What changed
The new version adds detailed requirements on the rule of law, judicial independence, corruption, media freedom, civil society and fundamental rights, including new benchmarks and monitoring. #9#10#11#12 It expands economic and financial provisions on SEPA, roaming, investment screening, energy security and environmental protection, and adds new recitals on enlargement, foreign interference and regional security. #1#2#3#13 It updates figures on closed negotiating chapters and adds calls for institutional responsibility, electoral integrity and protection of the information environment. #4#5#6#7 The other changes are formal and wording: the forwarding instruction is updated and explanatory passages are rephrased or shortened. #19#20#21
18 changes of substance, plus 1 formaland2 wording-only. Each change below carries a one-line ✦ note from the same model. Written from the two texts only — read the highlighted passages before relying on it.
The changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations (“having regard to …”), standard resolution paragraphs and punctuation-only edits are left out — they are in “Show every difference”.
Change #1 Substance
Adds that enlargement is a strategic investment in peace, security and prosperity on the European continent, particularly given the evolving geopolitical landscape and security challenges in Europe.
A. whereas enlargement is a key EU foreign policy tool and a strategic investment in peace, security and prosperity;prosperity on the European continent, particularly in the context of the evolving geopolitical landscape and the security challenges in Europe;
Change #2 Substance
Adds that candidate countries are judged with strict yet fair conditionality and measurable results, particularly on the rule of law and alignment with EU values and common foreign and security policy.
B. whereas each candidate country is judged on its own merits in fulfilling the Copenhagen criteria;criteria, with strict yet fair conditionality and measurable results, particularly in the areas of the rule of law and alignment with the EU’s values and common foreign and security policy;
Change #3 Substance
Adds recitals on Montenegro's application in 2008, candidate status in 2010, negotiations in 2012, its ambition to join by 2028, opened negotiating chapters, EU trust levels, political commitment, economic ties, regional security, foreign interference, corruption and tax alignment.
C. whereas Montenegro is the candidate country that has made the most progress towards EU accession;
C. whereas Montenegro applied for EU membership in 2008; whereas it was granted candidate country status in 2010; whereas negotiations began in 2012; whereas the Government of Montenegro has declared its ambition to become the 28th EU Member State by 2028;
D. whereas the EU is Montenegro’s most trusted partner and is trusted by 69 % of the country’s citizens;
D. whereas Montenegro is the candidate country that has made the most progress towards EU accession; whereas Montenegro has opened all 33 negotiating chapters, some of which have already been closed; whereas further progress is contingent on lasting results in implementing reforms, particularly in Chapters 23 and 24;
E. whereas the EU is Montenegro’s most trusted partner and is trusted by 69 % of the country’s citizens, which is among the highest levels of trust towards the EU in the region; whereas this increases the obligation on political actors to bring about responsible, consistent and effective reform;
F. whereas sustained political commitment from both the candidate countries and the EU is vital for maintaining the consistency, credibility, transparency and overall effectiveness of the enlargement process; whereas bilateral issues should be resolved bilaterally and should not be used to block or further politicise the enlargement process;
G. whereas the EU remains Montenegro’s main economic and financial partner and largest trading partner; whereas the smooth functioning of trade and transport flows between Montenegro and the EU is essential for economic stability, the resilience of the supply chain and the country’s gradual integration into the EU internal market;
H. whereas Montenegro’s stability is essential for the security of the Western Balkans and the EU; whereas external political projects seeking cross-border influence based on ethnic or religious affiliation risk undermining the sovereignty and constitutional order of countries in the region; whereas the future of the Western Balkans lies in European integration and not in competing geopolitical spheres of influence or ethnically driven regional alignments;
I. whereas Montenegro remains vulnerable to attempts to manipulate the information space from abroad and from within; whereas the Commission has underlined the need to close the space for foreign interference and information manipulation, including disinformation, and to strengthen societal resilience; whereas Russia has sought to advance its influence in the Western Balkans, including in Montenegro, through the strategic deployment of religious, cultural and so-called value-based narratives aimed at shaping public discourse and undermining Euro-Atlantic integration;
J. whereas, despite some institutional progress, corruption and organised crime remain present in several sectors of Montenegro’s economy and public institutions;
K. whereas alignment with the EU acquis on taxation and tax good governance remains a cornerstone of financial stability and trust in the context of EU accession;
Change #4 Substance
Updates the number of negotiating chapters provisionally closed in 2026 from 1 to 2 and the total from 13 to 14.
