What changed
The changes to the legal basis and the conclusion on fumus persecutionis are substantive, altering the cited articles and the finding of intent. #2#7 Other changes are formal or wording: date punctuation, rephrasing for clarity, and terminology alignment. #1#3#4#5
2 changes of substance, plus 2 formaland3 wording-only. Each change below carries a one-line ✦ note from the same model. Written from the two texts only — read the highlighted passages before relying on it.
The changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations (“having regard to …”), standard resolution paragraphs and punctuation-only edits are left out — they are in “Show every difference”.
Change #2 Substance
Changes the reference to the Greek Criminal Code articles, now citing Article 94, Article 361(1), and Article 333(1) instead of previous citations.
A. whereas the Deputy General Prosecutor of the Supreme Court of Greecethe Hellenic Republic has transmitted a request from the Prosecutor at the Athens Court of First Instance for the waiver of the immunity of Nikos Pappas, Member of the European Parliament elected in Greece, in connection with alleged insults online and threats, constituting criminal offences pursuant to Article 94, theArticle 361(1), first and second sentencessentences, ofand Article 361(1), and the333(1), first sentence of Article 333(1)sentence, of the Greek Criminal Code;
Change #7 Substance
Changes the conclusion on fumus persecutionis: now states Parliament found no evidence and that it does not appear the proceedings aim to damage Pappas' political activity and Parliament's independence.
I. whereas, in this case, Parliament has found no evidence of fumus persecutionis, whichthat is to say factualit elementsdoes indicatingnot appear that the intention underlying the legal proceedings in question is to underminedamage theNikos Member’sPappas’ political activity in his capacity as a Member of the European Parliament;Parliament and thus Parliament’s independence;