Sittings · Compare

What changed

From · opinion parliamentary committee · 2022-11-28 ENVI-AD-731545 on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings (recast)
To · act followup · 2024-07-22 SP-2024-350-TA-9-2023-0068 Follow up to T9-0068/2023
+8 added · −1046 removed · 0 modified paragraphs

SHORT JUSTIFICATION

ORDINARY LEGISLATIVE procedure

Buildings are responsible for 40% of total energy consumption and respective share of overall household spending and 36% of energy-related Greenhouse Gas emissions in the EU. Therefore, the building stock is of vital importance to deliver on net neutrality in 2050. Besides achieving our international commitments, a more energy-efficient building stock leads to improved energy security and reduced imports of energy to the EU, lower energy bills for consumers, healthier living conditions as well as increased growth, avant-garde technologies and jobs made in Europe.

Follow up to the European Parliament legislative resolution on the proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the energy performance of buildings (recast)

Several aspects are currently hindering the full energy savings potential from being untapped:

1. Rapporteur: Ciarán CUFFE (Greens/EFA / IE)

The complex interplay between EU legislation, national building codes, behavioural practices, economic and financial barriers and the diverging ownership structure of the building stock in the Member States (split-incentives) leave the deep renovation - which reduces energy consumption by at least 60% - at a rate of 0.2% of the building stock per year.

2. Reference numbers: 2021/0426 (COD) / A9-0033/2023 / P9_TA(2024)0129

Affordability - Pay-as-you-Save

3. Date of adoption of the resolution: 12 March 2024

Renovation is key for reducing the energy consumption of buildings, for bringing down emissions and for reducing rising energy bills. According to the Renovation Wave Communication 275 billion Euros per year of additional investments are needed to meet the building renovation contribution to the 2030 emission reduction target of 55% Greenhouse Gas Emissions in comparison to 1990. These costs might be borne by every day European citizens: renters - young and elderly alike - or single-family households. The Rapporteur is convinced that the transformation of the EU building stock will only succeed with a large support of EU citizens. To make renovations more attractive he proposes a novel financial support instruments - the so-called “Pay-as-you-Save”, guaranteeing that the repayment bills on the loan never exceed energy savings. The implementation by Member States is a prerequisite for the renovation obligation of existing one-family buildings. He adds economical safeguards in regards to the requirements for deep renovation to zero emission buildings as of 2030: These renovations should transform a building to a zero-emission building or the best results that a renovation costing up to 50% of the value of the respective building could provide for. For the rapporteur it is clear that vulnerable households and low-income owners should be given the clear priority when it comes to financial support and technical assistance. As these groups tend to live in worst-performing buildings, the Rapporteur changes the definition of class G (worst performing buildings) - from “the last 15%” to "minimum last 15%".

4. Legal basis: Article 194(2) paragraph 1 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union

Holistic tailor-made local approach

5. Competent Parliamentary Committee: Committee on Industry, Research and Energy (ITRE)

Climatic difference, local conditions and diverging building stocks necessitate for a holistic tailor-made approach - at local level instead of one-size-fits-all approach -. The Rapporteur thus introduces the consideration of such factors as well as the possibility for a different approach in regards to historic buildings and the prioritizing of renovations of public buildings such as schools and hospital. He strengthens the role of the one-stop-shops to support renovations of multi-apartment buildings and privately rented homes. Lastly, he takes due account of Member Sates’ different renewable mix in order to promote all renewables - including the ones from the grid. . While emphasizing a local implementation, the rapporteur sees the necessity for the Member States to provide an adequate framework to incentivize renovations: For him, it is vital to extent the national renovation strategies to include corrections measures in case of underachievement and sufficient financial support.

6. Commission's position: accepts all amendments.

Indoor Air Quality

Today, people spend a considerable time indoors. The pandemic has intensified the concept of working-and-living under the same roof. According to estimates, tens of millions of Europeans suffer from bad indoor air quality. This can have several reasons such as mould or dampness. Construction and maintenance of buildings can thus have huge effects on public health and the well-being of the whole population. The rapporteur thus proposes a holistic definition of indoor air quality.

