Skip to content
OPINION (COM(2023)0269 – C90190/2023 – 2023/0163(COD))

On the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on European Maritime Safety Agency and repealing regulation (EC) No 1406/2002

BUDG-AD-753727

Committee on Budgets · Rapporteur: Niclas Herbst

✦ In short · AI summary of this text, generated 4 Sept 2026

Written by a language model from the full text only; every figure comes from the text. The paragraph links open the paragraph a statement rests on — check the text itself before relying on it.

The Committee on Budgets opinion on the proposed regulation revising EMSA's mandate focuses on budgetary, governance and scrutiny issues. It opposes funding the new tasks by cutting CEF-Transport and proposes amendments to increase agency autonomy and parliamentary oversight.

Committee position. The Committee on Budgets proposes amendments focusing on financial provisions, governance and scrutiny, opposing cuts to CEF-Transport and increasing agency autonomy.

Key points

  1. Opposes offsetting the budgetary impact through compensatory reduction from CEF-Transport; funding should come from unallocated MFF margins or special instruments.
  2. Calls for the increased Union contribution to be drawn exclusively from unallocated margins or special instruments.
  3. Removes the Commission's veto right over Management Board decisions on administrative and budgetary matters, aligning with the Common Approach.
  4. Adds a European Parliament representative with voting rights to the Management Board and ensures gender balance in appointments.
  5. Requires the Management Board to publish conflict of interest rules and declarations of interests.
  6. Changes the adoption of the single programming document: no Commission veto, but justification if elements are not taken into account; forwards to Parliament and Council by 31 January.
  7. Changes fees and charges: scope limited to infrastructure, publications and training; delegated acts instead of implementing acts; revenue details in annual accounts.
  8. Modifies Executive Director appointment: shortlist by Commission, opinions from Parliament and Council, two-thirds majority for appointment and extension.
  9. Enhances parliamentary scrutiny: Executive Director may be called for hearings at any time; informs Parliament and Council on extension and removal.
  10. Encourages cooperation with other EU bodies to achieve financial savings and use interoperable platforms like EDES.

Who is affected

  • The European Maritime Safety Agency (EMSA) gains more autonomy in administrative and budgetary decisions and faces new reporting duties.
  • The European Parliament gains representation on EMSA's Management Board and more oversight over the Executive Director.
  • The Commission loses its veto rights over certain Management Board decisions and must consult Parliament on programming.

Figures and deadlines

  • EUR 50.997 million and 33 additional posts needed for the remainder of the MFF.
  • EUR 1.2 billion have been or are planned to be redeployed from programmes to agencies since the start of the MFF.