What changed

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

– having regard to the Commission proposal of 28 November 2007 for a Council directive amending Directive 2006/112/EC on the common system of value added tax, as regards the treatment of insurance and financial services (COM(2007)0747),

– having regard to Regulation (EU) 2023/1114 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 May 2023 on markets in crypto-assets, and amending Regulations (EU) No 1093/2010 and (EU) No 1095/2010 and Directives 2013/36/EU and (EU) 2019/19371,

– having regard to the Commission’s inception impact assessment of 22 October 2020 on a review of the VAT rules for financial and insurance services,

– having regard to the study requested by Parliament’sCommission Subcommitteeproposal onof Tax12 MattersSeptember entitled2023 ‘Theon taxationestablishing ofa theHead EU’sOffice financialTax sector’,system publishedfor bymicro, itssmall Directorate-Generaland formedium Economy,sized Transformationenterprises, and Industry inamending JuneDirective 20251,2011/16/EU,

– having regard to theCouncil InterinstitutionalDecision Agreement(EU, Euratom) 2020/2053 of 1614 December 2020 betweenon the Europeansystem Parliament,of theown Councilresources of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction ofrepealing newDecision own2014/335/EU, resources2,Euratom2,

– having regard to its resolutionthe ofCommission 10communication Mayof 202322 onDecember own2021 resources:entitled a‘The newnext startgeneration forof EUown finances,resources afor newthe startEU forBudget’ Europe3,(COM(2021)0566),

– having regard to the study requested by Parliament’s Subcommittee on Tax Matters entitled ‘The taxation of the EU’s financial sector’, published by its Directorate-General for Economy, Transformation and Industry in June 20253,

– having regard to the Court of Justice of the European Union’s case law on the VAT exemption for financial and insurance services,

– having regard to the Interinstitutional Agreement of 16 December 2020 between the European Parliament, the Council of the European Union and the European Commission on budgetary discipline, on cooperation in budgetary matters and on sound financial management, as well as on new own resources, including a roadmap towards the introduction of new own resources4,

– having regard to its resolution of 10 May 2023 on own resources: a new start for EU finances, a new start for Europe5,

– having regard to the report by Enrico Letta of April 2024 entitled ‘Much more than a market – Speed, Security, Solidarity: Empowering the single market to deliver a sustainable future and prosperity for all EU citizens’ (Letta report),

– having regard to the Commission communication entitled ‘Savings and Investments Union: A Strategy to Foster Citizens’ Wealth and Economic Competitiveness in the EU’ (COM(2025)0124),

– having regard to the Commission Recommendation (EU) 2025/2029 of 30 September 2025 on increasing the availability of savings and investment accounts with simplified and advantageous tax treatment6,

– having regard to the World Bank working paper of May 2025 entitled ‘VAT Exemptions, Embedded Tax, and Unintended Consequences’,

– having regard to Rule 55 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (A10-0000/2025),(A10-0169/2026),

A. whereas, in herthe Commission President’s 2024 mission letter to the Commissioner responsible for taxation, Wopke Hoekstra,the Commission President Ursula von der Leyenis tasked the Commission with identifying innovative solutions for the taxation oftaxing the EU’s financial sector to support the further integration of the sector, cross-border activityactivity, digitalisation and innovation; whereas the Commission has launched a study on taxation of the financial sector in the EU;

B. whereas financial services are generally exempted from value added tax (VAT) in the EU; whereas financial institutions cannot deduct VAT paid on their inputs because of that exemption, causing the ‘irrecoverableso-called irrecoverable VAT problem’;problem; whereas this exemption could create a lack of transparency, increase costs on consumers and result in additional costs for financial institutions, influence organisation and outsourcing decisions, and lead to competitive disadvantages for smaller, digital and cross-border service providers;

C. whereas the VAT exemption dates back to 1977 when taxing financial services was technically unfeasible; whereas technological advances now make such taxation viable and several jurisdictions worldwide have revised similar exemptions;