AMENDMENTS

The Committee on the Environment, Public Health and Food Safety calls on the Committee on the Industry, Research and Energy, as the committee responsible, to take into account the following amendments:

Amendment 1

Proposal for a directive

Recital 2 a (new)

Amendment 2

Proposal for a directive

Recital 3

Amendment 3

Proposal for a directive

Recital 4

Amendment 4

Proposal for a directive

Recital 5

Amendment 5

Proposal for a directive

Recital 5 a (new)

Justification

The EU Emission Trading System is a cornerstone of the EU's policy to combat climate change and its key tool for reducing greenhouse gas emissions cost-effectively.

Amendment 6

Proposal for a directive

Recital 5 b (new)

Justification

Necessary to reflect latest developments.

Amendment 7

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. The "energy efficiency first" principle should not be an end in itself. The reduction of energy consumption can be a possible instrument to achieve the EU climate targets. However, it is not necessarily the most cost-effective and can lead to considerable inefficiencies. With the Emission Trading System, the EU already has a cost-effective instrument to decarbonise.

Energy poverty and the high costs of renovations especially for vulnerable groups are important issue that should be consistently addresses throughout this Directive.

Amendment 8

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. The flexibility in the array of measures proposed in this recast should be reflected in the recital accordingly.

Amendment 9

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 b (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 10

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 c (new)

Justification

Necessary for the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 11

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 d (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 12

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 e (new)

Justification

Necessary for the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 13

Proposal for a directive

Recital 6 f (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 14

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7

Amendment 15

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7 a (new)

Amendment 16

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7 b (new)

Justification

Necessary for the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 17

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7 c (new)

Amendment 18

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7 d (new)

Amendment 19

Proposal for a directive

Recital 7 e (new)

Amendment 20

Proposal for a directive

Recital 8

Amendment 21

Proposal for a directive

Recital 9

Amendment 22

Proposal for a directive

Recital 10

Amendment 23

Proposal for a directive

Recital 10 a (new)

Justification

Reintroduction of recital removed by the Commission

Amendment 24

Proposal for a directive

Recital 10 b (new)

Amendment 25

Proposal for a directive

Recital 11

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 26

Proposal for a directive

Recital 12

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 27

Proposal for a directive

Recital 14

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. The rapid decarbonisation of heating and cooling requires a technological neutral approach. Boilers that are able to run on renewable energy sources constitute a cost-efficient way to decarbonise and should, thus, remain eligible for financial incentives.

Amendment 28

Proposal for a directive

Recital 14 a (new)

Amendment 29

Proposal for a directive

Recital 17

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. NEB should be taken into account when defining regulatory frameworks which affect to building sector, as it can provide information in areas that are outside the scope of purely energy regulation.

Amendment 30

Proposal for a directive

Recital 19

Amendment 31

Proposal for a directive

Recital 19 a (new)

Amendment 32

Proposal for a directive

Recital 19 b (new)

Amendment 33

Proposal for a directive

Recital 19 c (new)

Amendment 34

Proposal for a directive

Recital 20

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. Large companies are excluded from participation in energy communities according to RED. This disadvantage should be levelled out by allowing other forms of shared energy use within the neighbourhood, besides energy communities.

