What changed
Adds emphasis on women's needs and low-educated workers' higher unemployment risk, and calls for shorter EGF processing times. #1#3#6 Adds calls for proactive measures to prevent lay-offs and bankruptcies, and stresses social partner involvement and industrial policy. #4#5#7#8 Rephrases the objective of EGF contributions without changing substance. #2 Adds a formal letter from the Employment Committee with opinion details. #9
7 changes of substance, plus 1 formaland1 wording-only. Each change below carries a one-line ✦ note from the same model. Written from the two texts only — read the highlighted passages before relying on it.
The changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations (“having regard to …”), standard resolution paragraphs and punctuation-only edits are left out — they are in “Show every difference”.
Change #1 Substance
Adds that bankruptcies rise particularly in retail due to e-commerce and consumer habits, notes women are 67.5% of the workforce, and stresses EGF support should address their specific needs.
D. whereas Casa filed for bankruptcy on 6 March 2025; whereas in Belgium bankruptcies are on the rise since 2022;
D. whereas Casa filed for bankruptcy on 6 March 2025; whereas in Belgium bankruptcies are on the rise since 2022, particularly in the retail sector, which is undergoing a profound structural transformation driven by the rise of e-commerce and shifting consumer habits; whereas women represent 67,5 % of the workforce concerned in this case; stresses therefore that the support measures under the EGF should take into account the specific needs and barriers faced by those women in re-entering the labour market;
Change #3 Substance
Adds a stress on shortening the time between EGF application submission and financing decision, while safeguarding Parliament's rights as budgetary authority.
2. Notes that the Belgian authorities submitted the application on 23 September 2025, and that, following the receipt of additional information from Belgium, the Commission finalised its assessment on 6 February 2026 and notified it to Parliament on 11 February 2026; stresses the importance of shortening the time between the submission of an application for EGF assistance and the financing decision, while fully safeguarding the rights of the European Parliament as one arm of the budgetary authority;
Change #4 Substance
Adds a highlight on the need to enhance business management's capacity to prevent lay-offs by adapting to geopolitical context and proactively coping with restructuring.
4. Takes note that Casa experienced financial difficulties for several years prior to the bankruptcy declaration, stemming from the growing prevalence of e-commerce, heightened international competition and unfair competitive conditions, which ultimately resulted in severe liquidity shortages and the inability to identify potential purchasers for the company; highlights the need for enhancing of business management’s capacity to prevent lay-offs by adapting to current geopolitical context and to proactively cope with major restructuring events;
Change #5 Substance
Adds an emphasis that reintegrating laid-off workers is key to a future-proof European economy with a strong industrial base.
5. Notes that, while displaced sales assistants have most favourable employment prospects, warehouse workers face greater difficulties in securing new positions and require additional support through upskilling, reskilling, relocation, or redeployment; calls on Belgian authorities to provide specific tailored support to help workers overcome their shortcomings and find new jobs aligned with labour market needs; emphasizes that reintegrating the laid-off workers is key to a future proof European economy with a strong industrial base;
Change #6 Substance
Adds that in Flanders unemployment risk is more than double for people with low education levels.
6. Regrets that the rise in bankruptcies over the past two years had a negative impact on the employment rate in some regions in Belgium, particularly in Brussels and Olen (Province of Antwerp); notes that around 45 000 jobs were lost in Belgium within 18 months due to bankruptcies, mostly occurred in Flanders; emphasizes that in Flanders the unemployment risk is more than double for people with a low level of education; stresses the importance of a business-friendly environment that enables enterprises to remain competitive, creates jobs and contributes to sustainable economic growth.
Change #7 Substance
Adds a stress that social partners should be involved throughout the entire implementation of EGF measures, including monitoring.
7. Recalls that, in agreement with experts and social partners, personalised services to be provided to the workers consist of the following measures: info-sessions for guidance on work reintegration; outplacement services to guide workers in their job searching; active mediation focusing on each jobseeker’s profile; personalised programmes for skills development, including IT skills; training and retraining; individual training at the workplace; participation at job fair; emphasises the importance of fostering high-quality, future-oriented jobs that strengthen competitiveness and support digital transformation, while ensuring that the EGF is properly implemented and contributes to the Union’s long-term economic and social resilience; stresses that social partners should be involved throughout the entire implementation of the EGF measures, including the monitoring phase, to ensure the quality and relevance of the support offered to beneficiaries;
Change #8 Substance
Adds a new paragraph recalling EGF as solidarity instrument, cannot replace proactive industrial policy, and stresses prevention of closures and tailored support for low-educated workers.
8. Recalls that the EGF is an instrument of solidarity and just transition and while it provides support following job losses, it cannot replace a proactive industrial policy; considers that the mobilisation of the EGF needs to be embedded in a larger policy response on all political levels to ensure that the workers affected find adequate opportunities in line with their qualifications and skills; stresses that the Union’s primary task must be to prevent such closures in the first place, by creating the conditions to keep industrial production competitive, while at the same time investing in skills for both highly qualified and industrial workers; underlines the need to provide specific support tailored to profiles of workers with low-levels of education, while taking measures to reduce bankruptcies and address social disparities leading to exclusion from the workforce;