C. whereas the possibility for financial institutions to opt into VAT is not provided consistently across Member States, leading to further administrative complexity;

D. whereas both the Letta and Draghi reports underline that tax fragmentation in the single market obstructs economic growth, trade and cross-border business; whereas EU internal barriers effectively impose a near 100 % tariff on financial services;

D. whereas the VAT exemption dates back to 1977 when taxing such financial services posed significant technical and administrative difficulties; whereas the original technical justification for the VAT exemption could now be addressed through technological, digital and supervisory advances, including real-time data processing and improved reporting requirements;

E. whereas the taxation of financial services in the EU remains highly fragmented, with diverging national approaches to financial transaction taxes (FTTs), bank levies, financial activity taxes and other profit-based taxes; whereas this fragmentation creates legal uncertainty and complexity, drives market distortions, encourages tax avoidance and reduces the EU’s competitiveness;

E. whereas several jurisdictions worldwide have revised similar exemptions or have introduced alternative forms of taxation of financial services in order to address the unintended fiscal and competitive effects of irrecoverable VAT and to continue to ensure a fair and sound contribution of the financial sector to public revenues;

F. whereas FTTs and bank levies were discussed after the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009; whereas these measures sought to ensure that the financial sector contributes to public budgets, and to offset the costs of the crisis and curb the negative effects of speculative or high-risk financial activity;

F. whereas both the Letta and Draghi reports underline that tax fragmentation in the single market, including administrative and tax barriers, obstructs economic growth, trade and cross-border activities; whereas EU internal barriers effectively impose a near 100 % tariff on financial services; whereas those barriers and regulatory hurdles are, according to Draghi, far more damaging to economic growth than any tariffs the US might impose;

G. whereas at least seven Member States currently levy an FTT; whereas these Member States have not coordinated their FTTs in scope, rate or application; whereas no agreement has been reached on an EU-wide FTT, despite several legislative proposals from the Commission since 2011;

G. whereas, according to Eurostat data, the financial sector is a significant component of the EU’s economy, generating around EUR 0.9 trillion in value added in 2022, employing nearly 5 million people and recording a net turnover of approximately EUR 2.4 trillion; whereas the sector contributes to public finances through corporate taxation, payroll taxes and sector-specific levies; whereas the EU financial sector plays a central role in financing the real economy, supporting innovation and facilitating investment;

H. whereas Parliament has consistently supported the introduction of an EU-wide FTT, including as a possible own resource, most recently in its resolution of May 2023; whereas in its 2026 work programme, the Commission proposed to withdraw its previous FTT proposal;

H. whereas recent initiatives such as Council Directive 2025/50 of 10 December 2024 on faster and safer relief of excess withholding taxes7 (FASTER Directive) have made significant progress in reducing administrative burdens and facilitating cross-border economic activity in the EU, and similar efforts should continue in order to further strengthen the integration and efficiency of the single market;

I. whereas the Council has been delaying a decision regarding the Commission proposal for a Directive establishing a Head Office Tax system for micro, small and medium sized enterprises, and amending Directive 2011/16/EU, while Parliament already approved a legislative resolution on 10 April 20248;

J. whereas any future initiatives should reduce fragmentation in the single market and strengthen competitiveness by ensuring a coherent, predictable and neutral tax framework for financial services, while taking into account diverse business models and tax interactions across the EU financial sector;

K. whereas the taxation of financial services in the EU remains highly fragmented, with diverging national approaches to insurance premium taxes, financial transaction taxes (FTTs), bank levies, financial activity taxes and other profit-based taxes; whereas this fragmentation creates legal uncertainty and complexity, drives market distortions, encourages tax avoidance and reduces the EU’s competitiveness;

