What changed
The only substantive change clarifies that challenging production conditions contributed to the relocation of Audi’s facilities outside the Union. #3 Other changes are formal or wording: spelling adjustments and replacement of background sections with the decision text. #1#2#4#5
1 change of substance, plus 1 formaland3 wording-only. Each change below carries a one-line ✦ note from the same model. Written from the two texts only — read the highlighted passages before relying on it.
The changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations (“having regard to …”), standard resolution paragraphs and punctuation-only edits are left out — they are in “Show every difference”.
Change #3 Substance
Adds 'the relocation of' before 'Audi’s facilities' and changes 'sources' to 'sources,'.
5. Notes that the global market for the production and sale of cars, particularly electric cars, is characterised by increasingly aggressive global competition; highlights the growing challenges faced by European car manufacturers in bringing innovative and affordable models to the market in future-oriented segments like battery-electric vehicles; regrets that Audi ceased activities in Belgium despite remaining profitable, and that production will be moved to China and Mexico, resulting in the redundancy of 3 414 workers; notes with concern that challenging production conditions, including insufficient access to and deployment of cheaper clean energy sourcessources, contributed to the relocation of Audi’s facilities relocation outside the Union;