~~Wallets ~~providers,~~from ~~that~~▌established ~~have~~providers ~~completed~~of ~~the~~European ~~notification~~Business ~~process.~~Wallets, ~~Making~~or ~~that~~develop ~~information~~their ~~publicly~~own ~~available~~European ~~should~~Business ~~enable~~Wallets ~~users~~or toact ~~verify~~themselves ~~the~~as ~~authenticity~~provider ~~and~~for ~~trustworthiness~~Union ofentities ~~providers~~provided ~~complying~~that they comply with the technical requirements ~~and~~laid ~~obligations~~down ~~for~~in this Regulation. Where Union entities act as providers of European Business Wallets asto ~~set~~other ~~out~~Union inentities, ~~this~~they ~~Regulation,~~should ~~thereby~~also ~~promoting~~be subject to a ~~high~~supervisory ~~level~~framework. ofIn ~~security~~such ~~and~~cases, ~~trust~~the inCommission should be tasked to ▌supervise the provision of European Business ~~Wallet~~Wallets ~~ecosystem.~~by Union entities.

Recital 42: (42) Effective oversight by supervisory bodies, vested with sufficient powers and provided with adequate resources, is essential to ensure that European Business Wallets made available in the Union comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation. To best ensure such oversight and relevant expertise, Member States should designate a supervisory body or bodies for the purposes of supervising the application and enforcement of this Regulation. Member States should ensure the effective supervision of providers of European Business Wallets, especially as regards the requirements on being established in the Union and complying with applicable cybersecurity requirements, including those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers. Providers of European Business Wallets should provide the needed information for assessment of compliance with those requirements.

(16) Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 established a framework for electronic identification and trust services in the internal market. Building on the ecosystem established by Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, the European Business Wallets should offer economic operators and public sector bodies a secure and reliable solution for digital identification and authentication, data sharing, and the delivery of legally valid notifications. The trust framework for European Business Wallets, including the use of trusted lists, should build upon the structures established under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. The identification and authentication within the European Business Wallets framework should rely on electronic attestations of attributes, issued by trusted entities, which attest to the identity, attributes or specific roles of a natural or legal person using those solutions and enable their verification in accordance with the requirements of this Regulation.

Recital 46: (46) The Cooperation Group established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 should be given the additional responsibility for the coordination of national practices and policies related to this Regulation and facilitate discussions between competent authorities regarding the Regulation's application and enforcement, thereby delivering on the objectives of the Cooperations Group’s establishment and retaining expertise for the benefit of implementing the European Business Wallet framework. Member States may appoint additional members to the European Digital Identity Cooperation Group established pursuant to the Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 , as the tasks of the Cooperation Group will be extended to cover issues related to the European Business Wallets. The Commission should furthermore ensure that a wide range of relevant stakeholders will be invited to participate in its work, when appropriate, to enable a fruitful cooperation on emerging policy initiatives in the field of digital identity wallets, European Business Wallets, electronic identification means and trust services.

(17) The European Business Wallets should allow individuals granted the power to act on behalf of an entity in legal, financial, and administrative matters to exercise their functions by signing any attestations, declarations, or documents executed through a legally valid electronic signature within the meaning of Regulation (EU) 910/2014, which establishes that qualified electronic signatures shall have the equivalent legal effect of a handwritten signature.

Recital 46 a (new): (46a) In order to ensure compatibility between European Business Wallets and existing systems and solutions at both Union and national level, the European Digital Identity Cooperation Group should facilitate cooperation and information sharing on technical and operational issues to ensure the proper implementation and functioning of the European Business Wallets.

(18) To support the delegation of powers and mandates within a professional context, the European Business Wallets should incorporate a mandate and role-based secure authorisation system that governs access to services and transactions within the European Business Wallet in such a way as to support the various business needs and to preserve the integrity of the identity of the owner of that Wallet. That system should enable economic operators and public sector bodies to assign rights to authorised representatives through clearly defined technical mandates allowing the owner of a specific European Business Wallet to grant full rights to generally use the solution and act on its behalf. The authorisation system should also allow the creation of administrative mandates, within a comprehensive framework, allowing the owner of a Business Wallet to assign and manage clearly defined and restricted roles and responsibilities to various users of the solution within their organisation. The authorisation system could also enable the delegation of powers of representation by European Business Wallets owner to authorised representatives, which should be carried out under the applicable Union and national law, where that is relevant and necessary. The authorisation system should allow the use of European Digital Identity Wallets without imposing any obligation to obtain them, in accordance with the voluntary nature of such wallets. The authorisation system should ensure compatibility with the EU digital power of attorney, as established by Directive (EU) 2025/25 of the European Parliament and of the Council. This authorisation system should be robust and scalable, to ensure that economic operators and public sector bodies, as the owners of European Business Wallets, can delegate authority to multiple users, including employees or other authorised natural or legal persons, thereby facilitating the efficient and secure management of internal activities and ensuring that access to European Business Wallets and their functions is controlled, revokable, traceable and auditable. This system should govern access to services and transactions within the European Business Wallet, preserving the integrity of the owners' identities.

Recital 46 b (new): (46b) The Digital Identity Cooperation Group should also be a platform for sharing best practices around the most relevant use-cases for the European Business Wallets, especially concerning Small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and procedures that are particularly relevant for companies engaged in cross-border activities.

(18a) This Regulation should not prevent a natural or legal person from managing or operating multiple European Business Wallets on behalf of economic operators, public sector bodies, subsidiaries, affiliates, or other entities, where duly authorised to do so under applicable mandates or arrangements. That could include, for example, a business group structure in which a parent undertaking centrally manages or operates European Business Wallets on behalf of several subsidiary companies within the same corporate group.

Recital 47: (47) In order to support effective take-up and interoperability, public sector bodies should enable the use of the European Business Wallet in all relevant administrative procedures for the purposes of identification and authentication, signing or sealing documents, submitting documents and sending or receiving notifications. In this regard, public sector bodies should by 24 months after the entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in this Regulation ensure that the use of European Business Wallets by economic operators is possible and that, where the receipt or communication of documents or notifications is concerned, they are able to access the Business Wallets’ secure communication channel. To ensure seamless and interoperable application of this Regulation in this regard, public sector bodies should, where applicable, own a European Business Wallet for the purposes of receiving or sending documents and notifications. The obligation for public sector bodies to accept European Business Wallets by economic operators should not affect systems used for the exchange or submission of documents or data between competent authorities. However, in order to respect the proportionality principle and ensure cost-effective implementation, it is necessary to exempt certain smaller local authorities from the obligations laid down in this Regulation. Municipalities with 10,000 inhabitants or less should be exempt. However, such municipalities can voluntarily choose to have Eur…

(18b) Given the highly sensitive nature of the data exchanged via the European Business Wallet, including trade secrets and sensitive corporate attributes, it is essential that Business Wallet-relying parties adhere to strict security and transparency standards. To prevent unauthorised access to business data or the misuse of such data, Business Wallet-relying parties should be technically and legally restricted to requesting only those attributes which are strictly necessary for the administrative or commercial procedure concerned. Furthermore, where a Business Wallet-relying party processes credentials provided by a European Business Wallet, they should implement state-of-the-art security measures to ensure the confidentiality and non-repudiation of the exchange, ensuring that the European Business Wallet owner`s data is protected against unauthorised access or exfiltration.

Recital 48: (48) In order to avoid disrupting existing interactions between economic operators and public sector bodies, it is necessary to enable a transition period until 36 months after the entry into force of the most relevant implementing acts referred to in this Regulation. During such period public sector bodies may choose not to offer the European Business Wallets' secure communication channel and instead support alternative solutions already in place which enable economic operators to communicate with public sector bodies prior to offering the European Business Wallets’ secure communication channel. In order to ensure an adequate level of security and interoperability, any alternative solution used during this transition period should comply with the requirements for Qualified Electronic Registered Delivery Services set out in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and offer a gateway to European Business Wallets. The gateway should enable users of European Business Wallets to access the alternative solutions used during the transition period. After this period, public sector bodies should support the secure communication channel of the European Business Wallets to ensure a harmonised and efficient means of communication across the Union, to the benefits of European businesses.

(19) In order to facilitate the conduct of cross-border business transactions, reduce administrative burdens, and promote economic growth, it is necessary to establish a clear and predictable legal framework that recognises the legal equivalence between the use of the European Business Wallets, or their core functionalities and the secure communication channel where the latter is used by self-employed persons and sole traders, and other accepted methods for economic operators to identify, authenticate, submit documents and receive notifications when interacting with public sector bodies in the Union. To that end, the use of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet, or the secure communication channel where the latter is offered as a standalone service to self-employed persons and sole traders, should have the same legal effect as if lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or process that would otherwise be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements. That should not prevent economic operators from continuing to use other legally valid means of carrying out such actions, where permitted under applicable law.

Recital 48 a (new): (48a) To support efficient and wide uptake of the European Business Wallets by economic operators, especially SMEs, and public sector bodies in all Member States, the Commission and Member States should inform economic operators, especially SMEs, and public sector bodies of the benefits of the European Business Wallets. The Commission should develop, in close cooperation with Member States, a comprehensive and forward-looking Implementation Roadmap that extends beyond initial deployment, identifying key milestones and use-cases within business-to-government (B2G), government -to- business (G2B) and business-to-business (B2B) interactions, especially for SMEs, as well as, taking into account cross-border interoperability and interoperability with existing digital solutions at both Union and Member State level.

(20) To ensure a consistent user experience and to guarantee the utility, reliability, and interoperability of European Business Wallets across the Union, providers of European Business Wallets should implement a core set of functionalities. They should, as part of their commercial offering, while fostering innovation and responding to market needs, retain the freedom to offer additional features which comply with the security requirements laid down in this Regulation. In order to ensure uniform conditions for the development and use of the core functionalities, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to set out requirements and technical specifications necessary to ensure security, interoperability and seamless functioning across the Union. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and the Council() and should include the powers to define the necessary standards and protocols for the secure communication channel. When defining those requirements and technical specifications, the Commission should ensure that they remain technologically neutral, proportionate and adaptable, taking into account the latest technological developments. The technical specifications should enable the incorporation of new models for authorisation, automation and data exchange, as they become available, while preserving interoperability and a consistent level of security and assurance.

Recital 50: (50) To ensure that the European Business Wallets ecosystem continues to meet the needs of economic operators and public sector bodies, it is necessary to assess its implementation and impact in light of the purpose of this Regulation. The evaluation should, in particular, take into account the risk of legal fragmentation within the internal market regarding the electronic submission of documents and attestations of attributes as well as the technological developments and progression of the market for European Business Wallets and associated trust services. The evaluation should furthermore assess whether this Regulation has reduced administrative burdens and compliance costs, especially for SMEs and smaller public sector bodies, supported the wide uptake of European Business Wallets and their respective usage for cross-border business enhanced competitiveness, as well as, facilitated fraud reduction and environmental sustainability.

(20a) When adopting implementing acts in a timely manner pursuant to this Regulation, the Commission should ensure that they are proportionate, technologically neutral and do not create unnecessary administrative burden.

Recital 54: (54) In order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of the recognition and interoperability of business wallets or similar systems and framework from third countries to support and promote partnerships and cooperation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to set the conditions under which such similar systems or framework benefit from the provisions of this Regulation. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Whereas it is important that companies established outside the Union pursuing economic activities within the Union are able to obtain European Business Wallets, it is equally important to ensure that the European Business Wallets can be accepted by third countries. Therefore, the Commission should endeavour to negotiate mutual recognition agreements with the third countries, where appropriate.

(20b) European Business Wallets could benefit from the development and deployment of trustworthy automated transactions or AI solutions. In particular, European Business Wallets may use AI based services and solutions to support multilingual processing of transactions, including through automated translation and language-processing tools, thereby helping businesses operate more effectively across the internal market.

Recital 57: (57) To ensure a coherent and horizontal application across sectors of Union legislation, reduce administrative cost on economic operators and to improve budgetary efficiency, Union law concerning electronic identification, authentication, or the exchange of electronic documents, notifications, or attestations of attributes, particularly where specific technical requirements, systems, or protocols are established, should be applied in a manner consistent with this Regulation. Accordingly, any future legislative or non-legislative initiatives in these fields should adhere to the Business-Wallet-by-Default principle and should be designed and developed to build upon and enable the use of European Business Wallets. Where such alignment is not possible, the Commission should provide a written justification through an Impact Assessment, accompanying the relevant initiative, setting out the reasons for not enabling the use of European Business Wallets.

(20c) To facilitate the secure and trustworthy use of automated transactions or AI in the context of the European Business Wallets infrastructure, European Business Wallet users may authorise AI systems, including AI agents, to act on their behalf. The existence, validity, scope and status of authorisations granted by a European Business Wallet user should be verifiable and auditable, and should ensure a level of assurance and accountability equivalent to actions performed by a user. Member States should retain the right to regulate and approve specific solutions. Such AI systems should be fully compliant with the applicable Union and national law. The Commission should issue guidance for the purpose of achieving the required levels of interoperability, safety and security.

Recital 57 a (new): (57a) The Commission should evaluate and review this Regulation by ... [three years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and every four years thereafter and report to the European Parliament and the Council. This review is essential for assessing the continued relevance of the prescribed core functions and technical specifications, especially those associated with the QERDS as a secure communication channel, in the context of the latest technological advancements. Furthermore, the Commission should evaluate the notification procedures for providers of European Business Wallet, as well as the implementation and effectiveness of the rules on penalties established by Member States, to evaluate market developments and compliance levels. The Commission should assess the overall uptake of European Business Wallets and evaluate the achievement of the expected indirect benefits. Based on the results, the Commission should evaluate whether it is necessary to modify the scope of this Regulation or its specific provisions. Any such modification should be accompanied by an Impact Assessment.

(21) European Business Wallets should simplify the complex interactions between economic operators and public sector bodies, and should also facilitate interactions among economic operators themselves, reducing administrative burden and costs on economic operators in a broad range of economic sectors. In order to foster innovation and competitiveness, the European Business Wallets should enable sector-specific use cases and enhance operational efficiencies, while ensuring flexibility and adaptability to support the unique requirements of different sectors, including, but not limited to, agriculture, industry, energy, environment, social security coordination, with particular attention to sectors characterised by a high number of cross-border activities.

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 2: (2) establishes the principle of equivalence, giving equivalent legal effect to actions and transactions carried out via qualified trust services through a European Business Wallet as to actions and transactions lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements;

(22) The use of the European Business Wallets in such contexts can aid in the reduction of costs and promote a wide range of applications and use cases across the Union, such as Know Your Customer (KYC) and Know Your Business partner (KYB) processes, beneficial ownership verification, business permits, digital product passports, the submission of declarations, certificates and compliance data, applications for public funding, participation in public procurement procedures, access to public services, fulfilling due diligence obligations and facilitating secure cross-border data sharing and access within data spaces, such as the submission of A1 certificates concerning posted workers provided for under Regulation (EU) 883/2004. Facilitating regulatory compliance and administrative procedures could include making use of European Business Wallets in the secure submission, sharing and reuse of verified information required for public procurement, tax and VAT-related procedures, electronic declarations, such as the e-declaration of posted workers, and sustainability-related disclosure, such as environmental, social and governance reporting, as defined by Union law.

~~Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 8: (8) provides a framework for the supervision of Union entities, where such public sector bodies provide European Business Wallets to other Union entities;~~

(22a) To ensure seamless integration across Union digital infrastructures and reduce unnecessary administrative burden for economic operators, European Business Wallets should enable secure access to, as well as presentation and exchange of Digital Product Passport data. To that end, the technical frameworks governing European Business Wallets and Digital Product Passports should, where appropriate, rely on common or compatible interfaces and standardised technical protocols that enable secure and efficient data exchange between both systems.

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9: (9) provides a framework for the recognition of third-country systems similar to the European Business Wallets which offer the same level of security, trust and digital standards as European Business Wallets, and the issuance of European Business Wallets to third country economic operators.