L. whereas the Savings and Investments Union (SIU) requires stronger incentives for people to save and invest in European capital markets; whereas the completion of the SIU requires a comprehensive approach to financial stability, market integration and investor protection; whereas ensuring that the financial sector makes a meaningful contribution to public finances, internalises the risks it generates and supports long-term sustainable investment is crucial for the SIU’s success and credibility;

M. whereas FTTs and bank levies were discussed after the financial crisis in 2008 and 2009; whereas these measures sought to offset the costs of the crisis;

N. whereas at least seven Member States currently levy an FTT; whereas these Member States have not coordinated their FTTs as regards their scope, rate or application; whereas no agreement has been reached on an EU-wide FTT, despite several legislative proposals from the Commission since 2011;

O. whereas Parliament has consistently supported the introduction of an EU-wide FTT, including as a possible own resource, most recently in its resolution of May 2023; whereas in its 2026 work programme, the Commission proposed to withdraw its previous FTT proposal due to a lack of consensus among Member States with no agreement reached;

P. whereas Member States continue to introduce temporary windfall taxes or solidarity levies on bank profits to address extraordinary increases in profitability driven by monetary policy;

Addressing the tax fragmentation of the financial sector and increasing its competitiveness

1. Notes that the EU-wide VAT exemption for financial services has resulted in a substantial VAT policy gapgap; andhighlights athat highlyin fragmentedthe landscapeabsence of VAT revenues from financial services, Member States have introduced 91 sector-specific taxes acrossto tax the Memberfinancial Statessector toand mitigate these revenue losses;losses, resulting in a highly fragmented tax landscape; notes that this fragmented tax landscape makesgenerates complianceadditional moreoperational challengingand administrative costs and increases structural barriers to the cross-border expansion of financial services providers, thus weakening the EU’s financial sector and its investment capacity and undermining the objectives of the Savings and Investments UnionSIU and the Banking Union;

2. Highlights that fragmentation offragmented tax rules across Member States and the high mobility of the financial sector’s tax base create significant opportunities for regulatory arbitrage and capital and profit shifting;shifting, hinder cross-border activities of financial institutions and reduce the efficiency and resilience of the EU’s banking and capital markets;

3. Notes that fragmentation of national tax regimes increases the risk of cross-border double taxation and, driven by administrative and legal complexity, can inhibit the growth of the EU’s financial sector;

3. Notes that differences in national tax regimes reflect domestic policy choices; notes the ongoing work at an international level as regards profit shifting; calls for strengthened coordination at EU level, including in the implementation of the Pillar 2 Directive, robust anti-avoidance rules and transparency requirements, particularly in the field of public country-by-country reporting;

4. Stresses that removing tax barriers to cross-border investment through coherent EU-level rules would reduce compliance costs, improve market efficiency, enhance legal clarity for cross-border capital flows and strengthen the competitiveness of EU financial services, while simultaneously curbing tax evasion and aggressive tax planning;

4. Notes that fragmentation of national tax regimes increases the risk of cross-border double taxation and, driven by administrative and legal complexity, can inhibit the growth of the EU’s financial sector and pose an obstacle to a deeper integration of EU financial markets; emphasises that avoiding double taxation and reducing administrative burdens should remain crucial; stresses, however, that simplification efforts must not result in deregulation or a race to the bottom in tax standards;

5. Notes that, according to the Commission’s 2026 European Macroeconomic Report4, the EU household saving rate remains well above the average of the countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; regrets that around one third of these savings are invested outside the EU, which shows the shortcomings of the EU financial and tax framework in retaining investment;

5. Stresses that differences in national procedures for withholding tax create administrative burdens and barriers to cross-border investment, as acknowledged in the Commission’s SIU strategy; welcomes the adoption of the FASTER Directive; calls for further progress towards a more coordinated and ambitious framework;

6. Calls for the tax rules for the financial sector to be clarified to improve capital allocation and strengthen the sector’s competitiveness, while maintaining a high level of consumer protection; calls on the Commission to follow through on its commitment to propose innovative solutions for the taxation of the sector and for further integration at EU level;