Amendment 35

Proposal for a directive

Recital 21

Amendment 36

Proposal for a directive

Recital 22

Amendment 37

Proposal for a directive

Recital 23

Amendment 38

Proposal for a directive

Recital 23 a (new)

Amendment 39

Proposal for a directive

Recital 25

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. Financial measures shall cover buildings with clear roadmap of achieving zero-emission level within a set timeframe. Renovation Passport scheme is a framework to secure it by indicating a sequence of renovation steps building upon each other, with the objective to transform the building into a zero-emission building by 2050 at the latest

Amendment 40

Proposal for a directive

Recital 26

Amendment 41

Proposal for a directive

Recital 29

Amendment 42

Proposal for a directive

Recital 32

Amendment 43

Proposal for a directive

Recital 33

Amendment 44

Proposal for a directive

Recital 34

Amendment 45

Proposal for a directive

Recital 35 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 46

Proposal for a directive

Recital 35 b (new)

Amendment 47

Proposal for a directive

Recital 35 c (new)

Amendment 48

Proposal for a directive

Recital 35 d (new)

Amendment 49

Proposal for a directive

Recital 35 e (new)

Amendment 50

Proposal for a directive

Recital 35 f (new)

Amendment 51

Proposal for a directive

Recital 37

Amendment 52

Proposal for a directive

Recital 39

Amendment 53

Proposal for a directive

Recital 40

Amendment 54

Proposal for a directive

Recital 40 a (new)

Amendment 55

Proposal for a directive

Recital 41

Amendment 56

Proposal for a directive

Recital 42

Amendment 57

Proposal for a directive

Recital 43

Amendment 58

Proposal for a directive

Recital 44

Justification

According to the European Climate Law, the Commission should facilitate sector-specific climate dialogues and partnerships also within the building sector.

Amendment 59

Proposal for a directive

Recital 46

Amendment 60

Proposal for a directive

Recital 46 a (new)

Amendment 61

Proposal for a directive

Recital 46 b (new)

Amendment 62

Proposal for a directive

Recital 47

Amendment 63

Proposal for a directive

Recital 48

Amendment 64

Proposal for a directive

Recital 49

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 65

Proposal for a directive

Recital 50

Amendment 66

Proposal for a directive

Recital 51

Justification

Visibility of the energy transition should be enhanced by using buildings of public authorities as an exemplary example.

Amendment 67

Proposal for a directive

Recital 51 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 68

Proposal for a directive

Recital 53

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. Energy poverty and the high costs of renovations especially for vulnerable groups are important issue that should be consistently addresses throughout this Directive. Regular maintenance, inspection and independent assessment of electrical systems ensure optimal performance from an environmental, safety and energy point of view.

Amendment 69

Proposal for a directive

Recital 53 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. The amendment supports the requirements on ventilation - as set out already under the old EPBD.

Amendment 70

Proposal for a directive

Recital 54

Justification

Inspections must also cover electrical installations so as to improve energy efficiency according to available standard (IEC/HD 60364-8-1:2019). Ventilation is covered by Article 20 but missing in this Recital.

Amendment 71

Proposal for a directive

Recital 57

Amendment 72

Proposal for a directive

Recital 58

Justification

In order to stay in line with the long-term 2050 target of achieving net zero emissions in the EU, the building sector must raise its ambition by increasing the annual renovation rates to at least 3 %.

Amendment 73

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 74

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point f

Amendment 75

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point f a (new)

Amendment 76

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point g

Amendment 77

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point h a (new)

Amendment 78

Proposal for a directive

Article 1 – paragraph 2 – point k a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 79

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 2

Amendment 80

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 3

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 81

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4

Amendment 82

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 4 a (new)

Amendment 83

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 6

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 84

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 8

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 85

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 9 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 86

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 11

Amendment 87

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 13

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 88

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 18

Amendment 89

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – introductory part

Amendment 90

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point a

Amendment 91

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point b

Amendment 92

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 19 – point b a (new)

Amendment 93

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20

Amendment 94

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 20 a (new)

Amendment 95

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 21 – subparagraph 2

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 96

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 23

Amendment 97

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 24

Amendment 98

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26

Amendment 99

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 26 a (new)

Amendment 100

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27

Amendment 101

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 27 a (new)

Amendment 102

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 29

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 103

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point a – point iii

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 104

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point a – point iv

Justification

Necessary for the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 105

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 31 – point a – point v

Justification

Necessary for the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 106

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 36 a (new)

Justification

In order to ensure alignment of definitions between the EPBD, AFIR and RED proposals.