(22b) In order to facilitate cross-border business transactions and reduce unnecessary administrative burden, European Business Wallets should be able to support, through interoperable and technology-neutral implementation, business processes linked to the exchange of business data and documents between economic operators and with public sector bodies. Such processes may include, where relevant under Union or national law, the exchange of structured electronic invoices and related business documents as e-invoicing is a core digital business process that supports automation, reduces administrative burden and improves cash-flow management, in particular for SMEs.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part: ‘European Business Wallet’ means a digital solution that allows European Business Wallet owners to securely request, obtain, combine, store, manage, and present European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes to Business Wallet-relying parties and other entities using European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets for the following purposes:

(22c) European Business Wallets should function as an interoperable unifying architectural layer rather than an additional platform, enabling integration with existing and future national and Union-level digital gateways for efficient interaction of economic operators with public sector bodies.

~~Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a: (a) to authenticate and provide the verified proofs required by a European Business Wallet-relying party;~~

(23) The establishment of the European Business Wallets alongside the Once Only Technical System is expected to create powerful synergies that maximise efficiency and operational ease. In particular, economic operators should be able to use the European Business Wallet to hold and transmit evidence retrieved from competent public authorities through the Once-Only Technical System. Where appropriate, economic operators should also be able to combine evidence held in the European Business Wallet with evidence retrieved via the Once Only Technical System in the context of public procedures. Consequently, by providing a secure digital platform for storing, combining and exchanging business documents, the European Business Wallets should facilitate the exchange ▌between public sector bodies of such documents retrieved through the ▌Once-Only Technical System. The technical system supporting such interactions should also enable the exchange of machine-readable structured data.

~~Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c: (c) to enable the creation, management and delegation of mandates and roles to authorised representatives and users;~~

(23a) The Commission should provide further guidance on how possible overlaps between the requirements stemming from Regulation 2018/1724 and from this Regulation could be avoided, in order to improve synergies, efficiencies and interoperability.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 1 – subparagraph 1 a (new): and that may issue electronic attestations of attributes relating to data for which the European Business Wallet owner is the primary source,

(24) In order to ensure coordination between the Union’s ongoing digitalisation of judicial cooperation, the modernisation of secure cross-border information exchange, and the need to provide economic operators with efficient digital tools to interact with authorities, it is necessary to establish a coherent framework that enables smooth interaction between such relevant systems. Enhancing such coordination will reduce administrative burden, improve legal certainty, and strengthen the effectiveness of cross-border cooperation, by ensuring that communication channels used by economic operators function seamlessly within the European digital market. In that context, European Business Wallets should complement the systems set out in Regulation (EU) 2023/2844 and Regulation (EU) 2023/969, where a seamless interaction between these systems and the Business Wallets should be maintained through the Business Wallets gateway, enabling relevant authorities to maintain these systems whilst promoting simplification ▌. The framework for European Business Wallets should remain technologically neutral, so that different compliant solutions can coexist and reflect national specificities while remaining fully interoperable.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 7: (7) ‘European Business Wallet owner’ means an economic operator or public sector body whose identity has been verified from an authentic source that owns or has a right of use of a European Business Wallet;

(25) To facilitate a flexible and efficient exchange of information and services when using European Business Wallets, and to ensure seamless integration of European Business Wallets with existing digital identity solutions, it should be possible to use European Digital Identity Wallets, notified electronic identification means and electronic attestations of attributes for onboarding to and access management of the European Business Wallets, so that access to the European Business Wallet does not depend on the use of a specific digital identity solution. This should enable European Business Wallet users to leverage existing digital identities and electronic attestations of attributes to access European Business Wallets, thereby streamlining the onboarding process and enhancing the overall user experience. The use of electronic attestations of attributes in the context of the European Business Wallets should cater to the diverse needs of European Business Wallet owners and may be used to issue and enable the secure and trustworthy verification of key attributes, such as an owner's current address, VAT registration number, tax reference number, Legal Entity Identifier (LEI), Economic Operator Registration and Identification (EORI) number and excise number. European Business Wallets should support a wide range of use cases, from simple authentication and identification to more complex transactions and interactions.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 11: (11) ‘qualified electronic attestation of attributes’ means qualified electronic attestation of attributes as defined in Article 3, point (45) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

(26) In order to ensure the highest level of security and trustworthiness for the operation of European Business Wallets, providers of European Business Wallets should ensure that each European Business Wallet they provide is pre-configured to interact with certain trust services, which are required to enable the core functionalities of European Business Wallets, including the creation of qualified electronic signatures, the creation of qualified electronic seals, and the issuance and validation of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes. To support these functionalities, European Business Wallets should allow for the sharing ▌storage, and verification of specific information and documents relating to the owner, such as messages and documents for the secure communication channel, signed and sealed documents, and sets of attributes for attestation-related services.

~~Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 17: (17) ‘qualified electronic time stamp’ means a qualified electronic time stamp as defined in Article 3, point (34) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;~~

(27) To allow for the legal recognition of electronic attestations of attributes presented via European Business Wallets, it is necessary to allow for the creation and validation of linked attestations, whereby one attestation is cryptographically linked to another in a manner that allows the verification of the authenticity and integrity of each individual attestation, and of all linked attestations collectively. To that end, the European Business Wallet infrastructure should, through the use of the chain of attestations, enable the submission of a single instance of an attestation and facilitate its subsequent reuse across relevant procedures. Such functionality should allow European Business Wallet owners to transmit a reference to a document where appropriate with a cryptographic element, such as a hash key to a sealed attestation issued by a European Business Wallet, thereby attesting to the integrity and authenticity of the original submission.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 19 a (new): (19a) ‘automated transaction’ means a transaction executed by an authorised digital or AI-driven agent, performing actions under a valid, auditable and revocable authorisation issued by the European Business Wallet owner or authorised user;

(27a) In order to ensure a competitive market for providers of European Business Wallets, to enhance consumer choice and avoid vendor lock-in, European Business Wallet owners should be able to export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication logs, and interaction records, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format to another European Business Wallet.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 22: (22) ‘user’ means a natural or legal person, or a natural person representing another natural person or a legal person, that uses European Business Wallets provided in accordance with this Regulation;

(28) In order to ensure that the standards and technical specifications for European Business Wallets ensure interoperability across various solutions, it is necessary to define the standards and protocols for the core functionalities and technical requirements for European Business Wallets in an Annex to this Regulation. The common protocols and interfaces should be clear and unambiguous to avoid giving rise to different interpretations. The Annex should set out the requirements for the implementation of European Business Wallets. To ensure the long-term viability and effectiveness of the European Business Wallets, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to establish and update the procedures and technical specifications on the implementation of core functionalities, thereby allowing for the integration of additional features and new technologies that would enable new use cases, such as agentic AI or the provision of a digital identity to an owner’s asset, and enabling the European Business Wallets to continue to support the evolving needs of economic operators in a secure and trustworthy manner. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and the Council. To the extent possible, the standards and technical specifications of the European Business Wallet should take into account relevant technical solutions and standards used by existing ICT systems of economic operators, thereby facilitating their alignment and interoperability with the European Business Wallets. To ensure the timely development and deployment of European Business Wallets throughout the Union, the implementing acts set out in this Regulation should be adopted within a limited timeframe after this Regulation comes into force. In exercising those powers, the Commission should keep the European Parliament fully and promptly informed, given the structural importance of those implementing acts for the Union’s trust infrastructure. In order to support interoperability and foster innovation, providers are encouraged to release the source code of the application software of European Business Wallets under an open source licence.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 24: (24) ‘European Business Wallet unit attestation’ means a data object that describes the components of the European Business Wallet unit or allows authentication and validation of those components;

(29) To support the timely development of the market for European Business Wallets, the adoption of the implementing acts on core functionalities and the accompanying technical specifications should be prioritised and completed within a short period following the entry into force of this Regulation in order to enable providers to develop compliant European Business Wallet solutions without undue delay. Where appropriate, these should build on the existing standards including those set out in the Architecture and Reference Framework provided for in the context of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, to support the re-use of familiar technical standards and uptake of the European Business Wallets.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 27: (27) ‘critical assets’ means assets within or in relation to a European Business Wallet unit of such extraordinary importance that where their availability, confidentiality or integrity are compromised, that would have a very serious, debilitating effect on the ability to rely on the European Business Wallet unit or have significant operational, financial or reputational impact on the European Business Wallet owner;

(30) To ensure the high level of trust, functionality, and security of European Business Wallets for the cross-border provision of their services, and in particular to mitigate the risk of fraud, providers of European Business Wallets should be subject to clear and proportionate requirements and obligations as laid down in this Regulation, without being subject to additional national requirements. Providers should notify the relevant Member State supervisory body without undue delay of any substantive changes to their services or overall structure which could impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation.

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – point 43 a (new): (43a) ‘supporting infrastructure service provider‘ means a service provider that provides technical, operational, or security infrastructure essential for the provision of European Business Wallets, without itself providing the wallet for end-users. Such providers include entities such as cloud service providers supplying hosting services, cryptographic key management, secure communication networks or identity verification tools.

(30a) To facilitate the trusted participation of economic operators, providers of European Business Wallets should ensure that European Business Wallets and supporting infrastructure are secure-by-design by default and comply with the relevant cybersecurity requirements laid down in Directive (EU) 2022/2555. Providers should ensure appropriate safeguards for data access, storage and transfer, while taking into account the risks associated with centralised components and dependencies. Where appropriate, governance and implementation models should avoid excessive concentration of critical functions and ensure resilience through secure and reliable architectures, thereby supporting trust and the proper functioning of the internal market.

Article 4 – paragraph 1: Where a European Business Wallet owner makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1) that are based on qualified trust services the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements.

(30b) Given the key role of European Business Wallets in the Union’s digital infrastructure, the providers of European Business Wallets and qualified trust service providers should be ready to adapt to the quantum era and ensure they are prepared to transition to post-quantum cryptography in advance of the quantum breakthrough.

~~Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point a: (a) securely request, obtain, select, combine, store, delete, share and present electronic attestations of attributes;~~

(31) To ensure proper supervision in line with this Regulation, entities that would like to become providers of European Business Wallets should be required to notify their intention to provide such European Business Wallets to the supervisory bodies prior to offering their services so that supervisory bodies can assess whether providers meet the relevant requirements of this Regulation. In order to safeguard the integrity and accountability of European Business Wallet providers and to ensure the security of data stored or exchanged in the European Business Wallets ecosystem, providers should be established within the Union. This should ensure that such providers fall under the jurisdiction and supervision of a competent body in a Member State, allowing for effective enforcement of this Regulation and the protection of users' rights and data. Furthermore, providers of European Business Wallets should not present a risk to the security of the Union, namely by not being subject to either direct or indirect control by a third country or by a third-country entity, to ensure that the Union's critical digital infrastructure remains secure and resilient. In line with the requirements set out in this Regulation, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to ensure cooperation and interoperability with solutions established or endorsed by like-minded partners of the Union.

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point f: (f) issue electronic attestations of attributes for data for which the European Business Wallet owner is the primary source to European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets;

(31a) The concept of control should be understood in line with Regulation (EU) 2026/1386, and in particular having due regard to a company´s ownership structure and significant funding, specific governance arrangements, such as golden shares, or other features aimed at influencing management decisions. In addition, the applicability of third-country laws that impact jurisdiction over the company or its data should be considered. Ownership and governance of a provider of European Business Wallets should be subject to regular monitoring by supervisory bodies for the entire period during which they provide a European Business Wallet.

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point i: (i) transmit and receive electronic documents and data by means of a qualified electronic registered delivery service, which complies with Article 7(2) and the requirements set out in the Annex, and is capable of supporting confidentiality and integrity;

(31b) To ensure a high level of security, trust and resilience within the European Business Wallets ecosystem and to safeguard the Union’s digital sovereignty, providers of QERDS, as well as cloud computing service providers, should be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular, they should not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. To that end, the storage and processing of data within European Business Wallets should take place exclusively on infrastructure located within the Union and subject to Union law. Establishing such infrastructure within the Union serves to limit exposure to the extraterritorial application of laws of third countries, enables effective supervision by the competent authorities and contributes to the protection of sensitive business information, while simultaneously strengthening the Union's capacity to provide secure and trustworthy digital services to economic operators and public sector bodies.

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point j: (j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, with the possibility to create auditable and clearly defined and restricted delegations of powers, mandates and roles and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations;

(32) The Union must protect its security interest against providers and suppliers which could represent a persistent security risk due to the potential interference from third countries. To that end, it is necessary to reduce the risk of strategic dependencies on high-risk suppliers in the internal market, including in the ICT supply chain, as they could have potentially serious negative impacts on the security of economic operators and public sector bodies across the Union and the Union’s critical infrastructure, especially with regards to the integrity, confidentiality and availability of data and services. Any restrictions should be based on a proportionate risk assessment and corresponding mitigation measures as defined in Union policies and laws. Such limitations may apply, for example, to high-risk suppliers, as identified under Union law.

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point k: (k) authorise European Business Wallet-relying parties to request electronic attestations of attributes issued to the European Business Wallet owner, which are strictly necessary for the purpose of the transaction and prevent unnecessary processing, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations;

(32a) To ensure that digital services are user-firendly and accesible, European Business Wallet providers should ensure that their services are accessible for persons with disabilities, in accordance with Directive (EU) 2019/882.

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – point l: (l) export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication logs, and interaction records, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format, at the request of the owner or in the event of termination of service or revocation of the notification of the provider of the European Business Wallet and to import the data exported from a European Business Wallet unit to enable data portability across providers of European Business Wallets;

(33) In order to establish the identity of economic operators in a secure and reliable manner, this Regulation should allow for the use of qualified electronic attestations of attributes to issue European Business Wallet owner identification data. Qualified electronic attestations of attributes can be easily updated or revoked. The use of qualified electronic attestations of attributes for establishing the identity of economic operators provides an efficient, and secure solution that is suited to the needs of the digital economy. Qualified trust service providers issuing these attestations are regulated under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and are subject to strict requirements and scrutiny, ensuring a high level of security and trust in the issuance process. The authentic sources used to verify the data contained in the qualified electronic attestations of attributes are business registers and other registers, and the use of the Business Registers Interconnection System (‘BRIS’) and the Beneficial Ownership Registers Interconnection System (‘BORIS’) should be promoted to facilitate the verification of this data, thereby ensuring the accuracy and reliability of the identification data.

Article 5 – paragraph 2: 2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities adhere to the security requirements set out in Article 6(2), point (c), and do not interfere with or compromise the confidentiality, availability, or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide.

(34) This Regulation should not affect the functioning or the role of business registers as authentic sources and should not alter the way they operate or the data filed therein but rather build upon and complement the existing infrastructure. Member States should, in a timely manner, ensure that business registers are digitally accessible and technically capable of issuing electronic attestations of attributes. In this regard, where electronic attestations of attributes are issued by or on behalf of an authentic source, such as a business register, the register could directly issue the relevant data, further enhancing the security and reliability of the identification process.

Article 5 – paragraph 5: 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, including for wallet-to-wallet transactions between European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

(35) Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 requires Member States to ensure that measures are taken to allow qualified trust service providers to verify by electronic means, at the request of the user, the authenticity of the attributes listed in Annex VI of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, such as educational and professional qualifications, titles and licenses, powers and mandates to represent natural or legal persons, public permits and licenses and financial and company data. The European Business Wallets framework should build on this existing requirement that should cover all official data that is relevant for economic operators in the context of the European Business Wallets and enable the electronic verification of attributes to facilitate the issuance of European Business Wallet owner identification data and other electronic attestations of attributes.