1. Welcomes Montenegro’s steady progress on EU-related reforms, underpinned by broad political engagement and ambition to complete negotiations by the end of 2026; welcomes the provisional closure of 6 more negotiating chapters in 2025 and 12 in 2026, bringing the total to 13;14; reiterates its full support for the country’s future in the EU;
Change #5 Substance
Replaces paragraphs on political momentum, foreign policy alignment and foreign interference with new text on individual merit, public support, reform implementation, institutional responsibility, regional stabilisation, security and defence cooperation, foreign interference by China, Russia and Serbia, countermeasures, religious institutions and strategic communication.
2. Encourages all political actors to stay focused and maintain the momentum towards successfully concluding the accession negotiations; underlines the need for political stability and constructive cross-party cooperation in this regard; recalls that genuine progress depends on the effective implementation of the reforms that have been adopted and on enduring results in the area of the rule of law; encourages Montenegro to further advance its implementation of the closing benchmarks, particularly for Chapters 23 and 24;
2. Reaffirms that Montenegro remains the frontrunner in the EU accession process and stresses that the pace and sequencing of enlargement must continue to be determined by the principle of individual merit; underlines that progress towards membership should be assessed strictly on the objective fulfilment of established benchmarks; calls for sustained reform efforts to be met with an equally credible, predictable and timely EU perspective; emphasises that the integrity of the enlargement policy rests on consistency, fairness and equal treatment, reflecting each candidate’s demonstrated level of preparedness;
3. Welcomes Montenegro’s steadfast full alignment with the EU’s common foreign and security policy, including EU restrictive measures; welcomes the EU-Montenegro Security and Defence Dialogue;
3. Welcomes the broad and consistent public support among Montenegrin citizens for the country’s European path, with a strong majority of citizens expressing confidence in Montenegro’s future within the EU;
4. Remains gravely concerned by malign foreign interference, destabilising activities, hybrid threats and disinformation campaigns by third-country actors in Montenegro; calls for stronger measures to counter these and to enhance societal resilience; calls for the EU and Montenegro to continue pursuing targeted strategic communication on the benefits of enlargement and EU membership;
4. Encourages all political actors to stay focused, maintain the momentum towards successfully concluding the accession negotiations and intensify their efforts to bring about the necessary reforms; underlines the need for political stability and constructive cross-party cooperation in this regard; stresses that genuine progress depends on the effective implementation of the reforms that have been adopted and on enduring, measurable results in the area of the rule of law, including the handing down of final convictions in high-level corruption and organised crime cases; encourages Montenegro to further advance its implementation of the closing benchmarks, particularly for Chapters 23 and 24;
5. Calls on all state authorities to act in a spirit of institutional responsibility, ensuring that political differences do not delay the adoption and implementation of EU-related reforms; stresses that safeguarding the strategic objective of EU membership must remain a shared national priority above partisan considerations; urges the Montenegrin Parliament and Government to prevent identity politics from diverting attention from the EU agenda or straining relations with its neighbours, ensuring Montenegro remains firmly on the EU path;
6. Encourages Montenegro, as the most advanced candidate country, to continue playing a constructive and stabilising role in the region and to demonstrate through leadership that sovereignty, civic identity and European integration are mutually reinforcing;
7. Welcomes Montenegro’s steadfast full alignment with the EU’s common foreign and security policy, including EU restrictive measures, in particular those concerning Russia’s war of aggression against Ukraine, as well as its principled stance in the United Nations and participation in EU crisis management missions and operations, and in NATO and other international multilateral missions, including EU Naval Force ATALANTA, the EU Military Assistance Mission in support of Ukraine (EUMAM Ukraine), and the Kosovo Force; commends the Montenegrin Parliament’s decision to approve the country’s participation in EUMAM Ukraine; reaffirms that Montenegro’s consistent alignment with the EU’s common foreign and security policy, including restrictive measures against Russia, is a key indicator of its strategic orientation; stresses that this must remain unwavering; underlines that unwavering commitment from Montenegro’s political representatives to the country’s independent statehood and strategic European orientation remains a key political criterion alongside technical reform benchmarks;
8. Welcomes the EU-Montenegro Security and Defence Dialogue, including structured exchanges on security and defence cooperation, resilience to emerging threats and cooperation on support for Ukraine;
9. Welcomes the decision of the Montenegrin Parliament to send members of its armed forces to participate in EUMAM Ukraine, signalling a clear and unwavering alignment with EU and NATO security priorities; recalls that Montenegro is a key EU ally in the region; welcomes the decision of the Montenegrin Government to meet the 2 % defence spending pledge;