6. Calls on the Council to decide on the Commission proposal for a Council Directive establishing a Head Office Tax system for micro, small and medium sized enterprises, and amending Directive 2011/16/EU, duly taking into account Parliament’s legislative resolution of 10 April 2024;

7. Observes moreover that existing tax rules have not fully kept pace with the emergence of new financial products and market infrastructures; underlines that fragmentation is rapidly becoming more worrying with the success of neobanks, for example, digital-only banks, challenger banks or fintech banks; points out the significant increase in the share of cross-border deposits held by these banks in the last six years; underlines that differences in tax rules between banks and non-bank entities can create distortions;

8. Emphasises that the insufficient data on the effective tax burden across the EU financial sector obstructs evidence-based policymaking and the assessment of policy impacts on market behaviour, competition and financial stability; underlines the need for improved transparency and data collection as a prerequisite for coherent reform of financial sector taxation;

9. Stresses that removing tax barriers to cross-border investment through coherent EU-level rules would reduce compliance costs, improve market efficiency, increase legal clarity for cross-border capital flows and strengthen the competitiveness of EU financial services, while simultaneously curbing tax evasion and aggressive tax planning; stresses the need for a coherent set of rules for the EU financial sector, while respecting Member States’ tax sovereignty and the principle of subsidiarity; stresses that taxation of financial services should help sustain the competitiveness of the financial sector;

10. Notes that, according to the Commission’s 2026 European Macroeconomic Report9, the EU household saving rate remains well above the average of the countries of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; regrets that around one third of these savings are invested outside the EU, which shows the shortcomings of the EU financial framework in retaining investment; calls on the Commission to assess how tax measures can encourage investment to flow towards the EU; underlines the importance of discouraging financial outflows towards countries on the EU list of non-cooperative jurisdictions;

11. Underlines the importance of advancing the SIU to mobilise savings for productive investments; considers reducing tax fragmentation and improving cross-border investment channels as key to mobilising European savings for investment within the EU;

12. Stresses that a tax framework for financial services should be designed alongside the SIU’s objectives, focusing on increasing efficiency, addressing market distortions, and fostering investment and long-term growth, while ensuring a balanced approach that also reflects broader economic and social considerations;

13. Notes that the taxation of the financial sector should be governed by the principles of simplicity, neutrality, fairness, economic, environmental and social sustainability, and legal certainty; notes that it should also reflect the cyclical dynamics of banks profitability linked to monetary policy and economic conditions;

14. Calls on the Commission to follow through on its commitment to propose innovative solutions for taxing the sector that reduce fragmentation, support further integration at EU level and help complete the SIU;

Addressing the VAT regime for financial services

7.15. Notes that technologicalthe progressVAT hasexemption renderedfor thefinancial originalservices technicaldates justificationback forto the1977, VATserving exemptionto obsolete;avoid takestechnical thedifficulties viewin thatapplying theVAT statusto quocomplex perpetuatesfinancial marketservices, distortions,which reinforceswas considered administratively unworkable; acknowledges that the self-supplyoriginal biastechnical injustification for the financialVAT sectorexemption andcould createsnow competitivebe disadvantagesaddressed comparedby withthe institutionsrealities fromof non-EUtechnological countries;progress and digitalisation;

8. Regrets that repeated Commission initiatives, including its 2007 proposals and the 2020 inception impact assessment, did not result in a reform of the VAT exemption for the financial sector; notes that most recently the Commission intended to publish amendments to the VAT Directive5 in early 2023; observes that these plans were stalled, leaving this essential reform still pending;

16. Observes that the exemption does not necessarily constitute an advantage for financial institutions, as it prevents them from recovering VAT; takes the view that the status quo perpetuates market distortions, can create a lack of transparency and increase costs on consumers, reinforces the self-supply bias in the financial sector and creates competitive disadvantages compared with institutions from non-EU countries;

