What changed
The only substantive change is in recital J, where the text now says that the choice of criminal action raises doubts about its purpose, suggesting intent to harm the Member's reputation. #9 Other changes are formal or wording: updates to legal terminology, citations, and rephrasing for clarity. #1#2#3#4
1 change of substance, plus 3 formaland6 wording-only. Each change below carries a one-line ✦ note from the same model. Written from the two texts only — read the highlighted passages before relying on it.
The changes to the text itself, in document order. Cover page, citations (“having regard to …”), standard resolution paragraphs and punctuation-only edits are left out — they are in “Show every difference”.
Change #9 Substance
Changes 'very different' to 'significant differences', and rephrases to state that criminal action raises doubts about its purpose, suggesting intent to harm reputation.
J. whereas Péter Magyar is the president of the TISZA Party (Tisztelet és Szabadság Párt (Respect and Freedom Party ))Párt) and was also head of that party’s list of candidates for the 2024 European elections; whereas the political movement ‘MiMi Hazánk Mozgalom’ (Our Homeland Movement)Mozgalom also participated in the 2024 European elections and can therefore be considered a direct political rival of Péter Magyar; whereas political rivals are normally subject to greater criticism and controversy in political debate than citizens who are not politically active; whereas it appears that,that under Hungarian law,law defamation proceedingsclaims maycan be brought beforepursued both on the basis of criminal law and on the basis of civil courts,law, with verysignificant differentdifferences in the corresponding legal consequences, including imprisonment; whereas, in the present case, the decisionchoice toof bringbringing a criminal proceedingsaction raises doubts as to its purpose,purpose which may go beyond the legitimate aim of redressing the alleged harm suffered,suffered and suggests that the aim pursued goes beyond that legitimate objectiveaim and is in fact intended to harm Péter Magyar’s reputation as a Member of the European Parliament;