10. Remains gravely concerned by persistent and intensifying malign foreign interference, destabilising activities, hybrid threats and disinformation campaigns by third-country actors in Montenegro, aimed at undermining Montenegro’s democratic institutions, societal cohesion, strategic orientation towards the EU and NATO membership; underlines that such interference represents a direct challenge to the rule of law, democratic governance and national sovereignty; notes in particular the malign influence of China, Russia and Serbia;
11. Calls for the development of tailored support by the EU and NATO and their enhanced cooperation with Montenegro to establish stronger measures to counter such hybrid threats, foreign information manipulation and covert political financing and to enhance societal and institutional resilience, including strengthening cybersecurity, improving media literacy across all levels of education, ensuring adequate teacher training and modern teaching resources, strengthening strategic communication, improving counter-disinformation capacities and strengthening media ownership transparency; encourages the Commission to ensure that Montenegro can fully benefit from the European Democracy Shield; calls for stronger vetting and integrity mechanisms within Montenegro’s security and intelligence services;
12. Expresses concern about the political instrumentalisation of religious institutions by external actors; stresses that religious organisations must operate transparently and independently of foreign political influence, in full respect of Montenegro’s constitutional and secular framework;
13. Calls for the EU and Montenegro to continue pursuing and significantly strengthen targeted strategic communication on the benefits of enlargement and EU membership, by adopting a more proactive and locally adapted approach in close cooperation with national institutions and civil society; notes with concern that only 39 % of Montenegrin citizens feel well- or very well-informed about the EU, according to the latest Special Eurobarometer survey;
Change #6 Substance
Adds paragraphs welcoming a citizens' forum in Podgorica in September 2025 and the designation of Nikšić as 2030 European Capital of Culture and Podgorica as 2028 European Youth Capital.
15. Welcomes the holding of the citizens’ forum entitled ‘Citizens at the Heart of the Enlargement of the European Union’ on 20 and 21 September 2025 in Podgorica, Montenegro;
16. Welcomes the designation of the cities of Nikšić as the 2030 European Capital of Culture and Podgorica as the 2028 European Youth Capital, highlighting their role in fostering youth engagement, innovation, cultural exchange and closer ties between Montenegro and the EU;
Change #7 Substance
Adds that Parliament's role includes democratic accountability, oversight and transparency, and that accelerating legislation should not limit debate or the opposition.
6.17. Highlights the importance of the Montenegrin Parliament in the accession process and underlines its key role in ensuring democratic accountability, parliamentary oversight and transparency of the legislative process; encourages constructive dialogue and cooperation across the political spectrum;spectrum with a view to adopting high-quality legislation that solves or meaningfully improves structural problems and enables Montenegro to advance on its accession path; stresses that close cooperation between the Government and Parliament of Montenegro is crucial for the timely and effective implementation of reforms; underlines that accelerating the legislative process should not limit meaningful parliamentary debate or the role of the opposition, and calls for an appropriate balance between the pace of reforms and the quality of legislative scrutiny;
Change #8 Substance
Adds recommendations on transparency in political party expenditure, online political advertising, voter registration and protecting the electoral information environment.
7.18. Welcomes the amendments made to Montenegro’s electoral law, particularly those concerning the oversight of campaign finance and media, electoral integrity, gender quotas on electoral lists and a single local election day; urges Montenegro to fully align with EU standards and to fully implement all outstanding recommendations issued by the Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe’s Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights and the Group of States against Corruption, particularly on transparency in political party expenditureexpenditure, including the use of funds dedicated to women’s organisations in political parties, on online political advertising, including disclosure of sponsors and targeting criteria, and on preventing the abuse of state resources;resources, updating the voter register and addressing residence registration; recalls that this should be done through a transparent and inclusive consultation process with all relevant stakeholders; calls on the Montenegrin authorities, in the run-up to the elections, to systematically protect the electoral information environment by establishing rapid cooperation channels between the election administration, the media regulator and the competent authorities, in order to detect and respond to coordinated disinformation and illicit interference, while fully respecting freedom of expression;
Change #9 Substance
Adds paragraphs on Montenegro's inclusion in the Rule of Law Report, judicial appointments, Constitutional Court delays, prosecutorial council amendments, pressure on judges, corruption track record, anti-corruption agency independence, integrity mechanisms, organised crime, Frontex and Europol cooperation, visa policy and public administration.
