Sittings · Compare

What changed

From · report parliamentary committee draft · 2024-01-10 AGRI-PR-758002 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards multiannual survey programmes, notifications concerning the presence of regulated non-quarantine pests, temporary derogations from import prohibitions and special import requirements and establishment of procedures for granting them, temporary import requirements for high risk plants, plant products and other objects, the establishment of procedures for the listing of high risk plants, the content of phytosanitary certificates, the use of plant passports and as regards certain reporting requirements for demarcated areas and surveys of pest

→

To · Plenary report · 2024-02-15 A-9-2024-0035 on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council amending Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards multiannual survey programmes, notifications concerning the presence of regulated non-quarantine pests, temporary derogations from import prohibitions and special import requirements and establishment of procedures for granting them, temporary import requirements for high risk plants, plant products and other objects, the establishment of procedures for the listing of high risk plants, the content of phytosanitary certificates, the use of plant passports and as regards certain reporting requirements for demarcated areas and surveys of pest

+194 added · −40 removed · 12 modified paragraphs hide unchanged text

DRAFT EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT LEGISLATIVE RESOLUTION

– having regard to Rule 59 of its Rules of Procedure,

– having regard to the report of the Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development ~~(A90000/2024),~~(A9-0035/2024),

1. Adopts its position at first reading hereinafter set out;

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(1) Reporting requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements in order to ensure that they fulfil the purpose for which they were intended and to limit the administrative burden.

(1) Reporting requirements play a key role in ensuring proper monitoring and correct enforcement of legislation. However, it is important to streamline those requirements and promote harmonised, standardised and digitalised procedures in order to ensure that they fulfil the purpose for which they were intended and to reduce bureaucracy while limiting the administrative and financial burden.

Amendment 2

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(1a) Enhanced clarity, transparency and coherence are needed to ensure the correct implementation of this Regulation as healthy plants are vital to sustainable agricultural and horticultural production and contribute to food security and food safety.

Amendment 3

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 1 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(1b) Adequate public funding should be ensured in order to successfully manage outbreaks of harmful pests and diseases for crop plants, as well as to stimulate research and innovation in this area. It is essential to tackle the links between plant, animal, ecosystems and public health from a One Health perspective. Thus, European plant health partnerships should be encouraged following the example of the European partnership on animal health and welfare funded through the Horizon Europe Framework Programme.

Amendment 4

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 5

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(5) As experience has shown during the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, it is more effective, for the purpose of co-ordination of phytosanitary policy at Union level, to notify the demarcated areas immediately after their establishment. Immediate notification of demarcated areas by a Member State to the other Member States, the Commission and the professional operators helps to become aware about the presence and spread of the pest concerned and to decide on next measures to be taken. Therefore, Article 18(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 should establish an obligation for Member States to notify the Commission and the other Member States of the demarcated areas immediately after their establishment, together with the pests concerned and the respective measures taken. Such obligation does not add any new administrative burden, because the immediate notification of demarcated areas is an existing obligation set out in Annex I, point 7.1, to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/171510 and is currently practised by all Member States. Setting out that obligation in Article 18(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 will further enhance clarity about the applicable rules concerning demarcated areas, while the respective obligation in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1715 should be removed to avoid overlaps of the respective provisions.

(5) As experience has shown during the application of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, it is more effective, for the purpose of co-ordination of phytosanitary policy at Union level, to notify the demarcated areas immediately after their establishment. Immediate notification of demarcated areas by a Member State to the other Member States, the Commission and the professional operators helps to become aware about the presence and spread of the pest concerned and to decide on next measures to be taken. Therefore, Article 18(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 should establish an obligation for Member States to notify the Commission and the other Member States of the demarcated areas immediately after their establishment, together with the pests concerned and the respective measures taken. Such obligation should not add any new administrative or financial burden, because the immediate notification of demarcated areas is an existing obligation set out in Annex I, point 7.1, to Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/171510 and is currently practised by all Member States. Setting out that obligation in Article 18(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 will further enhance clarity about the applicable rules concerning demarcated areas, while the respective obligation in Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1715 should be removed to avoid overlaps of the respective provisions.

__________________

10 Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1715 of 30 September 2019 laying down rules for the functioning of the information management system for official controls and its system components (the IMSOC Regulation) (OJ L 261, 14.10.2019, p. 37).