9. Notes that, due to the failed reform efforts, the VAT Directive lacks specific provisions for emerging financial instruments, including crypto-assets, decentralised finance and fintech; notes that this has led to divergent national interpretations of VAT rules, legal uncertainty for service providers and uneven treatment between traditional and new financial services and has hindered innovation;

17. Stresses that VAT exemptions are often granted to activities of general interest in recognition of their essential social function; underlines that certain core financial services – notably payment services, deposit-taking and basic credit provision – can perform a comparable quasi-public utility function by safeguarding savings, enabling economic exchange and ensuring that people and businesses can participate safely in the economy;

10. Emphasises that, despite the use of VAT grouping and cost-sharing arrangements in some Member States, the outdated VAT exemption, combined with differing compensatory national tax rules, creates a complex, fragmented and incoherent tax landscape, making tax compliance costly and increasing firms’ operating expenses; stresses that clear VAT definitions and simplified rules are needed to reduce these burdens, ensure consistent application of rules across the EU, and support innovation;

18. Notes that repeated Commission initiatives, including its 2007 proposals and the 2020 inception impact assessment, did not result in a reform of the VAT exemption for the financial sector because Member States failed to reach a unanimous agreement; notes that the Commission most recently intended to publish amendments to the VAT Directive10 in early 2023; observes that these plans were stalled, leaving this essential reform still pending;

11. Stresses that the VAT exemption, especially for clearly identifiable financial charges such as fees and commissions, is no longer fit for purpose; underlines that taxing such charges, unlike margin-based services, can reduce distortions without creating disproportionate administrative complexity;

19. Notes that, under Article 11 of the VAT Directive, VAT grouping remains optional for Member States and is limited by territorial constraints, creating legal and practical obstacles for cross-border groups active in financial services;

12. Calls on the Commission to publish a proposal to reform the VAT rules for the financial sector and address the distortions caused by the VAT exemption; emphasises that this reform should take into account distributional consequences, mitigate costs for retail consumers and ensure that the financial sector makes a fair contribution;

20. Emphasises that, despite the use of VAT grouping and cost-sharing arrangements in some Member States, the VAT exemption, combined with differing compensatory national tax rules, like insurance premium taxes, creates a complex and fragmented tax landscape, making cross-border tax compliance costly and increasing firms’ operating expenses; stresses that clearer VAT definitions and simplified rules are needed to reduce these burdens, ensure consistent application of rules across the EU, facilitate cross-border activity and support innovation;

Ensuring that the financial sector makes a fair contribution

21. Notes that VAT grouping, which can reduce administrative burdens for, and improve the efficiency of, financial institutions, is currently applied unevenly across Member States and generally limited to entities established within a single Member State; highlights that greater convergence in the application of VAT grouping could reduce fragmentation and legal uncertainty in the internal market and facilitate cross-border financial services activity;

13. Recalls that the EU faces a significant investment gap of EUR 750 to 800 billion annually to meet its climate, digital and strategic autonomy objectives; recalls the commitment of the Member States and the EU to substantially increase European defence investment; emphasises that fair taxation of the financial sector could mobilise revenue for public investment;

22. Calls on the Commission to encourage Member States to implement VAT grouping in a consistent manner and to explore options for a clearer legal framework, including the possibility for cross-border VAT grouping; stresses that broader use of VAT grouping for financial and insurance services must be in line with corporate tax rules, notably those on transfer pricing, and must be accompanied by binding anti-abuse safeguards to prevent fraud and tax avoidance, intra-group VAT leakage and cost-sharing abuse;

14. Recalls the 2020 agreement between Parliament, the Council and the Commission on a roadmap for the introduction of new own resources, including an FTT; notes that at that time, an FTT with 10 participating Member States would have produced around EUR 3.5 billion per year in public revenue; notes that this figure would have risen to EUR 31 to75 billion with the participation of all the Member States;