8. Calls for judicial appointments to be made more quickly, using merit-based and transparent procedures, including appointments to the Constitutional Court and the Judicial and Prosecutorial Councils;
19. Welcomes Montenegro’s inclusion in the Commission’s 2025 Rule of Law Report;
9. Urges Montenegro to further align its legal framework with the EU acquis and European standards on judicial independence, accountability, impartiality, integrity and professionalism, and to implement outstanding recommendations; calls for greater efficiency in the justice system, including the reduction of backlogs, particularly on corruption and organised crime cases;
20. Calls for judicial appointments to be made more quickly, using merit-based and transparent procedures that are free from political influence and based on expertise and integrity, and are free from delays in processing times, including appointments to the Constitutional Court and the Judicial and Prosecutorial Councils, fully in line with the closing benchmark requirements; stresses the crucial role of a fully functioning Constitutional Court for the stability of the legal order and the electoral framework; is seriously concerned about continued delays in the appointment of a Constitutional Court judge, which risk undermining the full functioning of one of the key institutions for safeguarding the rule of law and EU integration;
10. Urges Montenegro to step up the proactive investigation and prosecution of high-level corruption and to strengthen the capacity and performance of judicial and anti-corruption bodies; calls for further alignment with the EU acquis and EU standards in the fight against corruption and urges Montenegro to address the outstanding recommendations in this area;
21. Urges Montenegro to further align its legal framework with the EU acquis and European standards on judicial independence, accountability, impartiality, integrity and professionalism, and to implement outstanding recommendations; calls for greater efficiency in the justice system, including the reduction of backlogs, particularly on corruption and organised crime cases, which is crucial for boosting public confidence and meeting the conditions for EU membership; recalls that the closing benchmarks require demonstrated results in practice, including improved working conditions, sufficient staffing and effective case management, as persistent structural shortcomings continue to affect judicial efficiency; welcomes measures to boost the appeal of judicial careers; calls for the adoption of the Montenegrin Law on Salaries and Other Rights Related to the Performance of Judicial and Constitutional Court Functions to ensure adequate, stable and predictable salaries and working conditions of judges and prosecutors, which are essential safeguards of their independence and the proper functioning of the justice system;
11. Calls for comprehensive integrity policies to safeguard law-enforcement agencies and the judiciary from corruption and organised crime; urges Montenegro to increase the efficiency of prosecutions and judicial proceedings for serious and organised crime, particularly money laundering cases;
22. Notes that civil society experts have raised serious concerns about the substance of the government’s draft amendments to the Prosecutorial Council, in that they do not meaningfully strengthen its independence and may even make it more difficult to ensure genuinely independent membership of the Prosecutorial Council; notes with concern the adoption of the amendments to the Law on Internal Affairs and the Law on the National Security Agency despite strong criticism from the opposition and civil society; urges transparent procedures and genuine cooperation and consultation, in particular on all laws pertaining to the EU integration process, with all relevant stakeholders, including the opposition, legal experts and the Commission;
12. Calls on Montenegro to fully align its visa policy with that of the EU, especially as regards countries posing security risks; recalls that this is a closing benchmark requirement under Chapter 24;
23. Strongly condemns the frequent political and public pressure on judges and prosecutors and calls on the competent institutions to react promptly and effectively to protect their independence and integrity;
13. Underlines the importance of a transparent and accountable public administration, stronger administrative capacity, and a professional, merit-based civil service;
24. Calls for further improvement of the track record on investigations and prosecutions regarding high-level corruption, including confiscation of assets; urges Montenegro to step up the proactive investigation and prosecution of high-level corruption and to strengthen the capacity and performance of judicial and anti-corruption bodies; notes that the Agency for the Prevention of Corruption continues to operate with leadership gaps, limited staff and insufficient financial independence, which restrict its overall impact, and calls for measures to ensure its full operational, financial and functional independence in line with European standards; calls for further alignment with the EU acquis and EU standards in the fight against corruption and urges Montenegro to address all outstanding recommendations in this area;
25. Calls for comprehensive integrity policies to safeguard law-enforcement agencies and the judiciary from corruption and organised crime; calls for the establishment of disciplinary mechanisms and stronger and more efficient ethical accountability mechanisms, particularly in cases involving the failure to declare assets, in order to ensure meaningful and effective accountability in practice; welcomes progress made in areas such as lobbying regulation, whistleblower protection and public procurement transparency, which demonstrates that targeted and properly implemented reforms can deliver tangible results;
26. Urges Montenegro to increase the efficiency of prosecutions and judicial proceedings for serious and organised crime, with a view to establishing a solid track-record of final convictions and confiscation of assets; notes that in the area of anti-money laundering, Montenegro has made significant progress in improving its anti-money laundering and counter-terrorist financing framework, as well as in implementing EU sanctions;
27. Welcomes Montenegro’s ongoing cooperation with Frontex, Europol, Eurojust and the European Union Agency for Law Enforcement Training in tackling cross-border crime, including the trafficking of weapons, drugs and human beings, and in combating terrorism and extremism; emphasises the need to reinforce cooperation in the fight against drugs;
28. Reiterates its calls on Montenegro to fully align its visa policy with that of the EU, especially as regards countries posing security risks; notes the Montenegrin Government’s decision to remove several countries from its visa-free list in 2025; recalls that this is a closing benchmark requirement under Chapter 24;
29. Underlines the importance of a transparent and accountable public administration, stronger administrative capacity, and a professional, merit-based civil service; notes with concern that continuing large-scale hiring in public administration, without transparent criteria and clear needs assessments, undermines the principles of merit-based recruitment and professionalisation; calls for further depoliticisation of senior civil service appointments, the introduction of clear performance-based evaluation mechanisms, and continuity of expertise;
Change #10 Substance
Replaces a paragraph on discrimination with text welcoming the Law on Protection of Equality and Prohibition of Discrimination and calling for strengthened implementation of equal treatment.