Amendment 5

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 6 a (new)

(6a) For reasons of consistency with the amendment of Article 18(6) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, the notifications referred to in Article 19(2) and the abolition of the demarcated areas referred to in Article 19(4) should also be made through the electronic notification system referred to in Article 103 of that Regulation.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 6

~~Amendment 2~~

Proposal for a regulation

(6b) As experience has shown, on certain occasions the Member States need the assistance of experts to allow for swift action against new outbreaks of particular pests in their territories. Therefore a Union Plant Health Emergency Team (‘the Team’) should be created, with the purpose of providing Member States, upon their request, with urgent assistance on the measures to be taken pursuant to Articles 10 to 19, 27 and 28 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 concerning Union quarantine pests, and the measures to be taken pursuant to Article 30 of that Regulation. In order to protect the Union territory from possible outbreaks in third countries bordering the Union territory or presenting an imminent phytosanitary risk for that territory, the Team should also be available to provide third countries with urgent assistance, where necessary, concerning outbreaks in their territories of Union quarantine pests and pests subject to the measures adopted pursuant to Article 30 of that Regulation.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 7

~~Amendment 3~~

Proposal for a regulation

(6c) In order to ensure the appropriate functioning of the Team, rules should be established concerning its appointment, composition and financing by the Commission. For reasons of better co-ordination and efficiency, the members of the Team should be appointed by the Commission in consultation with the Member States or third countries concerned, from experts proposed by the Member States, and those experts should possess different specialities related to plant health.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 8

~~Amendment 4~~

Proposal for a regulation

(7) In accordance with Article 22(3), Article 24(2) and Article 34(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, Member States are to report to the Commission and the other Member States, by 30 April of each year, the results of the surveys, which were carried out in the preceding calendar year, concerning the presence of certain pests within the Union territory. Those are Union quarantine pests, pests subject to the measures adopted pursuant to Articles 29 and 30 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, priority pests and protected zone quarantine pests respectively. Moreover, and in accordance with Article 23(2) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, Member States are, on request, to notify their multiannual survey programmes upon their establishment to the Commission and the other Member States. In order to enhance the rationalisation and digitalisation of the reporting obligations, the Articles concerned should be amended by adding the provisions that those notifications are to be submitted through the electronic notification system referred to in Article 103 of that Regulation.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 9

~~Amendment 5~~

Proposal for a regulation

(8) In accordance with Article 23(1), third subparagraph, the multiannual survey programmes are to be established for a period of five to seven years. In order to cope with challenges of implementing the multiannual survey programme and to reduce administrative burden for the competent authorities, that period should be extended to 10 years, while being subject to review and update.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 10

~~Amendment 6~~

Proposal for a regulation

(10) During the implementation of that provision, certain Member States expressed their doubts concerning the precise scope of the term ‘measures’, and in particular whether it concerns actions taken in the context of imports or internal movement of goods, in order to prevent the entry and spread of the respective pest in the Union territory. Therefore, and for reasons of legal clarity and completeness, Article 30(1) should be amended to specifically indicate that those measures may include the prohibition of the presence of the respective pest in the Union territory, and requirements concerning the introduction into, and movement within, the Union of plants, plant products and other objects.

(10) During the implementation of that provision, certain Member States expressed their doubts concerning the precise scope of the term ‘measures’, and in particular whether it concerns actions taken in the context of imports or internal movement of goods, in order to prevent the entry and spread of the respective pest in the Union territory. Therefore, and for reasons of legal clarity and completeness, Article 30(1) should be amended to specifically indicate that those measures may include the prohibition of the respective pest´s introduction into, movement within, or holding, multiplication or release in the Union territory, and requirements concerning the introduction into, and movement within, the Union of plants, plant products and other ~~objects.~~objects, in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/829.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 11

~~Amendment 7~~

Proposal for a regulation

Amendment

(12) However, no requirement to notify violation of the respective rules exists in Article 37 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, which concerns measures to prevent the presence of regulated non-quarantine pests (‘RNQPs’) on plants for planting.

(12) However, no requirement to notify non-compliance with the respective rules exists in Article 37 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, which concerns measures to prevent the presence of regulated non-quarantine pests (‘RNQPs’) on plants for planting above the specified thresholds when introduced into or moved within the Union territory.