23. Notes that the VAT Directive lacks specific provisions for emerging financial instruments, including crypto-assets, decentralised finance and fintech; highlights that in addition the Directive does not address the VAT treatment of derivatives and that the treatment of investment funds remains divergent across Member States; notes that this has led to diverging national interpretations of VAT rules, legal uncertainty for service providers and uneven treatment between traditional and new financial services and risks hindering innovation and competitiveness;

15. Regrets that the Commission announced, in its 2026 work programme, the withdrawal of the FTT proposal; urges the Commission to ensure that any proposal for a coherent framework for taxing the EU financial sector presents a concrete plan to address the policy gap created by the withdrawal of the FTT proposal;

24. Emphasises that a modern tax framework should support innovation in fintech and digital finance and avoid creating regulatory disincentives for new market entrants; calls on the Commission to clarify the VAT treatment of emerging financial services in order to ensure technological neutrality and a level playing field across the EU;

16. Emphasises that any forthcoming tax proposal should ensure that the financial sector makes a fair, sound and simple financial contribution under clear and predictable rules; stresses that these rules should safeguard market stability and competitiveness and mitigate costs for retail consumers;

25. Considers that a broad and undifferentiated VAT exemption for the entire financial sector raises questions regarding the overall consistency and balance of the tax system; underlines that a reform of the VAT exemption could reduce distortions and the level of irrecoverable VAT without creating disproportionate administrative complexity; notes that options for removing the VAT exemption could effectively remove the irrecoverable VAT by allowing financial corporations to fully reclaim the VAT that they pay on goods and services used in their operations; underlines that this would eliminate the current bias towards bringing services in-house rather than outsourcing them, which can limit a company’s ability to specialise, access external expertise, and innovate; recognises that this reform could also level the playing field as regards other jurisdictions and strengthen the international competitiveness of EU financial institutions;

17. Highlights that coordinated temporary windfall taxes can complement long-term sector-wide taxation by providing short-term revenue in times of crisis without destabilising markets or distorting long-term commercial activity; stresses that such temporary taxes should be transparent and proportionate, strictly time-bound and apply only to profits arising from circumstances unrelated to productivity gains or surges in demand; calls on the Commission to bring forward a legislative proposal for the temporary taxation of exceptional profits in the financial sector, ensuring the sector makes a fair and coordinated contribution at EU level in periods of extraordinary macroeconomic circumstances;

26. Recalls that VAT is a harmonised tax framework at EU level, although Member States retain some scope for implementing it; recognises, therefore, that a reform of the VAT system for financial services should be addressed at EU level;

27. Calls on the Commission to review the impacts of the current VAT regime on the financial sector and to publicly share this analysis; calls on the Commission to consider policy options to address identified distortive impacts, like more effective VAT grouping and options for reforming the VAT exemption, with a view to bringing forward a proposal to reform the VAT rules for the financial sector; emphasises that any such reform should reduce irrecoverable VAT and the fragmented application of rules, improve legal certainty and tax fairness, and strengthen the competitiveness of EU financial markets, while safeguarding financial stability and minimising regulatory arbitrage between Member States; emphasises that any such reform must also safeguard consumers and continue to ensure that the financial sector makes a fair contribution to public revenues;

28. Notes that any proposal for revising the VAT framework should be based on an in-depth analysis at macroeconomic level and comprehensive mapping of national bank tax and levies; emphasises that such an analysis should take into account the administrative implications for financial services, the interaction between existing national bank taxes, financial sector levies and the VAT system, and the impact on the single market;

29. Underlines that any changes to the VAT treatment of financial services must carefully assess the impact on services provided to retail consumers, particularly low- and middle-income households, and avoid any extra overall costs;

30. Calls on the Commission, as part of a possible reform of the VAT exemption, to assess the feasibility of replacing national insurance premium taxes by means of fully integrating insurance services into the VAT system;