14.30. Regrets the fact that national minorities, vulnerable groups, including Roma and Egyptians, persons with disabilities and LGBTIQ+ persons, still experience discrimination, hate speechspeech, in particular online, and hate crimes in Montenegro; reiterateswelcomes itsthe callrecent adoption of the Law on the MontenegrinProtection Parliamentof toEquality adoptand aProhibition newof anti-discriminationDiscrimination; lawcalls alignedfor withstrengthening the EUimplementation acquisof equal treatment for ethnic communities, ensuring that all ethnic, religious and social groups are guaranteed equal rights and opportunities, and can fully and effectively participate in social, political and economic life; recognises that safeguarding minority rights is fundamental to fostering social cohesion and democratic governance and upholding European standards;values; urges Montenegro to adopt and enforce comprehensive legislation and policies that prevent discrimination and promote inclusivity;
Change #11 Substance
Replaces paragraphs on multi-ethnic society, hate speech, gender discrimination and media with new text on registered partnerships, de-institutionalisation, minority languages, identity discussions, hate speech, fundamental rights, gender-based violence, media freedom, civil society and torture prevention.
15. Acknowledges the multi-ethnic character of Montenegrin society; notes the need for sensitive and inclusive handling of identity-related discussions with a view to preventing polarisation and building broad consensus on issues of common interest, such as Montenegro’s European path;
31. Calls on Montenegro to fully implement the Law on Registered Partnerships;
16. Strongly condemns all hate speech and hate crimes; welcomes the increase in the number of prosecutions for racism and hate speech; encourages Montenegro to step up its institutional response to hate speech and fully align with the EU acquis;
32. Calls on Montenegro to implement a de-institutionalisation strategy for persons with disabilities, as well as a strong child protection system grounded in community-based care;
17. Stresses the need to address discrimination against women; regrets the widespread nature of gender-based violence and victim-blaming attitudes; urges Montenegro to adequately fund, resource, coordinate and enforce its gender equality framework;
33. Acknowledges the multi-ethnic character of Montenegrin society and calls for enhanced respect for all languages, traditions and cultural heritage of local communities and national minorities; calls on Montenegro to intensify efforts towards the non-discriminatory use of minority languages in education and in dedicated media space in state and local outlets; calls for respecting the multi-ethnic identity of the Bay of Kotor, in particular by acknowledging the cultural heritage of the Croatian community; expresses deep concern over massive ongoing construction work at the Bay of Kotor UNESCO site, which has an impact on the preservation of heritage and the protection of the natural site, and calls for finalising the legal protection of Miločer Park;
18. Notes Montenegro’s zero-tolerance policy towards violence against journalists and condemns instances of strong verbal attacks on media and civil society representatives by public officials and political parties; calls for the swift and effective enforcement of the law and for effective judicial protection, prioritising conducting investigations and following up on unresolved cases;
34. Notes the need for sensitive and inclusive handling of identity-related discussions with a view to preventing polarisation and building broad consensus on issues of crucial interest for Montenegro’s independence, sovereignty and European path; reiterates its concern about attempts to amend the law on Montenegrin citizenship in the country’s Parliament in order to allow the acquisition of dual citizenship, which could have serious and long-term implications for the country’s decision-making process and identity; encourages the authorities to continue consulting and coordinating with the EU on any possible changes in legislation to ensure that it fully aligns with the EU acquis and international standards and upholds fundamental rights;
19. Underlines the key role of free and pluralistic media; welcomes the recent appointment of members to the Council of the Agency for Audiovisual Media Services and stresses that the Agency must be able to operate independently, free from political influence;
35. Strongly condemns all hate speech, including online, and hate crimes; welcomes the increase in the number of prosecutions for racism and hate speech, but expresses concern over insufficient action against speeches, public statements or symbolic acts that glorify war criminals or revise historical facts; encourages Montenegro to step up its institutional response to hate speech, ensure effective investigations and prosecutions and fully align with the EU acquis;