Therefore, Article 37 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 should be amended, by providing that in case of non-compliance with the requirements on RNQPs, Member States adopt the necessary measures, as referred to in Regulation (EU) 2017/625, and notify the Commission and other Member States through the electronic notification system referred to in Article 103 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 12

~~Amendment 8~~

Proposal for a regulation

(13) Consequently, Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, which concerns notifications in the case of presence of pests, should also include a reference to Article 37(1).

(13) Consequently, Article 104 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, which concerns notifications in the case of presence of pests, should also include a reference to Article ~~37(10).~~37(10) of that Regulation.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 13

~~Amendment 9~~

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 15

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(15) For purposes of clarity and transparency, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts providing for such derogations. For reasons of completeness, those acts should also set out the temporary measures [which are necessary to reduce the respective phytosanitary risk to an acceptable level and which allow the appropriate time for the full assessment of all pest risks, which are not yet fully assessed in relation to the particular plants, plant products or other objects. This will allow, once the respective assessment is completed, in accordance with the principles of Section 2 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, those plants, plant products or other objects to be kept in or removed from the list of commodities in accordance with Article 40(3) or Article 41(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.

(15) For purposes of clarity, consistency and transparency, the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts providing for such derogations. For reasons of completeness, those acts should also set out the temporary and proportional measures [which are necessary to reduce the respective phytosanitary risk to an acceptable level and which allow the appropriate time for the full assessment of all pest risks, which are not yet fully assessed in relation to the particular plants, plant products or other objects. This will allow, once the respective assessment is completed, in accordance with the principles of Section 2 of Annex II to Regulation (EU) 2016/2031, those plants, plant products or other objects to be kept in or removed from the list of commodities in accordance with Article 40(3) or Article 41(3) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031.

Amendment 14

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 19

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(19) The Commission should be empowered to adopt a delegated act, supplementing this Regulation by setting out procedures to be complied with for the listing of high risk plants, plant products and other objects. That procedure should include all of the following elements: the preparation, content and submission of the respective dossiers by the third countries concerned; the actions to be taken following the reception of those dossiers; the procedures on the performance of the respective risk assessment; the handling of dossiers concerning confidentiality and data protection. This is necessary because, experience has shown that a specified procedure in respect of listing high risk plants could guarantee transparency and consistency to Member States, third countries and the professional operators concerned.

Amendment 15

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25 a (new)

(25a) Article 81(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 provides that no plant passport is to be required for the movement of plants, plant products or other objects supplied directly to a final user, including home gardeners. However that exception is not to apply to final users receiving those plants, plant products or other objects by means of sales through distance contracts.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 16

~~Amendment 10~~

Proposal for a regulation

Recital 25 b (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(25b) As experience since the adoption of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 has shown, in certain cases it is appropriate that certain plants, plant products or other objects should not be accompanied by a plant passport, even if they are distributed through distance sales. Therefore the Commission should be empowered to adopt implementing acts allowing it to provide that Article 81(1), point (a), is not to apply, under certain conditions, to particular plants, plants products or other objects distributed by means of sales through distance contracts.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 1 a (new)

(1a) in Article 19, the following paragraph is added:

‘7a. The notifications referred to in paragraph 2 of this Article and the abolition of the demarcated areas referred to in paragraph 4 of this Article shall be made through the electronic notification system referred to in Article 103’;

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 18

~~Amendment 11~~

Proposal for a regulation

Amendment

(1b) ~~the~~The following ~~Article~~article is inserted:

‘Article 19a

Plant Health Emergency Team

1. A Union Plant Health Emergency Team (‘the Team’) composed of experts shall be created with the purpose of providing Member States, upon their request, with urgent assistance on the measures to be taken pursuant to Articles 10 to 19, 27 and 28 of Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 concerning new outbreaks of Union quarantine pests and pests subject to the measures adopted pursuant to Article ~~30.~~30 of that Regulation. The Team shall partake in EU-level simulation exercises pursuant to Article 26 of that Regulation. In well-justified cases, the Team may also provide urgent assistance to third countries bordering the Union territory or presenting an imminent phytosanitary risk for that territory, upon their request, where necessary, concerning the outbreaks in their territories of Union quarantine pests and pests subject to the measures adopted pursuant to Article ~~30.~~30 of that Regulation. For each case of assistance to a Member State or third country, the Commission shall appoint specific members of the Team, on the basis of their expertise, and in consultation with that Member State or the third country concerned. That assistance may include in particular:

~~For each case of~~(a) ~~assistance~~scientific, totechnical aand ~~Member~~managerial ~~State~~on-the-spot or ~~third country, the~~remote ~~Commission~~assistance ~~shall~~as ~~appoint~~regards ~~specific~~the ~~members~~eradication of ~~that~~the ~~team,~~pests onconcerned, the ~~basis~~prevention of their ~~expertise,~~spread, and other measures, in ~~consultation~~close cooperation and collaboration with ~~that~~the competent authorities of the Member State or third country ~~concerned.~~concerned by outbreaks of pests or suspicion thereof;

~~That assistance shall include in particular:~~

(a) scientific, technical and managerial on-the-spot or remote assistance as regards the eradication of the pests concerned and other measures, in close cooperation and collaboration with the competent authorities of the Member State or third country concerned by outbreaks of pests or suspicion thereof;

(b) specific scientific advice on the suitable diagnostic methods in coordination with the relevant European Union reference laboratory referred to in Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and with other reference laboratories, as appropriate;

(c) specific assistance to ~~ensure~~support coordination among the competent authorities of the Member States ~~and~~or third countries and with those laboratories, as appropriate. The content, conditions planning and timing of that assistance shall be determined by the Commission in agreement with the Member State or third country concerned, and the respective Member State(s) delivering the expert(s).

~~The content, planning and timing of that assistance shall be determined by the Commission in agreement with the Member State or third country concerned.~~

2. Member States may submit to the Commission the list of experts they propose for designation as members of the team and keep it updated. On that occasion, Member States shall provide all relevant information on the professional profile and the field of expertise for each expert proposed.

2. Member States may submit to the Commission the list of experts they propose for designation as members of the Team and keep that list updated. On that occasion, Member States shall provide all relevant information on the professional profile and the field of expertise for each expert proposed.

3. Members of the team shall be entitled to an indemnity for their participation in the team’s on-the-spot activities, and where applicable, for serving as team leaders or rapporteurs on a specific mission question. That indemnity, reimbursement of travel and subsistence costs shall be paid by the Commission in accordance with the rules for the reimbursement of travel, subsistence and other expenses for experts.’;

3. Members of the Team shall be entitled to an indemnity for their participation in the team’s on-the-spot activities, and where applicable, for serving as team leaders or rapporteurs on a specific mission question. That indemnity, reimbursement of travel and subsistence costs shall be paid by the Commission in accordance with the rules for the reimbursement of travel, subsistence and other expenses for experts.’

Amendment 19

~~Or. en~~

~~Amendment 12~~

Proposal for a regulation

The multiannual survey programmes shall be established for a period of 10 years, and shall be prolonged and as necessary updated thereafter for further consecutive periods of 10 years. The first period shall expire on 14 December 2029.;

The multiannual survey programmes shall be established for a period of five to ~~ten~~10 years. The programmes shall be reviewed and updated on the basis of the applicable rules and the phytosanitary situation of the territory concerned;

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 20

~~Amendment 13~~

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 25 – paragraph 3

Present text

Amendment

(4a) Article 25, paragraph 3 is replaced by the following:

3. Contingency plans may be combined for multiple priority pests with similar biology and range of host species. In those cases, the contingency plan shall consist of a general part common to all priority pests covered by it and of specific parts for each priority pest concerned.

"3. Contingency plans may be combined for multiple priority pests with similar biology and range of host species. In those cases, the contingency plan shall consist of a general part common to all priority pests covered by it and of specific parts for each priority pest concerned. Similarly, Member States may co-operate to synchronise plans for certain species, where appropriate for priority pest species of similar biology and overlapping or adjoining ranges."

Justification

Co-operation increases effectiveness

Amendment 21

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 4 b (new)

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 26 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(4b) In Article 26, the following paragraph is added:

“3a. Where appropriate, the Commission shall coordinate EU-level simulation exercises concerning the implementation of contingency plans for priority pests.