Promoting a more coherent tax framework for the financial sector

31. Recalls that the EU faces a significant investment gap of EUR 750 to 800 billion annually as regards meeting its climate, digital and strategic autonomy objectives; recalls the commitment of the Member States and the EU to substantially increase European defence investment; emphasises that in order to respond to these challenges, fair and more coherent taxation of the financial sector, that reflects both value creation and negative externalities, could contribute to mobilising private capital, thus stimulating retail investment, and to strengthening European capital markets, while raising revenue for public investment for strategic priorities, and our social, climate and investment needs, therefore strengthening the EU’s competitiveness;

32. Recalls, in this regard, the 2020 agreement between Parliament, the Council and the Commission on a roadmap for introducing new own resources, including an FTT based on the results of an impact assessment;

33. Acknowledges the lack of progress made on the FTT proposal in the Council, despite extensive debate, both under unanimity and enhanced cooperation, and takes note of the Commission’s announcement about the withdrawal of the FTT proposal in its 2026 work programme;

34. Takes the view that regular assessments of the economic impacts and the continued relevance of tax policy in the financial sector are crucial, in order to avoid unintended or lasting distortions to financial markets; welcomes the fact that the Commission is carrying out a comprehensive analysis of the potential impact of overall financial sector taxation on market functioning, cross-border investment, and the competitiveness of EU financial markets;

35. Emphasises that tax rules for the financial sector should be simplified and ensure that the sector makes a fair and sound financial contribution, and should be clear, transparent and predictable in order to reduce fragmentation, enable investment and cross-border activity while guaranteeing a high level of consumer protection; stresses that these rules should improve efficiency and capital allocation, safeguard market stability and competitiveness, and mitigate compliance costs, particularly for retail consumers and small and medium-sized enterprises;

°

° °

18.36. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

ANNEX: DECLARATION OF INPUT

Citigroup Inc.

2. Representatives of public authorities of third countries, including their diplomatic missions and embassies

None

The list above is drawn up under the exclusive responsibility of the rapporteur.

Where natural persons are identified in the list by their name, by their function or by both, the rapporteur declares that he has submitted to the natural persons concerned the European Parliament’s Data Protection Notice No 484 (https://www.europarl.europa.eu/data-protect/index.do), which sets out the conditions applicable to the processing of their personal data and the rights linked to that processing.

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Date adopted

3.6.2026

Result of final vote

+ : 37

- : 6

0 : 11

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

37

+

PPE

Georgios Aftias, Isabel Benjumea Benjumea, Stefan Berger, Gheorghe Falca, Marco Falcone, Markus Ferber, Dirk Gotink, Michalis Hadjipantela, Monika Hohlmeier, Fernando Navarrete Rojas, Ludek Niedermayer, Giusi Princi, Paulius Saudargas, Andreas Schwab, Flavio Tosi

PfE

Jaroslav Knot, Tomás Kubín, Jaroslava Pokorná Jermanová, Antonín Stanek

Renew

Engin Eroglu, Gerben-Jan Gerbrandy, Billy Kelleher, Ludovít Ódor, Anouk Van Brug, Stéphanie Yon-Courtin

S&D

Matthias Ecke, Jonás Fernández, Eero Heinäluoma, Aurore Lalucq, César Luena, Ana Catarina Mendes, Nikos Papandreou, Evelyn Regner, Irene Tinagli

Verts/ALE

Damian Boeselager, Vladimir Prebilic, Marie Toussaint

6

-

ECR

Bogdan Rzonca

ESN

Siegbert Frank Droese, Volker Schnurrbusch

PfE

Paolo Borchia, Mireia Borrás Pabón, Annamária Vicsek

11

0

ECR

Stephen Nikola Bartulica, Giovanni Crosetto, Denis Nesci, Guillaume Peltier, Ruggero Razza, Mariateresa Vivaldini

NI

Fabio De Masi, Katerina Konecná

PPE

Kinga Kollár

The Left

Gaetano Pedulla', Jussi Saramo

Key:

+ : in favour

- : against

0 : abstentions