On digital assets – challenges for the competitiveness and integrity of the European Union’s financial system
ECON-PR-784381
Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs · Rapporteur: Johan Van Overtveldt
Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.
This draft report addresses digital assets and their challenges for the EU financial system. It supports a system-wide, activity-based, and technologically neutral regulatory approach, and calls for strengthened data capabilities and supervisory dialogue on multi-function groups.¶¶¶ It highlights risks such as AML/CFT evasion and stablecoin devaluation, and calls for a legislative proposal on multi-issuance of stablecoins. It also notes benefits of tokenisation and stresses the need for interoperability and monitoring of non-EU dependencies.¶¶¶
Committee position. The rapporteur proposes a resolution that supports a system-wide, activity-based and technologically neutral approach, calls for strengthened data capabilities and supervisory dialogue, and requests a legislative proposal on stablecoin multi-issuance.¶¶¶
Key points
- Supports a system-wide, activity-based and technologically neutral approach for the EU regulatory framework for financial services.¶
- Stresses the importance of strengthening data capabilities, especially regarding leverage in the crypto industry and interlinkages with non-banking financial institutions.¶
- Calls on EU supervisory authorities to strengthen supervisory dialogue on significant multi-function groups and align the MiCAR policy framework for them.¶
- Regrets the role of crypto-assets in evading AML/CFT regulations and sanctions, and stresses the need for a better balance between privacy and transparency in KYC standards.¶
- Welcomes the potential benefits of tokenisation for trading financial assets, while noting that vulnerabilities should be monitored; supports the BIS in cross-border payment collaboration.¶
- Notes that stablecoins are a form of private money creation, with similarities to exchange rate pegs, money market funds and narrow banks, but without access to central banks or deposit guarantees.¶
- Calls on the Commission to propose legislation urgently to address the lack of legal certainty on multi-issuance of stablecoins by EU and non-EU entities, with strong prudential safeguards and cooperation arrangements.¶
- Underlines that interoperability is crucial in digital finance, requiring portable identity and verifiable credentials; legal entity identifier approaches should be assessed.¶
- Regrets the EU's dependence on non-EU service providers for DLT infrastructure and emphasises that the US administration's treatment of digital assets should be monitored with prudence.¶
Who is affected
- EU supervisory authorities (EBA, ESMA, AMLA, EIOPA, national competent authorities, ECB, ESRB) are called to strengthen dialogue on multi-function groups.¶
- The European Commission is called to propose legislation on stablecoin multi-issuance.¶
- Crypto-asset issuers and service providers are affected by calls for better AML/CFT compliance and potential new rules on stablecoins.¶
Figures and deadlines
- 9.7% of survey respondents or someone in their household owned crypto-assets, with 54% holding below EUR 1 000 and 91% below EUR 20 000.¶
- Total global market capitalisation of crypto-assets stood at EUR 2.03 trillion on 10 February 2026, with stablecoins at 12.9% or EUR 261 billion.¶
- Tokenised assets represented around 1% of global digital assets in February 2026.¶
- In 2025 the global crypto workforce stood at over 1.6 million professionals.¶