Those exercises shall take place with regard to all priority pests concerned within a reasonable period of time and with the involvement of the Union Plant Health Emergency Team and relevant stakeholders.

The Commission shall make available a report on the results of the EU-level simulation exercises to the Parliament.

Amendment 22

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 5

Those measures shall, where appropriate, implement, specifically for each of the pests concerned, one or more of the provisions referred to in points (a) to (g) of the first subparagraph of Article 28(1). They may include the prohibition of the presence of that pest in the Union territory and/or requirements concerning the introduction into, and the movement within, the Union territory of plants, plant products and other objects.;

Those measures shall, where appropriate, implement, specifically for each of the pests concerned, one or more of the provisions referred to in points (a) to (g) of the first subparagraph of Article 28(1). They may include the prohibition of the pest´s introduction into, movement within, or holding, multiplication or release in the Union territory and/or requirements concerning the introduction into, and the movement within, the Union territory of plants, plant products and other ~~objects;~~objects in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/829;

~~Or. en~~

Justification

~~Amendment 14~~

Necessary to clarify that the prohibition on the presence of pests in the Union territory also foresees the possibility to grant derogations needed to allow relevant research or breeding activities, for instance with regard to resistances or tolerances.

Amendment 23

Proposal for a regulation

In the event that plants for planting have been introduced into, or moved within, the Union territory in non-compliance with paragraph 1 of this Article, Member States shall adopt the necessary measures, as referred to in Article 66(3) of Regulation (EU) 2017/625 and shall notify that non-compliance and those measures to the Commission and other Member States through the electronic notification and reporting system referred to in Article 103.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 24

~~Amendment 15~~

Proposal for a regulation

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 42 a – paragraph 2 – point a

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(a) the third country concerned has submitted to the Commission a request, containing official written guarantees for the application in its territory, prior to and at the moment of making the request, of the measures which are necessary for addressing the respective phytosanitary risk; and

(a) (i) the Commission has received evidence justifying the adoption of temporary derogations with equivalent or more stringent requirements than those referred to in Article 41, or

(ii) the third country concerned has submitted to the Commission a request, containing official written guarantees for the application in its territory, prior to and at the moment of making the request, of the measures which are necessary for addressing the respective phytosanitary risk; and

Amendment 25

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 42a – paragraph 2 – point b

(b) a provisional assessment has shown that those plants, plant products or other objects pose a risk that can be reduced to an acceptable level by applying necessary measures in respect of the phytosanitary risk concerned.

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 26

~~Amendment 16~~

Proposal for a regulation

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 42a – paragraph 3 – point b

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(b) the actions to be taken following the reception of those requests and dossiers;

(b) the actions to be taken following the reception of those requests and dossiers, including the consultation and involvement of EFSA in assessing the phytosanitary risk of a requested temporary derogation, and in analysing the measures referenced in the respective request of the third countries concerned ;

Justification

In the introduction to the legislative proposal the Commission mentioned that EFSA involvement is today not always guaranteed; emergency phytosanitary interventions ought to be based on best available, robust science.

Amendment 27

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 9

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 42a – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – introductory part

By way of derogation from Article 42(2), the Commission may, by means of implementing acts, adopt temporary derogations from the acts referred to in Article 42(3), if both of the following conditions are fulfilled:

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 28

~~Amendment 17~~

Proposal for a regulation

2. The phytosanitary certificate shall specify under the heading ‘Additional Declaration’ which specific requirement is fulfilled, whenever the respective implementing act, adopted pursuant to Article 28(1) and (2), Article 30(1) and (3), Article 37(4), Article 41(2) and (3) and Article 54(2) and (3), allows for several different options for such requirements. That specification shall include the full wording of the relevant requirement and, in the case of regulated non-quarantine pests, an indication of the applicable option for the category concerned, as referred to in Article 37(7);

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 29

~~Amendment 18~~

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 11 a (new)

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 81 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

(11a) in Article 81, the following paragraph is added:

‘2a. The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, set out the cases where the provision referred to in paragraph 1, point (a), of this Article does not apply to particular plants, plants products or other objects distributed by means of sales through distance contracts. Those implementing acts may specify certain conditions for its application. Those implementing acts shall be adopted in accordance with the examination procedure referred to in Article 107(2).’;