20. Calls for the meaningful involvement of civil society in policymaking, including by resuming, after a long hiatus, the work the Council for Cooperation between the Government and Non-governmental Organisations;
36. Urges Montenegro to ensure the effective application of its fundamental rights frameworks, including access to justice and protection of vulnerable persons, and to implement all recommendations from international monitoring bodies;
37. Stresses the need to address discrimination against women, in particular those from minority groups; expresses concern over child marriage disproportionately affecting girls from the Roma and Egyptian communities in Montenegro; regrets the widespread nature of gender-based violence and victim-blaming attitudes, as well as gender-based hate speech and disinformation, including online, particularly towards women in public and political life; urges Montenegro to adequately fund, resource, coordinate and enforce its gender equality framework; calls for the respective authorities to maintain more vigilance and establish support systems for victims of gender-based and domestic violence; calls for improved data collection on domestic and gender-based violence, incomes and salaries, health and social security; calls on the Montenegrin authorities to ensure the increased political participation of women;
38. Notes Montenegro’s zero-tolerance policy towards violence against journalists and condemns intimidation and all instances of strong verbal attacks on media and civil society representatives, particularly including women working in the media and human rights defenders, by public officials and political parties; expresses concern over the use of informal summonses and investigative interviews against journalists, columnists and civil society actors for their criticism of public officials; calls for the swift and effective enforcement of the law and for effective judicial protection, prioritising conducting investigations and fully and effectively following up on unresolved cases, such as the murder of Duško Jovanović, as well as deterrent sanctions; notes that the Montenegrin legal system lacks a specific definition of, or expedited procedure to identify and dismiss, strategic lawsuits against public participation, and calls for the establishment of such mechanisms;
39. Underlines the key role of free and pluralistic media as a fundamental pillar of democratic society; recalls that ensuring the independence of the public broadcaster and the media regulatory authority remains a Chapter 23 benchmark; highlights the importance of ensuring full media ownership and funding transparency, including for online outlets; welcomes the recent appointment of members to the Council of the Agency for Audiovisual Media Services and stresses that the Agency must be able to operate independently, free from political influence; expresses concern over continued political influence at the public broadcaster and calls on the authorities to respect judicial proceedings, restore legality and guarantee the broadcaster’s institutional and editorial independence; calls on Montenegro to align its media legislation with the European Media Freedom Act4 and to increase resilience to foreign influence and disinformation; calls for the full transparency of media ownership structures and foreign funding sources, particularly where linked to political actors or foreign state interests, in order to prevent covert external influence on Montenegro’s public discourse;
40. Welcomes Montenegro’s vibrant and constructive civil society, which plays a crucial and positive role in the reform process; calls for the meaningful involvement of civil society in policymaking, including by ensuring more systematic engagement and timely access to relevant information; urges the authorities to ensure that EU-accession-related lawmaking does not bypass public consultation requirements and established standards of participatory governance; calls for resuming, after a long hiatus, the work of the Council for Cooperation between the Government and Non-governmental Organisations, with a view to building collaborative relationships and genuinely involving civil society in a transparent legislative process from an early stage;
41. Urges Montenegro to fully implement all recommendations of the European Committee for the Prevention of Torture and Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment; notes with concern the rising number of complaints of torture and coercion of statements, case backlogs, and the limited use of safeguards such as the audio-visual recording of interrogations; regrets the inconsistent suspensions and disciplinary action, as well as lenient sanctions, in cases of police ill-treatment, and calls for prompt, effective and impartial investigations;
Change #12 Substance
Replaces paragraphs on good neighbourly relations and war crimes with new text on the EU-Western Balkans Summit, bilateral issues, war crime prosecutions, reparations, political revisionism, regional narratives, archives and property issues.