~~Article 6 – title: Technical requirements for European Business Wallets~~

(36) As all economic operators and entities conducting economic activities should be able to use European Business Wallets, including self-employed persons and sole traders, European Business Wallet owner identification data should be provided in a manner that is specifically designed to verify their identity and attested attributes within a business context. To ensure consistency with existing Union frameworks and facilitate cross-border interoperability, the European Business Wallet framework should use the European Unique Identifier (EUID) provided by the codified Company Law Directive (EU) 2017/1132() and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU)2021/369() as well as Regulation (EU) 2024/1624() and Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2021/369(). Companies and other legal entities as well as arrangements such as trusts are assigned a European Unique Identifier to enable their unequivocal identification in cross-border situations. The European Unique Identifier is currently made publicly accessible through BRIS and used by BORIS. Accordingly, the European Business Wallet framework should rely on the issuance and recording process of European Unique Identifiers as the means of verifying the identity of economic operators to which European Unique Identifiers are provided in accordance with Directive (EU) 2017/1132. The European Business Wallet framework should rely on the issuance and recording process of European Unique Identifiers for other economic operators falling under Directive (EU) 2015/849.

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – introductory part: 1. Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure compliance with the reference standards and specifications set out in paragraph 5 and the technical requirements set out in the Annex to support common protocols and interfaces:

(36a) To ensure the effective functioning and widespread use of European Business Wallets, Member States should ensure that all requests for a unique identifier by economic operators and public sector bodies established in their territory are carried out without undue delay. Where appropriate, such identifiers should be derived from or linked to identifiers already used in national registers, notably company registers or other official registers, in order to promote interoperability and avoid duplication. Member States should ensure that unique identifiers are assigned automatically at the time of registration of a new company or other legal entity in a national register. Member States should also lay down procedures to ensure that economic operators that are not subject to registration in national company registers can be issued such an identifier by a competent national authority, thereby enabling all economic operators to make effective use of European Business Wallets.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point b: deleted~~

(37) To ensure that all European Business Wallet owners can be reliably identified and their electronic attestation of attributes are associated with a unique entity, it is also necessary to assign a unique identifier to other economic operators and public sector bodies that do not yet have such an identifier under Union law. A unique identifier should, upon the request of the economic operator, be created, without undue delay. To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of unique identifiers, in particular their effectiveness and consistency, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to specify the detailed requirements for the unique identifiers. Those powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011. Given the diverse approaches among Member States regarding the registration of some economic operators and public sector bodies, it is important to ensure transparency and accessibility for providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data. To this end, Member States should notify to the Commission the authentic sources that are relevant for the issuance of European Business Wallet owner identification data.

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point c: (c) for the validating, sharing and presenting to European Business Wallet-relying parties of European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestation of attributes and of selectively disclosed data;

(37a) In order to ensure that European Business Wallets can be effectively used, the framework for unique identifiers should support hierarchical and operational identifiers reflecting the structure and activities of economic operators by accommodating complex business structures, such as subsidiaries, branches, establishments or operational units that require distinct identification. The identifier framework should allow for the association of identifiers with such entities while maintaining a clear link to the economic operator to which they belong. Such flexibility is necessary to ensure interoperability with existing business systems and to support compliance processes, including electronic invoicing and reporting obligations. Furthermore, where natural persons act in various economic capacities, notably as self-employed persons, sole traders, entrepreneurs or representatives of legal entities, the framework could provide for the assignment of identifiers reflecting such distinct roles, insofar as necessary for the purposes of European Business Wallets and where relevant regulation in the Member State concerned allows it.

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point d: (d) to allow interaction with the European Business Wallets automatically without manual intervention or through direct user action such automated processes should be verifiable and auditable and ensure an equivalent level of assurance and accountability as interactions performed by an authorised user;

(38) In order to ensure the efficient, secure, and transparent functioning of the European Business Wallet framework, it is necessary to establish a European Digital Directory, that includes personal data of economic operators. The Commission should be empowered to set up and maintain this Directory, as a trusted source of information on economic operators and public sector bodies using European Business Wallets. The Directory should enable European Business Wallet owners to be easily contacted to promote legal certainty in relation to dealings between businesses and in relation to interactions with public sector bodies, particularly in the view of promoting trade between Member States. European Business Wallet Providers, liaising with the Commission, should submit the necessary information to support the functioning of the European Digital Directory and collaborate with the relevant qualified trust service providers, providers of electronic attestations of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source, and authentic sources, to ensure that the data submitted remains accurate. Such actions should not indirectly create a requirement for economic operators to update such information. In this regard the Digital Directory will rely on the information made available by business registers including, but not limited to, those accessible through BRIS while ensuring that such information will not be duplicated.

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point e: (e) to securely onboard the European Business Wallet owner or an authorised representative of the European Business Wallet owner remotely with an electronic identification means which meets the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 with regard to the assurance level ‘high’;

(39) Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Regulation (EU) 2018/172 of the European Parliament and of the Council apply to all personal data processing activities under this Regulation. Where the operation of the European Digital Directory includes the processing of personal data this will be carried out in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2018/1725. The relevant data protection principles, such as the data minimisation and purpose limitation principle, obligations, such as data protection by design and by default, and include, where appropriate, features of pseudonymisation and anonymisation should apply to all personal data processing under this Regulation.

Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point f: (f) for multidirectional interaction between European Business Wallets, and between European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets for the purpose of receiving, validating and sharing European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes in a secure manner;

(40) In order to ensure that regulatory burdens remain proportionate, ex post supervision of providers of European Business Wallets and monitoring of their activities should be provided for, along with proportionate rather than requiring prior compliance verification▌. This approach should allow for a more flexible, risk-based and efficient regulatory environment, while maintaining the necessary safeguards to protect users and ensure compliance with the requirements of the European Business Wallets framework. The notification process for providers of European Business Wallets should be clear, transparent, streamlined and efficient, with well-defined requirements and timelines for applicants. National supervisory authorities should, however, be given adequate time to review, assess, and validate the notified information to ensure that the providers comply with the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation ▌.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point h: (h) to verify the authenticity and validity of European Business Wallets;~~

(41) In order to ensure transparency and accountability in the European Business Wallet ecosystem, a publicly available list of notified providers of European Business Wallets should be established and maintained by the Commission. That list should include information transmitted by the national supervisory bodies concerning providers, including qualified trust service providers, that have completed the notification process. Making that information publicly available should enable users to verify the authenticity and trustworthiness of providers, complying with the requirements and obligations for providers of European Business Wallets laid down in this Regulation thereby promoting a high level of security and trust in the European Business Wallet ecosystem. That list should be updated without undue delay following the completion of the notification process in order to ensure legal certainty for entities intending to provide European Business Wallets and for users of such services.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 1 – point l: deleted~~

(42) Effective oversight by supervisory bodies, vested with sufficient powers and provided with adequate resources, is essential to ensure that European Business Wallets made available in the Union comply with the requirements laid down in this Regulation. To best ensure such oversight and relevant expertise, Member States should designate the ▌ supervisory body or bodies for the purposes of supervising the application and enforcement of this Regulation ▌. Member States should ensure the effective supervision of providers of European Business Wallets, especially as regards the requirements on being established in the Union and complying with applicable cybersecurity requirements, including those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers. Providers of European Business Wallets should provide the needed information for assessment of compliance with those requirements. The Commission should issue guidance, where necessary, specifying the information necessary for establishing proof of compliance.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point a: (a) ensure that the European Business Wallet owner identification data is cryptographically bound with the European Business Wallet of the owner;~~

(43) Due consideration should be given to ensuring effective cooperation between supervisory bodies designated under this Regulation, Article 46b of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and the competent authorities designated or established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the European Parliament and of the Council()Since the competent authorities are distinct entities, they should cooperate closely and in a timely manner, including by exchanging relevant information to ensure effective supervision and compliance of European Business Wallet providers with the applicable obligations under Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and Directive (EU) 2022/2555.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point c: (c) ensure security-by-design and implement and document security controls that provide reasonable assurance ;~~

(44) To ensure the enforcement of this Regulation, national supervisory bodies should be empowered to impose administrative fines. It is necessary to specify the upper limit of administrative fines and the criteria for their determination in order to promote equal treatment of providers of European Business Wallets across the Union regardless of their Member State of establishment. The competent supervisory authority should assess each case individually, taking into account all relevant circumstances, including the nature, gravity, recurrence and duration of the infringement, its consequences and any measures taken to ensure compliance and mitigate harm. In this regard, Member States should notify the Commission of the rules laid down in national law allowing the supervisory body to impose penalties by [Publications Office, insert the date 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] and should notify the Commission without delay of any subsequent amendments to those rules.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point d: deleted~~

(45) In order to ensure the proper functioning of the internal market and to protect the rights of economic operators, it is necessary to establish a mechanism enabling the Commission to intervene in cases where a provider of European Business Wallets is found, supported by objective evidence, to be repeatedly non-compliant with the requirements of this Regulation and where no effective, timely and proportionate measures have been taken by the competent supervisory authority to remedy the situation. This mechanism should allow for the Commission to carry out an evaluation of compliance, consult with the Member States concerned and the provider, and adopt implementing acts to provide for corrective or restrictive measures. This should enable the Commission to take swift and effective action to address any non-compliance and to ensure that the European Business Wallets are used in a secure and trustworthy manner.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f – indent 1: – upon the explicit request of the European Business Wallet owner or authorised user;~~

(46) The Cooperation Group established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 should be given the additional responsibility for the coordination of national practices and policies related to this Regulation and facilitate discussions between competent authorities regarding the Regulation's application and enforcement, thereby delivering on the objectives of the Cooperations Group’s establishment and retaining expertise for the benefit of implementing the European Business Wallet framework. Member States may appoint additional members to the European Digital Identity Cooperation Group established pursuant to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, as the tasks of the Cooperation Group will be extended to cover issues related to European Business Wallets. The Commission should furthermore ensure that a wide range of relevant stakeholders will be invited to participate in its work, where appropriate, to enable a fruitful cooperation on emerging policy initiatives in the field of digital identity wallets, European Business Wallets, electronic identification means and trust services.

Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f – indent 2 a (new): – where the security of the provider of the European Business Wallet as trust service provider, pursuant to Article 19 of Regulation (EU) 910/2014, has been compromised;

(46a) The Digital Identity Cooperation Group should support the implementation of European Business Wallets. It should act as a platform for sharing best practices concerning the most relevant use-cases for European Business Wallets, especially with regard to SMEs and procedures that are particularly relevant for companies engaged in cross-border activities. Furthermore, in order to facilitate cross-border interoperability and ensure compatibility between European Business Wallets and existing systems and solutions at both Union and national level, the European Digital Identity Cooperation Group should facilitate cooperation and information sharing on technical and operational issues to ensure the proper implementation and functioning of European Business Wallets, with a view to avoiding unnecessary transition costs or duplication of infrastructures.

~~Article 6 – paragraph 2 – point f – indent 4: – where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(3).~~

(47) In order to support effective take-up and interoperability, all public sector bodies should be required to enable the use of the European Business Wallet in all relevant administrative procedures for the purposes of identification and authentication, signing or sealing documents, submitting documents and sending or receiving notifications. To facilitate the effective implementation and deployment of European Business Wallets, Member States should provide public authorities, especially at local level, with the necessary financial resources and targeted technical assistance. In this regard, public sector bodies should by ▌24 months after the entry into force of the implementing acts provided for in this Regulation ▌ ensure that the use of European Business Wallets by economic operators is possible and that, where the receipt or communication of documents or notifications is concerned, they are able to access the Business Wallets’ secure communication channel. To ensure seamless and interoperable application of this Regulation ▌, public sector bodies should own or have a right to use a European Business Wallet for the purposes of receiving or sending documents and notifications. However, while it is necessary for all public sector bodies to accept the usage of European Business Wallets, attention should be paid to the capacity of smaller public sector bodies to comply with that obligation. To ensure acceptability, Member States should ensure that there is adequate and appropriate support to smaller public sector bodies, including, where possible, that affordable European Business Wallets are available for use by such entities. The obligation for public sector bodies to accept European Business Wallets by economic operators should not affect systems used for the exchange or submission of documents or data between competent authorities. In order to ensure cost-effective implementation, Member States should be able to prioritise implementation and use-cases with the highest administrative or cross-border relevance.

Article 6 – paragraph 4: 4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the technical requirements provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex and implementing acts, pursuant to paragraph 5.

(48) In order to avoid disrupting existing interactions between economic operators and public sector bodies, it is necessary to enable a transition period until ▌ 36 months after the entry into force of the relevant implementing acts provided for in Articles 5(5) and 6(5) of this Regulation ▌. During such period public sector bodies may choose not to offer the European Business Wallets' secure communication channel and instead support alternative solutions already in place which enable economic operators to communicate with public sector bodies prior to offering the European Business Wallets’ secure communication channel. In order to ensure an adequate level of security and interoperability, any alternative solution used during this transition period should comply with the requirements for Qualified Electronic Registered Delivery Services set out in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and offer a gateway to European Business Wallets. The gateway should enable users of European Business Wallets to access the alternative solutions used during the transition period. After this period, public sector bodies should support the secure communication channel of the European Business Wallets to ensure a harmonised and efficient means of communication across the Union, to the benefits of European businesses and the proper functioning of the internal market.

Article 6 – paragraph 5: 5. The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical requirements of European Business Wallets including those critical for interoperability and security, provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

(48a) In order to support the efficient and coherent implementation and wide uptake of European Business Wallets, the Commission and Member States should raise awareness of European Business Wallets with economic operators, especially SMEs, and public sector bodies. In addition, the Commission should, in close cooperation with Member States, develop and regularly update a comprehensive and forward-looking Implementation Roadmap. That Roadmap should extend beyond the initial deployment phase, and identify key milestones and priority use-cases and practical applications in business-to-government (B2G), government -to- business (G2B) and business-to-business (B2B) interactions, especially for SMEs. It should also take into account the need to ensure cross-border interoperability and interoperability with existing digital solutions at both Union and national level, with a view to facilitating uptake by economic operators and supporting public sector bodies at all levels, including those with limited administrative or technical capacity.

~~Article 7 – paragraph 1: 1. European Business Wallets shall be provided by providers of European Business Wallets that are included in the list established pursuant to Article 12(3).~~

(49) European Business Wallets contribute to the provision of a cross-border digital public service within the meaning of the Interoperable Europe Act (EU) 2024/903. The assessment required under that Regulation has been carried out, and the resulting report will be published on the Interoperable Europe Portal.

Article 7 – paragraph 2: 2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Union’s digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets and supporting infrastructure service providers that host European Business Wallets data shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to control by a third country or by a third-country entity. European Business Wallets data shall be exclusively stored and processed in the Union.

(50) To ensure that the European Business Wallets ecosystem continues to meet the needs of economic operators and public sector bodies, it is necessary to assess its implementation and impact in light of the purpose of this Regulation. The evaluation should, in particular, take into account the risk of legal fragmentation within the internal market regarding the electronic submission of documents and attestations of attributes as well as the technological developments and progression of the market for European Business Wallets and associated trust services. The evaluation should furthermore assess whether this Regulation has reduced administrative burden and compliance costs, especially for SMEs and smaller public sector bodies and supported the wide uptake of European Business Wallets and their respective usage for cross-border business, as well as identified obstacles to the interoperability of national and European systems.

Article 7 – paragraph 5: 5. Providers of European Business Wallets shall comply with applicable cybersecurity requirements laid down in Union and national law, including Regulation ... [ Cybersecurity Act 2 as proposed in COM (2026)11] and those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers. Providers shall also ensure that their suppliers of software and security solutions comply with these requirements and conform to the relevant security standards and requirements.

(51) To avoid duplication and reduce administrative burden, public sector bodies should not require the same information or documents to be submitted again through physical or alternative digital means, or in the inverse, once these have been validly transmitted via the European Business Wallet in accordance with this Regulation. Accordingly, Member States should not adopt or maintain additional national requirements regarding matters falling within the scope of this Regulation, unless explicitly provided for herein, since this would affect its direct and uniform application.