Amendment 107

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 37

Amendment 108

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 37 a (new)

Amendment 109

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 40 – introductory part

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 110

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 40 – point c

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 111

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 40 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 112

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 40 b (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 113

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 41 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 114

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 42 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 115

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 49 – introductory part

Amendment 116

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 50

Amendment 117

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 53

Amendment 118

Proposal for a directive

Article 2 – paragraph 1 – point 57 a (new)

Amendment 119

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 120

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – introductory part

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 121

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point c

Amendment 122

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d

Amendment 123

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d a (new)

Amendment 124

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d b (new)

Amendment 125

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 – point d c (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 126

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Amendment 127

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3 a (new)

Justification

Ensuring synergies and coherence with environmental acquis related to air quality, and applicable for the Annex II- Table

Amendment 128

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)

Amendment 129

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a b (new)

Amendment 130

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point c a (new)

Amendment 131

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 6

Amendment 132

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 7

Amendment 133

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 7 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 134

Proposal for a directive

Article 3 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Amendment 135

Proposal for a directive

Article 4 – paragraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 136

Proposal for a directive

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 137

Proposal for a directive

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 138

Proposal for a directive

Article 5 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 139

Proposal for a directive

Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point a a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 140

Proposal for a directive

Article 5 – paragraph 3 – point b

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 141

Proposal for a directive

Article 7 – paragraph 2 – introductory part

Amendment 142

Proposal for a directive

Article 7 – paragraph 2 – point b

Amendment 143

Proposal for a directive

Article 7 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Amendment 144

Proposal for a directive

Article 7 – paragraph 3

Amendment 145

Proposal for a directive

Article 7 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Amendment 146

Proposal for a directive

Article 7 – paragraph 4

Amendment 147

Proposal for a directive

Article 8 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 148

Proposal for a directive

Article 8 – paragraph 3

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 149

Proposal for a directive

Article 8 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 150

Proposal for a directive

Article 8 – paragraph 3 b (new)

Justification

It is estimated that a minimum of 130 million dwellings*, built before 1990, have not undergone an electrical system upgrade, readiness of existing electrical installations to cope with new renewable, energy efficiency, and e-vehicle charging demands is not proven in the EU domestic building stock. While the energy transition, decarbonisation and energy efficiency will drive electrification of buildings the integration of highly efficient equipment or on-site renewable generation & storage can be impossible with obsolete electrical installations. European building stock renovation must therefore integrate electrical inspection regime and upgrades.*source: https://www.feedsnet.org/

Amendment 151

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a – introductory part

Amendment 152

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point i

Amendment 153

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii

Amendment 154

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a – point ii a (new)

Amendment 155

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point i

Amendment 156

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii

Amendment 157

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point b – point ii a (new)

Amendment 158

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c – introductory part

Amendment 159

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point i

Amendment 160

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point ii

Amendment 161

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point c – point ii a (new)

Amendment 162

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Amendment 163

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2 a (new)

Amendment 164

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point a

Amendment 165

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b

Amendment 166

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point b a (new)

Amendment 167

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point c

Amendment 168

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point e a (new)

Amendment 169

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point e b (new)

Amendment 170

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point e c (new)

Amendment 171

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 3 – point e d (new)

Amendment 172

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point b

Amendment 173

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 5 – point c

Amendment 174

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 – paragraph 5 a (new)

Amendment 175

Proposal for a directive

Article 9 a (new)

Amendment 176

Proposal for a directive

Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point b

Amendment 177

Proposal for a directive

Article 10 – paragraph 3 – point c

Amendment 178

Proposal for a directive

Article 10 – paragraph 3 a (new)

Amendment 179

Proposal for a directive

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Amendment 180

Proposal for a directive

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 3

Amendment 181

Proposal for a directive

Article 11 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 4

Amendment 182

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c

Amendment 183

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – point c a (new)

Amendment 184

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 185

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Amendment 186

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 2

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 187

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 3

Amendment 188

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point a a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 189

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1 – point b

Amendment 190

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 2

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 191

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3

Amendment 192

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 5

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 193

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 6 a (new)

Amendment 194

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 195

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 8 – subparagraph 2

Amendment 196

Proposal for a directive

Article 12 – paragraph 9

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 197

Proposal for a directive

Article 14 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Amendment 198

Proposal for a directive

Article 14 – paragraph 5

Amendment 199

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 1

Amendment 200

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 4

Amendment 201

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Amendment 202

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 2

Amendment 203

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 6

Amendment 204

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1 a (new)

Amendment 205

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 8 a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 206

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 9 – introductory part

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 207

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 9 – point a

Justification

Financial measures are paramount to stimulate the energy renovation market. Such supportive measures have to go beyond the system of energy-savings obligations. (since energy savings obligation usually target commoditized products and not look at the overall performance/management of building). A report by the Building Performance Institute in Europe found that a combination of different tools may be more effective than single measures over the long-term. Attention shall be paid to the effective leverage of public money spend on energy efficiency measures in buildings. A recent study by the European Court of Auditors show that it is not possible to know how much energy will have been saved by investing a total of €6.6 billion of 2014-2020 public spending in residential buildings at EU level since the cost-effectiveness of the investments have not been measured.

Amendment 208

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 9 – point d a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 209

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 9 – point d b (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 210

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 9 – point e a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 211

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 10

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text. While accelerating fuel switching in buildings is essential, all technologies ready to use renewable and decarbonise energy should be able to contribute to buildings' decarbonisation. It is important to distinguish between technologies and the fuels they utilise: boilers on the market today can already use 100 % renewable energies (biomethane) and variable shares of hydrogen. It is essential to ensure that boilers that work in combination with renewable-based technologies and support the increasing uptake of renewable energy, such as hybrid heaters and solar thermal systems, remain fully eligible for incentives.

Amendment 212

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 10 a (new)

Justification

ensuring synergies and coherence with environmental acquis related to air quality. air pollution is responsible for hundreds of thousands of deaths in the EU. renovation wave and dedicated funding should not exacerbate the problem of air pollution and should provide only for win win solutions.

Amendment 213

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 11 – subparagraph 1

Amendment 214

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 12

Amendment 215

Proposal for a directive

Article 15 – paragraph 13

Amendment 216

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 217

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 2

Amendment 218

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 2

Amendment 219

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 3

Amendment 220

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 1

Amendment 221

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 5

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 222

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 6

Amendment 223

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 10

Amendment 224

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 11 – subparagraph 1

Amendment 225

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 11 – subparagraph 2

Amendment 226

Proposal for a directive

Article 16 – paragraph 11 a (new)

Amendment 227

Proposal for a directive

Article 17 – paragraph 1 – subparagraph 1 – point a

Amendment 228

Proposal for a directive

Article 17 – paragraph 2

Amendment 229

Proposal for a directive

Article 19 – paragraph 5 – subparagraph 1

Amendment 230

Proposal for a directive

Article 19 – paragraph 6 a (new)

Amendment 231

Proposal for a directive

Article 20 – paragraph 4 – subparagraph 3

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 232

Proposal for a directive

Article 20 – paragraph 7 – subparagraph 1

Justification

The scope (290kW) in the current EPBD is calculated referring to space heating and ventilation (Art. 14, par.4) but it also covers space cooling (Art.15, par.4). The proposed revision does not match the current BACS provisions, which the Member States are already implementing

Amendment 233

Proposal for a directive

Article 22 – paragraph 2

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 234

Proposal for a directive

Article 23 – paragraph 1

Amendment 235

Proposal for a directive

Article 23 – paragraph 2 a (new)

Amendment 236

Proposal for a directive

Article 25 – paragraph 2

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 237

Proposal for a directive

Article 26 – paragraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 238

Proposal for a directive

Article 26 – paragraph 2 – subparagraph 1

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 239

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 3

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text in order to have greater clarity for tenants and thereby foster energy efficiency and renovations.

Amendment 240

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 1 – paragraph 4

Justification

BACS impact is essential for the energy performance of buildings. EN ISO 52120-1 is an EPB standard within the M480 mandate and provides important inputs in the calculation of energy performance in buildings. Moreover, as buildings electrification is expected to increase, new electrical loads will add to the energy consumption.

Amendment 241

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 3

Justification

This amendment is necessary to ensure that the EPBD covers both energy performance and the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions as indicated in Art 1, paragraph 1. Include additional numeric indicators of greenhouse gas embodied emissions (production and/or construction of buildings) in the aspects to consider to assess the energy performance of buildings and the obligation to provide information on embodied emissions related to the use of construction products and materials.

Amendment 242

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 4 – point b

Justification

heat recovery can be an important part of the measures leading to energy efficiency and energy savings, but might be less attractive if their benefit is not considered when calculating the energy consumption of the building according to the EPBD.

Amendment 243

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 4 – point b a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 244

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 4 – point h

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text in regards to ventilation and public health.

Amendment 245

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 4 – point i a (new)

Justification

Monitoring is key to spark continuous improvement of energy performance, especially in regard to the rise of EV charging stations at home. Monitoring typically could lead in average to 10% energy savings; however, energy monitoring is not yet recognized as a Technical Building System in the current EPBD definition

Amendment 246

Proposal for a directive

Annex I – point 4 – point i b (new)

Justification

In order to cover efficiency of electrical installations, an obligation to minimize energy losses in the electrical installations should be introduced, alongside performance requirements for those solutions in line with existing and recognized standards (IEC EN 60364-8-1).

Amendment 247

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – point a – first row

Amendment 248

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point a – row 7 – indent 3

Justification

PTFE and PVC are not considered as a green listed waste at the international level. Both are subject to scrutiny in the EU because of their properties. The PTFE is in scope of the current PFAS restriction work, while there is also ongoing work on the restriction of PVC.

Amendment 249

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point a – row 9

Amendment 250

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point b – row 1

Amendment 251

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point c – row 1 – subparagraph 1 – point d

Amendment 252

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point c – row 1 – subparagraph 1 – point e

Amendment 253

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point c – row 1 – subparagraph 1 – point n

Amendment 254

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point c – row 1 – subparagraph 1 – point o

Amendment 255

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point c – row 1 – subparagraph 2

Justification

1) subparagraph d) is amended to ensure the practical implementation of national-level financial schemes targeted to energy poor and vulnerable households as per the applicable definition pursuant to the proposed amendments of the EED

2) subparagraph e) is amended to ensure accessible tailored services efficiently reaching the local communities, which are the main beneficiaries of the OSS concept. The suggested amendments also include the provision of integrated renovation services overcoming the issues related to the fragmentation of the construction sector in general and specifically of the renovation process, which is often cited as one of the major barriers to large-scale building retrofitting.

3) subparagraph n) is amended to ensure the application of streamlined instruments which are key for the life-long learning progress and regular upgrade of the skills and knowledge of building professionals in a quickly changing technological environment. Additionally, it brings coherence with the most effective and widely recognized EU initiatives in the area, thus avoiding duplication of measures and reduction of costs.

4) subparagraph o) is amended to ensure ambitious scope and outreach of the communication and awareness raising campaigns, which are expected to integrate national coverage by the public media and local community-oriented communication action to achieve highest impact.