21. Underlines the key role of good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation in the enlargement process; calls for constructive solutions to outstanding bilateral issues, with citizens’ interests as the priority;
42. Welcomes Montenegro’s hosting of the EU-Western Balkans Summit on 5 June 2026 in Tivat, which offers an important platform to strengthen regional cooperation, advance the accession agenda, enhance economic integration and address common challenges;
22. Commends Montenegro for its consistent progress in the domestic handling of war crime cases; encourages it to continue taking a proactive approach to ensuring access to justice and reparations for victims; welcomes regional cooperation on these issues, including on missing persons;
43. Underlines the key role of good neighbourly relations and regional cooperation in the enlargement process; recalls that good neighbourly relations are one of the key criteria for evaluating progress in Montenegro’s accession process, in accordance with the EU Negotiating Framework; calls for constructive solutions, in a spirit of mutual respect, to outstanding bilateral issues, with citizens’ interests as the priority; recalls that using unresolved bilateral and regional disputes to block candidate countries’ accession processes should be avoided; welcomes bilateral consultations between Croatia and Montenegro as a constructive mechanism for resolving outstanding issues and strengthening trust;
44. Commends Montenegro for its consistent progress in the domestic handling of war crime cases; notes, however, that since June 2024 the Special State Prosecutor’s Office has not opened any new investigations or filed any indictments in war crimes cases, and that no progress has been made on command responsibility; underlines the need to intensity efforts and continue building a credible and sustained track record of effective investigations, prosecutions and trials in respect of war crimes cases, including in high-level cases, in line with international law and standards; stresses the importance of access to archives in this regard;
45. Encourages Montenegro to continue taking a proactive approach to ensuring access to justice and effective reparations¸ including institutional support, for victims, including ensuring adequate and fair compensation for all persons who were prisoners of war in camps in Montenegro during the 1990s; welcomes regional cooperation on these issues, and calls for full cooperation in the region and with EU Member States, including the exchange of evidence and on clarifying the fate of missing persons; welcomes the arrest in Montenegro, following a request by Croatia, of an individual sentenced in absentia for war crimes against prisoners of war, and commends the cooperation between the competent authorities of both countries in this case;
46. Reiterates its concern over expressions of political revisionism by certain political actors, which undermine accountability and deepen societal divisions; strongly condemns any glorification of war criminals and public denial of war crimes;
47. Expresses concern over political concepts and narratives in the region, with which cross-border unification or coordination based on ethnic identity are advocated, including the so-called Serbian World, and which question the sovereignty and territorial integrity of neighbouring states; calls on all regional actors to respect Montenegro’s independence and refrain from interference in its domestic affairs; stresses that such narratives are incompatible with the principles of good neighbourly relations and the EU accession process; stresses that the future of the Western Balkans lies in EU integration, not in competing geopolitical spheres of influence;
48. Reiterates its call to open the archives that concern the former republics of Yugoslavia and for access to be granted to the files of the former Yugoslav Secret Service and the Yugoslav People’s Army Secret Service, in order to enable communist era crimes to be thoroughly researched and addressed;
49. Calls for the resolution of outstanding property issues; stresses that resolving outstanding property rights issues, including restitution, is essential for meeting Montenegro’s obligations under Chapter 23 and remains a key benchmark for closing negotiations on fundamental rights;
Change #13 Substance
Adds that measurable and lasting results in rule of law and public finance management are important for the Growth Plan.
23.50. Welcomes Montenegro’s engagement in the EU Growth Plan for the Western Balkans; commends its progress in implementing its reform agenda, with EUR 18 million disbursed, and encourages further implementation; highlights the importance of measurable and lasting results in implementing reforms, particularly in the areas of the rule of law and public finance management;
Change #14 Substance
Adds that stakeholder involvement should include business associations and social partners at all stages and recalls that EU funding depends on tangible reform progress and rule of law.
24.51. Continues to encourage Montenegro to make full and effective use of all EU funding granted to it, including by improving administrative capacity, speeding up programming and contracting, and improving coordination; highlights the importance of the broad and meaningful involvement of stakeholders, including local authoritiesauthorities, business associations, social partners and civil society;society at all stages, including in the design of reform measures, the implementation of projects and the monitoring of results; recalls the conditionality of EU financial support;support, whereby funding depends on making tangible progress in reforms and respect for the rule of law;
Change #15 Substance
Adds paragraphs on SEPA savings, roaming negotiations, economic alignment, foreign direct investment screening and digital single market integration.