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point c: (c) ensure that European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about their rights and obligations in relation to their European Business Wallet unit, in particular, the right to request revocation of their European Business wallet unit attestation, using the authentication mechanism provided in point 1 of the Annex;

(52) In order to enable effective access to Union procedures and markets and facilitate the participation of economic operators established outside the Union in the European Business Wallet framework, it is necessary to enable providers of European Business Wallets to issue European Business Wallets to such operators, provided that their identity can be verified with a high level of certainty. To prevent duplicate registrations and safeguard the integrity of the internal market, such operators should not be allowed to obtain more than one set of European Business Wallet owner identification data and one unique identifier. Member States’ should cooperate to mitigate the risk of duplicate registrations and ensure the uniqueness of registrations of economic operators established outside of the Union.

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point d: (d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 15(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation;

(53) The implementing act concerning the requirements and procedures for the unique identifier should encompass the conditions for their issuance to third country economic operators. In particular, it should set the conditions that promote coordination between providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data, ensuring that each third country economic operator is attributed only one unique identifier for the purpose of the European Business Wallet owner identification data. Prior to the provision of a European Business Wallet to an economic operator established outside the Union the relevant provider should confirm that the conditions for verifying the identity of the economic operator have been met. That should allow economic operators from third countries to use European Business Wallets, while preserving the security and trustworthiness of the ecosystem. In addition, providers should carry out appropriate checks to verify that third-country economic operators are not engaged in activities contrary to the Union’s security, including breaches of Union restrictive measures or involvement in money-laundering or terrorist financing.

Article 7 – paragraph 6 – point e: (e) notify without undue delay the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 15(1), of any substantive changes to their services, including the intention to suspend or terminate services, or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation;

(54) In order to ensure legal certainty, preserve a high level of trust and guarantee uniform conditions for the implementation of the recognition and interoperability of business wallets or similar solutions and framework from like-minded third countries and to support and promote partnerships and cooperation, implementing powers should be conferred on the Commission to set the conditions under which such similar solutions or framework benefit from the provisions of this Regulation. Before adopting those implementing acts, the Commission should conduct a comprehensive assessment to ensure that the third-country solution offers an equivalent level of protection to that guaranteed within the Union. In particular, the Commission should evaluate data protection standards to prevent the unlawful processing of sensitive business data and ensure compliance with cybersecurity requirements to mitigate the risk of unauthorised access or systemic disruption. Furthermore, the independence of the third-country system and its providers from high-risk government control should be scrutinised to ensure that the wallet infrastructure remains resilient against extraterritorial interference, which could compromise the integrity of digital transactions and the autonomy of Union entities. Those implementing powers should be exercised in accordance with Regulation (EU) No 182/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council. Once an equivalence has been established with the implementing act, the Commission should endeavour to negotiate mutual recognition agreements with the third countries, where appropriate.

~~Article 8 – paragraph 3 – point b: (b) electronic attestations of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source;~~

(55) Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 offers a secure and convenient means for Union citizens and residents in the Union as defined by national law, to identify themselves and access online services. It requires Member States to ensure that European Digital Identity Wallets are provided to legal persons, despite a lack of clarity on the specific technical implementation of European Digital Identity Wallets for legal persons. This uncertainty about the purpose and functioning of the European Digital Identity Wallets for legal persons increases legal and technical complexity for Member States. It is therefore necessary to amendment Article 5a of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 to ensure that the mandatory issuance of European Digital Identity Wallets relates only to natural persons.

Article 8 – paragraph 7: 7. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, set out harmonised requirements for European Business Wallet owner identification data issued pursuant to this Article, including procedures for Member States to notify to the Commission the relevant authentic sources. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

(56) The framework established by this Regulation should provide a secure, Union-wide digital infrastructure and should therefore constitute the principal instrument for such purposes. To fully realise the benefits of the European Business Wallet framework for both economic operators and public sector bodies, it is necessary to promote its use as the default tool for secure digital identification, authentication, and the exchange of electronic documents and attestations of attributes.

Article 9 – paragraph 2: 2. Where an economic operator or public sector body has not been attributed a European Unique Identifier, a unique identifier shall upon request by the economic operator be created without undue delay in accordance with the implementing act referred to in paragraph 4.

(57) To ensure a coherent and horizontal application across sectors of Union legislation, reduce administrative cost on economic operators and to improve budgetary efficiency, Union law concerning electronic identification, authentication, or the exchange of electronic documents, notifications, or attestations of attributes, particularly where specific technical requirements, systems, or protocols are established, should be applied in a manner consistent with this Regulation. Accordingly, any future legislative or non-legislative initiatives in these fields should adhere to the Business-Wallet-by-Default principle and should be designed and developed to build upon and enable the use of European Business Wallets. Where such alignment is not possible, the Commission should provide a written justification through an Impact Assessment, accompanying the relevant initiative, setting out the reasons for not enabling the use of European Business Wallets. ▌

~~Article 10 – paragraph 1 – point b: (b) a secure, web-based platform that provides access to authenticated and authorised users via an online portal for European Business Wallet users.~~

(57a) The Commission should evaluate and review this Regulation by [three years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] and every four years thereafter and report to the European Parliament and the Council. That review is essential for assessing the continued relevance of the prescribed core functions and technical specifications, especially those associated with the QERDS as a secure communication channel, in the context of the latest technological advancements. Furthermore, the Commission should evaluate the notification procedures for providers of European Business Wallet, as well as the implementation and effectiveness of the rules on penalties established by Member States, to evaluate market developments and compliance levels. The Commission should assess the overall uptake of European Business Wallets and evaluate the achievement of the expected indirect benefits, such as, enhanced competitiveness, as well as, facilitated fraud reduction and environmental sustainability. Based on the results, the Commission should evaluate whether it is necessary to modify the scope of this Regulation or its specific provisions, in particular when assessing whether new core functionalities should be added. Any such modification should be accompanied by an Impact Assessment.

Article 10 – paragraph 4: 4. The Commission shall make the European Digital Directory only accessible to European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives and providers of European Business Wallets and relevant Member State authorities.

(58) The European Data Protection Supervisor was consulted in accordance with Article 42(1) of Regulation (EU) 2018/1725 of the European Parliament and of the Council(), and delivered an opinion on [insert date].

~~Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point c a (new): (ca) information on of how the provider is compliant with Article 7(2) and (5)~~

HAVE ADOPTED THIS REGULATION:

Article 11 – paragraph 2 – point d: (d) a description of any additional functionalities supported by the European Business Wallets the entity intends to provide and a description of how they are compliant with the security-by-design technical requirement set out in Article 6(2), point (c);

Subject matter

~~Article 11 – paragraph 3: deleted~~

This Regulation enables secure digital identification and authentication, data sharing and legally valid notifications, reduces administrative burdens and compliance costs, and supports cross-border business and competitiveness. In particular, it:

As providers of Qualified Trust Service Providers are not subject to exactly the same rules as European Business Wallets providers, the review and verification procedure set out in paragraphs 4 to 6 should not be waived.

(1) establishes a secure framework for the provision of European Business Wallets;

Article 11 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2: When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the relevant requirements of this Regulation are met, the supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3).

(2) establishes the principle of equivalence, giving equivalent legal effect to actions and transactions carried out through a European Business Wallet as to actions and transactions lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements;

Article 11 – paragraph 5: 5. When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is not complete or the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation are not met, it shall request additional information or explanations from the notifying entity and set a reasonable deadline, not exceeding 15 calendar days, for response. If that information or those explanations allow the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and that the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation are met, it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). If not, or no response is received, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity that it will not be added to the list referred to in Article 12(3).

(3) establishes rules for the issuance of European Business Wallet owner identification data for the identification of economic operators and public sector bodies;

Article 11 – paragraph 6: 6. Where the supervisory body has not provided the notifying entity with a substantive response on the outcome of the review referred to in paragraph 4 within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity of the reason for the delay and shall complete the review within an additional 15 calendar days. When that review leads to the conclusion by the supervisory body that all information is complete and the relevant requirements of this Regulation are met, the Commission shall within two working days add that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3).

(4) establishes the European Digital Directory;

~~Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 1: – the registration of a notified provider of European Business Wallets not previously present on the list referred to in paragraph 3;~~

(5) designates the European unique identifier (EUID), as established and governed by Directive (EU) 2017/1132, as the unique identifier for European Business Wallet owners, and establishes a ▌ unique identifier for European Business Wallets owners to whom the European Unique Identifier is not available;

Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 2: – a change to previously submitted information regarding providers of European Business Wallets currently present on the list referred to in paragraph 3;

(6) lays down the notification mechanism under which providers of European Business Wallets shall be established;

~~Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point a – indent 3: – a request to remove a provider of European Business Wallets from the list referred to in paragraph 3;~~

(7) lays down obligations for public sector bodies concerning European Business Wallets;

~~Article 12 – paragraph 2 – point e: (e) an indication whether the provider of European Business Wallets is a qualified trust service provider complying with Article 7(2) of this Regulation.~~

(8) provides a framework for the supervision of Union entities, where such public sector bodies provide European Business Wallets to other Union entities;

Article 12 – paragraph 3: 3. On the basis of the information received pursuant to this Article, the Commission shall establish and maintain on the Commission’s website, in a machine-readable format, a list of providers of European Business Wallets. Based on the information received, the Commission shall decide to add or revoke a provider and update the list within 24 hours of receiving the information.

(9) provides a framework for the recognition of third-country systems similar to the European Business Wallets which offer the same level of security, trust and digital standards as European Business Wallets, and the issuance of European Business Wallets to third country economic operators.

Article 13 – paragraph 1: 1. Member States shall ensure effective governance and supervision of providers of European Business Wallets. For this purpose, each Member State shall designate a supervisory body for the purposes of this Regulation.

Scope

Article 13 – paragraph 1 a (new): 1a. Member States shall notify to the Commission the names and the addresses of their supervisory bodies designated pursuant to paragraph 1 and any subsequent changes thereto. The Commission shall publish a list of the notified supervisory bodies.

1. This Regulation applies to the provision and acceptance of European Business Wallets and the issuance and acceptance of European Business Wallet owner identification data, and to the use of European Business Wallets by economic operators and public sector bodies.

Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point c: (c) verify the existence and correct application of termination plans where a provider of European Business Wallets ceases its activities, including how information is kept accessible and how data export will be enabled in accordance with Article 5(1), point (l);

2. This Regulation is without prejudice to the existing systems and procedures mandated by Union law governing the exchange of documents and data between competent authorities.

Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point f: (f) inform the relevant competent authorities designated or established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member States concerned of any significant incident of which it becomes aware in the performance of its tasks and, in the case of a significant incident which concerns other Member States, to inform the single point of contact designated or established pursuant to Article 8(3) Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member State concerned and the single points of contact designated pursuant to Article 46c(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 in the other Member States concerned, and to inform the public or require the provider of European Business Wallets to do so where the supervisory body determines that disclosure of the breach of security or loss of integrity would be in the public interest;

Definitions

Article 13 – paragraph 5 – point k: (k) request that the Commission revoke the inclusion in the list established pursuant to Article 12(3) of a provider of European Business Wallets if the supervisory body determines that the provider no longer meets the requirements laid down in this Regulation or that the provider has failed to comply with the obligations imposed by this Regulation;

For the purposes of this Regulation, the following definitions apply:

Article 13 – paragraph 11: 11. Based on the evaluation, the Commission may decide that a corrective or restrictive measure is necessary, and after consulting the Member States concerned and the provider, the Commission may determine the appropriate course of action and shall provide appropriate justifications for the chosen action to the Member State and provider concerned. The Commission shall take into account the nature and severity of the non-compliance, as well as the potential impact on the internal market and the rights of economic operators.

(1) ‘European Business Wallet’ means a digital solution that allows European Business Wallet owners to securely request, receive, combine, store, manage, and present European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes to European Business Wallet-relying parties and other entities using European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets for the following purposes:

Article 13 – paragraph 12: 12. On the basis of the consultation, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to provide for corrective or restrictive measures, including temporarily suspending the provider from the list of notified providers or requiring the provider to take specific actions to bring the European Business Wallets into compliance with the Regulation. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

(a) to ▌ provide the verified proofs required by a European Business Wallet-relying party for authentication;

~~Article 15 – title: Governance and supervision of Union entities that provide European Business Wallets to other Union entities~~

(b) to access and use electronic attestations of attributes, electronic signatures, electronic seals, electronic registered delivery services, and electronic time stamps;

~~Article 15 – paragraph 1: 1. Where a Union entity provides European Business Wallets to other Union entities the Commission shall be its supervisory body.~~

Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part: By 24 months after the entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 5 and 6, public sector bodies shall enable economic operators to take the following actions by using the core functionalities of European Business Wallets as set out in Article 5(1):

and that may support additional functionalities in accordance with this Regulation;

Article 16 – paragraph 1 a (new): 1a. Municipalities with 10,000 inhabitants or less shall be exempted from the obligations laid down in paragraph 1. However, such municipalities can voluntarily choose to have European Business Wallets and enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1.

(2) ‘European Business Wallet owner identification data’ means a set of data that enables the establishment of the identity of a European Business Wallet owner and that is issued by a provider of European Business Wallet owner identification data;

Article 16 – paragraph 2: 2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies except those exempted under paragraph 1a shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i).

(3) ‘provider of European Business Wallet owner identification data’ means a qualified trust service provider or public sector body or the Commission issuing European Business Wallet owner identification data;

Article 16 – paragraph 3 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part: By way of derogation from paragraph 5 and until 36 months after the date of entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 5 and 6 , public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions:

(4) ‘economic operator’ means any natural or legal person, or a group of such persons, including temporary associations of undertakings, acting in a commercial, non-commercial or professional capacity for purposes related to their trade, business, craft or profession;

Article 17 – paragraph 1: 1. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries and which offer the same level of cybersecurity and digital standards on authentication, data protection and data integrity as the European Business Wallets are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that such business wallets or systems are supported by reliable trust frameworks and are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

(5) ‘public sector body’ means a Union entity, a national, state, regional or local authority, a body governed by public law or an association formed by one or several such entities or bodies , or a private entity mandated by ▌ such entities, authorities, bodies or associations to provide public services, when acting under such a mandate;

Article 17 – paragraph 2: 2. The Commission may adopt implementing acts establishing that third country frameworks for systems offering similar functions as the European Business Wallets, which offer the same level of cybersecurity and digital standards on authentication, data protection and data integrity, are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that the systems provided under that framework are supported by reliable trust frameworks and interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

(6) ‘Union entity’ means a Union institution, body, office and agency set up by or pursuant to the Treaty on European Union, the Treaty on the Functioning of European Union or the Treaty establishing the European Atomic Energy Community;

Article 17 – paragraph 2 a (new): 2a. The equivalency decisions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 can cover a period not exceeding three years, during which the Commission shall endeavour to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the third country.

(7) ‘European Business Wallet owner’ means an economic operator or public sector body that owns or has a right of use of a European Business Wallet;

Article 17 – paragraph 3: 3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, the Commission shall carry out a thorough assessment of the third-country business wallets, system or frameworks, assessing especially the equivalence of cybersecurity and data protection standards, and the independence of the providers or systems from the control of high-risk entities or third countries. Following the assessment, the Commission shall evaluate whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation.

(8) ‘trust service’ means trust service as defined in Article 3, point (16) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Article 17 – paragraph 4: 4. The Commission shall, after the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, monitor that the third country business wallets, systems or frameworks continue to offer assurances that are equivalent. If a Member State identifies a risk regarding a third country system that has been recognised as equivalent under paragraph 1 or 2, it shall provide a report and refer the matter to the Commission. Where available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, the Commission shall without undue delay and to the extent necessary, repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act.

(8a) ‘trust service provider’ means a trust service provider as defined in Article 3, point (19), of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Article 18 – paragraph 5 – introductory part: 5. Providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data may issue European Business Wallet owner identification data and unique identifiers pursuant to Articles 8 and 9 to economic operators established outside the Union, provided that the provider of European Business Wallet owner identification data has confirmed that:

(8b) ‘qualified trust service provider’ means qualified trust service provider as defined in Article 3, point (20), of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Article 18 – paragraph 6 a (new): 6a. The Commission shall establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish specifications for issuing of European Business Wallet owner identification data, including unique identifiers, to economic operators established outside the Union as part of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(9) and 9(4).

(9) ‘attribute’ means attribute as defined in Article 3, point (43) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Article 21 – paragraph 1: 1. The Commission shall review the application of this Regulation and shall, by [Publications Office, insert the date – 3 years after entry into force], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of the provisions of this Regulation with regard to facilitating the secure digital identification and authentication of businesses, the submission of electronic documents and electronic attestations and the overall uptake and usage of the European Business Wallets within B2G, G2B and B2B interactions, as well as technological, market, and legal developments. The report shall assess whether the Regulation has reduced administrative burdens and compliance costs, especially for SMEs and smaller public sector bodies, supported cross-border business and competitiveness, as well as, facilitated fraud reduction and environmental sustainability. The report shall also evaluate the cross-border interoperability of the Business Wallets and interoperability with existing digital solutions at both Union and Member State level, including identifying any duplication or parallel systems. The report shall also assess whether it is necessary to modify the scope of this Regulation or its specific provisions to set out an obligation for the use of the European Business Wallets to address the risks of legal fragmentation.

(10) ‘electronic attestations of attributes’ means electronic attestations of attributes as defined in Article 3, point (44) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

~~Article 21 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1 – point d a (new): (da) the adoption rate of the European Business Wallets, and relevant metrics on the use of European Business Wallets.~~

(11) ‘qualified electronic attestation of attributes’ means qualified electronic attestation of attributes as defined in Article 3, point (45) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Article 22 – paragraph 2: It shall apply from [Publications Office, insert the date – 1 year after entry into force]. However, Article 20 shall apply from [the day of entry into force of this Regulation].

(12) ‘European Digital Identity Wallet’ means European Digital Identity Wallet as defined in Article 3, point (42) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Annex – point 2 – paragraph 1: (2) Providers of the European Business Wallets shall ensure integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the communication within and among all Business Wallet’s back-end, front-end and secure cryptographic applications and device.

(13) ‘electronic signature’ means an electronic signature as defined in Article 3, point (10) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

~~Annex – point 3 – point 3: deleted~~

(14) ‘qualified electronic signature’ means a qualified electronic signature as defined in Article 3, point (12) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

~~Annex – point 4 – point 1 – point b: deleted~~

(15) ‘electronic seal’ means an electronic seal as defined in Article 3, point (25) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

~~Annex – point 4 – point 1 – point g: deleted~~

(16) ‘qualified electronic seal’ means qualified electronic seal as defined in Article 3, point (27) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Annex – point 7 – point 1: (1) The providers of European Business Wallets shall implement and document an appropriate logging policy that shall include, at a minimum, electronic signing, electronic sealing, and notifications of all transactions with Business-Wallet-relying parties, other European Business Wallets units, and European Digital Identity Wallets units, irrespective of whether the transaction is successfully completed.

(17) ‘qualified electronic time stamp’ means a qualified electronic time stamp as defined in Article 3, point (34) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Annex – point 10 – paragraph 1: Business Wallets shall support the secure export, import and portability of an owner’s European Business Wallet data in at least an open format. This shall enable the owner to migrate their data to another Business Wallets solution while ensuring a level of assurance of at least "substantial", as defined in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502.

(18) ‘authorised representative’ means a natural or legal person acting on behalf of the European Business Wallet owner in executing and operating functions of a designated European Business Wallet on the basis of an authorisation granted by a European Business Wallet owner;

Annex – point 11 – point 2 – point a: (a) designate one or more qualified electronic registered delivery service, which complies with Article 7(2) of this Regulation, that shall serve as the mandatory secure legal communication channel for European Business Wallets;

(19) ‘mandate’ means the authorisation granted by a European Business Wallet owner to an authorised representative, enabling that representative to act on behalf of the owner in executing and operating functions of a designated European Business Wallet;

Annex – point 11 – point 2 – point e: (e) ensure that the designated qualified electronic registered delivery services shall establish adequate procedures for ensuring continuous availability, redundancy and fallback mechanisms in case of service failure.

(19a) ‘automated transaction’ means a transaction executed by an authorised digital or AI systems, including those approved in accordance with Union or national law by Member States, performing actions under a valid, auditable and revocable authorisation issued by the European Business Wallet owner or authorised user, in full compliance with Union law;

Annex – point 12 – point 2 – introductory part: (2) Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure the access control mechanism enables fine-grained and auditable authorisation outcomes, ensuring that:

(20) ‘electronic document’ means an electronic document as defined in Article 3, point (35) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Annex – point 14 – point 2 – point c: (c) Wallet solutions shall support mechanisms that enable providers of Business Wallets Owner Identification Data to verify issuance, delivery and activation in compliance with assurance level high requirements set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502 (2.2);

(21) ‘qualified electronic registered delivery service’ means a qualified electronic registered delivery service as defined in Article 3, point (37) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

~~EXPLANATORY STATEMENT~~

(22) ‘user’ means a natural or legal person, or a natural person representing another natural person or a legal person, that uses European Business Wallets ▌provided in accordance with this Regulation;

The Rapporteur welcomes the Commission proposal on establishing European Business Wallets to address inefficiencies that economic operators face in the EU’s Single Market regarding digital identification, authentication and data exchange, especially in cross-border situations.

(23) ‘European Business Wallet-relying party’ means a natural person, an economic operator or public sector body that relies upon European Business Wallets;

The European Business Wallets framework is closely linked to the proposal on the 28th regime and is included in recent proposals on sectoral legislation as a digital tool for interactions between companies and public authorities, for example in notification and permitting procedures.

(24) ‘European Business wallet unit attestation’ means a data object that describes the components of the European Business Wallet unit or allows authentication and validation of those components;

Intended as a harmonised, reliable, and user-friendly digital framework, the European Business Wallets would be available for all economic operators, including companies of different sizes, organisations and public sector bodies to enable secure business-to-government (B2G) and business-to-business (B2B) digital interactions, potentially reducing administrative burdens and compliance costs, especially for SMEs.

(25) ‘European Business Wallet unit’ means a unique configuration of a European Business Wallet solution that includes European Business Wallet front-end and European Business Wallet back-end, wallet secure cryptographic applications and wallet secure cryptographic devices provided by a provider to a European Business Wallet to a specific European Business Wallet owner;

While many Member States already offer a range of digital public services for businesses, heterogeneous digital environments and lack of interoperability hinder their availability or usability for cross-border users. Credentials issued in one country are not always recognised in another. This leads to repeated verification procedures, document submissions, physical presence requirements, and an array of administrative burdens that may discourage cross-border business expansion.

(26) ‘European Business Wallet solution’ means a combination of software, hardware, services, settings, and configurations, including European Business Wallet front-end and back-end, one or more wallet secure cryptographic applications and one or more wallet secure cryptographic devices;

The European Business Wallets proposal builds on the EU Digital Identity Framework, which lays down rules for trust services and introduced the EU Digital Identity Wallets for citizens, expanding trusted digital identities to all economic operators and public sector bodies. The European Business Wallets would build on the same secure infrastructure, but would be developed for organisational needs, offering traceability, auditability, and the ability for companies or public sector bodies to assign mandates and roles to various users within their organisations. European Business wallets will most likely be server-based solutions relying on cloud data storage and processing, rather than mobile applications like the EU Digital Identity Wallets for citizens.

(27) ‘critical assets’ means assets within or in relation to a European Business Wallet unit of such extraordinary importance that where their availability, confidentiality or integrity are compromised, that would have a very serious, debilitating effect on the ability to rely on the European Business Wallet unit or have significant operational, financial or reputational impact on the European Business Wallet owner;

The European Business Wallets would allow companies, organisations and public sector bodies to share and store specific information and documents relating to the owner, sign documents by qualified electronic signature, create qualified electronic seals and issue and validate qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes.

(28) ‘wallet secure cryptographic application’ means an application that manages critical assets by being linked to and using the cryptographic and non-cryptographic functions provided by the wallet secure cryptographic device;

To support these functionalities, European Business Wallets would include a qualified electronic registered delivery service (QERDS) as a secure communication channel to enable the secure and legally valid exchange of information between parties.

(29) ‘wallet secure cryptographic device’ means a tamper-resistant device that provides an environment that is linked to and used by the wallet secure cryptographic application to protect critical assets and provide cryptographic functions for the secure execution of critical operations;

The Rapporteur considers the European Business Wallets should function as an interoperable unifying architectural layer rather than an additional platform, enabling integration with existing and future national and Union-level digital solutions.

▌

The Commission proposes that all public sector bodies at Union, national, state, regional or local authority level would have to have European Business Wallets and enable their use for the purpose of meeting a reporting obligation or fulfilling an administrative procedure. For economic operators European Business Wallets would be voluntary.

(32) ‘electronic attestation of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source’; means a electronic attestation of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source as defined in Article 3, point (46) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Whilst the Rapporteur can support the wallets being voluntary for economic operators, on the matter of public sector obligations, the Rapporteur wishes to provide nuance and introduces an exemption mechanism to smaller municipalities in Member States, where immediate implementation of the obligations, as set out in the Regulation, could entail disproportionate financial burden.

(33) ‘authentic source’ means authentic source as defined in Article 3, point (47) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

Many Member States already have well-functioning national systems for digital public services, with which economic operators can interact. For some, especially smaller local authorities, the expected volume of transactions via the European Business Wallets is low and limited cross-border business activity does not immediately support the cost-benefit of adopting European Business Wallets. Therefore, the Rapporteur believes a phased approach to adoption could be justified.

(33a) ‘incident’ means an incident as defined in Article 6, point (6), of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;

The Rapporteur considers that in general, due regard must be given to existing national and EU level digital solutions and gateways including the Once Only Technical System (OOTS), the Business Registers Interconnection System (BRIS) and the European Digital Identity Wallet, to ensure coherence and cost-effective implementation.

(33b) ‘significant incident’ means an incident within the meaning of Article 23(3) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555;

Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, the Rapporteur welcomes the requirement that European Business Wallet providers must be established in the Union and have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union. The Rapporteur suggests to expand this requirement to also cover closely linked service providers such as QERDS, as well as, the providers of supporting infrastructure services for hosting European Business Wallets data, namely cloud providers, in order to safeguard security and trustworthiness of the whole European Business Wallets ecosystem.

(34) ‘attestation scheme’ means a set of rules applicable to one or more types of electronic attestation of attributes;

Furthermore, due to sensitivity of the data potentially handled by the European Business Wallets, the Rapporteur suggests that European Business Wallets data should be exclusively processed and stored within the Union.

(35) ‘catalogue of schemes means a digital repository listing schemes for the electronic attestation of attributes registered in accordance with this Regulation and that is maintained and published online by the Commission;

These measures are essential to strengthen the EU’s digital sovereignty, reduce vulnerabilities and limit exposure to the extraterritorial application of third-country laws that could adversely affect the confidentiality, availability and integrity of data, as well as the control over data processed within the European Business Wallet ecosystem.

(36) ‘European unique identifier’ means the European Unique Identifier referred to in Directive (EU) 2017/1132;

The Rapporteur considers trust and security paramount to the success of the business wallets. Providers must abide by the existing EU cybersecurity framework and ensure security-by-design. To further strengthen the security aspects of the wallets, the Rapporteur puts forth amendments that aim to strengthen cybersecurity controls and assurance mechanisms.

(37) ‘national register’ means an official database or system established and maintained by or on behalf of a national government or its designated authority, which records, stores, and manages information pertaining to legal entities, including but not limited to companies, partnerships, foundations, associations as well as businesses as natural persons such as sole-traders and self-employed persons or other registrable persons or organisations;

European Business Wallets may enable automated processes without manual intervention. The Rapporteur agrees that the wallets should remain innovation-friendly and open to incorporate new technological developments, however, without compromising on the level of assurance, security and accountability. Therefore, the Rapporteur introduces amendments to ensure that such automated processes should always remain verifiable and auditable.

(38) ‘API’ or ‘Application Programming Interface’ means a set of definitions and protocols for building and integrating application software to share data;

The Rapporteur also puts forth amendments strengthening interoperability and efficiency, including allowing for data exchange to take place not only in document form, but as machine-readable structured data. To ensure an innovative and competitive market of European Business Wallets and enhance choice and affordability, the Rapporteur strengthens the measures allowing for business wallet owners to export their data and switch providers.

(39) ‘submission’ or ‘submit 'means any transmission of structured or unstructured data, files, forms, or records by between a public sector body and an economic operator or between economic operators or between public sector bodies, where such transmission is required, requested, or permitted under Union or national law, and is intended to support a legal, administrative, or procedural purpose;

The Commission proposal allows for the recognition of similar third countries systems as equivalent, which would facilitate trusted global exchanges with non-EU partners. While the Rapporteur is open to this possibility, it is necessary to ensure that the right safeguards are in place. The Rapporteur considers that a thorough assessment of the third-country business wallets or similar systems must be carried out to ensure the equivalence of cybersecurity and data protection standards, and the independence of the providers or systems from the control of high-risk entities or third countries. Furthermore, the Rapporteur considers that instead of equivalence, mutual recognition agreements would be preferable, to ensure European companies could benefit.

(40) ‘notification’ means any transmission of information, decisions, requests, or acknowledgements between a public sector body and an economic operator or between economic operators or between public sector bodies, which is required, requested, or permitted under Union or national law, and which is intended to produce legal effects or inform the recipient of rights, obligations, or procedural developments;

Lastly, the Rapporteur strongly believes that a significant success factor of the European Business Wallets will be their overall uptake. The Rapporteur suggests that Member States and the Commission develop a comprehensive Implementation Roadmap, identifying key milestones and use-cases within B2G, G2B and B2B interactions, especially for SMEs.

(41) ‘administrative procedure’ means a sequence of actions, defined by Union or national law, that must be taken by economic operators or public sector bodies to comply with obligations, provide information, or obtain a decision, authorisation, or benefit from a public sector body in the exercise of administrative functions;

The Rapporteur is of the opinion that these targeted amendments support interoperability, security and cost-efficiency, leaving room for innovation and market-based solutions, but highlighting the need to take into account cross-border interoperability and interoperability with existing digital solutions at the EU and Member State levels.

(42) 'European Business Wallet front-end' means the user interface component, regardless of platform or form factor, that interacts with ▌ and is part of the European Business Wallet unit;

(43) 'European Business Wallet back-end' means the server-side components, including software, services, and infrastructure, that provide the necessary functionality and support for the European Business Wallet front-end, and form part of the European Business Wallet unit.

Principle of equivalence

Where a European Business Wallet owner or an authorised representative makes use of any of the core functionalities of a European Business Wallet referred to in Article 5(1), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements.

Where a self-employed person or a sole trader makes use of the qualified electronic registered delivery service as a standalone service in accordance with Article 5(3), the resulting action shall have the same legal effect as if the action had been lawfully carried out in person, in paper form, or via any other means or processes that would be deemed compliant with applicable legal, administrative, or procedural requirements.

Core functionalities of European Business Wallets

1. Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that the European Business Wallets they provide offer the following core functionalities, allowing owners to utilise any combination of those functionalities at their own discretion:

(a) securely issue, request, obtain, select, combine, store, delete, share and present electronic attestations of attributes;

(b) selectively disclose European Business Wallet owner identification data and attributes contained in electronic attestations of attributes, in the context of the functionalities listed in points (a) and (f);

(c) request and share European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes in a secured way between European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets and with European Business Wallet-relying parties;

(d) sign by means of qualified electronic signatures and seal by means of qualified electronic seals, as applicable;

(e) bind data in electronic form to a particular time by means of qualified electronic time stamps;

(f) securely issue, on behalf of the European Business Wallet owner, electronic attestations of attributes for data for which the European Business Wallet owner is the primary source to European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets;

(g) link electronic attestations of attributes ▌ issued pursuant to point (f) to other electronic attestations of attributes forming part of a chain;

(h) enable the use of qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes to allow authentication of European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives ▌;

(i) transmit and receive electronic documents and data including by means of a qualified electronic registered delivery service, which complies with Article 7(2) and the requirements set out in the Annex, and is capable of supporting confidentiality and integrity;

(j) authorise multiple users to access and operate the European Business Wallet of the owner, with the possibility to enable delegations of powers and to create auditable and clearly defined and restricted mandates and roles and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations;

(ja) enable the European Business Wallet owner and its authorised representatives, to act in different roles or mandates within the same European Business Wallet, while ensuring a clear attribution of actions and appropriate logical separation between such roles, mandates or activities;

(k) authorise European Business Wallet-relying parties to request electronic attestations of attributes issued to the European Business Wallet owner, which are strictly necessary for the purpose of the transaction and prevent unnecessary processing, and for the European Business Wallet owner to manage and revoke such authorisations;

(l) export their data, including issued European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestations of attributes, communication and transaction logs, and interaction records, in a structured, commonly used and machine-readable format, at the request of the owner or in the event of termination of service or revocation of the notification of the provider of the European Business Wallet and to import the data exported from a European Business Wallet unit to enable data portability across providers of European Business Wallets;

(m) access a log of all communication and transactions;

(n) access a common dashboard for accessing, storing and verifying communications exchanged through the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in point (i).

2. Providers of European Business Wallets may offer additional functionalities beyond those listed in paragraph 1 provided that such functionalities do not interfere with the security requirements set out in Article 6(2), point (c), or compromise the confidentiality, availability, security or integrity of the minimum core functionalities, and the reliability and interoperability of the European Business Wallets they provide. Such additional functionalities may support interoperability with company IT systems through standardised interfaces where appropriate. Such additional functionalities shall not be used to make access to the core functionalities conditional upon the use of optional services.

2(a) Such additional functionalities may include the following, but not limited to:

(a) enable the processing of electronic documents and metadata, and certified attributes in machine-readable formats, and facilitate comprehension, for example, via automatic translation of electronic attestations, documents, and communications where the relevant jurisdiction provides a framework to recognise corresponding automatic translations, while ensuring that all translated outputs remain linked to their source credentials and preserve the integrity, authenticity, and verifiability of the original certified attributes;

(b) authorise payment transactions and enable automatic payments, such as invoices issued by suppliers authenticated by the European Business Wallet.

3. Providers of European Business Wallets shall enable the provision of the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in paragraph 1, point (i) as a standalone service to users of European Digital Identity Wallets.

4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the functionalities referred to in paragraph 1 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex.

5. The Commission shall by … [12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the core functionalities of European Business Wallets referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article, including those essential for interoperability and security and for wallet-to-wallet transactions between European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

Technical requirements for European Business Wallets

1. Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that the European Business Wallets they provide support common protocols and interfaces and comply with the reference standards and specifications set out in paragraph 5 as well as with the technical requirements set out in the Annex:

(a) for the issuance of European Business Wallet owner identification data, qualified and non-qualified electronic attestations of attributes and qualified and non-qualified certificates to European Business Wallets;

(b) for European Business Wallet-relying parties to request and validate European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes;

(c) for the sharing and presenting to European Business Wallet-relying parties of European Business Wallet owner identification data, electronic attestation of attributes and of selectively disclosed data;

(d) to allow interaction with the European Business Wallets automatically without manual intervention or through direct user action, where such automated transactions, including those enabled by digital or AI systems, are verifiable and auditable and ensure an equivalent level of assurance and accountability as interactions performed by a European Business Wallet user, in full compliance with EU and national law;

(e) to securely onboard the European Business Wallet owner remotely via a▌ representative empowered to carry out the onboarding process with an electronic identification means of that authorised representative which meets the requirements of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 with regard to the assurance level ▌ ‘high’;

(f) for multidirectional interaction between European Business Wallets, and between European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets for the purpose of receiving, validating and sharing European Business Wallet owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes in a secure manner;

(g) for authenticating European Business Wallet-relying parties by implementing authentication mechanisms, where authentication is required;

(h) for European Business Wallet-relying parties to verify the authenticity and validity of European Business Wallets, where ▌required;

(i) for the provision of the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), including an interface to the European Digital Directory established pursuant to Article 10;

(j) for the assigning to each European Business Wallet owner, for the purposes of the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i) and the European Digital Directory referred to in Article 10, at least one unique digital address;

(k) for the provision of wallet unit attestations to all European Business Wallet units, containing public keys and corresponding private keys protected by a wallet secure cryptographic device;

(l) for the management of critical assets, for the use of at least one wallet secure cryptographic application and wallet secure cryptographic device and, where critical assets relate to performing electronic identification at assurance level high, for ensuring that such cryptographic operators or other operations processing critical assets are performed in accordance with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level highas set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502.

2. Providers of European Business Wallets shall also:

(a) ensure that the European Business Wallet owner identification data is uniquely and securely attributed to the European Business Wallet of the owner;

(b) ensure that, for the purposes of the functionality referred to in Article 5(1), point (j):

mappings between roles and attributes are verifiable, auditable, revocable and traceable to their legitimate issuers;

– conflicts of roles, over-delegation, or expired authorisations are automatically detected and prevented in real time;

– all authorisation logic is interoperable between European Business Wallets across Member States.

(ca) ensure that data related to European Business Wallets is processed and stored exclusively within the Union;

(cb) ensure that for the purpose of the functionality referred to in Article 5(1), point (l), the owners of the European Business Wallet are provided with mechanisms to achieve unhindered data portability;

(d) provide validation mechanisms, in order to ensure that the authenticity and validity of European Business Wallets can be verified;

(e) provide a mechanism enabling European Business Wallet owners to easily request technical support and report technical problems or any other incidents having a negative impact on the use of European Business Wallets in a timely and effective manner;

(ea) provide a mechanism ensuring that the access to European Business Wallets and their functionalities is controlled and auditable;

(f) ensure that the validity of the European Business Wallets can be revoked in the following circumstances:

– upon the explicit request of the European Business Wallet owner or authorised representative, where the authorisation includes this power;

– where the security of the European Business Wallet has been compromised;

– where the security of the provider of the European Business Wallet as trust service provider, as defined in Article 3, point (19), of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, has been compromised;

– upon the permanent or temporary cessation of activity of the European Business Wallet owner;

– where the provider of the European Business Wallet is not included in the list referred to in Article 12(3).

(g) without undue delay, notify to the Commission:

– the mechanism allowing for the validation of the European Business Wallet owner identification data;

– the mechanism by which to validate the authenticity and validity of European Business Wallets.

3. The Commission shall make available the information notified pursuant to paragraph 2, point (g) of this Article to the public through a secure channel, in electronically signed or sealed form suitable for automated processing.

4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall implement the technical requirements provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 in accordance with the requirements set out in the Annex and implementing acts, pursuant to paragraph 5.

5. The Commission shall by … [12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation], by means of implementing acts, establish a list of reference standards and where necessary, establish specifications and procedures for the technical features of European Business Wallets including those critical for interoperability and security, provided for in paragraphs 1, 2 and 3 of this Article. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

5a. Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that the storage and processing of data associated with European Business Wallets takes place on infrastructure located within the Union and subject to Union law. Such infrastructure shall be established and structured in a way that ensures that the competent supervisory authorities within the Union are able to exercise effective oversight and enforcement in accordance with this Regulation.

Requirements and obligations for providers of European Business Wallets

1. European Business Wallets shall be provided by providers of European Business Wallets that are included in the list established pursuant to Article 12(3).

2. Given the role of European Business Wallets in the Unions digital infrastructure, providers of European Business Wallets shall be established in the Union, have their principal place of business and main operations in the Union and not present a risk to the security of the Union. In particular they shall not be subject to either direct or indirect control by a third country or by a third-country entity, including through rights or arrangements that enable a third-country public authority or entity to determine or materially influence strategic decisions concerning the governance, compliance, risk management, security policies or regulatory alignment of providers.

European Business Wallet providers shall only use providers of qualified electronic registered delivery services and cloud computing service providers that comply with the requirements set out in the first subparagraph. Those providers shall ensure that European Business Wallet data are stored, processed and transferred exclusively within the Union.

The data generated by using European Business Wallets shall not be used to train or fine-tune any AI system operated by a third country or a legal entity established in a third country.

3. Providers of European Business Wallets shall comply with the requirements set out in Article 19a of Regulation (EU) 910/2014. That obligation shall not apply to providers of European Business Wallets that are qualified trust service providers.

4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall comply with the applicable cybersecurity requirements laid down in Union and national law, including those relating to the identification of high-risk suppliers, as well as the requirements set out in Directive (EU) 2022/2555. Providers of European Business Wallets shall be considered part of the Union’s critical digital infrastructure pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2555 Annex 1 and may be identified as critical entities pursuant to Directive (EU) 2022/2557.

5. ▌Providers shall also ensure that their suppliers of software and security solutions as well as their cloud service providers that host European Business Wallets data comply with ▌ requirements laid down in Union and national law and conform to the relevant security standards and requirements.

6. Providers of European Business Wallets shall:

(a) implement appropriate technical and organisational measures to ensure the security, confidentiality, integrity, authenticity, interoperability, and availability of the European Business Wallets they provide with other European Business Wallets and European Digital Identity Wallets;

(b) ensure that European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about the terms and conditions of use of the European Business Wallet, and of any change thereof, including the scope and limitations of core and additional functionalities, cybersecurity standards, and the European Business Wallet owner’s rights with regard to data portability, redress, and termination of service;

(c) ensure that authorised representatives of European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives are clearly informed, in a user-friendly, concise and accessible manner, about their rights and obligations in relation to their European Business Wallet unit, in particular, the right to request revocation of their wallet unit attestation, using the authentication mechanism provided in point 1 of the Annex;

(d) cooperate with the competent supervisory bodies referred to in Article 13(1), or with the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 13(10) and 15(1) and respond without undue delay to any request for information or documentation necessary to verify compliance with this Regulation;

(e) notify without undue delay the relevant national supervisory bodies, or the Commission in the cases referred to in Article 15(1), of any substantive changes to their services, including the intention to suspend or terminate services, or overall structure which may impact the compliance of the provider with this Regulation;

(f) notify without undue delay European Business Wallet owners in the event of suspension, revocation or voluntary termination of the services offered by the providers of European Business Wallet`s services and of the removal of the provider of European Business Wallet from the list established pursuant to Article 12(3) and ensure the transfer or deletion of the European Business Wallet owner data in accordance with the European Business Wallet owners instructions, including European Business Wallet owner identification data;

(g) ensure that the information on European Business Wallet owners, pursuant to Article 10(2), is notified to the Commission and that the information initially submitted to the Commission is kept up to date and corroborated by the providers of the European Business Wallet owner identification data issuing through the issuance of the unique identifiers referred to in Article 8(5), point (b).

(ga) ensure that their services are user friendly and accessible, taking into account diverse needs, including those of persons with disabilities, in accordance with Union law.

European Business Wallet owner identification data

1. Providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data shall issue European Business Wallet owner identification data to European Business Wallets of European Business Wallet owners. Where European Business Wallet owners are Union entities, the Commission shall issue European Business Wallet owner identification data to the European Business Wallets of those Union entities.

2. Member States shall notify to the Commission the relevant authentic sources for the verification of the required attributes for the issuance of the European Business Wallet owner identification data. On the basis of the information received pursuant to this paragraph, the Commission shall make available on the Commission’s website, in a machine-readable format, a list of the notified relevant authentic sources.

3. European Business Wallet owner identification data shall be issued in a format compliant with one of the standards listed in Annex II of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2979 and as:

(a) qualified electronic attestations of attributes, when provided by qualified trust service providers;

(b) electronic attestations of attributes issued by or on behalf of a public sector body responsible for an authentic source▌

4. European Business Wallet owner identification data issued by the Commission shall have the same legal effect as qualified electronic attestations of attributes and attestations of attributes issued by, or on behalf of, a public sector body responsible for an authentic source.

5. European Business Wallet owner identification data shall contain at least the following attributes:

(a) the official name and contact details of the economic operator or public sector body, as recorded in the relevant register or official record;

(b) the relevant unique identifier attributed in accordance with Article 9.

6. The Commission shall establish and maintain an attestation scheme for European Business Wallet owner identification data. That scheme shall be listed in the catalogue of schemes for the attestation of attributes referred to in Article 8 of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2025/1569.

7. The Commission shall, by… [12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] by means of implementing acts, set out harmonised requirements for European Business Wallet owner identification data issued pursuant to this Article, including procedures for Member States to notify to the Commission the relevant authentic sources. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

Unique identifiers

1. Where an economic operator has been attributed a European Unique Identifier, that identifier shall be used as the unique identifier referred to in Article 8(5), point (b) of this Regulation.

2. Where an economic operator or public sector body has not been attributed a European Unique Identifier, a unique identifier shall upon the request of the economic operator be created free of charge and without undue delay in accordance with the implementing act referred to in paragraph 4. Member States shall ensure that a competent national authority is designated for that purpose.

3. Where a public sector body is a Union entity, the Commission shall create and attribute a unique identifier to that Union entity in accordance with paragraph 4 of this Article.

4. The Commission shall, by … [12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] by means of implementing acts, establish specifications, requirements and procedures relating to the unique identifier referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article, including measures to ensure that European Business Wallet owners are not attributed more than one unique identifier. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

4a. The unique identifier framework established pursuant to this Article shall support the identification of subsidiaries, branches, establishments or other operational units of economic operators, where necessary for administrative procedures or digital transactions.

4b. Where relevant laws of the Member State concerned allow it, the unique identifier framework may enable natural persons engaged in economic activity to be associated with different identifiers corresponding to their distinct economic roles.

European Digital Directory

1. The Commission shall establish, operate and maintain a European Digital Directory which shall act as the trusted source of information for European Business Wallet owners and shall take the form of a web application comprising of two easily accessible interfaces:

(a) a machine-readable interface exposed through an API for automated system-to-system communication;

(b) a secure, web-based platform that provides access to authenticated and authorised users via an online portal for European Business Wallet users.

2. For the purpose of maintaining the European Digital Directory, providers of European Business Wallets shall, upon the provision of a European Business Wallet, provide to the Commission the categories of information set out in the implementing act referred to in paragraph 6. The Commission shall ensure that the information is included in the European Digital Directory in a secure manner and in accordance with the relevant data protection principles.

3. The Commission shall ensure that the relevant information shall be included in the European Digital Directory.

4. The Commission shall make the European Digital Directory only accessible to European Business Wallet owners and their authorised representatives and providers of European Business Wallets and relevant Member State authorities.

5. Any modification or revocation concerning the information referred to in paragraph 2 shall, without undue delay and in any event within one working day, be communicated by the providers of European Business Wallet directly to the Commission for the purpose of maintaining the European Digital Directory.

6. The Commission shall, by … [12 months from the date of entry into force of this Regulation] by means of implementing acts, establish standards and technical specifications for the unique digital addresses and the categories of information to be communicated to the Commission for the purpose of the European Digital Directory. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

Notification of providers of European Business Wallets

1. Entities that intend to provide European Business Wallets shall notify that intention together with the information listed in paragraph 2 to the competent supervisory body.

2. The notification referred to in paragraph 1 shall include the following information:

(a) the entity’s legal name, any commercial names used, website URL, contact email, telephone number, and physical address;

(b) the entity’s register number issued by a national register, where available

(c) a description of how the core functionalities, set out in Article 5(1) shall be offered by the European Business Wallets the entity intends to provide;

(ca) proof of compliance with Article 7;

(d) a description of any additional functionalities supported by the European Business Wallets the entity intends to provide and a description of how they comply with the security-by-design technical requirement set out in Article 6(2), point (c);

(e) a declaration of conformity with the requirements of this Regulation.

The Commission shall issue guidance, where necessary, for the purposes of the first subparagraph, point (ca), specifying the information necessary for establishing proof of compliance.

▌

4. Upon receipt of a notification, the supervisory body shall have 30 calendar days to review the information submitted.

When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and the relevant requirements of this Regulation are met, the supervisory body shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3).

5. When that review leads the supervisory body to conclude that the information is not complete or the relevant requirements laid down in this Regulation are not met, it shall request additional information or explanations from the notifying entity and set a reasonable deadline, not exceeding 15 calendar days, for response. If that information or those explanations allow the supervisory body to conclude that the information is complete and that the relevant requirements laid down in in this Regulation are met, it shall inform the Commission within two working days with a view to the addition of that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3). If not, or no response is received, the supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity that it will not be added to the list referred to in Article 12(3).

6. Where the supervisory body has not provided the notifying entity with a substantive response on the outcome of the review referred to in paragraph 4 within 30 calendar days of receiving the notification, the ▌ supervisory body shall inform the notifying entity of the reason for the delay and shall complete the review within an additional 15 calendar days. When that review leads to the conclusion by the supervisory body that all information is complete and the relevant requirements of this Regulation are met, the Commission within two working daysshall add that provider to the list referred to in Article 12(3)

7. Member States shall ensure that notifying entities have the right to an effective judicial remedy against a decision of the supervisory authority, without prejudice to any other administrative or non-judicial remedy, in cases where the supervisory authority refuses to list them as a provider of European Business Wallets or takes no decision within a reasonable timeframe.

List of notified providers of European Business Wallets

1. Supervisory bodies shall inform the Commission of any changes to the information provided pursuant to Article 11, within 24 hours of having become aware of any changes.

2. The information provided by the supervisory bodies referred to in Article 11 and Article 12(1) shall include the following:

(a) the purpose of the submission, which may be one of the following:

– the registration of a notified provider of European Business Wallets not previously present on the list referred to in paragraph 3;

– a change to previously submitted information regarding providers of European Business Wallets currently present on the list referred to in paragraph 3;

– a request to remove a provider of European Business Wallets from the list referred to in paragraph 3;

(b) name and, where applicable, the commercial name of the provider of European Business Wallets;

(d) the name of the competent supervisory body;

(e) an indication whether the provider of European Business Wallets is a qualified trust service provider complying with Article 7(2) of this Regulation.

3. On the basis of the information received pursuant to this Article, the Commission shall establish and maintain on the Commission’s website, in a machine-readable format, a list of providers of European Business Wallets. Based on the information received, the Commission shall add or revoke a provider and update the list within 24 hours of receiving the information.

Governance and supervision

1. Member States shall ensure the effective governance and supervision of providers of European Business Wallets. Each Member State shall designate a supervisory body for the purposes of this Regulation.

1a. Member States shall notify to the Commission the names and the addresses of their supervisory body designated pursuant to paragraph 1 and any subsequent changes thereto. The Commission shall publish a list of the notified supervisory bodies.

2. Those supervisory bodies shall be responsible for supervisory tasks as regards providers of European Business Wallets having their principal place of establishment in that Member State.

3. Member States shall ensure that the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 have the necessary powers and adequate resources for the exercise of their tasks and for the enforcement of the obligations under this Regulation in an effective, efficient and independent manner.

4. The role of national supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 shall be to:

(a) monitor compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and take action, if necessary, in relation to providers of European Business Wallets ▌

(b) act as the main liaison office for providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data, facilitating access to information from relevant national authorities and registries, where necessary, for the issuance of European Business Wallet owner identification data and unique identifiers.

5. The tasks of the supervisory bodies referred to in paragraph 1 shall include the following:

(a) review and assess the notifications submitted in accordance with Article 11;

(b) set up a complaint mechanism whereby substantiated complaints can be filed, particularly those made by European Business Wallets owners, that a provider of European Business Wallets fails to comply with any of its obligations under this Regulation, investigate such complaints and to take action if necessary in a transparent manner and within a reasonable timeframe;

(c) verify the existence and correct application of termination plans where a provider of European Business Wallets ceases its activities, including how information is kept accessible and how data export is to be enabled in accordance with Article 5(1), point (l);

(d) ensure that providers of European Business Wallets remedy any failure to fulfil the requirements laid down in this Regulation;

(e) impose penalties in accordance with paragraphs 6 to 9;

(f) without undue delay, inform the relevant competent authorities designated or established pursuant to Article 8(1) of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member States concerned of any significant incident of which it becomes aware in the performance of its tasks and, in the case of a significant incident which concerns other Member States, to without undue delay inform the single point of contact designated or established pursuant to Article 8(3) Directive (EU) 2022/2555 of the Member State concerned and the single points of contact designated pursuant to Article 46c(1) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 in the other Member States concerned, and to inform the public or require the provider of European Business Wallets to do so where the supervisory body determines that disclosure of the breach of security or loss of integrity would be in the public interest;

(g) cooperate with supervisory authorities established pursuant to Article 51 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679, in particular, by informing them, without undue delay, where personal data protection rules appear to have been breached and about security breaches which appear to constitute personal data breaches;

(h) cooperate, as appropriate, with other national supervisory bodies;

(i) set up and ensure clear publicity of a complaint mechanism whereby complaints can be filed by providers of European Business Wallets in accordance with Article 11(7);

(j) report regularly to the Commission on its main activities;

(k) request that the Commission revoke the inclusion in the list established pursuant to Article 12(3) of a provider of European Business Wallets if the supervisory body determines that the provider no longer meets the requirements laid down in this Regulation or that the provider has failed to comply with the obligations imposed by this Regulation;

(l) cooperate with the supervisory authorities designated pursuant to Article 46b of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 by the Member States, in particular, to ensure that economic operators established outside the Union are issued only one set of European Business Wallet owner identification data and European business Wallet unique identifier.

6. Member States shall lay down the rules allowing the supervisory body referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article to impose penalties applicable to infringements of this Regulation and shall take all measures necessary to ensure that they are implemented. Those penalties shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. Those rules shall not affect Article 31 of Directive (EU) 2022/2555 and Article 83 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679.

7. By [Publications Office, insert the date 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] Member States shall notify the Commission of the rules laid down by Member States in accordance with paragraph 6 and shall notify the Commission without undue delay of any subsequent amendments to the rules. The Commission shall regularly update and maintain an easily accessible public register of those rules.

8. Member States shall take into account the following non-exhaustive and indicative criteria for the imposition of penalties in accordance with paragraph 6:

(a) the nature, gravity, scale and duration of the infringement;

(b) any action taken by the infringing party to mitigate or remedy the damage caused by the infringement;

(d) the financial benefits gained or losses avoided by the infringing party due to the infringement, insofar as such benefits or losses can be reliably established;

(e) any other aggravating or mitigating factor applicable to the circumstances of the case;

(f) the infringing party’s total annual turnover in the preceding financial year in the Union.

Member States shall ensure that infringements of this Regulation committed by providers of European Business Wallets be subject to administrative fines of a maximum of 2% of the total worldwide annual turnover in the preceding financial year.

9. Where the legal system of a Member State does not provide for administrative fines being imposed by administrative authorities, fines initiated by the supervisory body and imposed by competent national courts, which have an equivalent effect to the administrative fines imposed by supervisory bodies, shall be considered to comply with the requirements laid down in paragraph 6. In any event, the fines imposed shall be effective, proportionate and dissuasive. That Member State shall notify to the Commission the provisions of the laws which it adopts pursuant to this paragraph by [Publications Office, insert the date 12 months after the entry into force of this Regulation] and, without undue delay, any subsequent amendment law or amendment affecting them.

10. In circumstances which justify an immediate intervention to preserve the proper functioning of the internal market and where the Commission has sufficient reason supported by objective evidence to consider that the European Business Wallets provided by a provider are repeatedly non-compliant with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and no effective measures have been taken by the competent supervisory authority, the Commission shall carry out an evaluation of compliance. The Commission shall inform the relevant authorities accordingly and the provider shall cooperate as necessary.

11. Based on the evaluation, the Commission may decide that a corrective or restrictive measure is necessary, and after consulting the Member States concerned and the provider, the Commission may determine the appropriate course of action and shall provide appropriate justifications for the chosen action to the Member States and provider concerned. The Commission shall take into account the nature and severity of the non-compliance, as well as the potential impact on the internal market and the rights of economic operators.

12. On the basis of the consultation, the Commission may adopt implementing acts to provide for corrective or restrictive measures, including temporarily suspending the provider from the list of notified providers or requiring the provider to take specific actions to bring the European Business Wallets into compliance with the Regulation. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

13. The Commission shall immediately communicate the implementing acts to the provider and Member States shall implement those implementing acts without delay and inform the Commission accordingly. These measures shall be applicable for the duration of the exceptional situation that justified the Commission’s intervention, provided that the European Business Wallets concerned are not brought into compliance with this Regulation.

European Digital Identity Cooperation Group

The European Digital Identity Cooperation Group established pursuant to Article 46e of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 shall be responsible for facilitating cooperation and information sharing among Member States and the Commission on matters related to the European Business Wallets. This shall include sharing best practices, discussing technical and operational issues, and coordinating efforts to ensure the proper implementation and functioning of the European Business Wallets.

Governance and supervision of Union entities that provide European Business Wallets to other Union entities

1. Where a Union entity provides European Business Wallets to other Union entities the Commission shall be its supervisory body.

2. The role of the Commission acting as a supervisory body in accordance with paragraph 1 shall be to monitor compliance with the requirements laid down in this Regulation and take action, if necessary, in relation to providers of European Business Wallets, by means of ex post supervisory activities.

3. When acting as a supervisory body in accordance with paragraph 1, the Commission shall perform the tasks referred to in Article 13(5) points a, b, c, d, h and k.

The Commission shall submit a report to the European Parliament and the Council on its main activities in this respect.

Obligations on public sector bodies

1. By ▌ 24 months after the entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 5 and 6, public sector bodies shall enable economic operators to take the following actions by using the core functionalities of European Business Wallets as set out in Article 5(1):

(a) identify and authenticate;

(b) sign or seal;

(d) send or receive notifications.

The actions listed in points (a) to (d) of the first subparagraph shall take place for the purpose of meeting a reporting obligation or fulfilling an administrative procedure.

1a. Member States shall provide support and solutions to smaller public sector bodies to ensure that they have the capacity to enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, and, where possible, shall ensure the availability of European Business Wallets for use by smaller public sector bodies.

2. For the purposes of paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), public sector bodies shall have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i). Public sector bodies may also make use of European Business Wallets for the purposes referred to in paragraph 1, points (a) and (b), of this Article.

3. By way of derogation from paragraph 2 and until ▌36 months after the date of entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 5 and 6, public sector bodies may choose not to offer the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i), and support instead other existing alternative solutions which enable economic operators to take the actions listed in paragraph 1, points (c) and (d), provided those solutions:

(a) comply with the requirements applicable to qualified electronic registered delivery services set out in Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

(b) offer a gateway that enables European Business Wallet owners to submit documents and send and receive notifications using the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1), point (i).

After the expiry of the derogation period laid down in this paragraph, public sector bodies may continue to support the alternative solutions referred to in that subparagraph but shall, in accordance with paragraph 2, have European Business Wallets, including the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in paragraph 1 of Article 5(1), point (i).

Business wallets and other similar instruments and frameworks offered in third countries

1. The Commission may adopt, for the purpose of cooperation and interoperability within B2B contexts, implementing acts establishing that business wallets or solutions offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that such business wallets or solutions offer an equivalent level of security and standards regarding authentication, data protection and data integrity to European Business Wallets, are supported by reliable trust frameworks, and are interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

2. The Commission may adopt, for the purpose of cooperation and interoperability within B2B contexts, implementing acts establishing that third country frameworks for systems offering similar functions as the European Business Wallets are to be considered as offering assurances that are equivalent to European Business Wallets issued in accordance with this Regulation, provided that the solutions provided under that framework offer an equivalent level of security and standards regarding authentication, data protection and data integrity to European Business Wallets, are supported by reliable trust frameworks and interoperable with the trust framework laid down in Regulation (EU) 910/2014 and allow for the support of at least an identification and authentication functionality and the exchange of electronic attestations of attributes. Such implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 19.

2a. The equivalency decisions provided for in paragraphs 1 and 2 shall cover a period not exceeding three years. During that period, the Commission shall endeavour to negotiate a mutual recognition agreement with the third country. In the absence of such a mutual recognition agreement, the equivalency decisions referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 may be renewed once for a further period of three years .

Neither the equivalency decisions nor the mutual recognition agreements referred to in the first subparagraph shall constitute recognition or authorisation of the provision of European Business Wallet services within the Union by third-country providers.t

3. Prior to the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 and the mutual recognition agreements provided for in paragraph 2a, the Commission shall carry out a thorough assessment of the third-country business wallets, solutions or frameworks, assessing in particular the equivalence of cybersecurity and data protection standards, and the independence of the providers or systems from the control of high-risk entities or third countries. Following the assessment, the Commission shall evaluate whether the assurances can be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation without constituting recognition or authorisation for the provision of European Business Wallet services within the Union.

4. The Commission shall after the adoption of the implementing acts referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2, monitor on an annual basis whether the third-country business wallets, solutions or frameworks continue to offer assurances that are equivalent. If a Member State identifies a risk regarding a third-country system that has been recognised as equivalent under paragraph 1 or 2, it shall without undue delay provide a report and refer the matter to the Commission. Where monitoring or other available information reveals that those assurances can no longer be considered as equivalent to the requirements under this Regulation, the Commission shall without undue delay and to the extent necessary, repeal, amend or suspend the act referred to in paragraphs 1 and 2 by means of an implementing act.

5. The Commission shall publish on its website a list of frameworks, business wallets or systems offering similar functions that are issued by providers established in third countries in relation to which the Commission has adopted an implementing act pursuant to this Article.

Issuing of European Business Wallets to economic operators established outside the Union

1. Providers of European Business Wallets may provide European Business Wallets to economic operators established in a third country under the condition that such economic operators have been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data and a unique identifier in accordance with this Article.

2. For the purposes of this Article, economic operators shall request only one set of European Business Wallet owner identification data from one provider of European Business Wallet owner identification data.

3. Where an economic operator established outside the Union requests a European Business Wallet, the provider of European Business Wallets shall notify this request to the supervisory body of the Member State in which the provider is notified.

4. Providers of European Business Wallets shall request European Business Wallet owner identification data from a provider of European Business Wallet owner identification data on behalf of the economic operator established in a third country.

4a. Providers shall carry out appropriate customer due diligence prior to granting access to services or establishing a business relationship, including the identification and verification of the economic operator and its ultimate beneficial owners or entities exercising control over it, and verify whether the economic operator:

(a) is subject to Union restrictive measures in force;

(b) has been designated under Union or national regimes for money-laundering, terrorist financing or serious organised crime;

Where such risks are identified and cannot be effectively mitigated, the provider shall refuse to issue the European Business Wallet and shall inform the competent supervisory body.

5. Providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data may issue European Business Wallet owner identification data and unique identifiers without undue delay pursuant to Articles 8 and 9 to economic operators established outside the Union, provided that:

(a) the identity proofing and verification of those economic operators fulfils one or, when needed, a combination, of the methods for verification of identity set out in Article 24 (1a) of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

(b) the economic operator has not been issued another set of European Business Wallet owner identification data.

6. Member States shall cooperate to ensure that providers of European Business Wallet owner identification data can verify that an economic operator established outside the Union has not yet been issued European Business Wallet owner identification data.

6a. The Commission shall establish a list of reference standards and, where necessary, establish technical specifications for issuing European Business Wallet owner identification data, including unique identifiers, to economic operators established outside the Union as part of the implementing acts referred to in Articles 8(9) and 9(4).

Committee procedure

The Commission shall be assisted by the committee established by Article 48 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014. That committee shall be a committee within the meaning of Regulation (EU) No 182/2011.