5) additionally, monitoring mechanisms and penalties in case of non-compliance or underperformance are required to ensure coherent implementation at national level

Amendment 256

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point c – row 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f a (new)

Amendment 257

Proposal for a directive

Annex II – column 2 – point c – row 1 – subparagraph 1 – point f b (new)

Amendment 258

Proposal for a directive

Annex III – point I – paragraph 3 – indent 1

Amendment 259

Proposal for a directive

Annex III – point I – paragraph 4

Amendment 260

Proposal for a directive

Annex III – point II – paragraph 1

Justification

Considering the importance to promote a circular building ecosystem, it is essential to also report the additional environmental benefits resulting from reuse and recycling at the end of life stage of the building

Amendment 261

Proposal for a directive

Annex IV – point 2 – point c a (new)

Justification

Amendment necessary for pressing reasons relating to the internal logic of the text.

Amendment 262

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 1 – point h a (new)

Justification

indicators moved from paragraph 2 as an element to be displayed mandatorily.

Amendment 263

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 1 – point i

Amendment 264

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 1 – point i a (new)

Justification

indicators moved from paragraph 2 of Annex V as an element to be displayed mandatorily.

Amendment 265

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 1 – point i b (new)

Amendment 266

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point b

Amendment 267

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point g

Justification

National requirements too often focus on insulation (U-value) while other aspects are equally important to assess the performance of transparent elements of the building envelope, in particular the solar energy transmittance (g-value).

Amendment 268

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point j a (new)

Justification

Studies show that indoor climate improvements are among the key incentives for building owners to conduct energy renovations.

Amendment 269

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point j b (new)

Justification

Studies show that indoor climate improvements are among the key incentives for building owners to conduct energy renovations.

Amendment 270

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point m

Justification

Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) must integrate information about the latest inspection of the electrical installations and its readiness to install new major equipment. The proposed template for EPCs suggests including information about the presence of heat-pump, EV charging, storage or on-site renewable generation, but should also include information about the readiness and latest safety check of the electrical installations to integrate such equipment. Every dwelling owner or tenant should have an easy access to information about the status and readiness of the electrical installations particularly in the view of electrification of heating and transport and the possibility to add new equipment, such as EV charging point, heat pump, on-site renewable generation, and storage.

Amendment 271

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point n

Justification

Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) must integrate information about the latest inspection of the electrical installations and its readiness to install new major equipment. The proposed template for EPCs suggests including information about the presence of heat-pump, EV charging, storage or on-site renewable generation, but should also include information about the readiness and latest safety check of the electrical installations to integrate such equipment. Every dwelling owner or tenant should have an easy access to information about the status and readiness of the electrical installations particularly in the view of electrification of heating and transport and the possibility to add new equipment, such as EV charging point, heat pump, on-site renewable generation, and storage.

Amendment 272

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point r a (new)

Justification

Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) must integrate information about the latest inspection of the electrical installations and its readiness to install new major equipment. The proposed template for EPCs suggests including information about the presence of heat-pump, EV charging, storage or on-site renewable generation, but should also include information about the readiness and latest safety check of the electrical installations to integrate such equipment. Every dwelling owner or tenant should have an easy access to information about the status and readiness of the electrical installations particularly in the view of electrification of heating and transport and the possibility to add new equipment, such as EV charging point, heat pump, on-site renewable generation, and storage.

Amendment 273

Proposal for a directive

Annex V – point 2 – point r b (new)

Justification

Energy Performance Certificates (EPCs) must integrate information about the latest inspection of the electrical installations and its readiness to install new major equipment. The proposed template for EPCs suggests including information about the presence of heat-pump, EV charging, storage or on-site renewable generation, but should also include information about the readiness and latest safety check of the electrical installations to integrate such equipment. Every dwelling owner or tenant should have an easy access to information about the status and readiness of the electrical installations particularly in the view of electrification of heating and transport and the possibility to add new equipment, such as EV charging point, heat pump, on-site renewable generation, and storage.

PROCEDURE – COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION

FINAL VOTE BY ROLL CALL IN COMMITTEE ASKED FOR OPINION