25. Welcomes Montenegro’s operational participation in the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA);
52. Welcomes Montenegro’s operational participation in the Single Euro Payments Area (SEPA), marking a key step toward deeper financial integration with the EU and lower transaction costs for citizens and businesses; notes initial findings indicating significant savings in transaction costs since SEPA became operational in October 2025;
26. Notes Montenegro’s economic growth and urges continued fiscal discipline, structural reforms, improved governance, and measures to boost competitiveness, private sector growth and foreign investment;
53. Welcomes the Commission’s proposal to open negotiations with the Western Balkan partners, including Montenegro, to extend the EU’s ‘roam like at home’ regime, thereby enabling citizens and businesses to benefit from seamless mobile connectivity at domestic rates across the EU and the Western Balkans, fostering people-to-people contacts, boosting economic ties, supporting educational exchanges and facilitating tourism; underlines that this initiative constitutes a concrete step towards deeper pre-accession integration, supports cross-border social and economic ties and brings tangible benefits to citizens well ahead of full EU membership; calls for the swift adoption of the negotiating mandates and the timely conclusion of bilateral agreements with the Western Balkan partners;
27. Calls on Montenegro to boost the digitalisation of public services and enhance business-linked vocational training;
54. Notes Montenegro’s economic growth and urges it to continue with the fiscal discipline, structural reforms, improved governance, and measures needed to boost competitiveness, private sector growth, foreign investment and social and economic development; encourages Montenegro to align customs, social and tax policies with EU standards, including transparency and the effective exchange of tax information, in order to make progress under Chapter 16; calls on Montenegro to align with the EU framework for screening foreign direct investment, particularly in strategic sectors such as energy, telecommunications, critical infrastructure and media, in order to prevent strategic dependencies and safeguard critical infrastructure and key economic sectors; welcomes the first EU-Montenegro Investment Conference as a strong signal of deepening economic ties;
55. Calls on Montenegro to boost the digitalisation of public services and enhance business-linked vocational training; emphasises that the protection of citizens’ personal and sensitive data must be ensured in all digital systems; welcomes the calls to integrate all Western Balkan countries into the EU’s digital single market before EU membership;
Change #16 Substance
Adds that energy security, diversification, reducing strategic dependencies and integration into the regional and European energy market are important.
29.57. Urges Montenegro to step up its efforts towards a sustainable and green transition and to finally adopt and implement its national energy and climate plan; highlights the importance of energy security, the diversification of supply, reducing strategic dependencies on external actors, and full integration within the regional and European energy market; calls for full alignment with the Electricity Integration Package, and for stronger energy efficiency measures; calls for alignment with EU security-of-supply standards and transparent procurement procedures;
Change #17 Substance
Adds industrial pollution to the environmental sectors and calls for an agreement on the Zeta waste water treatment plant.
30.58. Calls on Montenegro to increase its efforts to meet Chapter 27 closing benchmarks,benchmarks focusingand onaccelerate alignment with and effective implementation of the EU environmental acquis across all relevant sectors, including air quality, water, nature protection, waste managementmanagement, industrial pollution and climate change, and to adopt air quality and nature protection strategies and action plans, and local waste management plans; welcomes the fact that Montenegro has joined the EU LIFE programme; calls on all parties to reach an agreement on the waste water treatment plant in Zeta municipality in a way that respects both the need to build the plant and addresses the concerns of the local population;
Change #18 Substance
Adds paragraphs on biodiversity protection, Natura 2000, animal welfare, administrative capacity, transport connectivity and border crossing blockades.
31. Calls on Montenegro to boost its administrative capacity and improve its decision-making on infrastructure projects; invites Montenegro to shift its transport policy towards sustainable and smart mobility;
59. Calls on Montenegro to safeguard areas of high biodiversity value, including Emerald sites and those with a future Natura 2000 designation, ensuring their legal protection and alignment with relevant EU directives; calls on Montenegro to significantly accelerate the establishment and implementation of the Natura 2000 network in full alignment with the EU acquis, ensuring that the identification, designation and management of protected sites are based on scientific criteria and transparent public consultation processes; calls for stronger enforcement of animal welfare legislation;
60. Calls on Montenegro to boost its administrative and inspection capacities at national and local levels and to improve inter-institutional coordination and its decision-making on infrastructure projects, including establishing effective coordination between strategic environmental assessments, environmental impact assessments and appropriate assessment procedures; invites Montenegro to shift its transport policy towards sustainable and smart mobility;
61. Highlights the importance of regional transport and energy connectivity as a key element of economic development and stability in the Western Balkans, and calls for projects that deepen integration with the EU Member States; is concerned about the recent blockades at border crossings into the Schengen area by professional drivers from Western Balkan countries in relation to the implementation of the EU entry-exit system from October 2025; underlines that prolonged disruptions risk negatively affecting supply chains, trade flows and economic relations between the EU and Montenegro; calls on the Commission, in close cooperation with the Member States, to assess possible pragmatic and legally sound solutions that balance operational realities in the transport sector with the need to preserve the integrity of the Schengen acquis, ensuring appropriate safeguards and preventing any abuse;