Amendment 30

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 12 a (new)

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 94 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Present text

Amendment

(12a) in Article 94, paragraph 1, subparagraph 1, is replaced by the following:

1. By way of derogation from Article 87, where a plant, plant product or other object, introduced into the Union territory from a third country which, for movement within the Union territory, requires a plant passport pursuant to Article 79(1) and Article 80(1), the passport shall be issued if the checks by means of official controls concerning its introduction have been completed satisfactorily and have led to the conclusion that the plant, plant product or other object concerned fulfils the substantive requirements for issuance of a plant passport according to Article 85 and, where appropriate, Article 86. The plant passport shall be issued no later than when the plant, plant product or other object concerned is moved for the first time by the importer within the Union to another operator. The importer of the plant, plant product or other object concerned shall be able to provide on request of the competent authority the result of the relevant official control using the Information Management System for Official Controls (IMSOC/TRACES) by the time the plant passport is issued.

Amendment 31

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 14

Regulation (EU) 2016/2031

Article 103 – paragraph 1

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

The Commission shall establish an electronic system for the submission of notifications and reports by the Member States.;

The Commission shall establish an easily accessible electronic system for the submission of notifications and reports by the Member States.;

Amendment 32

Proposal for a regulation

Article 1 – paragraph 1 – point 15

The Commission may, by means of implementing acts, lay down specific rules concerning the submission of notifications referred to in Article 9(1) and (2), Article 11, Article 17(3), Article 18(6), Article 19(2), Article 19a, Article 28(7), Article 29(3), first subparagraph, Article 30(8), Article 33(1), Article 37(10), Article 40(4), Article 41(4), Article 46(4), Article 49(6), Article 53(4), Article 54(4), Article 62(1), Article 77(2) and Article 95(5).

~~Or. en~~

Amendment 33

Proposal for a regulation

Article 2 – paragraph 2

Text proposed by the Commission

Amendment

Article 1, point (11) shall apply from … [6 months from the entry into force of this Regulation].

Article 1, point (11), shall apply from … [12 months from the entry into force of this Regulation].

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT

The rapporteur declares under her exclusive responsibility that she did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Title

Amending Regulation (EU) 2016/2031 of the European Parliament and of the Council as regards multiannual survey programmes, notifications concerning the presence of regulated non-quarantine pests, temporary derogations from import prohibitions and special import requirements and establishment of procedures for granting them, temporary import requirements for high risk plants, plant products and other objects, the establishment of procedures for the listing of high risk plants, the content of phytosanitary certificates, the use of plant passports and as regards certain reporting requirements for demarcated areas and surveys of pest

References

COM(2023)0661 – C9-0391/2023 – 2023/0378(COD)

Date submitted to Parliament

18.10.2023

Committee responsible

Date announced in plenary

AGRI

20.11.2023

Committees asked for opinions

Date announced in plenary

ENVI

20.11.2023

Not delivering opinions

Date of decision

ENVI

20.11.2023

Rapporteurs

Date appointed

Clara Aguilera

12.12.2023

Discussed in committee

24.1.2024

Date adopted

13.2.2024

Result of final vote

–:

Members present for the final vote

Clara Aguilera, Atidzhe Alieva-Veli, Attila Ara-Kovács, Benoît Biteau, Franc Bogovič, Daniel Buda, Isabel Carvalhais, Ivan David, Jérémy Decerle, Herbert Dorfmann, José Manuel Fernandes, Luke Ming Flanagan, Paola Ghidoni, Dino Giarrusso, Francisco Guerreiro, Martin Häusling, Krzysztof Jurgiel, Jarosław Kalinowski, Elsi Katainen, Norbert Lins, Maria Noichl, Juozas Olekas, Bronis Ropė, Katarína Roth Neveďalová, Bert-Jan Ruissen, Anne Sander, Veronika Vrecionová, Sarah Wiener, Juan Ignacio Zoido Álvarez

Substitutes present for the final vote

Rosanna Conte, Jan Huitema, Peter Jahr, Benoît Lutgen, Cristina Maestre Martín De Almagro, Michaela Šojdrová, Achille Variati, Emma Wiesner

Substitutes under Rule 209(7) present for the final vote

Stefania Zambelli

Date tabled

15.2.2024

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

Key to symbols: