What changed
The versions differ only in wording: the Polish institution name is expanded, and several phrases are rephrased for clarity. #1#2#3#4
0 changes of substance, plus 4 wording-only. Each change below carries a one-line ✦ note from the same model. Written from the two texts only — read the highlighted passages before relying on it.
The changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations (“having regard to …”), standard resolution paragraphs and punctuation-only edits are left out — they are in “Show every difference”.
Change #1 Wording
Replaces the Polish name of the Institute of National Remembrance with a more detailed version specifying its Kraków branch.
A. whereas, by letter dated 4 September 2025, the Prosecutor General of Poland has transmitted a request from the Kraków Branch of the Institute of National Remembrance, Commission for the Prosecution of Crimes against the Polish Nation (Instytut(Oddział Instytutu Pamięci Narodowej w Krakowie - Komisja Ścigania Zbrodni przeciwko Narodowi Polskiemu), for the waiver of the immunity of Grzegorz Braun, Member of the European Parliament elected in Poland, in connection with several alleged offences that occurred in 2025;
Change #2 Wording
Rephrases the provision on immunities to say 'the parliament of their Member State' instead of 'their parliament'.
F. whereas Article 9, first paragraph, point (a), of Protocol No 7 on the Privileges and Immunities of the European Union provides that, during the sessions of the European Parliament, its Members are to enjoy, in the territory of their own State, the immunities accorded to members of the parliament of their parliament;Member State;
Change #3 Wording
Rephrases the reference to the Polish Constitution, changing word order and adding 'of the Republic of Poland'.
G. whereas, pursuant to Article 105(2) and (5) of the PolishConstitution Constitution,of the Republic of Poland, from the day the election results are announced until the day their mandate expires, a deputy cannot be subjected to criminal accountability without the consent of the Sejm, and can neither be detained nor arrested without the consent of the Sejm, except in cases where they have been apprehended while committing an offence and in which their detention is necessary to secure the proper course of proceedings;
Change #4 Wording
Rephrases the sentence on parliamentary immunity, moving 'Member's' and changing punctuation.
I. whereas, in accordance with Rule 5(2) of its Rules of Procedure, parliamentary immunity is not a Member’s personal privilege of the Member but a guarantee of the independence of Parliament as a wholewhole, and of its Members;