What changed

MOTION FOR A EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT RESOLUTION

P10_TA(2025)0130

on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro

(2025/2020(INI))

Committee on Foreign Affairs

PE769.896

European Parliament resolution of 18 June 2025 on the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro (2025/2020(INI))

The European Parliament,

D. whereas Montenegro has gone furthest in the accession process, with all 33 chapters of the EU acquis open and six provisionally closed, and has significant public support therefor;

EE. whereas the EU is Montenegro’s largest trading partner, investor and provider of financial assistance;

FF. whereas Montenegro is exposed to malign foreign influence, disinformation campaigns and other forms of influence, including election meddling, hybrid warfare strategies and unfavourable investments from non-EU actors, particularly Russia and China, which are trying to influence Montenegro’s political, economic and strategic trajectory and threaten democratic processes and media integrity, jeopardising the country’s prospects for EU accession;

G. whereas on 8 June 2024, an ‘All-Serb Assembly’ took place in Belgrade with the participation of high-ranking parliamentarians under the slogan ‘One people, one Assembly’;

64. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council, the Commission, the Vice-President of the Commission / High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy, the Commissioner for Enlargement, the Commissioner for the Mediterranean, the governments and parliaments of the Member States, and to the President, Government and Parliament of Montenegro, and to have it translated and published in Montenegrin.

EXPLANATORY STATEMENT

The report reflects the 2023 and 2024 Commission reports on Montenegro, assessing the progress Montenegro has made in its accession path over the last two years. It mainly focuses on Montenegro’s commitment to the accession process, democracy and rule of law, fundamental freedoms, human rights and socio-economic reforms.

Montenegro is a nation with a rich, albeit sometimes turbulent, history and the country’s present political and social reality remains deeply shaped by it. Though there is no need to revisit past events, they are to be continually kept in mind.

Montenegro finds itself in a familiar political scenario: a single party governed for three decades, playing a pivotal role in securing the nation’s independence and its accession to NATO. However, this long-standing governance also left behind numerous unresolved challenges, many of which it either failed to address or, in some instances, actively contributed to creating. The current ruling coalition is highly diverse, necessitating significant coordination and, consequently, the acceptance of various compromises. Thus, it would be inaccurate to claim that Montenegro lacks a functioning democracy. Moreover, the country’s media landscape displays a level of plurality that far exceeds what is observed elsewhere in the region.

In 2024, the ruling coalition, working constructively with the parliamentary opposition, made considerable progress by passing legislation essential for closing key negotiation chapters. Montenegro has successfully concluded three out of the four anticipated chapters—an achievement that should not be underestimated. The remaining chapter is temporarily stalled due to objections from Croatia, yet it remains firmly on the table.

History is particularly relevant to this unresolved chapter, as it is deeply rooted in the historical context of both neighbouring countries. The rapporteur is confident that it will ultimately be resolved in accordance with European values—the very foundation of the European Union and its raison d’être.

The ruling coalition has reaffirmed its commitment to enacting the necessary legislative changes to advance Montenegro’s alignment with the European Union, thereby facilitating the completion of the negotiation process. Public opinion surveys consistently indicate strong support for EU accession among Montenegrin citizens. This widespread approval serves as an additional impetus for the authorities to persist in implementing the reforms and legislative measures required for this process.

For the state to function effectively, local governance must operate efficiently. However, the current electoral legislation, which allows municipal elections to be held on different dates rather than on a single nationwide election day, hinders this efficiency. This inconsistency generates political tensions that, given the country’s size and population, have broader ramifications at the national level. Additionally, it undermines the operational effectiveness of both municipal and state governance. Amendments to the electoral legislation should be introduced to rectify these inconsistencies and address other outstanding issues related to the electoral process.

It is crucial to address the judiciary, which must be firmly established as an independent branch of power, particularly given that one of Montenegro’s major challenges is combating crime and corruption. However, it would be unfair to claim that this issue is unique to Montenegro, as no country is immune to such challenges. There are, however, differences in how countries approach and address these issues. The Rapporteur recognises a high level of awareness regarding these challenges in Montenegro, which is a positive and encouraging sign.

The Rapporteur’s overall assessment is that there is no shortage of political will to continue on the European path. However, it is imperative to ensure that the daily fluctuations of political life do not obstruct the enactment of essential legislation required to complete the negotiation process. The legislation must be both as effective as possible and must not succumb to the temptation of being merely “cosmetic.”

Above all, Montenegro should draw strength from its rich and proud history, recognising the considerable progress it has made. As an independent and sovereign state, it should move forward without any unnecessary complex of smallness. It has every opportunity to join the EU within the current mandate of the European institutions.

ANNEX: ENTITIES OR PERSONS FROM WHOM THE RAPPORTEUR HAS RECEIVED INPUT

The rapporteur declares under his exclusive responsibility that he did not receive input from any entity or person to be mentioned in this Annex pursuant to Article 8 of Annex I to the Rules of Procedure.

INFORMATION ON ADOPTION IN COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL BY THE COMMITTEE RESPONSIBLE