Amendment to Regulation (EU) No 910/2014

In Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, Article 5a is amended as follows:

(1) paragraph 1 is replaced by the following:

‘1. For the purpose of ensuring that all natural persons in the Union have secure, trusted and seamless cross-border access to public and private services, while having full control over their data, each Member State shall provide at least one European Digital Identity Wallet within 24 months of the date of entry into force of the implementing acts referred to in paragraph 23 of this Article and in Article 5c(6).’

(2) in paragraph 5 point (f) is replaced by the following:

‘(f) ensure that the person identification data, which is available from the electronic identification scheme under which the European Digital Identity Wallet is provided, uniquely represents the natural person or the natural person representing the natural or legal person, and is associated with that European Digital Identity Wallet;’;

(3) in paragraph 9 point c) is replaced by the following:

‘(c) upon the death of the user.’;

(4) Paragraph 15 is replaced by the following:

’15. The use of European Digital Identity Wallets shall be voluntary. Access to public and private services, access to the labour market and freedom to conduct business shall not in any way be restricted or made disadvantageous to natural persons that do not use European Digital Identity Wallets. It shall remain possible to access public and private services by other existing identification and authentication means.’.

Evaluation and review

1. The Commission shall review the application of this Regulation and shall, by [Publications Office, insert the date – 3 years after entry into force], submit a report to the European Parliament and to the Council. The report shall evaluate the effectiveness of the provisions of this Regulation with regard to facilitating the submission of electronic documents and electronic attestations to public sector bodies, the overall uptake and usage of the European Business Wallets within B2G and B2B interactions, as well as technological, market, and legal developments. The report shall assess whether this Regulation has generated direct savings, in particular for small and medium-sized enterprises and smaller public sector bodies, as well as indirect benefits for the wider Union economy and society. The report shall also assess whether it is necessary to modify the scope of this Regulation or its specific provisions to set out an obligation for the use of the European Business Wallets to address the risks of legal fragmentation. In particular, the Commission shall assess whether new core functionalities should be added to the Business Wallets, such as enabling payments.

2. The report referred to in paragraph 1 shall include at least the following aspects:

(a) the minimum core functionalities of European Business Wallets;

(b) the level of compliance of providers of European Business Wallets and the notification procedure and criteria established in Article 11;

(d) the detailed requirements and technical specifications for the qualified electronic registered delivery service referred to in Article 5(1) point I;

(da) the adoption rate of European Business Wallets by economic operators and public sector bodies, disaggregated by size category and sector where relevant, and relevant metrics on the use of European Business Wallets;

(db) the financial or administrative impacts on economic operators, specifically small and medium-sized enterprises, including micro enterprises and start-ups, sole traders and self-employed persons;

(dc) the financial or administrative impacts on smaller public sector bodies;

(dd) the assessment of indirect benefits for the wider Union economy and society, including, fraud reduction and environmental sustainability;

(de) the evaluation of the cross-border interoperability of the Business Wallets and interoperability with existing digital solutions at both Union and Member State level, including identifying any duplication or parallel systems;

(df) the effectiveness of cooperation between supervisory bodies in the Member States and with the Commission in the implementation and supervision of this Regulation.

No later than one year before the report referred to in paragraph 1 is due, Member States shall provide the Commission with the information necessary for the preparation of the reports.

Entry into force and application

This Regulation shall enter into force on the twentieth day following that of its publication in the Official Journal of the European Union.

It shall apply from [Publications Office, insert the date – 1 year after entry into force].

However, Article 20 shall apply from … [the day of entry into force of this Regulation].

This Regulation shall be binding in its entirety and directly applicable in all Member States.

Done at Brussels,

For the European Parliament For the Council

The President The President

Requirements for minimum functionalities and technical requirements of European Business Wallets

1. European Business Wallets Unit Authentication

Access to the European Business Wallets Unit shall be granted only after the European Business Wallets user has been successfully authenticated by means of either:

(1) a notified electronic identification (eID) means in accordance with Article 6 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014, fulfilling at least the requirements for a substantial level of assurance as defined in Article 8 of that Regulation and further specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502; or

(2) an alternative authentication mechanism recognised as equivalent and fulfilling at least the requirements for a substantial level of assurance as defined in Article 8 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014 and further specified in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502.

Until such authentication has been completed, no functionality of the European Business Wallets Unit or of any other functionalities shall be made accessible to the Wallets user.

2. European Business Wallets Unit integrity

Providers of European Business Wallets shall, for each European Business Wallet unit, generate and sign a European Business Wallet unit attestation in accordance with the requirements laid down in point 5. The certificate used to sign or seal the Business Wallet unit attestation shall be issued under a certificate listed in the trusted list referred to in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2980.

3. European Business Wallets secure communication and critical asset management

(1) European Business Wallet back-end shall use at least one Wallet secure cryptographic application and Wallets secure cryptographic device to manage critical assets.

(2) Providers of the European Business Wallets shall ensure integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the communication within and among all Business Wallet’s back-end, front-end and secure cryptographic applications and device.

(3) Where critical assets relate to performing electronic identification at assurance level substantial, the European Business Wallets cryptographic operations or other operations processing critical assets shall be performed in accordance with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level substantial, as set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502.

4. Wallets secure cryptographic applications

(1) Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that European Business Wallets secure cryptographic applications and devices:

(a) perform the wallet’s cryptographic operations involving critical assets other than those needed for the Wallets unit to authenticate the Wallets owner only in cases where those applications have successfully authenticated Wallets users;

(b) where they authenticate the European Business Wallet owner in the context of performing electronic identification at assurance level substantial as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502;

(d) are able to perform secure erasure of critical assets;

(e) are able to generate a proof of possession of private keys;

(f) protect the private keys generated by these Wallets secure cryptographic applications and devices during the existence of the keys;

(g) comply with the requirements for the characteristics and design of electronic identification means at assurance level substantial, as set out in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502.

5. Wallets unit authenticity and validity

(1) Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that the European Business Wallets unit attestations referred to in point 1 contain public keys and that the corresponding private keys are protected by a Wallets secure cryptographic device.

(2) Providers of European Business Wallets shall provide mechanisms, independent of Wallets units, for the secure identification and authentication of Wallets users.

6. Revocation of Wallets unit attestations

(1) Providers of European Business Wallets shall establish a publicly available policy specifying the conditions and the timeframe for the revocation of Wallets unit attestations.

(2) In line with Article 6, where the providers of European Business Wallets revoke European Business Wallets unit attestations, they shall inform the affected European Business Wallets users without undue delay and no later than 24 hours from the revocation of their European Business Wallets units, including the reason for the revocation and the consequences for the European Business Wallets user. This information shall be provided in a manner that is concise, easily accessible and using clear and plain language.

(3) Where European Business Wallets providers have revoked a European Business Wallet’s unit attestation, they shall make publicly available the validity status of the European Business Wallet unit attestation and describe the location of that information in the Business Wallet’s unit attestation.

7. Transaction logs

(1) The providers of European Business Wallets shall implement and document an appropriate logging policy that shall include, at a minimum, electronic signing, electronic sealing, and notifications of all transactions with Business-Wallet-relying parties, other European Business Wallets units, and European Digital Identity Wallets units, irrespective of whether the transaction is successfully completed.

(2) The logged information shall at least contain:

(a) the time and date of the transaction;

(b) the name, contact details, and unique identifier of the corresponding Business-Wallet-relying party and the Member State in which that Business-Wallet-relying party is established, or in case of other Wallets units, relevant information from the Wallets unit attestation;

(d) in the case of non-completed transactions, the reason for such non-completion.

(3) Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure integrity, authenticity and confidentiality of the logged information.

(4) European Business Wallets back-end shall log reports sent by the Wallets user to the competent authorities via the Wallets unit, including interactions related to notifications, regulatory compliance, data sharing, or audit requests.

(5) The logs referred to in subpoints 1 and 2 shall be accessible to the European Business Wallets provider, where it is necessary for the provision of Wallets services.

(6) The logs referred to in subpoints 1 and 2 shall remain accessible for as long as required to be accessible by Union law or national law.

8. Qualified electronic signatures and seals

(1) In line with Article 6, providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that Wallets users are able to receive qualified certificates for qualified electronic signatures or seals which are linked to qualified signature or seal creation devices that are either local, external, or remote in relation to the Wallet’s unit.

(2) Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that European Business Wallets solutions can securely interface with one of the following types of qualified signature or seal creation devices: local, external, or remotely managed qualified signature or seal creation devices for the purposes of using the qualified certificates referred to in subpoint 1.

9. Signature creation applications

(1) The signature creation applications used by European Business Wallets units may be provided either by European Business Wallets providers, by providers of trust services or by Business-Wallet-relying parties.

(2) Signature creation applications shall have the following functions:

(a) signing or sealing data provided by European Business Wallets users;

(b) signing or sealing data provided by relying parties;

creating signatures or seals in accordance with the optional format;

– informing Wallets users about the result of the signature or seal creation process.

To ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation, the Commission is empowered to adopt implementing acts in accordance with Article 6 that specify the technical standards referred to in subpoint 2, letters (c) and (c)(ii).

(3) The signature creation applications may either be integrated into or be external to European Business Wallets back-end. Where signature creation applications rely on remote qualified signature creation devices and where they are integrated into European Business Wallets back-end, they shall support the application programming interface set out in the implementing acts, which the Commission is empowered to adopt in accordance with Article 5 in order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation.

10. Data export and portability

Business Wallets shall support the secure export, import and portability of an owner’s European Business Wallet data in at least an open format. This shall enable the owner to migrate their data to another Business Wallets solution while ensuring a level of assurance of at least "substantial", as defined in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502.

11. Secure Legal Communication Channel for the Business Wallet

(1) In line with Article 5 of this Regulation, Business Wallets shall integrate and support the use of ▌ qualified electronic registered delivery services, which comply with the technical and interoperability requirements established pursuant to subpoint 2, in accordance with Articles 43 and 44 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014.

(2) The Commission shall, by means of implementing acts:

(a) establish a common set of technical and operational requirements, including a standardised interface, for qualified electronic registered delivery services to be used as asecure legal communication channel for European Business Wallets;

(b) define the minimum technical and interoperability requirements that such qualified electronic registered delivery services must fulfil, including alignment with the reference standards, specifications and procedures established under Articles 43 and 44 of Regulation (EU) No 910/2014;

(c) ensure that the ▌qualified electronic registered delivery services referred to in subpoint 1 are based on open, publicly available and royalty-free standards to guarantee interoperability and prevent vendor lock-in;

(d) ensure that the ▌ qualified electronic registered delivery servicesreferred to in subpoint 1 are end-to-end encryption to guarantee confidentiality;

(e) ensure that the designated qualified electronic registered delivery services shall establish adequate procedures for ensuring continuous availability, redundancy and fallback mechanisms in case of service failure.

(3) Interoperability between Business Wallets and the ▌ qualified electronic registered delivery services referred to in subpoint 1 shall be mandatory. Providers of Business Wallets shall ensure technical integration in accordance with the implementing acts referred to in subpoint 2.

12. European Business Wallets Access Control Mechanism

(1) Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that authorisation decisions under the access control mechanism are based on one or more of the following criteria, as appropriate to the specific access request:

(a) the electronic attestation of attributes of the acting subject;

(b) the formal role of the acting subjects within a recognised organisational structure or economic operator;

(d) contextual information or policies and rules adopted at Union or national level for sector-specific compliance.

(2) Providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure the access control mechanism enables fine-grained and auditable authorisation outcomes, ensuring that:

(a) visibility of credentials and attestations is selective and conditioned on access rights;

(b) access to business processes, digital procedures or submission interfaces is controlled by real-time validation of roles and mandates;

(c) all access and execution events are logged, timestamped, and bound to cryptographically verifiable proofs of authorisation, suitable for audit and legal proceedings.

(3) Providers of the European Business Wallets shall ensure that:

(a) mappings between roles and attributes are verifiable, auditable, revocable and traceable to their legitimate issuers;

(b) conflicts of roles, over-delegation, or expired authorisations are automatically detected and prevented in real time;

(4) The list of reference standards, technical specifications and procedures to be applied for the implementation of the access control mechanism shall be defined in the implementing acts, which the Commission is empowered to adopt in accordance with Article 5 in order to ensure uniform conditions for the implementation of this Regulation. These shall cover in particular:

(a) the formats for the representation of roles and attributes;

(b) interoperability mechanisms for mandates and delegations across wallets;

(d) requirements for secure logging, timestamping and auditability of authorisation events.

(5) Compliance with the requirements laid down in this Article shall be presumed where the standards, specifications and procedures referred to in subpoint 1 are met.

13. General provisions for protocols and interfaces

In line with Article 6 of this Regulation, providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that European Business Wallets units:

(1) authorise requests and, where applicable, authenticate those made through relying-party access certificates or Wallet unit attestations. Authentication of the relying party shall be required where attestations are intended for a restricted audience; in all other cases, attestations may be presented by any requesting party;

(2) display to Wallet users’ information contained in the Business-Wallet-relying party access certificates or in the Wallets unit attestations where applicable;

(3) display to Wallets users, where applicable, the attributes that Wallets users are requested to present;

(4) present Wallet unit attestations of the Wallet unit to Business-Wallet-relying parties or Wallets units that request it.

14. Issuance of electronic attestations of attributes to Wallets units

(1) In line with Article 5 of this Regulation, providers of European Business Wallets shall ensure that Business Wallet units requesting issuance of, electronic attestations of attributes are able to authenticate relying parties.

(2) In relation to the issuance of electronic attestations of attributes to a Wallet unit, Wallet providers shall ensure that the following requirements are complied with:

(a) where European Business Wallets owners, through their Business Wallet unit, request from the provider of the European Business Wallet the issuance of Business Wallets owner identification data or of electronic attestations of attributes from providers of Business Wallets owner identification data or providers of electronic attestations of attributes that enable issuance of Business Wallets owner identification data or electronic attestations in more than one format, the Wallets unit shall request it in all formats referred to in Article 8 to this Regulation laying down rules for the application of the Business Wallets Regulation as regards the integrity and core functionalities of Business Wallets;

(b) where Business Wallet owners use their Business Wallets unit to interact with competent national authorities and providers of electronic attestations of attributes, Wallet units shall enable authentication and validation of the Wallet unit components by presenting the Wallet unit attestations to those competent national authorities and providers upon their request;

(c) Wallet solutions shall support mechanisms that enable providers of Business Wallets Owner Identification Data to verify issuance, delivery and activation in compliance with assurance level high requirements set out in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2015/1502 (2.2);

(d) Wallet units shall verify the authenticity and validity of Business Wallets owner identification data and electronic attestations of attributes.

15. Presentation of attributes to European Business Wallet relying parties

In line with point (d) and (k) of paragraph 1 of Article 5, European Business Wallet providers shall ensure that:

(1) European Business Wallet solutions support protocols and interfaces for the presentation of attributes to Business-Wallet-relying parties in accordance with the standards defined in the implementing acts;

(2) At the request of users, European Business Wallet units respond to successfully authenticated and validated requests from Business-Wallet-relying parties in accordance with the standards defined in the implementing acts;

(3) European Business Wallet units support proving the possession of private keys corresponding to public keys used in cryptographic bindings.

16. Issuance of European Business Wallet Owner Identification Data to Wallets units

(1) Competent authorities shall ensure that Business Wallets owner identification data issued to Business Wallets units comply with the technical specifications set out in the implementing acts, in line with Article 8 of this Regulation.

(2) Competent national authorities shall ensure that Business Wallets owner identification data that they issue is cryptographically bound to the Wallets unit to which it is issued.

17. Issuance of electronic attestations of attributes to Wallets units

(1) Electronic attestations of attributes issued to European Business Wallets units shall comply with at least one of the standards in the list set out in the implementing acts, in line with Article 5 of this Regulation.

(2) Providers of electronic attestations of attributes shall identify themselves to European Business Wallets units using their wallet-relying party access certificate.

(3) Providers of electronic attestations of attributes shall ensure that electronic attestations of attributes issued to European Business Wallets units contain the information necessary for authentication and validation of those electronic attestations of attributes.